These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Statement regarding CCP refocusing

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Screenlag
Armaggedon Inc.
RAZOR Alliance
#661 - 2011-09-28 13:48:16 UTC
+1
Vhaine Vhindiscar
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#662 - 2011-09-28 13:50:07 UTC
+1
Ryikan
Purple Panty Posse
#663 - 2011-09-28 14:06:41 UTC
++++++1

Couldn't have summed it up better myself.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#664 - 2011-09-28 14:27:28 UTC
+1

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Philalexandros
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#665 - 2011-09-28 14:33:07 UTC
+1
Joffre Tremblant
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#666 - 2011-09-28 15:48:26 UTC
There aren't enough +1's in EVE for this post.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#667 - 2011-09-28 15:53:02 UTC
+1
Interesting, empty world are empty. But there is always hope. Big smile

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude
Hudson Mohawk
Kanienkehaka Tribe
#668 - 2011-09-28 16:57:32 UTC
+1
Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#669 - 2011-09-28 17:30:45 UTC
+1

Though I am compelled to point out there should be a -1 option for people. Having only one option says nothing for the discussion.
Fipio
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#670 - 2011-09-28 18:45:01 UTC
+1
Lolmer
Merciless Reckoning
#671 - 2011-09-28 19:44:15 UTC
+1
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#672 - 2011-09-28 19:48:01 UTC
Can I temporarily log on all of my dormant accounts and give a + 1 with each?
Will each +1 still be worth as much in the eyes of CCP in terms of recognizing votes?


oh Snap! No he didn't!
Oh, yes... I most certainly did.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Lorren Canada
High is the Way - But all eyes are Upon the Ground
#673 - 2011-09-28 20:01:16 UTC
+10
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#674 - 2011-09-28 20:07:35 UTC
Lorren Canada wrote:
+10


See freakin 10 accounts right there...

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Kenji L'arc
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#675 - 2011-09-28 20:23:28 UTC
+1
Jake Rivers
New Planetary Order
#676 - 2011-09-28 21:22:34 UTC
Ancient Enemy
The Institution.
#677 - 2011-09-28 21:29:42 UTC
+1
Taram Caldar
Royal Black Watch Highlanders
#678 - 2011-09-28 21:44:10 UTC
Agree with this to a point. I think devs need to listen to the players and using crowdsourcing as a means of input is a great idea but CCP should always look towards game balance whenever looking at suggestions or requests from the players.

For example:
Folks are up in arms about Super Carriers being the way they are but if you were around back then you should recall that CCP was going to tone them down before they went live then a huge outcry happened on the forums and they wound up putting them in 'as is' and we are now where we are now with super carriers.

But I do agree, CCP needs to stop focusing their attentions on things that are meaningless to players and have little to no impact on the quality of the game.

+1

I would add:
CCP also needs to improve their QA process to prevent such incredibly glitchy major update deployments. Implementing a patch/update to the game shouldn't break game mechanics that already worked, especially when it's flaws that are easily identified with simple boundary testing.

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country.  He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
Haldr Geitz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#679 - 2011-09-28 23:49:30 UTC
+1
Tristan North
The Scope
#680 - 2011-09-28 23:54:40 UTC
+1