These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So why is 20% of the game's population representing the entire CSM?

First post
Author
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#61 - 2012-08-13 20:30:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
i almost forgot legion of xXdeathXx (understandable) and hans' faction war alliance, other big nullsec players
Blastil
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#62 - 2012-08-16 15:42:31 UTC
Hold up one second, I refuse the premise that because you're a member of a big sov holding alliance in nulsec, that you do not play/understand the highsec and lowsec game. In fact, I think that is wholely, utterly, and entirely wrong. Most members of large sov holding alliances maintain alts who mine, mission run, and plex. If they don't now, they have in the past for sure. Some of them started out as a youngn' running missions, mining and ratting for ISK. This is not some undiscovered country for them, they've had experience many of them in all aspects of the game.

Your premise is flawed, and therefore your argument invalid. Its called Logic.

Oh and if you don't like it, run for CSM 8
Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#63 - 2012-08-16 22:03:07 UTC
Blawrf McTaggart wrote:
because the 20% is the only % that matters heh



lol this is funny.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

Frying Doom
#64 - 2012-08-17 22:40:37 UTC
Blastil wrote:
Hold up one second, I refuse the premise that because you're a member of a big sov holding alliance in nulsec, that you do not play/understand the highsec and lowsec game. In fact, I think that is wholely, utterly, and entirely wrong. Most members of large sov holding alliances maintain alts who mine, mission run, and plex. If they don't now, they have in the past for sure. Some of them started out as a youngn' running missions, mining and ratting for ISK. This is not some undiscovered country for them, they've had experience many of them in all aspects of the game.

Your premise is flawed, and therefore your argument invalid. Its called Logic.

Oh and if you don't like it, run for CSM 8

How about the premise that those of us on the forums really have no idea at all what the huge, non-posting non-voting majority of this game actually want.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Hrothgar Nilsson
#65 - 2012-08-19 06:32:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Hrothgar Nilsson
JonnyRandom wrote:
We know that the game's population is split something like 70% hisec, 10% low sec, 20% null-sec. Something like that, the exact figures are not important.

Well, my home is in null-sec.

I have two no-skill characters on my account in high sec. So, I'm 33% null-sec, 67%-high-sec.

The stats really mean nothing.

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if over half of high-sec characters are alts of null-sec mains.
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#66 - 2012-08-19 09:57:08 UTC
As this already has been discussed at length in the past, I wil just summarize a couple points:

- CCP's demography stats talk about people who was online at a certain time. No matter wether they are "mains" or "alts", more than 70% of the characters are logged into hisec, and the number of characters logged into nullsec has been shrinking to under 15%. Even if everyone in hisec was an alt to nullseccers, hisec still would be 70% relevant to gameplay (we may assume that people don't log in their characters just for the sake of it).

- What is the incentive to vote for the CSM to the unaligned player? CSM only matters to the individual player if the issues they deal with matter to the players, but then, do you really think that 85% of the game ignores the CSM election because the CSM is relevant to them?

If the CSM doesn't does what interests players, players won't interest on the CSM. And we only know for sure that 85% of the players don't care to vote the CSM at all, so we end up with a representative body that represents only 15% of the player base... which is a good reason to not vote for it.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Frying Doom
#67 - 2012-08-19 10:00:28 UTC
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:
JonnyRandom wrote:
We know that the game's population is split something like 70% hisec, 10% low sec, 20% null-sec. Something like that, the exact figures are not important.

Well, my home is in null-sec.

I have two no-skill characters on my account in high sec. So, I'm 33% null-sec, 67%-high-sec.

The stats really mean nothing.

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if over half of high-sec characters are alts of null-sec mains.

Unless you were actually on your no-skill characters at the time of the 'snap shot', it would not matter.
It was a percentage generated from where people actually where at a specific time.

So if you don't want Null to look barren, don't log onto your no-skill characters or they might take another snapshot and count you as a hi-sec character Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#68 - 2012-08-19 10:03:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
And we only know for sure that 85% of the players don't care to vote the CSM at all, so we end up with a representative body that represents only 15% of the player base... which is a good reason to not vote for it.

Don't care or don't know what the CSM is or think its only relevant to Null sec characters.

Hell I just had someone in GD say that the CSM is NULL sec players.

So education is needed for the masses.

This game is as much theirs as it is the forum posters or interest groups game.

The idea came up in the town meeting that during CSM elections people would have to actively Vote or abstain before logging in. I think this is a good idea if it includes a blurb about the function of the CSM, especially as it gets more important every year.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#69 - 2012-08-19 10:11:14 UTC
^ Could backfire, and a troll candidate could win, and I don't just mean Darius III.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Frying Doom
#70 - 2012-08-19 10:23:55 UTC
rodyas wrote:
^ Could backfire, and a troll candidate could win, and I don't just mean Darius III.

We know the current system is flawed and if they do it in such a way for instance the first page just having a blurb about the CSM and 2 big buttons for Vote or Abstain and from there the normal voting page if you click Vote, it would at least let everyone know about the CSM before they choose to ignore it.

And then we will have real stats on how many people don't care.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#71 - 2012-08-19 10:29:13 UTC
As well as stats to how many, are pissed off by being forced to vote, or stats on how many trolls there are in EVE. Or perhaps stats on how many are uneducated on eve online.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#72 - 2012-08-19 11:16:03 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
And then we will have real stats on how many people don't care.


Anyone who votes only because it's staring them in the face on a login screen doesn't care in the first place, no matter what button they blind click. Forcing people to vote is an awful idea since it pretty much skips the whole "hey, let's maybe try to find out WHY these people wouldn't vote otherwise" thing which is apparently so important.

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["

Frying Doom
#73 - 2012-08-19 11:16:09 UTC
rodyas wrote:
As well as stats to how many, are pissed off by being forced to vote, or stats on how many trolls there are in EVE. Or perhaps stats on how many are uneducated on eve online.

Being forced to do two extra clicks to click on Abstain is so nasty..

I would rather have a representative CSM and an informed EvE population than a CSM easily controlled by a small percentage of the population for there own interests.

As to stats on the uneducated I believe CCP already has those and troll stats, well aren't the forums powered by trolls?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#74 - 2012-08-19 11:54:10 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
And we only know for sure that 85% of the players don't care to vote the CSM at all, so we end up with a representative body that represents only 15% of the player base... which is a good reason to not vote for it.

Don't care or don't know what the CSM is or think its only relevant to Null sec characters.

Hell I just had someone in GD say that the CSM is NULL sec players.

So education is needed for the masses.

This game is as much theirs as it is the forum posters or interest groups game.

The idea came up in the town meeting that during CSM elections people would have to actively Vote or abstain before logging in. I think this is a good idea if it includes a blurb about the function of the CSM, especially as it gets more important every year.


I already suggested that in the past; log in screen of electible voters would show a list of the candidates (randomized each log in to neutralyze the "click the one on top" bias) plus an option to be reminded later -but no "abstain" option until the last day of election.

Shoving the CSM down player's throats would force them to at least wonder what is the CSM.

Also after the election, CSM shuld be allowed to send a mass mailing to everyone who voted them, to thank them for their cooperation.This would reward those who voted upon interesting themselves on the list.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Frying Doom
#75 - 2012-08-19 11:58:34 UTC
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
And we only know for sure that 85% of the players don't care to vote the CSM at all, so we end up with a representative body that represents only 15% of the player base... which is a good reason to not vote for it.

Don't care or don't know what the CSM is or think its only relevant to Null sec characters.

Hell I just had someone in GD say that the CSM is NULL sec players.

So education is needed for the masses.

This game is as much theirs as it is the forum posters or interest groups game.

The idea came up in the town meeting that during CSM elections people would have to actively Vote or abstain before logging in. I think this is a good idea if it includes a blurb about the function of the CSM, especially as it gets more important every year.


I already suggested that in the past; log in screen of electible voters would show a list of the candidates (randomized each log in to neutralyze the "click the one on top" bias) plus an option to be reminded later -but no "abstain" option until the last day of election.

Shoving the CSM down player's throats would force them to at least wonder what is the CSM.

Also after the election, CSM shuld be allowed to send a mass mailing to everyone who voted them, to thank them for their cooperation.This would reward those who voted upon interesting themselves on the list.

Frankly I think just have the Abstain button from day 1 because either way around if there is a blurb on the CSM before it at least they have had the ability to read about it before choosing to ignore it.

I agree as to the random order and it isn't that hard to do either but I feel the candidates should be on a separate page so as to reduce random clicking .

As to the mail CCP does not track the voters and to be honest nor should they.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#76 - 2012-08-19 18:38:28 UTC
JonnyRandom wrote:
We know that the game's population is split something like 70% hisec, 10% low sec, 20% null-sec. Something like that, the exact figures are not important.
Yet it seems that the CSM is composed entirely out of representatives of big alliances in null-sec. So the CSM which is the voice all of Eve's population represents only 20% of the game's population... Shocked

I know there have been talks with CSM of how to bring more people into nullsec? But why are people that already live in nullsec trying to find ways to bring hi-sec into null-sec? Seems kind of backwards to me. I'd rather people like myself, that live in hi-sec, had more influence in finding ways to make null-sec more attractive to us.

That's just 2 thoughts I wanted to bring up... not sure if this has been discussed or not before.


Ummmmm what?? First off, its completely false that the CSM is all null dudes. 2nd, I see zero effort on the part of the current CSM to drag more highsec people out to nullsec - please cite your sources for this. What you hear is the CSM saying 0.0 should be fixed - which is important and necessary in the long run (and I'm not even one of the dudes that lives out there.)

If you want to have influence, send the CSM a mail. Tell us what you want to see - you'd be suprised at what you hear.....

We gotta move on beyond these stereotypes - posting misleading info like this continues to jade people about the CSM, and causes many to never contact us because they think its hopeless (which only worsens your chances of getting represented). You currently have reps on the CSM that live full-time in ALL areas of space - lowsec, highsec, WH, and null. Take advantage of them.

o7

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#77 - 2012-08-19 19:08:56 UTC
But but but HANS!

what about the truthiness, Hans?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Blastil
Aideron Robotics
Aideron Robotics.
#78 - 2012-08-19 19:23:05 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Blastil wrote:
Hold up one second, I refuse the premise that because you're a member of a big sov holding alliance in nulsec, that you do not play/understand the highsec and lowsec game. In fact, I think that is wholely, utterly, and entirely wrong. Most members of large sov holding alliances maintain alts who mine, mission run, and plex. If they don't now, they have in the past for sure. Some of them started out as a youngn' running missions, mining and ratting for ISK. This is not some undiscovered country for them, they've had experience many of them in all aspects of the game.

Your premise is flawed, and therefore your argument invalid. Its called Logic.

Oh and if you don't like it, run for CSM 8

How about the premise that those of us on the forums really have no idea at all what the huge, non-posting non-voting majority of this game actually want.



way to dodge the point. If those people don't like something and don't speak up I have no sympathy. Eve is a game where if you actively take a part in the universe you can influence its direction. If you don't then sit back for the ride, because the CSM will only represent the opinions presented. You can't honestly expect them to do otherwise. besides the forums really ARE a good pulse of the EVE community, they haven't lead the CSM too drastically astray yet.
Frying Doom
#79 - 2012-08-19 22:03:12 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
And then we will have real stats on how many people don't care.


Anyone who votes only because it's staring them in the face on a login screen doesn't care in the first place, no matter what button they blind click. Forcing people to vote is an awful idea since it pretty much skips the whole "hey, let's maybe try to find out WHY these people wouldn't vote otherwise" thing which is apparently so important.

How strange a interest group is against more people voting.

They WHY is fairly easy its either laziness, apathy, misinformation or ignorance.

As I have said the population of EvE needs to be educated about the CSM and why they need to vote.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#80 - 2012-08-19 22:10:34 UTC
Blastil wrote:

way to dodge the point. If those people don't like something and don't speak up I have no sympathy. Eve is a game where if you actively take a part in the universe you can influence its direction. If you don't then sit back for the ride, because the CSM will only represent the opinions presented. You can't honestly expect them to do otherwise. besides the forums really ARE a good pulse of the EVE community, they haven't lead the CSM too drastically astray yet.


The forums are a good pulse of us load mouths. Subscription numbers are a good pulse for the whole game.

That is why I would like to see ALL of EvE informed about the CSM, what it is doing, its role ect..

As well as making every account active in the voting process, even if it just means they click Abstain.

Then the CSM will truly represent the whole player base and not just those of us with mouths so big we could swallow a bus.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!