These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

How will the mining and technetium affect fuel block prices?

Author
243636
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-07-28 17:44:06 UTC
So I was thinking, the changes to mining ships will mean more isotopes on the market which should lower the cost of fuel blocks.

Flip over to the changes to technetium and alchemy. More Alchemy should mean more towers, which leads to more fuels blocks being consumed which will make the price of fuel blocks go up as demand increases.

Will the two balance each other out so overall no change in price?

Only problem is I can see mining changes leading to more isotopes on the market but there will be no extra PI products like coolant, mechanical parts ect. . . Is this why there are alot of big buy orders on for these at the moment? people stockpiling for after the patch?

If these PI items go up in price would this not then raise the price of fuel blocks?

Will we see the price of PI items go back to there heady heights of 6 months ago?

Dave stark
#2 - 2012-07-28 17:55:36 UTC
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.
243636
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-07-28 18:09:52 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.


Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?
Dave stark
#4 - 2012-07-28 18:35:54 UTC
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.


Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?


yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of?

you over estimate people.
243636
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-07-28 19:23:09 UTC
Dave stark wrote:
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.


Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?


yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of?

you over estimate people.



Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced.
I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out.

I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off.
Dave stark
#6 - 2012-07-28 19:26:53 UTC
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.


Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?


yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of?

you over estimate people.



Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced.
I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out.

I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off.


people panic selling stockpiles because they think there's going to be some huge influx of miners.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#7 - 2012-07-28 19:32:33 UTC
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
243636 wrote:
Dave stark wrote:
why will the changes to mining ships mean more isotopes? the maximum yield is unchanged.


Less ganking more AFK mining on a whole?


yeah but do you really think those people who afk mine are aware that their mack is going to be mining a lot less ice, especially with a rig they're probably not aware of?

you over estimate people.



Well something has made the price of isotopes loose 15-20% since the patch was announced.
I think it will be interesting to say the least to see which way this pans out.

I brought up my materials to make my fuel blocks for the next year so I hope my gamble will have paid off.


Perma hulkageddon has fizzled, last week ice mining systems at The Forge were back up again to 80+ in local instead of 25.

Plus a sizable number of people left for summer vacations and offlined their POS.
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#8 - 2012-07-29 18:43:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
"Perma hulkageddon has fizzled, last week ice mining systems at The Forge were back up again to 80+ in local instead of 25.

Plus a sizable number of people left for summer vacations and offlined their POS"

this....

Oo

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#9 - 2012-08-06 19:05:12 UTC
Iv warned the eve community of the impending crash before.

If you trust the goons, you will foot the bill.

Speaking for myself, luckily iv liquidated 80% of my assets last week, still nearly 1B in losses are expected for my little tiny shop in the quorner, perhaps Im a little bit guilty of trust, myself.
Javajunky
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-08-06 19:52:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Javajunky
Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.

All Isotopes - 300 to 350 p/u
Liquid Ozone 200 to 225 p/u
Heavy Water 12 to 15 pu

By end of year...
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#11 - 2012-08-06 21:11:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Kara Books
Javajunky wrote:
Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.

All Isotopes - 300 to 350 p/u
Liquid Ozone 200 to 225 p/u
Heavy Water 12 to 15 pu

By end of year...


Indeed, cant blame just one piece of the puzzle.

Scripts and apps are supposedly the next big hit.

Edit part:
oh and yes, if you've tired of the market, nows the perfect time to pull out and go PvP or do something you've always wanted to do.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#12 - 2012-08-06 21:27:16 UTC
Kara Books wrote:

oh and yes, if you've tired of the market, nows the perfect time to pull out and go PvP or do something you've always wanted to do.

etny doesn't know how to do anything but mine, sorry

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-08-06 23:40:26 UTC
Javajunky wrote:
Bots come back in droves after this change. Everyone on the planet gets to AFK in ICE BELTS where they only have to dock like 2 x an hour. Seriously how could you not see this coming.


errr ... bots didn't need an ore bay boost, do you even know what a bot is?

If nothing else this lets the casual miners compete with all the bot trains out there, and not get ganked nonstop (another thing the botters had zero issues with.)

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

243636
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-08-07 05:43:49 UTC
PI parts of fuel block manufacture are on the way up. How high will they reach if isotopes bottom out and supply saturates the market but PI goods supply cannot match it . Only Bob knows . .

Big smile
shar'ra matcevsovski
Doomheim
#15 - 2012-08-07 13:43:47 UTC
eventually you want to take into account that there will be massive technetium raction farms that qill require also a lot of fuel, wich would affect the fuel block in the oposite way.

shar'ra phone home

243636
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-08-07 18:31:51 UTC
Well its already netted me more than 16 billion and I have built up quite a stock of materials which I expect to go up quite abit more after the patch. Just surprised only a few other buyers cottoned on early.

Robotics have made me 6B alone never mind Coolant/mechanical parts and enriched uranium.

Fuel blocks I sold several million units at 20k+ and then brought them back at 15-16k 3 weeks later.

Long live Patches Cool
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#17 - 2012-08-07 22:38:00 UTC
shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:
eventually you want to take into account that there will be massive technetium raction farms that qill require also a lot of fuel, wich would affect the fuel block in the oposite way.


Indeed, I also dont see massive hoards of increased mineral supplies flooding the markets, different ships doesn't mean there's going to be another flood of miners, just not as gankable as before is all.

But, they will increase in numbers, slowly but surely.
GreenSeed
#18 - 2012-08-09 01:46:48 UTC
Unless all the high sec mining is done on skiffs, macks are easily gankable. A full yield mack used to mine 76 blocks an hour, now it mines 70... that’s a reduction in extraction. The ehp of the old yield mack was 10k, now its 16k. Old macks on wholesale went for 150millon each, now 290m due to mat changes. And hulks? Who the hell would undock one of those now?

the point is, if the extraction of isotopes comes from full yield ships, then ganking is now more profitable than ever due to killing hulks when actually killing one, and also when killing a mack!.... lots of blue salvage? Oh yeah.

Cost of the gank? 2 dessies. Potential targets? Yield macks, half yield/half tank macks (DCUII + 2 invuls) and just about any hulk, really. Got 3 dessies? Well **** it, only skiffs are out of reach.

The real point is this; a full yield mack was affordable to lose. Now it isn’t. It must be tanked because it’s expensive as ****. A yield mack died to a dessie before and still does today, the difference is the cost of the barge, it’s 100% more expensive. If it is half tanked ehp climbs to 26k and the yield suffers even more, and goes down to 64 cubes/h and guess what, it dies 100% of the time to a double dessie gank... Am i really the only one who sees this?

The ehp buff? Now that was the real "fizzle". From the insane 48kehp yield macks we are down to 16kehp (with perfect skills, and t2 shield gang) can a single cat kill one? Not always... can two? 100% sure.

How long until miners begin to ***** about a 30 million gank killing their 300m ship? heh, didn’t take long for the bitching to start when the gank was 15m and their ship was 150m.

Also, ice prices were "stable" at around 1k p/u, they peaked at 1.3kp/u and since then they went down simply because 40m isk/h on highsec was too good to be true, the initial speculation before the patch actually raised prices, mostly due to what we now know as a fact, ice yield is down.

And yes some more miners will undock and mine 2 to 6 hours a week. woop de doo... the high sec isotope supply doesn’t come from the miners that mine and sell in the system station once or twice a week, it comes from the no lifers like myself that mine 1 - 2 million units a day. (i am, ofc, not even mentioning those damn bots)

My yield didn’t go up, it went down. All the while my risk cost went through the roof.

Now, please. Tell me how does this lower isotope prices?

Quite frankly 2 things have me puzzled, first how come Vaerah Vahrokha seems to agree that ganking is over because barges are now immortal… I thought you were the smart one around here, unless you are buying lots of what others are trowing away. And the second thing is why corestwo isn’t being more smug about how horribly will this barge rebalance backfire, I mean if there’s someone looking at the stupid production cost/gankability of the “new” barges, it has to be the gooons.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#19 - 2012-08-09 02:10:58 UTC
GreenSeed wrote:

Now, please. Tell me how does this lower isotope prices?


Because being able to mine in a gank-proof ship with somewhat lower yield than the old mackinaw is better than getting zero yield because you're too afraid to mine at all.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Sunrise Omega
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2012-08-11 20:53:17 UTC
GreenSeed wrote:
Unless all the high sec mining is done on skiffs, macks are easily gankable. A full yield mack used to mine 76 blocks an hour, now it mines 70... that’s a reduction in extraction. The ehp of the old yield mack was 10k, now its 16k. Old macks on wholesale went for 150millon each, now 290m due to mat changes. And hulks? Who the hell would undock one of those now?


Ah yes, but now you can get nearly the same output out of a Retriever (which is only 4% less yield per hour then the Mack, if the Mack pilot has Exhumer IV). Slightly less EHP (about 10k EHP if tanked), you dock every 30 minutes instead of every 35 minutes, and your total ship cost is around 40-50M instead of 300-350M.

Unless the T2 Mack gets a bigger boost per level in the Exhumer skill then it currently has, I expect Retrievers to line the ice belts.
12Next page