These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Barge Fairy Tale

First post First post
Author
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2841 - 2012-08-07 20:11:59 UTC
People will still figure out a way to fit their Mackinaws without a single tank mod beyond "permatank the serpentis spy in the belt" and they'll still die to a few Catalysts. This will not change.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Pipa Porto
#2842 - 2012-08-07 20:15:01 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Yet we've seen a number of ganks in .5's with partially tanked, non expanded hulks as well. Not the majority I'm sure but they have and still are happening.


Yep. Being less profitable to gank than your neighbor is no guarantee of safety. It does make it less likely though ("Not the majority").

Being unprofitable to gank, is also not a guarantee of safety. It does make getting ganked really unlikely though,

Being aligned and awake at the keyboard is a guarantee of safety (except to Jorma's magical 2km/s cloaked bump ship). It does make mining slightly less convenient though (with some fitting choices and planning, you can mitigate this inconvenience).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#2843 - 2012-08-07 20:16:02 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
I quite agree with most of that. However CCP in it's infinite wisdom has made it much easier to tell at a glance who the stupid and greedy miners are compared to the intelligent and prudent ones.

Just look for the hulk pilots in busy high sec systems and I have little doubt you will continue to find plentiful poorly fit, profitable targets.


And tbh, I'm fine with the idea behind Barge re-balance (get moar viable ships). Atm, the problem with it is that the Mackinaw can get over the magical safety number and still do everything better than the Skiff, rendering the Skiff mostly (well, entirely) useless.


I could be mistaken, but I think you are assuming a sensible fit... which for your average AFK miner is not all that likely... to be honest.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Pipa Porto
#2844 - 2012-08-07 20:21:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Richard Desturned wrote:
People will still figure out a way to fit their Mackinaws without a single tank mod beyond "permatank the serpentis spy in the belt" and they'll still die to a few Catalysts. This will not change.


Ranger 1 wrote:
I could be mistaken, but I think you are assuming a sensible fit... which for your average AFK miner is not all that likely... to be honest



People fly Megas that get killed by Itty Vs. Does that mean CCP should balance the Mega around them?

I'm sure there were some Titan Pilots that didn't understand how to remote AOE DD. Did that mean that was balanced because the least skillful pilot couldn't do it?

Ship Balancing shouldn't be based on what the least skillful player can come up with.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2845 - 2012-08-07 20:33:13 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
People will still figure out a way to fit their Mackinaws without a single tank mod beyond "permatank the serpentis spy in the belt" and they'll still die to a few Catalysts. This will not change.


Ranger 1 wrote:
I could be mistaken, but I think you are assuming a sensible fit... which for your average AFK miner is not all that likely... to be honest



People fly Megas that get killed by Itty Vs. Does that mean CCP should balance the Mega around them?

I'm sure there were some Titan Pilots that didn't understand how to remote AOE DD. Did that mean that was balanced because the least skillful pilot couldn't do it?

Ship Balancing shouldn't be based on what the least skillful player can come up with.

If I recall the story behind that kill I'm not sure how it compares to a suicide gank as that was a consensual fight (the Mega engaged the Itty V for stealing loot). If it were a gank situation then the Itty V would have failed despite the fitting of the Mega.
Pipa Porto
#2846 - 2012-08-07 20:37:14 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
People will still figure out a way to fit their Mackinaws without a single tank mod beyond "permatank the serpentis spy in the belt" and they'll still die to a few Catalysts. This will not change.


Ranger 1 wrote:
I could be mistaken, but I think you are assuming a sensible fit... which for your average AFK miner is not all that likely... to be honest



People fly Megas that get killed by Itty Vs. Does that mean CCP should balance the Mega around them?

I'm sure there were some Titan Pilots that didn't understand how to remote AOE DD. Did that mean that was balanced because the least skillful pilot couldn't do it?

Ship Balancing shouldn't be based on what the least skillful player can come up with.

If I recall the story behind that kill I'm not sure how it compares to a suicide gank as that was a consensual fight (the Mega engaged the Itty V for stealing loot). If it were a gank situation then the Itty V would have failed despite the fitting of the Mega.


Missing the point entirely. Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.

That's why, despite it being likely that plenty of Mack pilots will be untanked, the fact that it can fit above the magic profit line is a problem for the Skiff's chances of being at all useful.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2847 - 2012-08-07 20:49:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Tyberius Franklin
Pipa Porto wrote:

Missing the point entirely. Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.

That's why, despite it being likely that plenty of Mack pilots will be untanked, the fact that it can fit above the magic profit line is a problem for the Skiff's chances of being at all useful.

If it were balanced at what the least skillful pilot could think up it would have 40-50k EHP base at low skills. It leaves room to fail, just like other ships.

Edit: If anything equating the 2 situations is like saying the Mega is OP because it could have been fit in such a way to kill the itty V even rail fit just like the Mack can be fit to make a gank unprofitable.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2848 - 2012-08-07 20:49:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Pipa Porto wrote:
Missing the point entirely. Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.


Ok, sorry... but now you are just beeing ignorant... it's one thing to pin all responsibility on the "bad miners" that "are not smart enough to tank their barges" and what not, but it's entirely ridiculous to expect that CCP balances NON combat ships (that, in essence, need no combat skills to be used efficiently) with pure combat vessels...

For once, have the decency and admit that what you (not you specifically, but gankers in gerneral) do is the lowest and cheapest form of PvP short of gate/station camping... admit it, you don't have to spend pages upon pages to justify yourself...

Seriously... Roll

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#2849 - 2012-08-07 20:51:39 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.


Omg you used mining and skillful pilot in the same sentence. Good show. Big smile

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#2850 - 2012-08-07 21:00:11 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.


Omg you used mining and skillful pilot in the same sentence. Good show. Big smile


The drake is balanced that way.

Perhaps minmitar to an extent, with how far their guns can shoot. Also minmitar drones, gets second best dmg, plus speed I think, and shafts another race to get that bonus.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#2851 - 2012-08-07 21:15:12 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Missing the point entirely. Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.


Ok, sorry... but now you are just beeing ignorant... it's one thing to pin all responsibility on the "bad miners" that "are not smart enough to tank their barges" and what not, but it's entirely ridiculous to expect that CCP balances NON combat ships (that, in essence, need no combat skills to be used efficiently) with pure combat vessels...

For once, have the decency and admit that what you (not you specifically, but gankers in gerneral) do is the lowest and cheapest form of PvP short of gate/station camping... admit it, you don't have to spend pages upon pages to justify yourself...

Seriously... Roll


You act like it takes a great deal of specilized training to fit a Hulk with a proper tank.
News Flash: it doesn't.

T2 shield and T1 shield rig fittings take a trivial amount of time to train for, relative to training into a Hulk.

Now, players can choose to neglect that sort of training in favor of Exhumers V - but if you can't be bothered to spend half a day to train up for a Medium Shield Extender, why throw a fuss when you lose your ship?

Why throw a fuss when you looked at those empty slots and decided to put Cap Rechargers there instead of a tank?

I'm sure its frustrating to lose a couple days worth of mining to replace your ship, but eventually you have to learn to stop pointing fingers at other players and accept it.

YOU are responsible for the loss of your Mining Ship. Nobody else.

After getting ganked, instead of raging, crying on the forums and quitting the game, ALL miners should
1. Stand up.
2. Walk to their bathroom, look in the mirror and point at themselves.
3. Say: "It is MY fault that my Hulk was destroyed. There is nobody else to blame but me."
4. And then learn something from the experience.....




Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2852 - 2012-08-07 21:20:38 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
YOU are responsible for the loss of your Mining Ship. Nobody else.


Ignorance truly is bliss, I guess... but ok, if that's what gankers like to believe, who am I to shake their opinion? Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Pipa Porto
#2853 - 2012-08-07 21:24:26 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Missing the point entirely. Why should ship balancing for Mining barges be based on what the least skillful pilot can dream up? No other ship is balanced that way.


Ok, sorry... but now you are just beeing ignorant... it's one thing to pin all responsibility on the "bad miners" that "are not smart enough to tank their barges" and what not, but it's entirely ridiculous to expect that CCP balances NON combat ships (that, in essence, need no combat skills to be used efficiently) with pure combat vessels...

For once, have the decency and admit that what you (not you specifically, but gankers in gerneral) do is the lowest and cheapest form of PvP short of gate/station camping... admit it, you don't have to spend pages upon pages to justify yourself...

Seriously... Roll


I never said that CCP should make Mining Barges comparable to Combat Vessels.

Efficient Mining requires that you survive long enough that losing your ship will not significantly affect your bottom line. Every other ship in the game requires support skills to do their job effectively, why should mining ships be any different?

Gankers do what they enjoy. Why do miners want to stop other people from playing the game the way they enjoy playing? If you enjoy having e-honor and losing to people who don't, that's your preference, and that's fine.

And again, why should mining ships be balanced against what the least intelligent, least skillful* player can bring to the table?

*Not SP, Player Skill. Being aligned requires 0 SP. A Meta Web requires ~250SP. Complaining about training time taking away from getting Exhumers 5 is a red herring.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#2854 - 2012-08-07 21:25:43 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
YOU are responsible for the loss of your Mining Ship. Nobody else.


Ignorance truly is bliss, I guess... but ok, if that's what gankers like to believe, who am I to shake their opinion? Blink

Because we forced you to fit no tank.
Pipa Porto
#2855 - 2012-08-07 21:26:39 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Herr Wilkus wrote:
YOU are responsible for the loss of your Mining Ship. Nobody else.


Ignorance truly is bliss, I guess... but ok, if that's what gankers like to believe, who am I to shake their opinion? Blink


In a game where violence is explicitly allowed anywhere, who else can you blame for putting yourself in a position where you're giving money to people who violence your boat?

If you didn't know that violence is explicitly allowed anywhere, who else can you blame for not learning the first thing about a game before diving into it for months?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pankas Carter
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2856 - 2012-08-07 21:27:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Pankas Carter
Guns don't kill people, people letting other people shoot them kill people?

That's some twisted logic you got there.

The ONLY person responsible for a ship being destroyed are the people shooting at it.

Suicide gankers: parasites. Someone get the fungicide creme...

Adama: Starbuck, what do you hear? Starbuck: Nothing but the rain. Adama: Then grab your gun and bring in the cat.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2857 - 2012-08-07 21:28:34 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
For once, have the decency and admit that what you (not you specifically, but gankers in gerneral) do is the lowest and cheapest form of PvP short of gate/station camping... admit it, you don't have to spend pages upon pages to justify yourself...


i'm sorry if suicide ganking doesn't meet your arbitrary standards of e-honour

we'll stop because you don't like it, noted authority on what constitutes PvP

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2858 - 2012-08-07 21:29:22 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
YOU are responsible for the loss of your Mining Ship. Nobody else.

In actuality, if no one chose to gank anyone then it wouldn't matter what kind of tank you fit. You can be responsible for the fact that your ship was a tempting target, but you can't be ultimately responsible for it's explosion unless you self destructed or blew it up on an alt.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2859 - 2012-08-07 21:30:00 UTC
Pankas Carter wrote:
Guns don't kill people, people letting other people shoot them kill people?

That's some twisted logic you got there.

The ONLY person responsible for a ship being destroyed are the people shooting at it.


hi, this is a game

please leave your silly RL analogies at the door

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Nerf Burger
Doomheim
#2860 - 2012-08-07 21:30:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Nerf Burger
Richard Desturned wrote:
nobody suicide ganks hulks for a profit, it's for sport

but "suicide ganking shouldn't be profitable" is a bit of a newsflash


I thought it was fairly obvious. I guess great minds think alike.

Wow, if I was a CCP dev I would def start to loathe my player base with all the arrogant, snarky ass-hats who seem to think so highly of themselves, trying to tell the devs what is what.