Assembly Hall

I think everyone but total crybaby carebears can agree that eve is supposed to be a dangerous place. Part of that is because destruction is a key part of the economy. You would all agree with this right?

Another part of the game is that risk, a part of which is initial investment, should equal reward. That's a fair assessment isn't it?

Unfortunately, one of the most expensive and most useful ships in the game, the T3 strategic cruiser, isn't getting destroyed enough. In high sec, they can do their job too fast, too well, and with no risk. They are hard to pin down and hard to gank. Maybe someone has hard numbers but if you wanted to suicide gank a tengu in high, how hard is it? It isn't as easy as it needs to be, I can tell you that much. So they can run missions and sites in relative safety acting as a part of the ISK faucet that is bad enough as it is. The risks don't equal the rewards and both are lower than they should be.

It's time something is done about this ISK faucet.

It's good for the game's economy if T3s were moved to low and null. It's good for the new players, they can have early successes that make them want to move on to low and null. It's good for the WH players as there will be more demand for WH goods. It's good for the T3 players: they can do better than high; even if they lose the occasional ship, they'd still be making more in the long run and providing more high end stuff for the rest of us to buy. It's also be good for low and null as it'd bring more players into those areas... that means more potential players in the CSM's corps or making things interesting for the current null residents. Maybe the T3 players will eventually band together and try to set up their own small block; camaraderie and shared experiences are good for a corp and the game.


As I see it, restricting T3s to low and null is the best thing for everyone and it should be done. It's the obvious and common sense thing to do. I really hope the CSM will bring this to CCP's attention.

Why? Arbitrary rules are arbitrary and bad. If you're suggesting removing T3s from highsec, why not Marauders too? How about HACs? What about BSes? The problem with arbitrary rules is that they don't end anywhere, they're arbitrary.

I don't think there should be any restrictions on what ships can be used in high sec.

I don't see why I can't use my carrier there. Maybe put a restriction on capital only weapons being used but its not in the spirit of the sandbox.

Yes, let's all cry together to make this sandbox even smaller with even more barriers. Why not remove - HACs maybe? Battleships ? how about Maurauders ?

You have made a very poorly thought-out illogical post about something which is intefereing with your mode of gameplay. Wait, did you try and gank a T3 cruiser and failed ?

Your post makes you come across as a huge crybaby. Who's the carebear now ?

OK

Only if they're buffed to roughly double their current power.

If you really want them to be blown up more, then they have to be worth the price of getting them blown up often. The only way they'd be worth the lost training time and the billion-odd ISK you'd be out each time you lost one, is if they got turned into OMGWTFBBQ solo-pwnmobiles.

For the record, I don't think that would be good for null, low, or wormholes either.

Also, you're complaining that you can't gank a 1+ billion ISK ship fast enough? Seriously? How much do 6 Tornadoes cost? (back of the napkin: 175mil x 6 = 1.05 billion ISK... so you'd have to risk a little less than the ISK cost of a Strategic Cruiser to gank one, and you'd get the pleasure of knowing you cost the pilot the time of retraining skills... seems like the risk/reward for ganking is balanced for once.)

*sniffs*

I smell the fear of a care bear who can't handle real exploration. There are some people who say hi sec should be frigates only, some people around here help them prove their point.





You're right. High sec would be a lot better if we could bring in a few carriers and a dreadnought or two. Maybe a titan with a XXXL smartbomb that could take out every battleship within 100km while we are at it.





I'd like to agree with you, but if you could get 100mil for downing 10 hulks needing 5 other people plus someone to scan him down, only being able to break even doesn't sound right.





The least you guys could do is triple the price of the export mats and then put a bounty of 1 billion on the things. You have to at least credit the goons for being able to get their act together and make a profit. WHers fail in comparison. And here I am trying to help you guys out and all I get is criticism.

That's the whole point. OP got pwned by wardeccers in t3s, and thus wants them banned in his place of residence.

****tarded idea is ****tarded.

Just remove NPC corps and make individuals wardeccable, then you can compete with these T3 pilots over highsec resources.