These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Anyone living in a WH system with a C5 static?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Musophil
XX Industries
#21 - 2012-08-06 13:14:45 UTC
Terrorfrodo wrote:

But keep in mind that you'll not have a Cataclysmic C4 very often once you don't live in that C4 anymore. We had tons of god-awful Black Hole C4s Ugh They are usually full of sites because everyone hates them.


This is true. We don't mind rolling our holes, though, so I think we'll be ok.

Terrorfrodo wrote:
Make no mistake, of course you'll make good money, everyone in w-space does. I just don't think it's the best option available Blink

I guess you're in it for PvE, because like Godfrey said C4s are also terrible for PvP. Many are deserted, and the ones inhabited are almost exclusively held by pvp-averse carebears.


Well, we're not averse to pvp, although living in this c4 most of our PvP is either us versus an enemy covops, or us versus a huge ludicrous blob we have no hope against because we can't field anywhere near their numbers, and so we tend to end up doing PvE together much more often than PvP.

I expect it to be the same in a C5, except we'll have cap ships to use for the site escalations... the main reason we want to move into a C5.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2012-08-06 13:25:51 UTC
Musophil wrote:
I expect it to be the same in a C5, except we'll have cap ships to use for the site escalations... the main reason we want to move into a C5.


This should be fun.
RioCrokite
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2012-08-08 14:33:46 UTC  |  Edited by: RioCrokite
Terrorfrodo wrote:
I'd be surprised if more than 10% of C5s with static C4 are occupied... it's the most useless type of system in EVE. Bad C4 sleeper sites and yet no easy access to Empire because the C4 will never have a k-space connection.


C4 anoms are fine if you know how to do it. With the right fleet setup you are looking at 130mil/h+ per ship in the op no matter what system effects are.

Also <3 black holes c4 even more than magentars for income.
Archdaimon
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#24 - 2012-08-08 17:51:35 UTC
Musophil wrote:


Well, we're not averse to pvp, although living in this c4 most of our PvP is either us versus an enemy covops, or us versus a huge ludicrous blob we have no hope against because we can't field anywhere near their numbers, and so we tend to end up doing PvE together much more often than PvP.

I expect it to be the same in a C5, except we'll have cap ships to use for the site escalations... the main reason we want to move into a C5.


In c5's you'll encounter capitals. Capitals take down your towers. Sure you ready for this?

Wormholes have the best accoustics. It's known. - Sing it for me -
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2012-08-17 07:46:36 UTC
Archdaimon wrote:
In c5's you'll encounter capitals. Capitals take down your towers. Sure you ready for this?

To do justice, this forum is full of people claiming to love bashing towers with battleships. Admittedly, possibility of capital invasions is something that makes requirements entirely different.

Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
Previous page12