These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

90% of PVP happens at gates. THAT'S that problem.

First post
Author
Boudicca Arbosa
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2012-08-03 13:16:16 UTC
AFK Mining =/= AFK Gatecamping
ISD TYPE40
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-08-03 13:18:50 UTC
Thread cleaned of troll posting. Please post responsibly, thank you - ISD Type40.

[b]ISD Type40 Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#23 - 2012-08-03 13:19:56 UTC
I propose some galaxy wide catastrophe that destroys the gates (and local along with it) and leaves nothing but wormholes connecting the systems

Everything would be so much better.
Boudicca Arbosa
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2012-08-03 13:24:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Boudicca Arbosa
Rek Seven wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.

I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.


Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?

You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?).

Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.


How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions?
You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right.

If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. Shocked


Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates.

I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players.

After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up.


I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.

This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a pussy move.

You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2012-08-03 14:12:52 UTC
Okay, since I'm a highsec ******* and not a lowsec *******, I won't speak to that bit, but there's a common argument that I see that I'd like to address for a second if you'll indulge me.

I often get told that if I were a real pvper I wouldn't:
- dec people potentially less skilled or more poorly equipped than me
- spy
- safari
- scam or lie
- logon trap
- corp hop (now dead RIP)
- use neutral logi (I generally don't, but that's another discussion)
- etc.

The etc can be very broad, too. I once got accused of fighting cheap because I used a command ship in highsec. And by that I don't mean that I got called out for using an off-grid booster, but apparently fighting from an Absolution is cheating somehow.

Really, dudes? You honestly expect people to throw away competitive advantages? In everything you do, you're up against someone else, directly or indirectly. Do you think all your competition is also throwing away these advantages? Does your sense of e-honour have you in such an incredible stranglehold? I mean, I get it, I harbor some shreds of e-honour I have trouble letting go of too, but this isn't pistols at dawn. This is a shanking in a prison shower.

If we were playing tag, would you demand that everyone hop on one foot? If we were playing chess, would you demand everyone do it blind drunk? Are you living in such a Harrison Bergeron world that you really want to bring the whole game down to the lowest common denominator?
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-08-03 14:14:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.

I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.


Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?

You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?).

Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.


How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions?
You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right.

If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. Shocked


Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates.

I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players.

After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up.


I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.

This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.

You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.


Just because you done like the way someone else plays doesn't mean it isn't a legit strategy. Gate camping has always been a part of eve and it always should be. It's even a tactic used in the novels and i bet there are a bunch of players that get a buzz from escaping gate camps as they type "fail" into local. Big smile

But i am just playing devils advocate here and i haven't looked into the proposed change in detail. Will it be impossible to tank gate guns now or will it be manageable providing you have enough logi, resulting in an increase of blob warfare?
flakeys
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-08-03 14:16:23 UTC
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.

This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.

You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.



Looking at your stats on BC you have three kills in low-sec of wich a 2vs1 , a 10v1 and to top it off a 20vs1 . I think the people you are adressing will also not be impressed either as they rarely have a 10 man gang let alone a 20 man gang.

I'd suggest trying low-sec piracy with 1 or 2 friends for a month and not using the gates for your kills.I bet you'll be bored before the 2nd week is over because of lack of targets.


The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-08-03 14:23:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
flakeys wrote:

The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.


This.

Low sec should be a place that high sec dwellers aspire to be but why bother when you can get rich from lvl 4's?

Don't get me started on FW. CCP apparently think their recent changes to the FW system system was good enough... Please Roll
Karl Planck
Perkone
Caldari State
#29 - 2012-08-03 14:33:15 UTC
just cant resist. I largely camp now because i ran out of ppl that would fight me. Ironically i don't camp the gate.

I has all the eve inactivity

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#30 - 2012-08-03 14:34:28 UTC
Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#31 - 2012-08-03 14:51:58 UTC
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.

I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.


Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?

You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?).

Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.


How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions?
You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right.

If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. Shocked



you mean .. places that are completely empty in low sec except for a few seconds every day?


There is not enough activity in low sec for other places to have PVP. The logical choice would be to make low sec belts spawn Battleship sized rats so people would go there t make REAL isk. That alone would skew a lot of the attention from gates and into the belts
Seishi Maru
doMAL S.A.
#32 - 2012-08-03 14:53:11 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
flakeys wrote:

The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.


This.

Low sec should be a place that high sec dwellers aspire to be but why bother when you can get rich from lvl 4's?

Don't get me started on FW. CCP apparently think their recent changes to the FW system system was good enough... Please Roll



well .. was SOMETHIGN at least:P In fact FW made a lot for low sec, increase commerce in low sec and the rpesence of a strong group (the militias) make some zones less inhabited by large static pirate activities.
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#33 - 2012-08-03 14:56:49 UTC
the main reason why i am in FW is:

1) docking rights -> no station games
2) war -> no gate guns/gcc
3) plexes -> good for solo/small scale pvp

its like avoiding Eve's main game design issues by joining FW ;)

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2012-08-03 14:58:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
Seishi Maru wrote:

well .. was SOMETHIGN at least:P In fact FW made a lot for low sec, increase commerce in low sec and the rpesence of a strong group (the militias) make some zones less inhabited by large static pirate activities.


I guess so... I just want to be able to take over Amarr low sec for the Republic.
Karl Planck
Perkone
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-08-03 15:01:39 UTC
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
If you turds would just get off gates and hunt like REAL pirates, there wouldn't be a need to change the way gates work in low. Stop hugging gates to gain an advantage (because your 93843 million ISK ship going after that cheaply fit Rifter wasn't good enough) and get your asses out there and destroy ships in SPACE. Get off your front porch, you whiny pussies.

I'm a goddamn new player that immediately went to lowsec space to carve out my niche. Even I'M not ***** enough to sit at a gate. I hunt when I'm feeling froggy. You veterans sitting around at the gates make my teeth itch. Get off the gates and join the rest of the world.


Okay genius, where should people fight in low sec then?

You can't drag people into bubbles in low sec so the only places fights can happen is gates and stations (docking games are fun?).

Ps. ganking mission runners isn't legit pvp.


How about... belts? POCO's, POS's, WH entrance/ exits, anomalies, complexes, missions?
You know, the more I think about it the more I feel the OP is right.

If you guys actually would get your sticky rear OFF those gates you probably had more targets to pew with. Shocked


Do you understand what pirates are? They don't sit by an asteroid hoping that someone might come along. They sit by gates because 90% of people will enter the system through the gates.

I'm not a pirate, i'm actually affiliated with anti-pirate groups so don't misunderstand where i'm coming from here, but I feel that low sec should be policed by the players.

After a pirate group has ganked that noob in a rifter, do you think they are going to stick around for a good fight with an anti-pirate group while also taking massive amounts of gate gun fire? I think people will now only attack ships they know they can take out in a few seconds and then doc/pos up.


I don't consider myself a pirate, per se. I'm a mission runner and explorer. My Corporation just recently moved to Low Sec. To ensure that I felt like my new home felt "safe" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.

This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.

You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.


lol you have 6 kills and one of them is in lowsec, mail me in a year and let me know how this goes for you

I has all the eve inactivity

EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#36 - 2012-08-03 15:10:35 UTC
gates exist to cause pvp
EvilweaselSA
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#37 - 2012-08-03 15:11:59 UTC
literally that is their purpose, to force people into specific areas so you know where you can find people to shoot
Pinstar Colton
Sweet Asteroid Acres
#38 - 2012-08-03 15:14:32 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates.


Gates have the element of surprise (If the traveler doesn't have forward scouts) AND they must align and warp from a dead stop after exiting a gate (unlike a station, where you can instawarp with the proper bookmark). Gates are literally the only place a pirate can even attempt to take down a target who is merely traveling through the system.

The whole concept of piracy (In the oldschool naval sense) is to catch a ship going from point A to point B and steal its loot. Given EVE game mechanics, that is literally the only choice pirates have.



In the cat-and-mouse game that is low sec, there is no shame in learning to be a better mouse.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#39 - 2012-08-03 15:18:12 UTC
Pinstar Colton wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Fights happen on gates because contact happens on gates.


Gates have the element of surprise (If the traveler doesn't have forward scouts) AND they must align and warp from a dead stop after exiting a gate (unlike a station, where you can instawarp with the proper bookmark). Gates are literally the only place a pirate can even attempt to take down a target who is merely traveling through the system.

The whole concept of piracy (In the oldschool naval sense) is to catch a ship going from point A to point B and steal its loot. Given EVE game mechanics, that is literally the only choice pirates have.


Even discounting gate camps, suppose you have two wandering gangs looking for PVP. Where will they be most likely to meet? At a random celestial, or at a gate as they travel?

Where are they most likely to actually engage in a fight? Hint: the smaller/weaker gang is most likely going to avoid the fight if they can, because nobody wants to pointlessly lose a dozen ships to a more powerful enemy. The only way you're going to force a fight from them is catching them on a gate. Anywhere else and they are far more likely to simply run.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Boudicca Arbosa
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2012-08-03 15:20:15 UTC
flakeys wrote:
Boudicca Arbosa wrote:
" I actively hunted people out on d-scan and went after them. I didn't sit on a gate hoping to poon someone that was passing through.

This is akin to those idiots that sat in front of an instance portal in WoW killing lvl 30's trying to get into SM. It's just silly and actually kind of a ***** move.

You have a d-scan. Use it. Get off gates. No one is impressed.



Looking at your stats on BC you have three kills in low-sec of wich a 2vs1 , a 10v1 and to top it off a 20vs1 . I think the people you are adressing will also not be impressed either as they rarely have a 10 man gang let alone a 20 man gang.

I'd suggest trying low-sec piracy with 1 or 2 friends for a month and not using the gates for your kills.I bet you'll be bored before the 2nd week is over because of lack of targets.


The gates is not the problem , it's the enviremont that needs to be adressed as it has had that need for year upon year upon year now.


The 2v1 was against 2 T2 ships....at a gate.

Applaud me?