These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Barge Fairy Tale

First post First post
Author
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2781 - 2012-08-07 11:20:20 UTC
Gawd, you ARE persistent, are you!?^^

Ok: In the real world, there are those that do stuff and those that help them do stuff... arguably, the latter ones, though they are in the majority, carry less responsibility for their actions. This is all well and good, until the "helpers" start to abuse the power given to them by the "doers"... usually that ends in relvolution OR, if that's not possible, outside intervention.

Notice any similarity to the current state of EVE?

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Pipa Porto
#2782 - 2012-08-07 11:22:36 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Gawd, you ARE persistent, are you!?^^

Ok: In the real world, there are those that do stuff and those that help them do stuff... arguably, the latter ones, though they are in the majority, carry less responsibility for their actions. This is all well and good, until the "helpers" start to abuse the power given to them by the "doers"... usually that ends in relvolution OR, if that's not possible, outside intervention.

Notice any similarity to the current state of EVE?


I'm not noticing any concrete nouns, let alone something that I can connect to EVE.

Seriously, I have no earthly idea what you're on about.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2783 - 2012-08-07 11:23:49 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nope. That's like saying everyone who plays Chess is Regicidal.


*smirks* You know, most semi-professional chess players I know (a good friend of mine was in a club) are analy retentive guys... and VERY bad loosers.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#2784 - 2012-08-07 11:26:08 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Notice any similarity to the current state of EVE?
Not really, since the whole “game” part kind of overshadows any similarities.

But besides that, you're still not really showing the relevance of your statement.
How is life in any way relevant to the simple fact that EVE is PvP-centric, and to the fact that this is not an excuse but rather how the game is designed.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2785 - 2012-08-07 11:26:58 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Seriously, I have no earthly idea what you're on about.


As I said... I don't wanna go into a sociological discussion... my english would probably fail me half way in. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#2786 - 2012-08-07 11:29:01 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
As I said... I don't wanna go into a sociological discussion.
You probably should, since you're just spouting nonsensical clichés without any factual basis at the moment.
Frying Doom
#2787 - 2012-08-07 11:29:42 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
You're misguided if you think hisec was ever intended to be "opt-in" only for PvP.

Personally I believe ganking in high sec for profit should be a hard find. Its essentially looking for an idiot in a super shiny ship
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14210105
For example or now that the exhumer change is about to occur people who fly hulks in hi sec. Lets face it if they are still flying a hulk, they are still looking for Maximum yield so therefore will probably have little or no tank, so will still be easy kills.

But I personally do not want to see high sec ganking removed completely from hi-sec, because lets face it, some people just really need to die. It has always been a good way to get in kills on people who war dec you or that you have war deced.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2788 - 2012-08-07 11:33:44 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Personally I believe ganking in high sec for profit should be a hard find. Its essentially looking for an idiot in a super shiny ship
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14210105
For example or now that the exhumer change is about to occur people who fly hulks in hi sec. Lets face it if they are still flying a hulk, they are still looking for Maximum yield so therefore will probably have little or no tank, so will still be easy kills.

But I personally do not want to see high sec ganking removed completely from hi-sec, because lets face it, some people just really need to die. It has always been a good way to get in kills on people who war dec you or that you have war deced.


I don't think that a Hulk should be a "profitable" gank target unless it's fit in an expensive way (i.e. with expensive named MLUs) so let's just get that out of the way. I also don't believe that a ship should be given a free "idiot tank" because the pilots are generally so complacent that they AFK mine in max yield fits that can only permatank hisec belt rats.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Pipa Porto
#2789 - 2012-08-07 11:36:00 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
You're misguided if you think hisec was ever intended to be "opt-in" only for PvP.

Personally I believe ganking in high sec for profit should be a hard find. Its essentially looking for an idiot in a super shiny ship
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=14210105
For example or now that the exhumer change is about to occur people who fly hulks in hi sec. Lets face it if they are still flying a hulk, they are still looking for Maximum yield so therefore will probably have little or no tank, so will still be easy kills.

But I personally do not want to see high sec ganking removed completely from hi-sec, because lets face it, some people just really need to die. It has always been a good way to get in kills on people who war dec you or that you have war deced.


You can fit 2 MLUs and enough tank to be an unprofitable gank in the higher sec bands.

You can fit a Hulk with enough tank to be an unprofitable gank in all sec bands.

It is entirely the Miners choice whether he's going to be a profitable gank. Just like any other ship. Where's the problem?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pipa Porto
#2790 - 2012-08-07 11:38:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Shalua Rui wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Nope. That's like saying everyone who plays Chess is Regicidal.


*smirks* You know, most semi-professional chess players I know (a good friend of mine was in a club) are analy retentive guys... and VERY bad loosers.


But are they Regicidal? (Regicide is the act of killing a Monarch).

You compared an in game action to smashing someone's RL toy (when I'd say it's most equivalent to capturing a piece in Chess). You have not provided any evidence to show that your comparison is valid.


EDIT: Since I'm calling on you to show validity:
Capturing a Chess Piece: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player
Suicide Ganking a Hulk: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Frying Doom
#2791 - 2012-08-07 11:40:46 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:

I don't think that a Hulk should be a "profitable" gank target unless it's fit in an expensive way (i.e. with expensive named MLUs) so let's just get that out of the way. I also don't believe that a ship should be given a free "idiot tank" because the pilots are generally so complacent that they AFK mine in max yield fits that can only permatank hisec belt rats.

When I say profitable I should balance that by saying exactly that a couple of million for a ganker nothing major but still a profit. This due to the cost of T2 strip miners, crystals and MLU's vs the fact there will still be lots that will ahve little tank other than the ships built in ehp.

Personally I like the fact that miner have to choose between tank, storage and yield. It gives the skiff a real role now and while I think the mack is a bit much on what it got, the hulk is about right.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Pipa Porto
#2792 - 2012-08-07 11:42:44 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:

I don't think that a Hulk should be a "profitable" gank target unless it's fit in an expensive way (i.e. with expensive named MLUs) so let's just get that out of the way. I also don't believe that a ship should be given a free "idiot tank" because the pilots are generally so complacent that they AFK mine in max yield fits that can only permatank hisec belt rats.

When I say profitable I should balance that by saying exactly that a couple of million for a ganker nothing major but still a profit. This due to the cost of T2 strip miners, crystals and MLU's vs the fact there will still be lots that will ahve little tank other than the ships built in ehp.

Personally I like the fact that miner have to choose between tank, storage and yield. It gives the skiff a real role now and while I think the mack is a bit much on what it got, the hulk is about right.


They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Frying Doom
#2793 - 2012-08-07 11:45:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
Pipa Porto wrote:

They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.

Yes but at least with the mackinaw they are at least having to sacrifice some yield compared to the hulk and the base hulk only has 8713 ehp.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#2794 - 2012-08-07 11:49:45 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.
…not to mention that they're also reducing the value of ganks by reducing the value of what can drop — a Mack full of Veldspar is carrying 7M ISK worth of loot that the ganker(s) simply can never get.
Frying Doom
#2795 - 2012-08-07 11:55:51 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.
…not to mention that they're also reducing the value of ganks by reducing the value of what can drop — a Mack full of Veldspar is carrying 7M ISK worth of loot that the ganker(s) simply can never get.

Does loot from ore holds not drop? Sorry I have never heard that before.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#2796 - 2012-08-07 11:58:00 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
But are they Regicidal? (Regicide is the act of killing a Monarch).


I know the meaning, of course they aren't... the reason to play chess isn't to kill a king, but to win a tactical competition.

Pipa Porto wrote:
You compared an in game action to smashing someone's RL toy (when I'd say it's most equivalent to capturing a piece in Chess). You have not provided any evidence to show that your comparison is valid.


Ok then:

Capturing a Chess Piece: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player... in a predifined invironment, where both parties are aware of all the rules AND, more importantly, have the same mindset towards the game.

Suicide Ganking a Hulk: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player... without all the above... atleast as far as the ganker knows or cares.

The chess comparison is abit lacking, though, 'cause nobody playes chess because the peices are so pretty or whatever... your play to win a tactical competition... atleast I think so.^^ In EVE, there are many reasons why people play, and not all of them are combat... but suicide gankers don't care for that... they have the power (cause the Goons schowed them, mind you) so they use it...

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Pipa Porto
#2797 - 2012-08-07 11:58:18 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:

They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.

Yes but at least with the mackinaw they are at least having to sacrifice some yield compared to the hulk and the base hulk only has 8713 ehp.


The Mack has a functionally identical yield to the Cargo Hulk (especially when you take warping out for dropoffs into account). With enough Tank to be unprofitable to gank.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Frying Doom
#2798 - 2012-08-07 12:05:41 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:

They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.

Yes but at least with the mackinaw they are at least having to sacrifice some yield compared to the hulk and the base hulk only has 8713 ehp.


The Mack has a functionally identical yield to the Cargo Hulk (especially when you take warping out for dropoffs into account). With enough Tank to be unprofitable to gank.

Why would any one mine solo in a hulk now it only holds one cycle worth of ore so if you included warping out to drop off loot the mack would mine double the hulk and probably more.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Pipa Porto
#2799 - 2012-08-07 12:06:05 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
But are they Regicidal? (Regicide is the act of killing a Monarch).


I know the meaning, of course they aren't... the reason to play chess isn't to kill a king, but to win a tactical competition.

Pipa Porto wrote:
You compared an in game action to smashing someone's RL toy (when I'd say it's most equivalent to capturing a piece in Chess). You have not provided any evidence to show that your comparison is valid.


Ok then:

Capturing a Chess Piece: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player... in a predifined invironment, where both parties are aware of all the rules AND, more importantly, have the same mindset towards the game.

Suicide Ganking a Hulk: In Game Action -> Causes In Game Harm to other Player... without all the above... atleast as far as the ganker knows or cares.

The chess comparison is abit lacking, though, 'cause nobody playes chess because the peices are so pretty or whatever... your play to win a tactical competition... atleast I think so.^^ In EVE, there are many reasons why people play, and not all of them are combat... but suicide gankers don't care for that... they have the power (cause the Goons schowed them, mind you) so they use it...


So now ganking is bad because people don't have the mindset to play the game?

EVE is a predefined environment. Both parties have every opportunity to be aware of the rules (you don't get to cry "No Fair" when you lose because you didn't know how Checkmate worked when the guidebook is on the table next to you).
No two Chess players have the same mindset either; some are more aggressive, some less, etc. more importantly, Mindset is not a game mechanic.

You can play EVE for whatever reason you want. But as the Rules clearly allow it (and you have every opportunity to learn the rules), you have to account for the possibility of combat and prepare for that possibility (not necessarily by preparing to fight).

If you would like to play a Consensual PvP Only version of EVE (because the ships are pretty, or whatever), CCP has generously devoted a server to your use: SISI.

If you wish to participate in the market where your actions affect everyone else, it's only fair that other people's actions can affect you.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Pipa Porto
#2800 - 2012-08-07 12:07:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Frying Doom wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:

They already had that choice. It was all in the Hulk's fittings. Now CCP's giving them the fittings for free, along with a Cargo Hulk equivalent that can tank enough to be unprofitable to gank.

Yes but at least with the mackinaw they are at least having to sacrifice some yield compared to the hulk and the base hulk only has 8713 ehp.


The Mack has a functionally identical yield to the Cargo Hulk (especially when you take warping out for dropoffs into account). With enough Tank to be unprofitable to gank.

Why would any one mine solo in a hulk now it only holds one cycle worth of ore so if you included warping out to drop off loot the mack would mine double the hulk and probably more.


The TQ Cargo Hulk (as in, no Ore Hold change) has roughly the same Yield as the SISI Mackinaw. Yet the SISI Mackinaw has to unload half as often and has a much sturdier tank.

So, no, the people who used the Cargo Hulk are getting a straight buff.

And the people who used the Tank Hulk (the people who actually put some thought into how to survive in a Hostile environment), are getting nerfed, because the Skiff mines less than a Tank Hulk.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto