These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - Market Manipulation on a Grand Scale

First post First post First post
Author
Chia Mulholland
Perkone
Caldari State
#861 - 2012-06-22 10:10:43 UTC
Sometimes people find ways to use the systems in game in unexpected ways. In a game as complicated as Eve, that's pretty much inevitable.

Take jetcan mining. Jetcans were never intended to be used that way, but people did and CCP let it stay in game. Noone was banned for using jetcans that way or had their ore taken away.

Other times an unexpected use of a mechanism is too unbalanced and gets removed - like when you could buy Pax Amarria from NPCs and refine it into cheapish nocxium. The mechanism was removed, but noone was banned or had their nocxium removed for using this mechanism.

Some people bought tons of PI materials when they predicted that prices would skyrocket when NPCs stopped selling them. Again, noone has had their ISK taken away or been banned for this.

I believe it would be a first if CCP were to ban people for taking advantage of an in-game market mechanic, no matter how broken, and/or take their ISK (or in this case, LP rewards) away.

But hey - there's a first for everything I guess.

But it's interesting to me that a lot of the market "exploits" that have been done over time all involve NPCs either buying or selling stuff at fixed, non-market prices with unlimited demand/supply. Maybe there's a lesson here that we can learn from.
Montmazar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#862 - 2012-06-22 10:11:47 UTC
Every single Improve FW Megathread in Features and Ideas or Assembly Hall since forever has always had everyone agreeing "LP for kills? No that's a dumb idea. But what about. . . ."

And then CCP ships something that gives LP for kills, which turns out to be actually be a pretty dumb idea!

What I'm getting at here is maybe y'all should just get rid of the Features and Ideas and Assembly Hall forums, since it's pretty clear you aren't reading anything in there.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#863 - 2012-06-22 10:13:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Desturned
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
When did the huge distinction appear ?


At the very beginning. Unless everyone else who slow-clapped in this thread is also involved.

Also the **** didn't "hit the fan" when the NPC alts started wagging their fingers at the "general membership."

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Vokanic
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#864 - 2012-06-22 10:16:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Vokanic
Aryth wrote:

When CCP originally released their devblog on Inferno and revealed the formula they intended to use, we sat in shock. I immediately stated a phrase I would repeat many times: “/10000 will not save them”. CCP made the assumption that rewarding a player 1/10th of the value of the player’s kill at 1K ISK/LP, for a total of 10K ISK destroyed CCP Value/1 ISK reward, would prevent manipulation of the system. While this was an understandable mistake, it turned out to be several orders of magnitude off.



The above quote shows why this isn't a bug, and it's not an exploit.

CCPs design was inherently flawed, but it was designed that way. At no point did a CCP employee typo a decimal place in the wrong place. It just doesn't work.

It's not even a formula that a single employee would have used to meet a goal. It was a core component of the whole system. It would have been vetted by numerous people. They probably even did some modelling on it (with the wrong parameters of course).

CCP just had too narrow a vision to figure out what could happen in a system that by design is dynamic in its nature (and value).
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#865 - 2012-06-22 10:18:58 UTC
If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)

How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?

What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

uuj Oramara
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#866 - 2012-06-22 10:19:05 UTC
Sizeof Void wrote:
Kmelx wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:

By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch.

Empty threats, best threats!

Keep in mind that CCP Sreegs is the one who disqualified Hydra and OB from ATX. He is also the one who routinely seizes ISK and assets, and applies the ban hammer, to RMT accounts. He would not be my first choice of CCP devs to accuse of making empty threats.

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#867 - 2012-06-22 10:19:19 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Tyrozan
Richard Desturned wrote:
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
When did the huge distinction appear ?


At the very beginning. Unless everyone else who slow-clapped in this thread is also involved.

Also the **** didn't "hit the fan" when the NPC alts started wagging their fingers at the "general membership."




-----Edit----- not allot of NPC alts till CCP came in to comment .

Tal

Post edited.
No personal attacks, please.


ISD Tyrozan
Ensign
Community Communications Liaisons
Interstellar Services Department
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#868 - 2012-06-22 10:19:24 UTC
whats goin on in this thread
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#869 - 2012-06-22 10:20:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Destination SkillQueue
Imryn Xaran wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Ituhata Saken wrote:
Dearest Market-Interested Space Tycoons,

At downtime today we made an adjustment to the average price of some items in order to curb a situation whereby the average price of an item could be manipulated in order to create a disparity between the value of an item in Isk and its value in Loyalty Point payouts. There will be additional changes in how this system works in the future. We will be monitoring for attempted manipulation of the LP market and will reverse any proceeds deemed to have been obtained through manipulative means. We are watching you. Don’t be That Guy.


By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch.


I’d be interested to hear how you are twisting this into being an “abuse”. As far as I can see the mechanics being used here are working exactly the way you guys designed them to work. The fact that you have now decided to change the way some of those mechanics work is irrelevant.

Also I’m a bit worried to see that although the investigation isn’t yet complete you already seem to have decided what the outcome will be. I would HOPE that a full investigation would highlight what have to be enormous flaws in your design and QA processes that allowed this system to be implemented, and I would HOPE that the resulting recommendations would strongly suggest that additional testing and QA processes were needed to emphasise the testing of “edge” or “limiting” cases.

I EXPECT your investigation will gloss over the failures of CCP employees (as usual) and place the blame on the players who in this case are obviously smarter than all of you guys put together.

Isn’t it about time you guys at CCP realised that this isn’t a game? This is your lively –hood and you should probably start to act with a bit more professionalism when it comes to the changes you make to it.


It's a clear case of abuse, but the consequenses are still up in air. Outsmarting the devs isn't a defense. It's what every exploiter or abuser does succesfully. The only thing in question is what are the consequenses. To me this is similar to the infinite tracking abuse that happened in specific wormholes some time ago. The mechanics worked as they were designed, but created a situation where you could break the system and gain excessive benefits because of it. I believe the consequense was removal of assets CCP thought was fair to remove. I suspect something similar will happen here.

The people who did this also acted against how CCP has adviced people act in similar situations. IIRC it was posted at least in one of the forum exploit devblogs made by Sreegs. The basic gist of it was, that you're supposed to report it to CCP in detail with reproduction steps and not use the exploit once you have discovered it for any reason. A specific example of what not to do was to report it, but continuing to use it. What actually will happen to them is up to CCP to decide based on the actual details of the case, but there are clear precedences where people who acted in similar fashion have suffered from CCP actions against them.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#870 - 2012-06-22 10:21:03 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)

How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?

What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits?

Ban all the things.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#871 - 2012-06-22 10:25:23 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
If CCP remove the profits of this venture from Goons, will they also retroactively remove the profits from the guy who posted about how he built tens of thousands of battleships, insured them and then destroyed them for a profit? (this was before the insurance nerf)

How about the people who made obscene profits (possibly totally even more than 5Tn) from the horribly botched P.I. introduction?

What about the BoB members who used to rake in billions a week using titans to bridge freighter-loads of NPC goods from Delve for unbelievable profits?

Ban all the things.



XxD memes r funny
Alain Kinsella
#872 - 2012-06-22 10:29:43 UTC
Thank you for a couple hours of interesting reading. corestwo had been acting even slyer than usual in -lounge so I figured something was still up. :-)

I'm not going to weigh in on either side. I made it very clear a while back that I've had my experience with SA back in SL, and the rest of y'all can duke it out this time. :-p

I *am* waiting to see what Screegs will say though. *That* will be a popcorn moment for sure, forget this here.

"The Meta Game does not stop at the game. Ever."

Currently Retired / Semi-Casual (pending changes to RL concerns).

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#873 - 2012-06-22 10:32:29 UTC
Alain Kinsella wrote:

I *am* waiting to see what Screegs will say though. *That* will be a popcorn moment for sure, forget this here.


Truth right here

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#874 - 2012-06-22 10:34:31 UTC
I'm imagining the most popular Google™ search performed in Iceland today was "What is an outlier?"
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#875 - 2012-06-22 10:35:51 UTC
Well, seeing as you are likely to lose most of the isk you 'earnt' my advice to go Jita and mess up the Price of plex just for fun before they take it all the isk away from you and leave oyu with negative wallets

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Vokanic
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#876 - 2012-06-22 10:48:39 UTC
Graic Gabtar wrote:
I'm imagining the most popular Google™ search performed in Iceland today was "What is an outlier?"


You could have saved 90% of the people reading this thread the trouble by explaining it.
Then again, this *is* an entertaining thread, so why stop that by educating the masses.
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#877 - 2012-06-22 10:53:17 UTC
If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#878 - 2012-06-22 10:53:47 UTC
Singulis Pacifica wrote:


Without the Goons, this would not have been discovered for a while. And clever players would have found out eventually, by accident or on purpose. Regardless, it would likely be abused over a longer period of time as the Goons are honest enough to publicize their findings in a relatively short time-frame (within a month upon release on the live servers).


It's funny because right yesterday I was chatting with Corestwo on SCC-Lounge when I told him CCP should not have released moving averages based content. In fact I found another way to manipulate a similar principle Inferno mechanic (you call it "clever player") that is not the FW LP stuff and was talking about it before this thread was written.
But I am not going to "publicize" my findings, I just create an in game ticket.


Singulis Pacifica wrote:

Should the Goons be punished? Ban their accounts? Possibly. CCP has the right and ability to do whatever she deems fit.


Well CCP labelled it as "abuse", it means they did not like it. This trumps every EULA foggy clause (that can be twisted as CCP wants anyway). In fact I would not be suprised if they came up with the "against the spirit of the game" clause, even if tbh the spirit of this game is to screw up the next guy and then smack talk him in public.
Graic Gabtar
The Lemon Party
#879 - 2012-06-22 10:56:03 UTC
CCP Sreegs wrote:
By way of explanation we addressed the manipulation issue but haven't yet completed the investigation into the scope of the abuse. Once that happens I'm pretty sure some people are going to be a bit less smug about the money they made that one time when there was a bank error in their favor and then lost again when the bank fixed the glitch.
Vile rat wrote:
If the people who figured this out, then told CCP while waving huge flags that read "FIX THIS OR THE ECONOMY IS SCREWED" get punished, then the only stupid thing they did was actually be dumb enough to inform CCP about the issue.
It seems positions are now clear.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#880 - 2012-06-22 10:56:44 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Well, seeing as you are likely to lose most of the isk you 'earnt' my advice to go Jita and mess up the Price of plex just for fun before they take it all the isk away from you and leave oyu with negative wallets


it's called 'restraint'

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration