These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP you lost allready much of faith and trust in you

Author
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#81 - 2012-08-07 08:27:01 UTC
The title of the thread makes little sense! Shocked

CCP have lost faith..... in themselves?

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  

Lexmana
#82 - 2012-08-07 08:27:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Lexmana
lol wrong thread
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#83 - 2012-08-07 08:49:12 UTC
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:
Geez, you didn't read my full post, i said.....would be necessary to field BC's at least again to bring down a Hulk.

I was talking about BC's, as the price the gankers would have to pay to kill a 300 Million T2 Ship.
That doesn't make any sense. Anything that can be killed by BCs can be killed with destroyers (and the destroyers will do it for less ISK). This is by design.

It sounds like you're asking for one of those silly level-based systems where lvl N-1 can't be used against lvl N. Fortunately, EVE isn't that kind of game.
Doddy
Excidium.
#84 - 2012-08-07 08:59:17 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Last time I tried ganking a Hulk in a catalyst that cost me less than 3 mil I did not even get past 80% shields. Clearly the guy must have been hacking according to your analysis.


scan before you gank, lest you flub


To be honest the not knowing till you try is the best part. When a hulk melts to your single t1 dessie instead of lol tanking you at 90% shield its a great feeling.
Doddy
Excidium.
#85 - 2012-08-07 09:01:41 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
feel free to show the class that killmail of a hulk by a "lolnoobship"


anski you know he meant a catalyst or 3... which to a hulk 400 million is not balanced but keep up that tech reimbursement policy...


Wonder how much tank you think a gold magnate should have by your thinking.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#86 - 2012-08-07 09:39:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Tarryn Nightstorm
[lolRP]

Hey, OP, the family-name is supposed to be Sarpati, not that other thing...Serpentis is just the name of the originally-legal booster manufacturer R&D corp. that V. Salvador Sarpati started.

[/lolRP]

(Jesus, if you're going to be such a putrid little carebear, then the least you could do is use all that Tabbed-out time by reading-up on Prime Fiction!)

E:

"Putrid little carebear:" I think I've just found a new favourite phrase, right up there with "URP-SPLOSION TYME NAOW!"

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#87 - 2012-08-07 12:16:11 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:
Geez, you didn't read my full post, i said.....would be necessary to field BC's at least again to bring down a Hulk.

I was talking about BC's, as the price the gankers would have to pay to kill a 300 Million T2 Ship.
That doesn't make any sense. Anything that can be killed by BCs can be killed with destroyers (and the destroyers will do it for less ISK). This is by design.

It sounds like you're asking for one of those silly level-based systems where lvl N-1 can't be used against lvl N. Fortunately, EVE isn't that kind of game.

^___^

Oh now, the destroyer's Small weapons magically do nothing against the hulk which is ... not all that large either.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#88 - 2012-08-07 14:43:56 UTC
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Andre Jean Sarpantis wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
When it takes 40 T2 Catalysts to gank a hulk of course.

Well 40 is a bit over the edge, but it would make it more cost equal so that at least BC's were necessary again to gank a Hulk not those fecking lowcostlolcatalysts.

What, 35? Don't you think you're taking it a bit easy on...

Oh, ok. Sure let's go for 35 for now, later on we'll jump to 45 by "remembering" they not only destroy 400mil but also get salvage and loot.



Geez, you didn't read my full post, i said.....would be necessary to field BC's at least again to bring down a Hulk.

I was talking about BC's, as the price the gankers would have to pay to kill a 300 Million T2 Ship.

Sincerly

Andre Jean Sarpantis ( Roleplayed nephew from the Serpentis Founder )


I find it amusing you still can't grasp that the highest yield ship is the easiest to pop by design, and the lowest yield ship is the best tank.

If you can't understand the game design logic behind that decision, perhaps you should just stop commenting on things like this.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.