These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Games for next weekend.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
5n4keyes
Sacred Templars
Fraternity.
#41 - 2012-07-03 01:10:16 UTC  |  Edited by: 5n4keyes
Ranking should be Points you scored, and then the points scored against you.

So if you scored 50 points, but lost 10, your above someone who scored 50 points and lost 11.

The second fights should just simply be, Loser of game 1 day 1 vs loser of game 1 day 1, winner of game 1 day 1 vs winner of game 1 day 2, etc
No rankings needed, its random draw, and solves rankings for the end of the qualifying rounds.

I doubt there would be many draws after that, if there was, then you could easily do a mid week playoff, or speed in which they won, or highest isk destroyed.
Ophey Won
Inviolable
Omnivores
#42 - 2012-07-03 01:19:24 UTC
5n4keyes wrote:
Ranking should be Points you scored, and then the points scored against you.

So if you scored 50 points, but lost 10, your above someone who scored 50 points and lost 11.

The second fights should just simply be, Loser of game 1 day 1 vs loser of game 1 day 1, winner of game 1 day 1 vs winner of game 1 day 2, etc
No rankings needed, its random draw, and solves rankings for the end of the qualifying rounds.

I doubt there would be many draws after that, if there was, then you could easily do a mid week playoff, or speed in which they won, or highest isk destroyed.



its about the strength of the opponent. An opponent that scored 11 points is rated higher then one that scored 10. So if two teams tied with 50 points then the tie barker would be how strong your opponent was.
5n4keyes
Sacred Templars
Fraternity.
#43 - 2012-07-03 01:47:37 UTC  |  Edited by: 5n4keyes
Realisticly if you want Qualifying rounds you want to have 3 fights, as the point divide would be quite large, having 2 fights really doesnt divide the points, causing what we have at the moment, with many with the same score =P
Ophey Won
Inviolable
Omnivores
#44 - 2012-07-03 01:54:59 UTC
5n4keyes wrote:
Realisticly if you want Qualifying rounds you want to have 3 fights, as the point divide would be quite large, having 2 fights really doesnt divide the points, causing what we have at the moment, with many with the same score =P


How many matches do you want... is this the NHL where we play until June. Wait and see how teams separate after 2 matches.
5n4keyes
Sacred Templars
Fraternity.
#45 - 2012-07-03 01:57:25 UTC
@Ophey, its not currently what we have got, currently its just the points you got, not the points you lost, example Huns are currently on top, but they lost ships, there was a couple of matches that had 0 losses, so these should in theory be ranked higher.
Ophey Won
Inviolable
Omnivores
#46 - 2012-07-03 02:03:04 UTC
Well I can't keep explaining it to you. You don't get how the system works.
Kumq uat
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2012-07-03 04:55:34 UTC
I know it is tough for you to do snake but stop crying.
Firebolt145
The Hatchery
RAZOR Alliance
#48 - 2012-07-03 08:40:40 UTC
Really, I'm just sad that either Verge of Collapse or Darkside might not make it through, and this is just the prelims.

That's like having Spain and Italy play in a bo1 knockout even before the group stages of the Euros.

:(
Previous page123