These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The future of Community and CCL

First post First post
Author
Pipa Porto
#221 - 2012-06-27 18:40:33 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:
Corina Jarr wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
...
I say this to you now, stay the course and do not be swayed by a few discontented opinions. If their posted reply was in compliance with the Forum Rules, then it wouldn't have needed moderation. ...
...
DMC

You clearly haven't a clue what happened.

Legitimate threads with no issues other than mild trolling (nothing worse than every other thread on the forums) from respondents got locked, for no reason, without the OP getting their legitimate question answered.

And then an ISD locked another thread and linked to a locked one saying we should post our comments there.


And then the rage of insanity that some of us wish had not needed to happen.
And now, those who were on the front of the rage machine are trying to get things better by working with CCP.

So don't speak when you just embarrass yourself.


We posted almost at the same time but yours came on top, but I gotta say +1. Obviously DMC doesn't have the slightest clue of what happened and what is being talked about both in the forums and in the petitions.


This does not in any way detract from his overall message which I thought was well written, on topic and I find it pretty difficult to disagree with any of it.

Of course, you can continue to berate a couple of green recruits who made an error, which we have apologized for. These guys will retain our support and we will help them improve.

Not sure if you can ever forgive and forget but mistakes happen.


His overall message was based on a faulty premise.

We could keep berating them, but the issue is that they've been making the same errors for more than a week and you didn't notice.

Yeah, mistakes happen. Breaches of trust happen. The passive tense just happens.

Failure to own up to your mistakes in an adult way (If you have to use the passive tense, you're not being an adult) means that it will take longer to recover from the mistake.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#222 - 2012-06-27 18:41:31 UTC
MailDeadDrop wrote:


Consequently, that you feel "doubt and uncertainty" about your prior acts speaks well of you.

In more vernacular: thanks for manning-up.

MDD


Hello! Did you know CCP added a nifty "Signature" function where you don't have to sign your posts manually like you're new to the Internet? Congratulations! Your posting is now better.
Pipa Porto
#223 - 2012-06-27 18:50:13 UTC
ISD Tyrozan wrote:
The time has come to "face the music". I look back at some of my actions and find that I wish I could retract them. All I can do is to issue a heart-felt apology for any errors that I have made and make a solemn promise to try to do better.

A bit of information about myself. I am one of the older players of EVE and have been away for a period due to a massive heart attack. I originally started with a corporation that played extensively in null space, but since my return I find care bearing a bit more to my liking for now.

I will undertake to provide an explanation of any action that I may take. However, when I make a mistake, please file a petition since that is a sure way to get my attention.

Again, I apologize for my part in the recent problems.

Fly safe.



This is how you apologize. This is how an adult apologizes. It's all Active Voice sentences (and a few fragments).

Thank you Tyrozan. Apology accepted.

EvE: Everyone vs Everyone

-RubyPorto

Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
#224 - 2012-06-27 18:57:38 UTC
MailDeadDrop wrote:
ISD Eshtir wrote:
My name is Eshtir and as you said correctly, i am the Vice Admiral of the CCL team and i am responsible for the CCL volunteers Shocked (how can you not know this Sad )

I am old and my memory isn't what it used to be. I'll go out on a limb and suggest the same holds true for Crunchie. Big smile


Does the old man smell transmit over the internet? OH NOES!!!P
Eve forums official anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA Real men tank hull. Fake women shield-tank Gallente.
Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
#225 - 2012-06-27 18:58:25 UTC
Mara Tessidar wrote:


Hello! Did you know CCP added a nifty "Signature" function where you don't have to sign your posts manually like you're new to the Internet? Congratulations! Your posting is now better.



You ruined the moment Sad
Eve forums official anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA Real men tank hull. Fake women shield-tank Gallente.
Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#226 - 2012-06-27 19:02:52 UTC
Crunchie Attuxors wrote:


You ruined the moment Sad


Yeah, well, you kinda ruined the last few pages of this thread with tinfoil and badposting that CCP really should have told you to stop doing, so I don't feel bad. At all, in fact.
ISD Eshtir
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#227 - 2012-06-27 20:04:30 UTC
You are going off topic guys ....

ISD Eshtir

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons

Interstellar Services Department

Crunchie Attuxors
Always Another Corporate Venture
#228 - 2012-06-27 20:11:44 UTC
ISD Eshtir wrote:
You are going off topic guys ....


Thank you, I got carried away on the reference...
Eve forums official anthem: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pudOFG5X6uA Real men tank hull. Fake women shield-tank Gallente.
David Toviyah
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#229 - 2012-06-27 20:21:53 UTC
Balak Ragnek wrote:
Its very important to realise that just becuase you don't think it should be an issue does not mean that is actually the case.
Where do you draw the line then? In recent years we have seen more and more ridiculous cases of people suing others over allegedly un-PC behavior. It seems to me that right now the only requirement for this appears to be that you felt offended.
Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#230 - 2012-06-27 20:25:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Delen Ormand
David Toviyah wrote:
CCP Navigator wrote:
No. CCP do not tolerate religious, racial or sexist messaging which is used to cause discomfort to other players.

That will not change, ever.
But isn’t this the crux of the whole debate? A few people claim that they are offended by the use of these words even though they are not the ones addressed. If two people talk to each other and one of them says, for instance, that he himself is “jewing” or something of that sort (I have never seen it being used myself) then you simply cannot claim that the intent of this phrase is “to cause discomfort to other players”. Especially if neither of the two interlocutors take offense to it. Why should a third party that is listening in on this conversation have a say in what words these two people may or may not use? Where will this end? Mandatory trigger warnings so that victims of rape who might be playing EVE are not discomforted when they stumble upon someone mentioning “abuse” in Local?

People have the right to be offended but they do not have the right to censor everyone else’s speech because of that. Just my two cents.


You're making this out to be far more complicated than it is. On a public forum, third parties are not just "listening in" as though it's a private converation. It's the equivalent of shouting it out to the world. Just use a bit of common sense - if you really can't do without using words that people might reasonably find offensive, then send a private message or something.

Yes, "reasonable" does have some leeway. Let's not get all interweblawyerz about it.

::edit::
Jeez... I ******* knew it. In the time it took me to type that, someone already started.. Roll
Jason Auralis
The Marshall Group
#231 - 2012-06-27 20:36:50 UTC
We will be watching.

"Could I request that ISD please lock my shirt into my trousers?" - Lilliana Stelles 2012.06.25 Never forget.

Jason Auralis
The Marshall Group
#232 - 2012-06-27 20:48:33 UTC
CCP Guard wrote:
Vera Algaert wrote:
apologies for stating the obvious but a lot of the recent troubles seem to come down to one very simple issue:

Q: Who has the strongest motivation to volunteer for the CCL?
A: Someone who was not happy with the way forum rules were enforced pre-CCL.

People who were basically happy with the way forum rules were enforced by CCP moderators (i.e. extremely sporadically & inconsistently) had little reason to act and those who would want forum rules to be relaxed knew they would not be able to change anything by joining CCL.
However, CCL gave those who were fed up about CCP tolerating constant violations of the forum rules an outlet for action (and there isn't much CCP can do about them - after all they only enforce the rules that were created by CCP).


A second point I'd like to bring up is that I don't think having "anonymous" moderators was a good idea.
These ISD characters don't have any reputation to gain or to lose through their actions, they don't command any respect and they deemphasize the "those people moderating the community have been chosen from the community itself" aspect which is crucial for the success of this experiment. It also invites speculations about hidden bias on part of the ISD moderators as their true identity is not known.
In my opinion CCP would have done good to get respected community figures on board for the CCL and should have leveraged that respect to enforce forum rules.
If "ISD Lady Spank" locks my C&P thread for trolling I have little choice but to shut up, look into the mirror and ask myself if I have become a badposter. When "ISD Whatsyourname" does the same my initial reaction is that he probably doesn't "get" C&P anyways.


I agree with your assessment that people who think forum moderation can be improved are likely to be the ones that apply but then I don't think that's a band thing since we sort of agree, and that being one of the reasons for starting the CCL...other major reasons being more boots on the ground to gather good feedback, and to interact in a pro-active manner etc.

However, I disagree with the argument that we would all be better off if they moderated under their in-game names. While that can work very well in a community that's purely based around a forum and all social repercussions are contained on that forum, it wouldn't work the same in a community where the forum is just a part of a persistent galaxy where their corporations, assets, relationships and livelihood can be severely affected by who's toes they step on during their daily duties.

Would they constantly have to worry about things like whether or not to lock someone's thread because he might toss them out of an alliance if they did? Or about editing this guy's thread because he runs the meanest infiltration group known to man and would probably be feasting on their corpses in a few months time if he knew their in-game identities? :)

Don't get me wrong, it would have its benefits, but more downsides in my opinion.


I could see that alliance getting wardeced because they kicked a beloved forum moderator from the alliance just because he was doing his job.

"Could I request that ISD please lock my shirt into my trousers?" - Lilliana Stelles 2012.06.25 Never forget.

TheBreadMuncher
Protus Correction Facility Inc.
#233 - 2012-06-27 21:00:32 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:


This does not in any way detract from his overall message which I thought was well written, on topic and I find it pretty difficult to disagree with any of it.

Of course, you can continue to berate a couple of green recruits who made an error, which we have apologized for. These guys will retain our support and we will help them improve.

Not sure if you can ever forgive and forget but mistakes happen.


The community will berate your green recruits because you sent them out as green recruits into one of the most populated forums in EVE with what seemed like minimal training, no idea what to expect and no tolerance to any criticism. You need to teach your recruits that, as with Incarna, we know their job better than they do. The community will deal with shiptoasters far more effectively then an ISD will, except for the all-damning lock. This is why they need to listen to us rather than thinking "these guys are morons. Locklocklocklocklocklocklock".

Which is why we need to be able to discuss moderation. Because damnit son, if we can't tell you how to improve, you just can't improve. End of.

"We will create the introduction thread if that is requested by the community. Also, we will have an ISD Seminar about the CCL team in the coming weeks in which you can ask your questions about the CCL team and provide some constructive feedback to us." - Countless pages of locked threads and numerous permabanned accounts later, change is coming.

Velicia Tuoro
Light Speed Interactive
#234 - 2012-06-27 21:04:45 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:

Truth of the matter is that they are not deleting good content from your posts and leaving bad stuff there.


In general perhaps, but... and it's bad form to point it out... but this is exactly what has happened. I've had a post deleted, and then restored after asking. And that is the point. Yes you've got guys learning how to do this job, but you need to be careful about how destructive that learning is, and wholesale deleting of content should be right at the bottom of the list for controlling a situation. (well, apart from Bans, but they don't have that power!)

Senior Representative Light Speed Interactive http://www.lightspeedinteractive.net

Jason Auralis
The Marshall Group
#235 - 2012-06-27 21:14:40 UTC
Given the open discussion it caused with the Devs. Id say it was worth the ban on posting privileges with my 8 yearold main.

Really CCP, thank you for addressing the situation and opening this dialogue.

"Could I request that ISD please lock my shirt into my trousers?" - Lilliana Stelles 2012.06.25 Never forget.

Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#236 - 2012-06-27 21:35:19 UTC
And as I wake up this morning is seems that the ISD has taken further action against my continued forum existence.

I await a response to my petition not with baited breath as I would be dead many times over.

I cannot wait to get an interpretation of which of the precious "rules" have been breached in some heinous forum crime.

I will keep you posted as this one will likely be interesting.
Velicia Tuoro
Light Speed Interactive
#237 - 2012-06-27 21:38:08 UTC
ISD Eshtir wrote:
You are going off topic guys ....


Good moderation :)

Senior Representative Light Speed Interactive http://www.lightspeedinteractive.net

Lando Tarsadan
Doomheim
#238 - 2012-06-27 22:52:13 UTC
Here we go again,

Yet another attemt to use volunteers whom has an interest in your business as customers.

It has happned in just about every MMO there is and imho it has always failed. People whom most of the time sign up for this line of work are mainly power hungry/angry and what not with the current state of business and will most of the time abuse their power cause of eagerness to use them rather than have common sence.

As well as several others here I have also worked/working/volunteered with CS and have been for a good 20 years. as you should know (as its already your job) it takes skill/knowledge patience and understanding to police others. (I use police as thats what moderation is in general about)

So forth we have already seen how moderation can harm more than do good. Already seen several posts in CnP where i would rather have you delete the entire post by the person than read you snip snip snip edited removed by ISD whatsmyname. With little to no reason why it was done.

There is forum rules and we should all follow them. In the perfect world we would not need moderations. But since we need them i would rather see someone with no connection whom is paied by CCP uphold the rules rather than someone whoms hobby/spare time usage is within the same world as he/she polices. in my mind it creates a state of conflict we all play on the same server. and if ISD whatsmyname run into a person on the forum that he has a beef with in game. would be reason enogh to try and fit the vaugest rule violations on that person than his corp CEOs violations. (best part is the violator dont know the ISD person in game have a beef with him) I can understand the anonymoous need for the moderators as they are customers.

You state you will monitor and so forth and maybe you will catch the moderation on the person the ISD has the beef on. but it will be alot harder to catch the places where there were not used moderation as no action were taken. ofcause you have a team where another ISD or CCP employ might catch the violation but at a much later time than it initially could happen cause of favortism was applied.

I know you guys are probably understaffed after the rotation that was made after incarna but pulling in volunteers is imho not the best course of solution to your problem.

Best regards

Lando

PS: Grama and spelling errors you get for free:D
Kaeoz
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#239 - 2012-06-28 00:37:02 UTC
Forums better place with mods working.
Malcom Vincent
Generic Alt Corporation 421
#240 - 2012-06-28 00:39:33 UTC
Learning curve = Cliff.

I would not expect voluntary players with little to no prior training to slide right into awesome from day one.

Outside of being gratefull for them donating their own spare time to do it, its propably a good idea for several posters to adjust expectations to a realistic level.

Perhaps, if the program had been running for a year we'd have experienced moderators so new mods would have someone to lean on in case of doubt.

Outside of that, expect to see the timeframe of PM's to ISD's be that of your own. They are availble when they are awake and available, not when it suits you. Expecting responses within a few minutes is simply unrealistic given the sheer volume of the forums and the availability.


Since we have a history of interviewing ISD's on EVE Stratics, I'd be interested in taking up a new one with the ISD's here.

Upstarting Blogger: Ormehullet Guides and more is coming