These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goons 4x4ing through the Sandbox - Market Manipulation on a Grand Scale

First post First post First post
Author
Reptail
#2681 - 2012-06-23 18:14:47 UTC
The point is CCP is taking a wrong direction

and not only , they do not care about Eve

but i know some old devs do!,

Actually some ppl care about EvE

instead of crappy players who just **** in their panties!

Ground Shiwer

Fix Lag
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2682 - 2012-06-23 18:16:13 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Fix Lag wrote:
I don't get which part was against the rules, Sreegs, so maybe you can point it out for me: was it the part where they bought and sold things on the market or the part where they blew it up?


dont worry your pretty little head you dont have to understand... its not a rule for gameplay...


"its not a rule for gameplay"

I'd like you to expand on this.

CCP mostly sucks at their job, but Veritas is a pretty cool dude.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#2683 - 2012-06-23 18:19:53 UTC
Fix Lag wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
Fix Lag wrote:
I don't get which part was against the rules, Sreegs, so maybe you can point it out for me: was it the part where they bought and sold things on the market or the part where they blew it up?


dont worry your pretty little head you dont have to understand... its not a rule for gameplay...


"its not a rule for gameplay"

I'd like you to expand on this.


sorry i did not see a please and thank you in there...

how rude...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Dodeca Hedron
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2684 - 2012-06-23 18:23:41 UTC
Fix Lag wrote:
I don't get which part was against the rules, Sreegs, so maybe you can point it out for me: was it the part where they bought and sold things on the market or the part where they blew it up?


This is also the part where I am hung up on.
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2685 - 2012-06-23 18:23:59 UTC
Xython wrote:
So I just woke up from a couple hour nap -- has there been any actual updates rather than CCP Sreegs wading back into the murky depths of this thread and promptly getting trolled?





Funny given that trolling itself is supposedly against the forum rules

but yeah THATS just funny imo

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Mrr Woodcock
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2686 - 2012-06-23 18:28:22 UTC
You have got to be joking me. What I get from this is Goons took a game mechanic that had vulnerabilities, took advantage of it to make mega bucks, and doesn't want to give it back, as well as anyone else that happen to have done it.

1) If the Isk doesn't throw the game totally out of balance, CCP should tell ya to keep it. If it does throw it out of balance
the participants that got it, have to give it back! it's that simple, like it or lump it. It's CCP's Call.

2) Shut the heck up about it, and move on.

3) If ya don't shut up, CCP always has the ban hammer, Participants that did this can always unsubscribe.

Goon'es ya all sound like a bunch of GD drama queens. I personally hope CCP just buries this in your butts. You deserve it for following that idiot.


Piranhas
The Milkmen
Churn and Burn
#2687 - 2012-06-23 18:28:43 UTC
So if this isn't intended gameplay what about:

Titans - There is a lot of them

Supercarriers - ^ see above

Tech

T2 BPOs


Just to give a few good examples.
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2688 - 2012-06-23 18:29:12 UTC
Haquer wrote:
Tallon Sylph wrote:
Is Eve still a sandbox? I'm pretty confused right now.


It is until you hit an arbitrary limit in which it's "abuse" and then get your assets seized.


Funny, just like everyone else lol

Or rather I should say, now the rules apply to you too.
Kinda the same stuff you guys were screaming when you started doing thing BoB was doing that were afterwards said to be exploits. This is all very "not learning from history and doomed to repeat it" to me

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

SwahiliRapist Zuluabortion
Doomheim
#2689 - 2012-06-23 18:31:09 UTC
Aryth wrote:
This is a story of what happens when the sandbox gets so complicated, it becomes possible for truly magical opportunities.
Greed IS Good

We went straight to plaid


When Eve Online: Inferno was released, most people were underwhelmed. Missile effects were pretty, but functionally useless; ship balancing was mediocre; the inventory revamp was a complete disaster, and most people were simply wondering what the point of the whole thing was. There was even a revamp to Faction Warfare, an oft-maligned, unfun feature of the game. Most people wrote it off as CCP throwing a bone to the few subscribers who stuck around for that sort of thing.

Most people are myopic.
But not the Snip. Don't use ethnic stereotype slurs. -Guard bal.

Occasionally you will see the odd forum poster that throws out wild conspiracy theories about shadowy figures controlling parts of the game, or in the case of the especially insane, Goons controlling the game. This has never been true...until now.

As we’ve said, in most ways, Inferno was a bust. But a throwaway blog about an obscure part of the upcoming faction warfare revamp was much more interesting than it seemed. A small group of market and game mechanics wizards sat in a channel, put their heads together and designed a theoretical exploit to game the system. It succeeded beyond their wildest dreams.

The revamp to Faction Warfare in Inferno was the single biggest mistake CCP has ever made. It was bigger than guidance systems, which merely made us a couple of trillion isk. It was certainly bigger than deleting boot.ini, which merely cost CCP some bad press. It was possibly even bigger than Incarna, a potentially game ruining ‘expansion’ *** cash grab. Simply put, Inferno was released with a way to destroy the value of missions.


Inferno’s big design mistake was that it was released with a literal currency fountain, very nearly without limit. Unbeknownst to themselves, CCP had accidentally delved into the world of forex, providing a way to exchange one currency (isk) for another (LP) with only a few checks and balances built into the system.


The original theory came about as many of the theories in the Snip. Don't use ethnic stereotype slurs. -Guard bal do: Aryth wondering what the implications of X may be if we did Y. Every theory in the collective is always vetted, and so, Mynnna went to work on a super spreadsheet. This sheet would end up breaking down every niche of FW into its components and checking them for leaks; much like everything in Spreadsheets Online, once created, the sheet had to be tested via running the numbers countless times. Luckily, they added up.

It was time to wreck some pubby wallets :commissar:



When CCP originally released their devblog on Inferno and revealed the formula they intended to use, we sat in shock. I immediately stated a phrase I would repeat many times: “/10000 will not save them”. CCP made the assumption that rewarding a player 1/10th of the value of the player’s kill at 1K ISK/LP, for a total of 10K ISK destroyed CCP Value/1 ISK reward, would prevent manipulation of the system. While this was an understandable mistake, it turned out to be several orders of magnitude off.

We laid in wait. Much of what we believed to be true could not be tested on SISI. Patch day came and we immediately moved into action, enrolling alts into Minmatar FW & Amarr FW and moving freighters full of delicious zydrine/nocxium/megacyte into position. Goons had been invested heavily in minerals pre-patch, and with the massive recession all of EVE went into post CCP changes, Burn Jita, and Hulkageddon, we wanted to give them a way to cash out as well as get rich ourselves. Therefore, the test would start with a simple, yet hilarious murder of several innocent freighters full of extremely valuable highends.

Freighter Death

This also meant that we could cash out our hundreds of billions of ISK worth of minerals at prices far higher than on the market. For example, we cashed out Megacyte at 3300, Zydrine 1400, Nocxium at 900. So some of the very largest stockpiles of pre-drone nerf minerals no longer exists. Tying back into the mineral manipulation we have been engaging in.
The test quickly became even bigger than anticipated because upon release, FW turned out to have a bug that rewarded LP for both dropped and exploded cargo, doubling the rewards. So we went to work, sending hundreds of billions of ISK worth of highend minerals to Yulai to be blown up. Why Yulai? Anyone enlisted in faction warfare gets shot at by faction police of the opposing factions. Yulai and its entire constellation are owned by CONCORD, which is neutral territory. Thus, both FW alts could move through peacefully. Also, Yulai has an “Inner Circle” station, which was just plain funny. How fitting that Yulai, once the most important system in Eve, finally becomes relevant again.



and you got more friends now?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#2690 - 2012-06-23 18:31:23 UTC
Piranhas wrote:
So if this isn't intended gameplay what about:

Titans - There is a lot of them

Titans are rare, a major alliance might have one or two, some might even have as many as four titans.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2691 - 2012-06-23 18:34:03 UTC
AureoBroker wrote:
Dear goons; again.
If anyone had come to ccp and asked "Can we do this?", you KNEW what answer you would've gotten. So, why you did it?

This is an exploit, that is a completely unintented use of game mechanics.
You can justify it in-lore if you want: Factions would never pay out un-earned rewards, and would launch investigations.
Think of CCP as acting in-game, rather than out.
Would the Minmatar let you do that? God, no. So, why whine?


But ... but ... we're here to destroy YOUR game.
lol


And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#2692 - 2012-06-23 18:35:16 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Piranhas wrote:
So if this isn't intended gameplay what about:

Titans - There is a lot of them

Titans are rare, a major alliance might have one or two, some might even have as many as four titans.

"64K of ram will be enough for anyone."

"There is market in the world for maybe 5 computers"

"There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance."

Lol

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Reptail
#2693 - 2012-06-23 18:35:38 UTC
i've hundreds gallons of beer meet me at jita 4-4 memorial

gotta go out soon (btw)

Ground Shiwer

Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#2694 - 2012-06-23 18:36:31 UTC
ITT: People taking Eve seriously.

Go get some sun.

Seriously.

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

SwahiliRapist Zuluabortion
Doomheim
#2695 - 2012-06-23 18:38:26 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
AureoBroker wrote:
Dear goons; again.
If anyone had come to ccp and asked "Can we do this?", you KNEW what answer you would've gotten. So, why you did it?

This is an exploit, that is a completely unintented use of game mechanics.
You can justify it in-lore if you want: Factions would never pay out un-earned rewards, and would launch investigations.
Think of CCP as acting in-game, rather than out.
Would the Minmatar let you do that? God, no. So, why whine?


But ... but ... we're here to destroy YOUR game.
lol




Congratulations to you then in wasting your life


Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2696 - 2012-06-23 18:38:27 UTC
Luis Graca wrote:
So many people talking about the sandbox


Quick question whats a sandbox and it's limits?

For me i always thing it was a game were everyone plays together and doesn't have limits but now i'm kinda lost


Dunno; I never played in a sandbox that didnt have those wooden walls all around it and grass beyond that.

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2697 - 2012-06-23 18:41:55 UTC
Ryunosuke Kusanagi wrote:


ahh I see. Still there is a small discrepency in your statements, The Devs knew about the problem, but you did not? it sounds like there isnt clear communications from the devs to your team that "Hey, this might be a problem, might want to keep an eye on it." type of deal. And apparently, not confirming or denying anything in this statement, that the devs knew about this from it's introduction on Sisi, I do not have the bug reports or such to view this so cannot say one way or another.


Yeah you know cause theyre totally not human and infallable
being omnipotent beings like you are after all

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2698 - 2012-06-23 18:44:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Antisocial Malkavian
Danfen Fenix wrote:
People keep throwing around the word sandbox...

The clue is in the spelling


Sand box

All sandboxes have walls, and goons simply hit them this time P Whats the big deal?

One thing I have noticed though with you goons is that, when somethings in your favour, you're all happy. Once it's against you, you whine like theres no tommorow...All the while knocking on people who whine about you, or things you agree with.

HTFU?


You sir are wise

Tallon Sylph wrote:


Not working as intended?

Oh my.

Maybe you guys should make things better rather than going on asset grabbing rampages when a group of players understands the impact of your changes better than you do.


Or maybe you should realize that abusing mechanics may not be a good way to do it (whether or not they listened to you on the test server)

I didnt think Goons were so poor that 5 trillion would hurt so much.

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Reptail
#2699 - 2012-06-23 18:47:47 UTC
c'mon do not be shy if u believe in what u r doing

come shooot jita mem

Ground Shiwer

Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#2700 - 2012-06-23 18:48:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Antisocial Malkavian
Xython wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:
I don't disagree. We should have notified the people we did things to.


So, learning experience then?

GROUP HUG, EVERYONE!


I believe the term is HTFU
or maybe UMAD BRO?

Or is it pubbie? Maybe youre CCP's pubbies now...

Xython wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Tallon Sylph wrote:
Maybe you guys should make things better rather than going on asset grabbing rampages when a group of players understands the impact of your changes better than you do.


If that ever happens I'll agree with you.


Ok. Please see this thread for a prime example of it happening.


Ah, I understand, thats the disconnect. YOU see "asset grabbing", the rest of us see "market correction"

some see "justice"

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.