These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Small Truths: The Caldari (revised)

Author
Roga Dracor
Gladiators of Rage
Fraternity.
#41 - 2012-08-01 21:37:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Roga Dracor
Lyn Farel wrote:
That would be interesting as well. Do you have sources I could read on the matter ?

Also, I do not understand what causes you trouble in the point I am trying to make. Because the Jove, that can not stand aggressive behavior, ignored one major power guilty of it - and a second one if you are correct - does not mean that they can not ignore other major powers in the future. Or even right now. Who have heard of them since YC 111 after all ?

There is something else, too. I especially added that they might miss other forms of aggressiveness. I am not sure if the Jove are a model of virtue or perfection ? If they are not, what does it proves ?


An immediate source would be the official historical overview of New Eden's major events, old Jovian calendar date 21355, approximately 195 years ago the Jove cut ties... Records originally recorded by the Gallente and the Caldari themselves... I am sure there are more detailed histories available in both the pertinent nations, though, each may have a nationalistic slant attached. The pod technology was bestowed upon the Caldari approximately 173 years ago.

It proves that you are being selective and circumspect in the "facts" you choose to use in your argument, leaving your entire argument suspect.. The Jove, as far as I know, still hold the Caldari and Matari in high esteem, at least officially. And so it points to a Jovian sympathy for the aforementioned Nations. Or, perhaps they have a penchant for gambling, as do we Caldari, and like to take the long odds..

Honestly? Why even use them as a talking point, if you are as quick to dismiss them?

It's no use going back to yesterday, because I was a different person then, and it's a poor sort of memory that only works backward.

Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#42 - 2012-08-02 02:08:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Gwen Ikiryo
I'm going to try and speak my mind on this topic. I hope very much that I don't offend anyone, especially my fellow citizens of the State, and apologize very much if I do. Please, keep in mind that most of my views are not from a Capsuleer perspective.

That being said...

I think the State is wounded. Hurt. Maybe in a way that can never be healed, completely.

A lot of this has already been said by Jenneth-haani or Scherezad, but the Caldari (for the record, I'll be using the term "Caldari" in the ethnic sense, and so not ecompassing myself of other Achura) are a people reared on want and suffering. Or "Cold" as it usually simplified. Taught to co-operate, to sacrifice.

But when the Federation came to Caldari Prime, they changed them, deeply. They wore away a great deal of their identity, replacing their culture with their own to the point that a great deal is still forgotten. They took away their purpose, the reason for their defiant, enduring spirit. They took a people who thrived in the winter and gave them eternal summer.

A tremendous gift, that it was only human to give... But also a curse. This alone probably left them alienated, lost from themselves, resentful. They never really accepted it, and that is their right. The right to be themselves in spite of all else.

Perhaps more pressingly, though, they made them subservient. (To make sure everyone is on the same page: At the time, the Federation was, very much, a Gallentean beast. The leaders were Gallenteans, and there was a strong dynamic of them "leading" the less advanced civilizations, etc). They didn't hold any power, and probably never would have, unless they intergrated. Voters, you know?

This led to a connection that was, in my opinion (though this is an over-the-top way to put it, I confess) reminiscent of a ruling and working class. Let me elaborate: The hard working, order following, undecadent culture of the Caldari, now a part of the consumerist Federation, with the Gallente at the head. With them having all the money, and the power... It's obvious how it'll end up. The hard workers, who have been taught not to want, not to indulge... Well, all the work they'll be doing, in this age of warmth and plenty, will be to the benefit of those who do.

What I'm saying, I suppose, is that in any kind of co-operative relationship, with the way Caldari culture has ended up after the Federations arrival, (corporate consumerism wed with self-sacrificial honest, dedicated work) will end with their culture working for the others.

What were the Caldari, bound by the desire to hold on to their pasts, their culture, which served their newfound friends so well, who profited from their labour, their identity, to do? Who's own pride made them exploited?

To be given a choice: To become the Gallente, or to serve them, in some manner or another?

This, I believe, is the root of the bad blood. Shame, loss, resentment. It hasn't even been truly escaped, even after the war. Heth and his government are probably proof enough of that. The Federation stripped them of their pride, their meaning, and manipulated what was left. In a way, they continue to do so, and as long as the two are close (as it seems they must be) it will continue until one is gone or changed. With such an unforgettable wound imbedded into themselves, how can they do anything else but fight the "giver"?

I should note, though: Please, don't take any of this as anti-Federate sentiment. The whole thing appears more just an event of tragic misfortune, for both cultures.

I worry, often, that resentment of the Federation will lead to a state of unending war (in some form or another) in the State, and eventually it's own end. If this is ever to be avoided, the nation must find some means to escape or forget it's own past... Because, in trying to destroy one half and save the other, it'll be left in ruins.

I guess the only question is... How could it be accomplished?

That's all. And, uh, thank for you for sharing your thoughts, Jenneth-haani. I found both versions insightful. Hopefully I'm not missing the mark, here.
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#43 - 2012-08-02 07:44:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Gwen Ikiryo wrote:

What were the Caldari, bound by the desire to hold on to their pasts, their culture, which served their newfound friends so well, who profited from their labour, their identity, to do? Who's own pride made them exploited?

To be given a choice: To become the Gallente, or to serve them, in some manner or another?

This, I believe, is the root of the bad blood. Shame, loss, resentment. It hasn't even been truly escaped, even after the war. Heth and his government are probably proof enough of that. The Federation stripped them of their pride, their meaning, and exploited what was left. In a way, they continue to do so, and as long as the two are close (as it seems they must be) it will continue until one is gone or changed. With such an unforgettable wound imbedded into themselves, how can they do anything else but fight the "giver"?

Arguing that the Federation might have exploited Caldari labour only works metaphorically, as the violation of its propriety perhaps. Although I liked your post, tbh it doesn't make a lot of sense economically. In fact I think the rhetoric of colonialism is awkward, not unfair but misleading in its emphasis.

The overwhelming experience of feeling or emotion in my view would have been disgust. The Caldari became disgusted by the Federation. A Federation shot through with deception and decadence, a Federation that controlled its own population by pandering to a base populist instinct, with pleasure rather than force. The fruit and flower of Federation culture bent towards manipulation. As though upon waking you discover your new lover, having metamorphosed overnight into a giant c0ckroach, is presenting a reasoned argument for increased sexual intimacy dictated by its new alien appetites. The tragedy was that this led to a kind of Caldari repression, but is it unsurprising, in the circumstances, that the Caldari became phobic?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2012-08-02 13:40:30 UTC
Roga Dracor wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
That would be interesting as well. Do you have sources I could read on the matter ?

Also, I do not understand what causes you trouble in the point I am trying to make. Because the Jove, that can not stand aggressive behavior, ignored one major power guilty of it - and a second one if you are correct - does not mean that they can not ignore other major powers in the future. Or even right now. Who have heard of them since YC 111 after all ?

There is something else, too. I especially added that they might miss other forms of aggressiveness. I am not sure if the Jove are a model of virtue or perfection ? If they are not, what does it proves ?


An immediate source would be the official historical overview of New Eden's major events, old Jovian calendar date 21355, approximately 195 years ago the Jove cut ties... Records originally recorded by the Gallente and the Caldari themselves... I am sure there are more detailed histories available in both the pertinent nations, though, each may have a nationalistic slant attached. The pod technology was bestowed upon the Caldari approximately 173 years ago.

It proves that you are being selective and circumspect in the "facts" you choose to use in your argument, leaving your entire argument suspect.. The Jove, as far as I know, still hold the Caldari and Matari in high esteem, at least officially. And so it points to a Jovian sympathy for the aforementioned Nations. Or, perhaps they have a penchant for gambling, as do we Caldari, and like to take the long odds..

Honestly? Why even use them as a talking point, if you are as quick to dismiss them?


Thank you for the source.

What makes you think I use them as a talking point, and that I dismiss them ? I said above that I find Ms Jenneth interesting. It is not me that brought them on the table. Precisely because I think their example hardly proves anything, but still remains interesting.
Talisa Latarien
Dark Tempest Enterprises
#45 - 2012-08-02 19:02:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Talisa Latarien
This is one of the most interesting discussions I've read here. To be frank, what Gwen Ikiryo wrote has struck a note in me, even if most of Aria's essay seemed also true. That doesn't make me disagree with others that posted here, which only adds to the confusion. Let me share some of my feelings, in the hope that it can shed some light on what makes an Achura like me tick.

Unlike many here, I was lucky to grow up on a planet. It was beautiful - nature still had its way there, and between the greenst forests, purest sand and maiden seas you could forget at times that there were things beyond your homeworld. Growing up in a rather technical family, I was always interested in how things worked. To study them, to classify them was as natural to me as breathing.

When you are looking down from a cliff, just before you dive into the fresh, crystal clean water, you can't help but wonder at the garden that lies below the surface. It seems like paradise, if you believe in one, with its lush vegetation and richest colours imaginable. Once you break through the mirror of the water surface, and open your eyes again, that picture is still there.

Yet, it is very different from what you saw earlier. The colours are still rich, and life abundant. But you begin to see more than just those colours. You see shapes, both weird and beautiful, slick and jagged, tall and short, all going about their miraculous business. Then you see even more... That flower you thought so tender just caught a small pointy fish and pulled it into its mouth that you can clearly see now between the tentacles. And you notice that the fish was dead long before it got eaten, from the poison that 'flower' carried in its 'crown of petals'. Next you see a larger creature making its way through the open areas of seabed, searching for other, smaller things to eat.

Some adapt and grow big and strong themselves, but thus rely heavily on food and need it every day. Others depend on the collective to survive, be it for the hunt or to avoid being hunted. Some may die, but others would carry on. Yet more creatures just carve a niche for themselves and feel content with it, as long as it caters to their survival needs, accepting everything that surrounds them, adapting to it, only to find out later that they are overspecialized and incapable of feeding once their preferred prey is gone.

Suddenly, you feel the air in your lungs is spent, and it is time to make for the surface. What did you see down there, really? Was it pure beauty or pure tragedy? What is it, living like that, being both prey and the predator?

Later, when I grew up, I worked as a diplomat for a company too small to be mentioned. And I saw things. Same hunters and hunted, in a different setting. Once again, people go about their business, sometimes living in a symbiosis, other times making uneasy alliances or waging economic wars on each other. Not that much different from what I see now, as a capsuleer.

Why would I be telling you all this? Well, if the question was 'what is being Caldari like', I cannot answer. I know, I am Caldari, and I probably wouldn't want it any other way. But I can tell you what being Achura means for me. To see this lush garden, so full of life, and all it brings with itself, including competition, cooperation, death and new life again, to view this as a great pattern that is repeated all throughout the known universe, and to accept it. This is The Stream for me - follow it blindly or fight it violently, it is still stronger that me, than all of us. Learn its rules and live your life, finding happiness along the way, and one day when you look back at your life, you realize that you have changed The Stream. Even if just a little bit, still you did change it.

And then, at some point, you see that people - neighbours, friends, colleagues, that stranger you saw riding your bus to work from time to time, are The Stream themselves, not just a small part of it, but a large force of life that, if united in its direction, can alter things without too much turbulence. But any stream can carve rocks, and if not careful, those rocks may fall and block the path. I guess, that's how I view The State.

A short word about aforementioned Rights - some may not know this, but Rights are central to The State. It is the fact that they also come with certain Responsibilities attached - that might be harder to understand for some. In any case, that is a different subject and might ask for a different prequel story.
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#46 - 2012-08-02 20:06:12 UTC
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#47 - 2012-08-02 20:25:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Silas Vitalia wrote:
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....


Well that introduces some much needed perspective at the very least. Even if the idea of Caldari minstrels does rather put one's teeth on edge.
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#48 - 2012-08-02 20:37:12 UTC
Evet Morrel wrote:
Silas Vitalia wrote:
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....


Well that introduces some much needed perspective at the very least. Even if the idea of Caldari minstrels does rather put one's teeth on edge.


The Caldari in their hearts crave collective purpose and order above all, something that we provide in spades.

As the Khanid were our spearhead on the planetside battles of many a crusade, I imagine the Caldari, bent and directed to our purposes being the space-based instruments of our will like none other. Efficient, ruthless, and without mercy upon our enemies.

Truly a thing of beauty were it to happen.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#49 - 2012-08-02 20:40:21 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....



That might seem so to you, but I'm not convinced that the same people that violently fought my Federation for Freedom (whatever they wanted to do with it was their decision) because of minor differences would rejoice at the thought of being obliged to follow every word of someone from outside, someone who wouldn't even ask of what they wanted.

Make no mistake, I am Gallente, and I know that Caldari are supposed to be my enemies and all that. But I have great respect for them for standing up and fighting for their Freedom. Yes, that word is as sacred to them as it is for me, and as God is for you. And I don't ever think that a foreign theocracy is what they would have had in mind had they been given a choice. I even think that your alliance with them is somewhat forced by events, and they are way closer to Matari in spirit, the only difference being birth clans vs. corporate clans.

Yes, the Caldari still fight us, over territory, among other things. But that is a mostly economical thing which is also supported by strong emotions. Too much bad blood between our peoples still there. Not the same with Minmatar. For they you are not only The Enemy, but you are The Threat. Many attribute Minmatar violence upon Amarr to vengeance. I think it is because they realize - as long as you exist, as a theocracy with your self-given mandate to take over others for your God, the matari will know no peace. And, trust me, had you met the Caldari before us, knowing how hardy, strong-wiled and independant they are, you would have probably had two wars on your hands by now.

As always, disregard this if you will, as I am merely voicing my personal opinion.
Pierre Echerie
Horseshoe Industries
#50 - 2012-08-02 20:41:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Pierre Echerie
Silas Vitalia wrote:
Evet Morrel wrote:
Silas Vitalia wrote:
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....


Well that introduces some much needed perspective at the very least. Even if the idea of Caldari minstrels does rather put one's teeth on edge.


The Caldari in their hearts crave collective purpose and order above all, something that we provide in spades.

As the Khanid were our spearhead on the planetside battles of many a crusade, I imagine the Caldari, bent and directed to our purposes being the space-based instruments of our will like none other. Efficient, ruthless, and without mercy upon our enemies.

Truly a thing of beauty were it to happen.



Pardon if I do not comment on the entire quote, but these three words "bent and directed" are not something that would ever sit well with Caldari, let me tell you. We tried directing, even gently, and we also tried to listen to them. Didn't work. Can't bend sharp hardened steel. You either break it (and then all you can do is throw it away or try to mold it again through a chain of long industrial processes), or you cut yourself. Even if you break it, you still can cut yourself, actually.
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#51 - 2012-08-02 20:48:06 UTC
Pierre Echerie wrote:
Silas Vitalia wrote:
I often wish it had been the Amarr that reached the Caldari people first, instead of the Gallente.

What beautiful music we would have made together.....



That might seem so to you, but I'm not convinced that the same people that violently fought my Federation for Freedom (whatever they wanted to do with it was their decision) because of minor differences would rejoice at the thought of being obliged to follow every word of someone from outside, someone who wouldn't even ask of what they wanted.

Make no mistake, I am Gallente, and I know that Caldari are supposed to be my enemies and all that. But I have great respect for them for standing up and fighting for their Freedom. Yes, that word is as sacred to them as it is for me, and as God is for you. And I don't ever think that a foreign theocracy is what they would have had in mind had they been given a choice. I even think that your alliance with them is somewhat forced by events, and they are way closer to Matari in spirit, the only difference being birth clans vs. corporate clans.

Yes, the Caldari still fight us, over territory, among other things. But that is a mostly economical thing which is also supported by strong emotions. Too much bad blood between our peoples still there. Not the same with Minmatar. For they you are not only The Enemy, but you are The Threat. Many attribute Minmatar violence upon Amarr to vengeance. I think it is because they realize - as long as you exist, as a theocracy with your self-given mandate to take over others for your God, the matari will know no peace. And, trust me, had you met the Caldari before us, knowing how hardy, strong-wiled and independant they are, you would have probably had two wars on your hands by now.

As always, disregard this if you will, as I am merely voicing my personal opinion.




Interesting. I'm of the opinion that actually very few Caldari crave 'freedom' in the way you have described it. Very few in Caldari society are the ones making decisions. The are incredibly "Top-Down" in their organization in the same way as the Amarr. Decisions for many are made by a few at the top, in this way we are quite similar.

I don't say they would make such an excellent addition to the Empire lightly; I truly feel once they commit they do so with the entirety of their society and all of their resources. It's nearly religious in its devotional nature to seeing goals met by the actions of the collective. Sound familiar?

Many current members of the Empire were not conquered so much as made the collective decision to join as a society and a culture, and have been among out most valued members.

The desire to belong, to contribute, to see the success of the larger collective, all things the Empire encourages and the Caldari are exceptional because of.


Sabik now, Sabik forever

Talisa Latarien
Dark Tempest Enterprises
#52 - 2012-08-02 21:20:49 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:



Interesting. I'm of the opinion that actually very few Caldari crave 'freedom' in the way you have described it. Very few in Caldari society are the ones making decisions. The are incredibly "Top-Down" in their organization in the same way as the Amarr. Decisions for many are made by a few at the top, in this way we are quite similar.

I don't say they would make such an excellent addition to the Empire lightly; I truly feel once they commit they do so with the entirety of their society and all of their resources. It's nearly religious in its devotional nature to seeing goals met by the actions of the collective. Sound familiar?

Many current members of the Empire were not conquered so much as made the collective decision to join as a society and a culture, and have been among out most valued members.

The desire to belong, to contribute, to see the success of the larger collective, all things the Empire encourages and the Caldari are exceptional because of.




Perhaps to clarify a bit. The magic word 'Freedom' got mentioned here a lot. Now, granted, we, Caldari, and the Gallente understand it in a different fashion. Perhaps that humorous post in that other thread could be a good example of those thin lines between Freedom and some old and tried political system that often gets confused with it.

For me Freedom has nothing to do with liberalism. The latter only gives you too many choices of "how" once the choice of "what" was already made. Freedom is about making that first choice, "what", without any foreign influence (ideally; realistically - trying to minimize it as much as possible). And while I do agree that in The State we chose to sacrifice a few unneeded liberties, we did so for the greater good of Freedom. We want to be the masters in our own house, meaning that no external threat to our own culture, which was shaped in hardships for some (ask Civire or Deteis), would be the reason for us becoming something we don't want to be. If we do change, it is because we chose to change ourselves.

As for meritocracy with strong leadership, well, it makes sense. You can rely only on what you produce, and most things nowadays require cooperation. Someone has to stay at the helm, and it better be a person of experience. But one must uderstand, The State is not some oppressive entity that sits atop the backs of the people. The State IS the people. If we don't like our leadership, there is not much they can do - someone else will get elected. But when we do elect someone, we expect them to do their job, to make choices they are qualified to make, and not ask us, the people, to make every choice. However, we also want them to represent us, to stand up for all that we are, to make sure our new home stays home, and not a room in a hotel where someone else makes the rules at their own will.

I know many Amarr, and I feel we do get along fine, but they all are Capsuleers or Agents, and probably tend to be more open-minded about foreigners. Plus, the two wars gone bad also had some impact, and the Amarr don't seem to be as authoritative as they were back when first contact with the Federation was made. And I sure hope we can get along with you as well.
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#53 - 2012-08-03 10:33:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Cpt. Jenneth,

if I read what you write it makes me sad. Apparently you either forgot about the conversations we had or you deem me to be in spiritual crisis or having ended all our conversations with: "Well, happily, God exists, and all of this is according to His design, so it's all just fine. You'll learn in time." Also, me implying by this that you'll be duly conquered and enslaved.

You implied that the Amarr, in general, are incapable of critical thinking. (The Amarr are probably past dissuading; they will not accept their God and his Kingdom as "small truths" however hard I try to paint the picture that way for them. The Gallente, however, have a frequently-demonstrated capacity for critical thought.) That none of us question whether God exists or no.

You'd be surprised.

Empirical studies show that the usual Amarr has about two to three life-crisis-events in his or her life and on average in one of those the existence of God is questioned. Though most Amarr are indeed incapable of systematic theological reflection on this, it's not at all the case that most Amarr run for Sabikism once they are hit by this crisis: Most of them stay with or return to the flock and usually with a deepened faith. Oftentimes such an event is what prompts someone to start the studies of theology.

Theology itself, by the way, isn't limited to critically examine bits and pieces of Scripture. The fundamental part of theology - called fittingly fundamental theology - deals with the fundaments of the Amarrian religion and thus questions the existence of God. As I concede that the aim here is apologetic, the consensus is that one has to engage the position one wants to argue against in it's strongest possible version. We call this the 'principle of charity' - and you might want to acquaint yourself with it. Therefore, there are theologians who specialize in formulating as strong as possible arguments against the existence of God.

In fact, the strongest arguments I've seen against God's existence stem from Amarrian theologians (and philosophers of religion), as they actually respond to the counters the other theologians bring up. I'm at the moment myself contributing to counter one of the newest arguments against God in the theological journals of Hedion - the mother and cradle of all critical thinking within the Empire and an highly esteemed institution with a reputation that does even let the UoC pale in comparison.

Also, the study of theology is open to every subject of the Empire and - along the military career - a prime way that allows for social mobility. So, it's not at all the aristocracy doing all the thinking here.

So, your implication that Amarrians pride themselves on their irrational religiosity is only showing how your irrational fear of it colors your perception of it. Suddenly it should be irrational if the Amarr who struggles with his faith consults a theologian, while it's quite rational for the citizen of the state to ask an expert if he has a problem with something he's not well versed in?

We Amarr are proud of our theological tradition and, yes, we claim it to be a tradition of reason. No other intellectual and spiritual tradition has put as much effort into engaging in a concerted and systematical examination of the foundations of religion and faith and shed as much light onto these things as Amarrian theology did. Amarrian theology and thus religion is steeped in rational and above and beyond that reasonable dialogue, a dialogue that can't and doesn't stop at questioning the core fundamentals of itself.

Apologetics necessitates us to be the harshest critics of our own position. Well, except for those critics that leave the bounds of reasoned argument of course.

Then, indeed, theologians involved in apologetics rarely become capsuleers. They, understandably, have another calling in life. So, your run ins with Amarr - as amusing as they might be in some cases - have anecdotal relevance at best. If you want to judge the Amarr, you better don't depend on an induction based on the few persons you met.

I responded to this issue in great length because I feel the same pain that Cpt. Amith feels if one misrepresents what Amarrians and our religion is like. I also hope it will be prompted by my words to think a bit more and inform yourself before the unavoidable 'small truths of the Amarr' treatise will hit us. Also, you might see that you should let go of your fear of the Amarrian when you try to understand them, or else it will color all you see in ways that are distorting the picture. And last, but not least, you might take from my words here the admonition, that your own 'small truth' is that only the Achura strive for the 'great truth' and all the others cling to their 'little truths' like children to their mother's lap.

May light shine upon your path!

Faithfully,
N. Mithra
Evet Morrel
Doomheim
#54 - 2012-08-03 11:47:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Evet Morrel
Honored Cpt. Jenneth,

I fear, though, that certain people are simply advertising their own views and ideology rather than engaging in reasoned debate. Let's not waste too much breath on those that do so, as they are not deserving of any effort from our side.

May the floor of your quarters be free from small unaccountable objects that you may not have seen and thus potentially pose a nasty trip hazard.

Kind regards,

E.Morrel
Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2012-08-03 11:58:47 UTC
You amuse me, Cpt. Morrel. How does the saying go? Even God is fond of a good joke.

Now lets get back to the matter at hand. I'm sure if Cpt. Jenneth deems my defense of how the Amarr understand their engagement with religion and faith to be ideology and advertisement, her answer will be a sufficently short one.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#56 - 2012-08-03 22:51:43 UTC
I should like to hear what you might have to say about the Matarri, Ms. Jenneth.

Looking forward to it, actually. If nothing else, it should make me think, and this is never a bad thing. Blink

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Benjamin Eastwood
#57 - 2012-08-07 15:38:04 UTC
I don't have the time to write a lengthy reply as I'd like to, I have a conference meeting with my employees working colonies that aren't producing anything at the moment, but I take issue with your assertion that the Gallente's free wheeling nature allowed them to be first in space. The reason for this is quite obvious. The inhospitable Caldari home world is not exactly an incubator for the growth of space faring nations, unlike the Gallente's lush planet. It is, however, a crucible fit to create a nation tough enough to stand the tests of time.

"Endless ISK, the sinews of war"

Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#58 - 2012-08-08 10:16:10 UTC
Benjamin Eastwood wrote:
I don't have the time to write a lengthy reply as I'd like to, I have a conference meeting with my employees working colonies that aren't producing anything at the moment, but I take issue with your assertion that the Gallente's free wheeling nature allowed them to be first in space. The reason for this is quite obvious. The inhospitable Caldari home world is not exactly an incubator for the growth of space faring nations, unlike the Gallente's lush planet. It is, however, a crucible fit to create a nation tough enough to stand the tests of time.


I think you have the wrong idea of what she intended, sir. She mentioned in the second paragraph that the Caldari managed to, with great difficulty and by virtue of their traits, achieve "surviving", and it was this that meant they were not first into space. I don't think this was written to imply that they're aptitude at simple living was culturally based and thus limiting their progress, but rather that it was all they could have possibly achieved in such a place, and was impressive nonetheless.
Previous page123