These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The future of Community and CCL

First post First post
Author
Pipa Porto
#641 - 2012-10-06 10:45:50 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Is it just me, or are people trying to incite another forum protest today?


Who knows. But the quality of ISD posts and moderation has been dropping again.


Agreed & it's happening very rapidly.

CCP; You really need to get this under control on a permanent basis or you could possibly end up with another forum riot such as the one in June. I would also suggest seriously reconsidering the need for unpaid forum moderators, considering that a large portion of the EVE community (Which you claim to love so dearly) disagrees with this course of action.


Remember when you were a kid, and you'd be screwing around until your parents walked in, then on your best behavior until the instant your parents left the room?

The ISDs are kids, and CCP has left the room.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#642 - 2012-10-07 02:47:04 UTC
^ I also remember always getting away with it too. So I suppose it looks good for ISD.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Pipa Porto
#643 - 2012-10-07 04:38:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
CCP Phantom wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
Since when can you, as an ISD volunteer, create rules?
Our ISD CCL team interprets the forum rules to their best knowledge and intent. It is perfectly valid for the CCL team to act in accordance with their understanding of the forum rules and to contact the EVE Community team for confirmation that this interpretation is correct. This is not considered creating rules - especially not when it is mentioned that the EVE Community team has been contacted for confirmation or assistance.


ISD Suvetar wrote:
You and your fellow forum users are not allowed to post killmails, killboard links or screenshots of killboards in General Discussion.

It's a rule.
ISD Suvetar wrote:
We realise there is not a specific rule forbidding posting killmails, killboard links or screenshots of killboards in the Forum rules

But then it's not actually a rule.

In what way is this not creating rules?


Any news on the ISDs new self appointed ability to create rules?

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Corpse Bride
Perkone
Caldari State
#644 - 2012-10-07 19:17:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Corpse Bride
Forum rules don't exactly state that I can't post racoon porn either, but it's pretty darned likely that it'll get the heck moderated out of it, if I did.

What makes you so special ?

They've said they interpret killmail posts as trolling, then link some very good explanations as to why and a blue post even tells you that it's their job to interpret the rules. (They being the ISD CCL).

Cut them some slack and stop bad posting; it's a lot better here when people are talking about the game and not whining at the help.

Do you really not think that asking CCP to *LIST ALL THE RULES* and every possible connotation is ridiculous ?
Pro-tip: It is.

If you force them down this line, do you not think that might lead to the so-called censorship that people keep blattering about ?
Pro-tip: It will and people will blame the likes of you for it.

Before you ask, no I'm not mad. I've been around for a while, I lurk more then I post (obviously) and all I see is ISD people being helpful in game, in the forums and in EVE Radio.
Pipa Porto
#645 - 2012-10-08 02:18:32 UTC
Corpse Bride wrote:
Forum rules don't exactly state that I can't post racoon **** either, but it's pretty darned likely that it'll get the heck moderated out of it, if I did.


Sure they do.
[Rule 3]Posting images and ASCII art on the forums is prohibited with the following exceptions:

Quote:
They've said they interpret killmail posts as trolling, then link some very good explanations as to why and a blue post even tells you that it's their job to interpret the rules. (They being the ISD CCL).


No, CCP Spitfire's rule posts in One Subforum state that killmail posting in that forum is trolling. To say that rule applies to other subforums is patently rificulous.

Quote:
Cut them some slack and stop bad posting; it's a lot better here when people are talking about the game and not whining at the help.


Try reading the whole thread. We went from ISDs providing terrible moderation (something CCP all but admitted in the OP) and calls for their disbanding, to "Hey they're improving," and now we're back to them shitting the bed again.

Quote:
Do you really not think that asking CCP to *LIST ALL THE RULES* and every possible connotation is ridiculous ?
Pro-tip: It is.


I'm saying that the rules of one subforum do not apply to all the rest. The ISD (and, I guess, you) is(are) saying the opposite.

Quote:
If you force them down this line, do you not think that might lead to the so-called censorship that people keep blattering about ?
Pro-tip: It will and people will blame the likes of you for it.

Before you ask, no I'm not mad. I've been around for a while, I lurk more then I post (obviously) and all I see is ISD people being helpful in game, in the forums and in EVE Radio.


If CCP wants to make this forum inhospitable to discussion, that's their right. People will move to other forums the same way most other MMOs' official forums are largely abandoned.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Corpse Bride
Perkone
Caldari State
#646 - 2012-10-08 04:19:27 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:

Sure they do.
[Rule 3]Posting images and ASCII art on the forums is prohibited with the following exceptions:


You just totally undermined your own argument; right there.

Did I mention images or ascii art ? No; I did not.

But you assumed intent and hurt, you interpreted my post and quoted forum rules at me; to make what I said *wrong*.

So likewise to the ones who post killmails, maybe they didn't mean any harm but other people assume intent, interpret and quote forum rules to make them look bad.

Like you just did.

You just interpreted a generalised forum rule to prove me wrong, by making it an exact rule; because you assumed I meant something I didn't. You don't know me and you did that, to *prove* your point.

The ISD people apply generalised forum rules, to make this place nice and constructive, and to make things right.
Because they know that people rarely make intentionally hostile posts, but the best way to avoid that is to not have ambiguity.
Pipa Porto
#647 - 2012-10-08 06:47:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
Corpse Bride wrote:
You just totally undermined your own argument; right there.

Did I mention images or ascii art ? No; I did not.

But you assumed intent and hurt, you interpreted my post and quoted forum rules at me; to make what I said *wrong*.


So how else are you going to post "raccoon ****"? The word is censored, and evading that word filter is against the rules.

Posting the words "raccoon ****" without evading the word filter is perfectly legal unless the manner in which you post it violates a different rule.



Quote:
The ISD people apply generalised forum rules, to make this place nice and constructive, and to make things right.
Because they know that people rarely make intentionally hostile posts, but the best way to avoid that is to not have ambiguity.


Except that's not what they did. They applied a specific rule which properly applies to a specific subforum to the whole of the forums.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

CCP Gargant
C C P
C C P Alliance
#648 - 2012-10-08 10:33:17 UTC
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.

CCP Gargant | EVE Universe esports Coordinator

Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#649 - 2012-10-08 10:46:02 UTC
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.
So the takeout is it's still not good compared to the pre 20% forum, but hell - it's free.
Pipa Porto
#650 - 2012-10-08 11:07:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.


It's been a year since your started the CCL program. You're well past the time when "growing pains" of this magnitude are acceptable. Trying to bury this thread isn't going to help that.

You're also not answering the question at hand. Why are you allowing ISD Volunteers to create new rules (or, and this is no better, enforce the rules of one subforum on the rest of the forum).


By the way, rushing to claim victory and bury the evidence doesn't work well on the internet.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#651 - 2012-10-08 11:15:51 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.


It's been a year since your started the CCL program. You're well past the time when "growing pains" of this magnitude are acceptable. Trying to bury this thread isn't going to help that.

You're also not answering the question at hand. Why are you allowing ISD Volunteers to create new rules (or, and this is no better, enforce the rules of one subforum on the rest of the forum).


By the way, rushing to claim victory and bury the evidence doesn't work well on the internet.


If you actually had paid employees for this (like you actually did, but sacked them because of your space barbie obsession) that we wouldn't be having all this trouble with volunteers now.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#652 - 2012-10-08 11:23:29 UTC
I want to be a better poster Roll

Maybe I should Apply for ISD Twisted

Jim Says wat, I say Lock! Cool

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

CCP Gargant
C C P
C C P Alliance
#653 - 2012-10-08 11:40:42 UTC
Pipa Porto wrote:
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.


It's been a year since your started the CCL program. You're well past the time when "growing pains" of this magnitude are acceptable. Trying to bury this thread isn't going to help that.

You're also not answering the question at hand. Why are you allowing ISD Volunteers to create new rules (or, and this is no better, enforce the rules of one subforum on the rest of the forum).


By the way, rushing to claim victory and bury the evidence doesn't work well on the internet.


I mentioned nothing about victory and nowhere did I state that the future Navigator spoke about is here. That should do enough to indicate that our work isn't finished, shouldn't it? I'm not burying anything, I have the lock function for that.

We are aware of the issue that arose last week and we are simply still discussing it. I know that is a vague answer but it is the only one you will get for now.

CCP Gargant | EVE Universe esports Coordinator

Josef Djugashvilis
#654 - 2012-10-08 11:49:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
If ISD 40, or whatever his name is, came across as a bit less arrogant it might help.

On a personal level, I have little or no interest in which threads are modified, moved or locked. It is the attitude if the ISDs I find off-putting.

It just seems that the ISD folk are a little drunk on their power right now.

The idea is fine, just the implementation seems a bit off at the moment.

Quote from ISD 40 person "I think this thread has almost gone as far as it can but I'm not quite willing to close it just yet, if you can all get back on topic. This thread is not another "Issues with mining barges" thread, we already had that."

The above quote from ISD 40 is, in my view, an example of his arrogance.

"I'm not quite willing to close it just yet..."

Dear me.

This is not a signature.

Pipa Porto
#655 - 2012-10-08 14:43:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Pipa Porto
CCP Gargant wrote:
Pipa Porto wrote:
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.


It's been a year since your started the CCL program. You're well past the time when "growing pains" of this magnitude are acceptable. Trying to bury this thread isn't going to help that.

You're also not answering the question at hand. Why are you allowing ISD Volunteers to create new rules (or, and this is no better, enforce the rules of one subforum on the rest of the forum).


By the way, rushing to claim victory and bury the evidence doesn't work well on the internet.


I mentioned nothing about victory and nowhere did I state that the future Navigator spoke about is here. That should do enough to indicate that our work isn't finished, shouldn't it? I'm not burying anything, I have the lock function for that.

We are aware of the issue that arose last week and we are simply still discussing it. I know that is a vague answer but it is the only one you will get for now.


CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose.


Anyway, what this thread has become is a place to help try to improve the ISDs who you've foisted on us after shitcanning firing your well respected and effective paid moderators. The fact that it seems to bounce from crisis to crisis simply reflects the fact that the ISDs seem to feel the need to provide us with a crisis every week (it's like the TV drama with the world's least interesting visuals). On the odd week that we're without a crisis, it usually stays quiet or ends up talking up the ways ISDs have done better.

The fact that they haven't significantly improved overall (besides banishing one outrageous example to the Russian forums) in 4 months that this thread has been running is just sad.

Unsticking a Sticky is an attempt to bury a topic when Locking it might seem impolitic.

One last edit:
By the way, as to this thread's purpose:
CCP Navigator wrote:
Finally, the Community team will be locking the myriad of threads on criticizing ISD. You can direct all comments to this thread only as this is the only one we will be following and answering.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#656 - 2012-10-08 22:33:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Mallak Azaria
This thread would make an awesome sticky thread, then everyone could read it & see how you have nothing to hide... Oh wait, nevermind.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#657 - 2012-10-08 22:42:31 UTC
I blame the parents... Big smile

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Pipa Porto
#658 - 2012-10-09 07:46:55 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
This thread would make an awesome sticky thread, then everyone could read it & see how you have nothing to hide... Oh wait, nevermind.


It's funny how the ISDs keep trying to make up new rules while having no idea how the current forum (or game) mechanics work.

WTB Stcky to prove that CCP isn't trying to bury the fact that their ISD experiment has failed. (Growing Pains this severe after a full year is a sign that you're going to have to suck it up and hire people).

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#659 - 2012-10-09 08:06:24 UTC
Nerf HML missiles.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Rats
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#660 - 2012-10-09 08:12:18 UTC
CCP Gargant wrote:
This thread has fulfilled its purpose. It is about time to unsticky it as it has derailed in such a fashion that hurts the initial message we wanted to bring across. Yes we are still going through the growing pains and yes there is still room to improve, but this has become something else entirely.

The CCL seminar that Navigator mentioned will be held this week with the exact time and date to be announced later.



Has it, I thought this thread was to be an ongoing discussion between the player base and the mods if things go sour and was put into place as there wasn't a forum for this type of discussion before.

Are you saying that as far as your (CCP) concerned the discussion is finished ? which goes against why this thread was created in the first place.

Does feel like your trying to bury it.



Tal


I Fought the Law, and the Law Won... Talon Silverhawk