These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Seeding super capitals on Singularity? - Yes!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sam Rockbender
LifeHatesUsAll
#41 - 2012-06-30 01:32:32 UTC
hi ccp am for sended super on market some ppl dont have super on tq can test it and if something go wrong whit them thay will send bug report also the only group of ppl on forum againt sended super are on the same corp on sisi and thay have super thay dont want to do fair fight thay do 10 titan vs 1 titan and thay dont want to change that am agree at 100% for sended super on market
Socomar
Quantum Corp
#42 - 2012-06-30 02:59:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Socomar
all i want is to get to try them a while to see what there like.
i dont care about going on a war path.
just to get to play with them a while. :)
Punctuate
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2012-06-30 04:10:07 UTC
0/ ccp am agree at 100% whit super capital on market
Patti Mohar
Quebec's Underdog League
Quebec United Legions
#44 - 2012-06-30 04:12:24 UTC
super on market it a great thing send them
Homer Aishai
Perkone
Caldari State
#45 - 2012-06-30 04:19:51 UTC
hi i think seeded super it a good way to test it when we dont have chance to get 1 on tq so seeded super is good
Legendary Spartan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#46 - 2012-06-30 04:23:29 UTC
am agree whit seeded super :)
Thomas Hornigolds
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#47 - 2012-06-30 04:26:55 UTC
hi ccp am so agree whit super cap on market :)
Daneel Trevize
Give my 11percent back
#48 - 2012-06-30 09:46:15 UTC
WTF is this, log in your Quebec United Legions alts to distort the average opinion? It's a test server, blobbing someone to **** need only be 'tested' as a tactic so many times while others are genuinely trying different fits & tactics. If only there were a simple way to coerce people to not be terrible. What's permitted on TQ doesn't have to be on Sisi.
Failing that or some scheduled supers seeding & removal mechanism to make them only a thing once a week/day, CCP you're clearly going to have to keep them away from the general testing systems as some people are far too keen to slap e-peens and waste other people's time.
Kein Echerie
Doomheim
#49 - 2012-06-30 10:39:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Kein Echerie
Daneel Trevize wrote:
WTF is this, log in your Quebec United Legions alts to distort the average opinion? It's a test server, blobbing someone to **** need only be 'tested' as a tactic so many times while others are genuinely trying different fits & tactics. If only there were a simple way to coerce people to not be terrible. What's permitted on TQ doesn't have to be on Sisi.
Failing that or some scheduled supers seeding & removal mechanism to make them only a thing once a week/day, CCP you're clearly going to have to keep them away from the general testing systems as some people are far too keen to slap e-peens and waste other people's time.


I agree with Daneel the supers should be seeded in a another system other then C-6 or Qvo8<------ whatever that system name is. or it might start many problems with other caps and sub-caps. well the Caps I'M not sure about them if they should be seeded with the super-caps.

and CCP make a new system like what you did with the other New test system.
Era'kanath
Zebra Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#50 - 2012-06-30 11:06:31 UTC
Im all for it! =o

I find it ironic that only DoomsDay Legion members that are complaining thus far, when they Have the most supercaps on the fields in SISI. Lol

Other then that, It would be nice for more things to test and play around with, more variation more counters~ Blink

Keep PVH cyno jammed though, for those who dont want to test with the supercaps being seeded in 6-c. Smile

"The more we sweat in peacetime, the less we bleed in war."

Tankn00blicus
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2012-06-30 14:22:10 UTC
Sam Rockbender wrote:
hi ccp am for sended super on market some ppl dont have super on tq can test it and if something go wrong whit them thay will send bug report also the only group of ppl on forum againt sended super are on the same corp on sisi and thay have super thay dont want to do fair fight thay do 10 titan vs 1 titan and thay dont want to change that am agree at 100% for sended super on market
Punctuate wrote:
0/ ccp am agree at 100% whit super capital on market
Patti Mohar wrote:
super on market it a great thing send them
Legendary Spartan wrote:
am agree whit seeded super :)
Thomas Hornigolds wrote:
hi ccp am so agree whit super cap on market :)
Obvious alts are obvious
Nakranoth Milesios
The Energy Group
Conduit of Knowledge
#52 - 2012-06-30 15:21:27 UTC
Im game. lets get it!!
Aegis Verseles
The Energy Group
Conduit of Knowledge
#53 - 2012-06-30 15:35:20 UTC
its been.. almost a year and a half since they were last seeded. bring them !!! :)
Thomas Hornigolds
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#54 - 2012-06-30 17:54:18 UTC
Sam Rockbender wrote:
hi ccp am for sended super on market some ppl dont have super on tq can test it and if something go wrong whit them thay will send bug report also the only group of ppl on forum againt sended super are on the same corp on sisi and thay have super thay dont want to do fair fight thay do 10 titan vs 1 titan and thay dont want to change that am agree at 100% for sended super on market
Punctuate wrote:
0/ ccp am agree at 100% whit super capital on market
Patti Mohar wrote:
super on market it a great thing send them
Legendary Spartan wrote:
am agree whit seeded super :)
[quote=Thomas Hornigolds]hi ccp am so agree whit super cap on market :)


yeah those are alt i pay for them i can post agree whit them also you can see am agree whit super on market :)
Vorll Minaaran
Centre Of Attention
#55 - 2012-06-30 21:48:07 UTC
Hi!

What about a mechanic to seed them through the redeeming system for chars who has the skills to fly them? Maybe in small batches like 3 unit for one Sisi mirror?
It could be prevent the full supercapital apocalypse, but provide enough ship for testing.

Any thoughts?
jdizzel95
Di-Tron Heavy Industries
OnlyFleets.
#56 - 2012-06-30 22:17:14 UTC
How do you do. i do agree with the said statement. *ccp note* I wish that supers would be seeded but in there own system. to do this would be very simple pick said system like eza or something and just drop an incursion over the constellation cyno jamming everything. (take off the negitve effects of the incursion) this will allow players to test there supers without harming the people in 6-c also. for the moveme situation just restrict the move me bot to ship size. if someone in a super is asked to be moved they should be docked in the supercapital system someone not in a super would be moved to 6-c. by doing this it will result in less station fighting for people in capitals in 6-c (no OOPS killed you with my DD). That is my opinion. Cool


Yours truley,
JD Oops


PS. LOL thom nice spam on the fourms :))
PSS. Ignore all spelling and grammer and what ever else i screwed up on thank you P
Matthew97
#57 - 2012-06-30 23:04:01 UTC
My 2 Cents:

With the introduction of the new sub-cap only system I don't see why not as the major argument against them was that they ruin testing but this new area kind of nulls that points.

I agree that it should be seeded in a different system however to prevent the rage - if a super is required in a fleet for other ships a BH / CCP etc can always manually move them.


To all the people that are saying it's not gonna work --- How do you know? A lot of you are basing it off the fact that it'll be like the armageddon day where everyone just came to fly titans and noone followed the rules. If this doesn't work out and there's a lot of rule breaking then it'll be removed as stated in the OP.

-Matt
Tankn00blicus
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2012-07-01 00:49:55 UTC
Thomas Hornigolds wrote:
yeah those are alt i pay for them i can post agree whit them also you can see am agree whit super on market :)
Engrish is not an actual language and therefore your opinion is null and void.
J3ssica Biel
Caldari State
#59 - 2012-07-01 01:13:36 UTC
Tankn00blicus wrote:
Thomas Hornigolds wrote:
yeah those are alt i pay for them i can post agree whit them also you can see am agree whit super on market :)
Engrish is not an actual language and therefore your opinion is null and void.

And your stupidly ignorant to the fact english isn't his first language, ******* idiot
Sokodo Sanizuku
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#60 - 2012-07-01 02:18:48 UTC
Against. Even though there have been changes since, when we look at the past, every single time supers have been seeded (either by accident or by design) there have been problems. Too much hassle for too little gain.

Destination SkillQueue wrote:
What is the problem you're trying to solve by introducing them to the market? You say the upsides outweigh the downsides, so I'd be interested in knowing what the upsides you envision are, because they aren't obvious from my point of view? You'll certainly get more "testing" done on them, but was there an issue with the lack of testing on supercaps? People lost their supercaps at such frequency, that they ran out constantly and therefore huge bugs got on TQ?

Let me be clear. I'm not against this change, but I'm not seeing any real upsides outside the obvious increased testing and use, while the various downsides are somewhat obvious. As time goes by and characters are skilled to access these new features through training and free skillpoint distribution, majority of testing increasingly focusing on ships and modules, that form the clear minority of use cases on TQ. Attracting more people who just want to play around instead of doing proper testing and bug reporting, which will ruffle some feathers and will require increased babysitting from CCP staff to manage. Increasing low quality/trash feedback on such ships, since the people who will be flying them on SiSi have little to no actual experience in their use on TQ. Nothing earth shakingly bad, but what is the good that comes from this?

Again it might be more easier to give constructive critique or complements about the proposal, if we knew your reasons behind the change. It's a bit hard to do, when you're not laying out your argument in the open about why you are thinking about implementing the change in the first place.


This right here is a good post.

Finally, why does nearly every suggestion by players include QA having to code something unique just for Singularity?