These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Devalued ISHUKONE Shirt? CCP Marketing Malpractice? [UPDATE]

First post
Author
Norrin Ellis
Doomheim
#281 - 2012-06-27 19:42:15 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
The drone region/mining changes are a pretty big stretch from discussing your market speculations.

CCP's motivation was to balance the economy and strengthen it's base (the mining segment), and this was accomplished admirably.

Obviously a shift in the economy was going to force some people to change what they are doing or they would be adversely affected. Pretty much everyone understood that basic fact, and if you are paying attention there is a best a minute fraction of the EVE player base that is complaining about it.

A great deal of mineral speculation was done prior to the change. Some people made a fortune, some people lost their shirt.

If you speculate on the value of an item it is, as always, at your own risk.


Given the topic of the thread, I lol'd at "some people lost their shirt."
Bill Loney
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#282 - 2012-06-27 19:49:32 UTC
Norrin Ellis wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
The drone region/mining changes are a pretty big stretch from discussing your market speculations.

CCP's motivation was to balance the economy and strengthen it's base (the mining segment), and this was accomplished admirably.

Obviously a shift in the economy was going to force some people to change what they are doing or they would be adversely affected. Pretty much everyone understood that basic fact, and if you are paying attention there is a best a minute fraction of the EVE player base that is complaining about it.

A great deal of mineral speculation was done prior to the change. Some people made a fortune, some people lost their shirt.

If you speculate on the value of an item it is, as always, at your own risk.


Given the topic of the thread, I lol'd at "some people lost their shirt."

And throwing the rattle out the pram.
Boober Fraggle
#283 - 2012-06-27 19:58:28 UTC
Quote:
CCP's motivation was to balance the economy and strengthen it's base (the mining segment), and this was accomplished admirably.


How? The market went way up in speculation and once the patch was actually released the price went DOWN again. You make LESS from mining AGAIN. And thats WITH hulkagoondouche running 23.5/7. I was making way more money hisec mining before the "fix". And when I say before i mean not anymore because it blows again (profit).

Veld and scord are up a bit since then, but were already up amost 100% prior to the fix.
Dheeradj Esil
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#284 - 2012-06-27 20:07:20 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
The Antiquarian wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
The Antiquarian wrote:

But you gotta admit, my idiocy is nothing compared to the level of idiocy exhibited by the Great Mittani, your Dear Leader.

no dear leader never spent $300 just to acquire virtual pants

i will take drunkenly making a fool of yourself over spending $300 on virtual pants any day of the week


I spent $260 to get a damn virtual shirt. I don't see anything wrong with that. I am spending what I earned. Some spend it on hookers and enjoy a colorful concoction of STDs and Herpies. I spend it on nerdy items.


except that a person who spends $260 on "nerdy items" and plays EVE would probably buy tangible goods, like, say these things

You didn't spend $260 on the shirt, you spent it on PLEX. This is a fact no matter how much you insist otherwise.


I consider the Guristas shirt the best shirt I ever bought.

By the same logic, training skills is botting, as it gives an advantage to your character without you being at the keyboard.

-Abdiel Kavash

Sidious Lord
Doomheim
#285 - 2012-06-27 20:11:06 UTC
Norrin Ellis wrote:

You completely ignore the fact that you were buying 13 PLEX and continue to insist that you made the purchase exclusively because CCP was offering the shirt. That is, you essentially deny that the PLEX had any value to you at all.


No, he is hiding something vital from us. Something that might explain his relentless raging: he put all his PLEXes into the cargohold of his noobship, forgot he was in low sec, undocked and got ganked.

So, while he in theory got 13x game time from his purchase, in reality he only ended up with the shirt for his hard earned $260...

Forever faithful to the Royal Amarr Institute

Morgorathi
Euaemon
#286 - 2012-06-27 22:12:18 UTC
Wow this thread is still going!

When did Crime & Punishment become the mercenary employment board?

Trini Soren
Doomheim
#287 - 2012-06-27 22:54:12 UTC
Why am I not seeing these items in the NeX store?
iskflakes
#288 - 2012-06-28 00:25:19 UTC
Trini Soren wrote:
Why am I not seeing these items in the NeX store?


I'm not seeing either of the two accidental releases/screwups on the NEX store. Perhaps this means CCP is taking action to fix this mess?

I would like all of these shirts purchased from the NEX store given a new name and turned into a separate item from the original "special edition" shirts. That way the "special edition" shirts can maintain their rareity, but people can still get something that looks the same on the NEX store at a reasonable price.. everybody wins.

-

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#289 - 2012-06-28 01:06:32 UTC
I'm not seeing them in the Noble Exchange either.

I may be premature here but I think I will congratulate The Antiquarian for having the fortitude to stick to his guns long enough to get CCP to see the error of their ways and pull the contentious items from the NeX store.

This is where all the naysayers in here start the run on buying up what's left of them in the market. I've already cleaned out the Amarr area so don't bother there.

Mr Epeen Cool
Rikula
Doomheim
#290 - 2012-06-28 01:36:47 UTC
For all those constant critics in this thread, you still haven't addressed the main concern: even IF CCP was within their rights to do this, was it the right move? Was it smart? Was it needed?

As The Antiquarian has pointed out, other games have special limited items, and I think games are better for it. I think EVE, especially, benefits from having both the common and the rare.

This move has had a negative effect on the trust for CCP promotions regarding clothing, and for the NEX store. Many of you may hate the NEX and virtual clothing, and for you this is a good move insofar as it brings disrepute on these aspects of the game. But CCP shouldn't listen to you, because your motives do not match theirs. They should listen to the people that support their idea, insofar as CCP wants to have this area of the game be successful.

Mr Epeen wrote:


This is where all the naysayers in here start the run on buying up what's left of them in the market. I've already cleaned out the Amarr area so don't bother there.

Mr Epeen Cool


To fix this issue, CCP will need to not only remove from the NEX store, but destroy and reimburse all those purchases made post-patch.
Rikula
Doomheim
#291 - 2012-06-28 01:50:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Rikula
Just to give some positive suggestions, I would recommend the following to CCP:
a. Either:
i) Identify (if possible) all the copies of the shirt (and the red/black women's executor) that existed before the patch, and convert those to some other appropriate item that will henceforth remain special
or
ii) Remove (as they have) the items from the NEX, and destroy with reimbursement all the copies that were created post patch. Destruction is required though, otherwise the value of these items will be seriously reduced
(I favour (i) simply because I suspect it won't annoy people that bought the shirt/executor for cheap price because they wanted to wear it…collectors are probably a little less concerned about appearance and more concerned with rarity - while those who bought them post patch are more concerned with appearance and less with rarity)
b) Declare their intentions clearly regarding future products - eg, will they agree that should this happen in future, they will work to correct it?

And further recommendations for the future (eg, to protect the value of the monocle):
c) Implement market-sellable ship paint jobs in the NEX (or at least some paint jobs). This will allow people to use their aurum on NEX items that are guaranteed to be of interest to many players, and sellable on market, for what their appropriate aurum to isk exchange value is. What this should do is help get spent some of the stockpiled aurum
d) A few months after the above, when ship paint jobs are being sold on market for roughly their true aurum->isk exchange worth, allow transfer of Aurum

By delaying the implementation of aurum until (d), it will help ensure that the value of the monocle does not drop drastically - people will already have a good outlet to cash in their aurum, and a destructible outlet too that means it can be renewed. They won't instantly look to buy the monocle just to sell it for a quick buck.

I think transfer of aurum should be allowed - it's something I want - but not until (d).

Edit: An alternative to (c) would be to simply remove the old items from the NEX store immediately before allowing aurum exchange. On the assumption that they only ever return to the store for their old price, if at all!
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#292 - 2012-06-28 02:31:09 UTC
Rikula wrote:


To fix this issue, CCP will need to not only remove from the NEX store, but destroy and reimburse all those purchases made post-patch.


Ideally, yes.

But I'm reminded of the Pax Ammaria incident where they just quietly removed them from the market and let the situation sort itself out. I don't know that they have the time or ability to wade through the convoluted mess that has been created here and refund isk/ Arum for thousands of items that each went through multiple hands and two different exchange mediums.

No; I suspect they have done what they are going to do and that's as much fixing as we'll see.

Mr Epeen Cool
Flakey Foont
#293 - 2012-06-28 02:34:51 UTC
Reminds me of the folks who hung at the bank in Britannia exchanging pixels for fake money.
Kilabi
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#294 - 2012-06-28 02:42:36 UTC
The Antiquarian wrote:
ADDENDUM
Please refer to the following post on the Market Discussion for those who were adversely affected by CCP's recent flooding of pre-existing rare/unique outfits on NEX Store for fraction of their initial costs.


I try to keep myself calm, but this is just way too outrageous that I had to vent here again and again.

You, CCP, made it sound as if ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION Shirt was only available contingent upon the purchase of 13 X PLEXs several months ago. I didn't have to, but I took the damn bait, with the expectation that CCP and its honest marketing department will maintain the "uniqueness" and rarity of these special items.

But you decide to reward those who took that "extra leap of faith" by treating us like ***** and dingleberries and having these same items available for 50 cents each several months later. Where is fairness in this?

CCP, You should have MADE IT ADAMANTLY CLEAR FROM THE BEGINNING THAT AFTER 6 MONTHS, THESE SPECIAL ITEMS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR 50 CENTS EACH!

CCP should make appropriate reparation by rewarding the previous faithful ISHUKONE SPECIAL SHIRT owners with other equivalent UNIQUE items. Prior to this debacle, the shirt had a market value of approximately 1.2-1.3B. Now, it costs 11 million to purchase.


So far, this has been the message that CCP has indirectly expressed to all the supporters of Noble Exchange, cash for PLEXs, and all other marketing schemes:

"Thank you for your contribution. You assumed the risk and this is what you get. You will be the laughing stock of the entire community of EVE Online. We will remain mute for the rest of the period. Oh!! And don't forget: we are here sitting behind the desk, laughing at you too!"
ahahahahah
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#295 - 2012-06-28 02:46:25 UTC
Flakey Foont wrote:
Reminds me of the folks who hung at the bank in Britannia exchanging pixels for fake money.


I blame you for me spending two and a half hours digging through old boxes for my Mr Natural comix yesterday. God bless Robert Crumb for giving me something entertaining to do while wasting my youth away being wasted.

Mr Epeen Cool
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#296 - 2012-06-28 03:11:13 UTC
Wow. Just wow. This is the second thread I have seen that displays an outrageous amount of angst about SHIRTS.

Yes. You spent real money to get your shirt.
Yes. People that are buying the shirt now are also spending real money to get the shirt.

You're upset that you paid more six months ago and compare it to this:

The Antiquarian wrote:
Yea, how would you react if you decide to purchase that pretty Mercedes E350 of yours for $48,000 and realize that the same dealership is selling that car for $1,000, 6 months later?


I think that would suck but do you honestly think that anyone would go back to the Mercedes dealership and demand $47,000? Do you think Mercedes would refund that money. If they did they would no longer be in business.

It is unfortunate but internet spaceships apparel is a dog-eat-dog enterprise and I stand in awe of you, the Titan of Shirt-dom. You invest in shirts and sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. Don't let it get you down. There will be other shirts.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Reloadin
#297 - 2012-06-28 03:24:32 UTC
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Wow. Just wow. This is the second thread I have seen that displays an outrageous amount of angst about SHIRTS.


Yes, how silly of us to have the temerity to voice dissent at an oversight by CCP that devalued some of our items by billions of isk. We should stick to complaining about ship insurance or that plex just went up by 10mil.

Anyway, the whole two threads which people like yourself just couldn't ignore and say, hey that doesn't concern me I might not bother with it, seems to have had an effect. No more ishukone shirt or womens executor coat in the nex.

It's really quite baffling how this happened anyway. Shows the level of ignorance about their own product by people working in CCP. Someone working on their MT store was not aware of the collectors edition boxes, the plex bundle, or even bothered to have a look at the market.
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#298 - 2012-06-28 03:29:37 UTC
As an owner of the 500 Aurum Ishukone Shirt, I would be interested to know if ones that have already been purchased might well be removed.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

The Antiquarian
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#299 - 2012-06-28 04:37:10 UTC
Judging by the CCP’s recent action to remove the two highly controversial items from NEX Store, it shows CCP’s admittance on their mistake to release those two items on the NEX Store in the first place.

Removing those two items is an appropriate first step, but that does not provide any reparation for those who were adversely affected by CCP’s marketing failure. Those who took the “leap of faith” in CCP’s are still disenfranchised by seeing billions of their initial investments on these unique shirts turned to “dust” due to the untold number of those shirts being circulated out into the market, thanks to CCP’s mistake of releasing those items for $0.50 on NEX Store.

Obviously CCP can not take away hundreds of ISHUKONE SPECIAL EDITION SHIRT and WOMEN’S EXECUTOR COAT (RED/GOLD) that were purchased for $0.50 post the recent patch.

CCP needs to make appropriate reparations in forms of another completely unique items to the previous owners of those rare apparels. Those are the only “just” and “equitable” action.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#300 - 2012-06-28 04:41:28 UTC
Rikula wrote:
For all those constant critics in this thread, you still haven't addressed the main concern: even IF CCP was within their rights to do this, was it the right move? Was it smart? Was it needed?
Sure. More stuff on the market, rather than languishing as (largely) dead code in the database = better.

Quote:
This move has had a negative effect on the trust for CCP promotions regarding clothing, and for the NEX store.
Not really, no. It has had the effect of people exposing themselves as the reason why advertising exists: because they read far too much into an offer and vastly overvalue what they get for free. The OP got exactly what he wanted: 13 PLEX and a free shirt. Where's the trust issue?

Mr Epeen wrote:
I'm not seeing them in the Noble Exchange either.
Personally, I don't even see it on the market, so I still kind of wonder exactly what shirt the OP is talking about. I asked somewhere back on page [very early], but got no answer (which goes with the overall theme of the OP not really being able to show what it is he's complaining about). It might all just be a storm in a tea cup…