These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

How do you feel about Gallente cultural influence?

Author
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#1 - 2012-06-19 20:28:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
The Hanaya Clan has stood with the Emperor for three hundred years now. We're small, but diligent in our duty to the Kingdom and a very traditional, family-focused Clan.

The other day, I was visiting my sister and noticed my nephew had a new comic on his reader: Fusion. It starred a young man with superpowers fighting the Death Squads of an evil corporation whose leader wanted to take over the world and enslave everyone to work in his factories. I noticed that the writer and artist were Gallente and I'll say that their viewpoint reflected the culture of the Federation. When I asked my sister about the comic, she said only that it was popular with children at my nephew's school.

Not long ago, I was in Rens delivering some cargo when I noticed the music the dock workers listened to. I forget the singer's name, but I think she's rather popular. She uses 'authentic tribal beats' and updates them for a modern audience, and tends to be political in her songs. She's also signed to a Gallente publisher, has a Gallente agent, and the musicians and songwriters she works with are all Gallente as well. Her beats might be authentically tribal, but I don't think her songs are.

I also happen to have a dear Caldari lady friend who's rather ambitious and makes an effort to 'dress to impress.' I'll be honest: she looks good. The latest Gallente fashions she wears aren't the rather tawdry looks we tend to associate with that group, but are very chic and sophisticated. I often feel a bit plain when I go out with her.

I see this wherever I go. Not only in the busy population hubs of the cluster but the rather mundane middle systems. Advertizing, music, books, movies, clothing, and even the language are being infused with Gallente elements, but that the average person seems ignorant of this fact.

What do you think of this trend?

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-06-19 21:02:35 UTC
As you have asked for opinions, I will present mine and hope that it finds some merit.

If an individual, or a group of individuals, chooses to accept particular cultural influences and apply them to themselves, be they literature, art, fashion, music, language, mannerism and so on; then that is their choice. I see nothing wrong with this, as choosing to learn from others and apply things of merit from other persons can strengthen one and the whole.

However, when it comes to where such things are expected, in that an individual choosing not to adopt these same influences is suddenly seen as inferior, behind the times or inept in some way; then it becomes a problem. It is a thing I have heard referred to as cultural warfare, where the purpose of the "conquering" culture is to constantly be setting the trends and standards so that it becomes necessary to adapt and conform in order to succeed or fit in.

I suppose the goal at this point would be to determine which of the above scenarios is being practiced.

~Malcolm Khross

Logan Fyreite
Grim Bit Interface
#3 - 2012-06-19 21:04:53 UTC
Gallente "culture" is their religion, and it is just as insipid as the rest.

As for it's penetration into various cultures, I am not surprised, their entertainment is quite catchy, even if their music leaves much to be desired. I suppose some of the younger generations might enjoy it, but I prefer some of the older, more original works out there, rather than the new trend of music that seems to be modifying old beats slightly and calling it a radical innovation.

As for Gallente clothes, I think those should spread more, and faster if possible. Especially amongst the Capsuleer crowd, though to be fair most of our capsuleer elite already wear the Crystal Boulevard's best.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#4 - 2012-06-19 21:16:25 UTC
Logan Fyreite wrote:
Gallente "culture" is their religion, and it is just as insipid as the rest.


Now I have to admit that I wonder how you would react to someone calling the Matari culture and traditions insipid.
Logan Fyreite
Grim Bit Interface
#5 - 2012-06-19 21:21:58 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Logan Fyreite wrote:
Gallente "culture" is their religion, and it is just as insipid as the rest.


Now I have to admit that I wonder how you would react to someone calling the Matari culture and traditions insipid.

I would totally agree, even whole-heartedly so. Bunch of spirits in the tree's, divine touch in tattoo's, trust thy elder, trust thy commander nonsense if you ask me.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#6 - 2012-06-19 22:17:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Hm. It appears that my views are actually more protectionist than those of my superior, which probably makes me some sort of extremist. With apologies, Khross-haan, I must differ on the harmlessness of individual collectors.

As I see it, Caldari society functions well as long as it retains its internal integrity: the meritocracy must actually be based on merit, and those given high honors and great responsibilities must be able to live up to them. This requirement is in tension with certain natural human tendencies, notably greed and selfishness-- not directly, for one can do very well for one's self and one's family by behaving honorably and responsibly. However, if one can look down on a factory floor full of one's subordinates and think, "I owe these people nothing," something has gone very wrong.

Especially at the high level, individualism is toxic to the State.

The Gallente have been engaged in a campaign of cultural warfare against the State since, more or less, the end of the last war. The idea appears to have been to insinuate individualistic memetics and cultural tropes into Caldari society, hopefully resulting in a "grass roots" revolt that would sweep away the old corporate meritocracy and replace it with a nice individualist democracy that would differ from the Federation mostly in the superior quality and inferior user-friendliness of its technical products.

Sadly, it's not the State's "grass roots" that can usually afford to fill its eyes, ears, and gray matter with imported articles of Gallentean culture. The Gallente didn't hit the bottom of the State meritocracy: they hit the top. The "roots" remained passionately community-minded and meritocratic, while the top developed a severe case of individualism.

The revolution did come, but it was a cultural restoration, not a cultural overthrow. Furthermore, because of the populist, anti-elitist character of the revolt, the meritocracy's recovery came with a heaping helping of unsophisticated hoi polloi playing at leadership.

Gallentean cultural influence, then, is at least partly responsible for the individualism-driven corruption at the top of Caldari society, and therefore for the Provists who asserted their power in order to correct it. Had we kept our import policies tighter, our minds freer of a culture antithetical and toxic to our own, we might very well still be at peace.

We can slow this process if we resist the temptation to help the Gallente counter-acculturate our elites by allowing them access to our leaders' brains. Allowing individual "Gallentean culture habits" to develop is akin to permitting individuals to sip tasty cups of heavily-diluted liquid corruption.

It's poisonous.

I don't usually take a hard line on these sorts of matters, but we really ought to ban any Gallentean product with more political heft to it than Quaffe.

It is probably inevitable that sooner or later the meritocracy will again become destabilized. Leaders will sneer at duty, management will be conducted to maximize personal gain, workers will be viciously exploited, and another renewal will become necessary.

That day doesn't need to be soon.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-06-19 23:17:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Nakal Ashera
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Hm. It appears that my views are actually more protectionist than those of my superior, which probably makes me some sort of extremist. With apologies, Khross-haan, I must differ on the harmlessness of individual collectors.

As I see it, Caldari society functions well as long as it retains its internal integrity: the meritocracy must actually be based on merit, and those given high honors and great responsibilities must be able to live up to them. This requirement is in tension with certain natural human tendencies, notably greed and selfishness-- not directly, for one can do very well for one's self and one's family by behaving honorably and responsibly. However, if one can look down on a factory floor full of one's subordinates and think, "I owe these people nothing," something has gone very wrong.

Especially at the high level, individualism is toxic to the State.

The Gallente have been engaged in a campaign of cultural warfare against the State since, more or less, the end of the last war. The idea appears to have been to insinuate individualistic memetics and cultural tropes into Caldari society, hopefully resulting in a "grass roots" revolt that would sweep away the old corporate meritocracy and replace it with a nice individualist democracy that would differ from the Federation mostly in the superior quality and inferior user-friendliness of its technical products.

Sadly, it's not the State's "grass roots" that can usually afford to fill its eyes, ears, and gray matter with imported articles of Gallentean culture. The Gallente didn't hit the bottom of the State meritocracy: they hit the top. The "roots" remained passionately community-minded and meritocratic, while the top developed a severe case of individualism.

The revolution did come, but it was a cultural restoration, not a cultural overthrow. Furthermore, because of the populist, anti-elitist character of the revolt, the meritocracy's recovery came with a heaping helping of unsophisticated hoi polloi playing at leadership.

Gallentean cultural influence, then, is at least partly responsible for the individualism-driven corruption at the top of Caldari society, and therefore for the Provists who asserted their power in order to correct it. Had we kept our import policies tighter, our minds freer of a culture antithetical and toxic to our own, we might very well still be at peace.

We can slow this process if we resist the temptation to help the Gallente counter-acculturate our elites by allowing them access to our leaders' brains. Allowing individual "Gallentean culture habits" to develop is akin to permitting individuals to sip tasty cups of heavily-diluted liquid corruption.

It's poisonous.

I don't usually take a hard line on these sorts of matters, but we really ought to ban any Gallentean product with more political heft to it than Quaffe.

It is probably inevitable that sooner or later the meritocracy will again become destabilized. Leaders will sneer at duty, management will be conducted to maximize personal gain, workers will be viciously exploited, and another renewal will become necessary.

That day doesn't need to be soon.


I wasn't expecting to see such an unambiguously extreme viewpoint from you on this matter, Captain Jenneth.

Most of what you say is more or less true - that is, that the influence of the Federation almost certainly does have a negative impact on the States ability to maintain it's cultural (and structural, since, as you pointed out, this sort of thing does tend to flow to those most exposed to at the top of the ladder) basis, especially since greed, a nautral province of those in power, and individualism go hand in hand.

But while I cannot earnestly presume to offer a better solution, I can say that simply cutting links to the Federation indefinitely would not, likely, work. The two nations are, in simple geography if nothing else, especially close. This is, disregarding a mass migration of one of the two populaces, not going to change. As long as both exist, they will maintain a high level of exposure to one another, and limiting trade would only serve to weaken that link for the people at the lowest level of society. Individuals who rise to the top would still be just as likely to partake in the cosmopolitan cluster level culture that has some to exist, and be influenced thus.

All of this is only magnified by the fact the two will likely share a system for the forseeable future.

All that I think it would accomplish, at least from my perspective, is fostering an unhealthy alienation and hatred of a very close neighbor amongst people who simply do not know better. Not too different from the case now, even.

And, more to the point, it is far too easy to use talk of "Toxic" cultural values to justify actions of conquest, as opposed to merely preservation and "protectionism", as you put it. Something that you don't need to travel far on this forum to already find zealous and manic support of.

That is, unless you meant the word to mean something different altogether.

Please, feel free to correct me on any of these points if I have misunderstood you.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-06-19 23:19:04 UTC
((double post))
Mammal Tafren
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#9 - 2012-06-19 23:23:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Mammal Tafren
Aria Jenneth wrote:


The Gallente have been engaged in a campaign of cultural warfare against the State since, more or less, the end of the last war. The idea appears to have been to insinuate individualistic memetics and cultural tropes into Caldari society, hopefully resulting in a "grass roots" revolt that would sweep away the old corporate meritocracy and replace it with a nice individualist democracy that would differ from the Federation mostly in the superior quality and inferior user-friendliness of its technical products.


Not far from the village from which my ancestors hailed, there is a confluence of rivers. One river is wide and brown, a meandering flatland river.

The other is a swift mountain stream, blue water laced with white caps, continually dashed and refreshed over rapids.

They meet and then flow steadily to the sea.

They mix and then no-one can tell what water came from what river. One could dam up one of the rivers, to keep the other river pure, as it were. But then, water from one would evaporate, condense, and inevitably rain would fall, mixing the rivers. No matter what, no stream can be kept pure.

Pretending otherwise is futile. Just like the man who thinks that he can control the course of rivers utterly is shocked to find that nature defies his efforts, so too do we idly seek to isolate cultures from each other.

That is not to say that we should not try to preserve culture. What if one of the streams contained a poisonous algae, and a village that relied on the water was downstream? Would it not then be in the best interests of everyone to dam the river?

Of course, but with the understanding that the river does what it does, not from malice, not because the river is at war with the village downstream, but because the river is a river and flowing is simply what rivers do.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#10 - 2012-06-19 23:31:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
How odd.

The IGS will have to forgive me as I've perhaps lead a sheltered and privileged existence in the Kingdom, but I find the Gallente cultural warfare is insidious and poisonous. They may not be showing up with a fleet of warships, but they are subverting the national fabric of all non-Gallente states.

Given the reaction to Amarrian religious expansion, I'm surprised at the mildness of the views expressed here. Perhaps if Theological Council employed more nubile blondes, used catchy jingles for the Scriptures, and slave collars came out in a different array of bright colors each season, the cluster would all live under the Pax Amarr by now.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#11 - 2012-06-19 23:42:45 UTC
Nakal Ashera wrote:
Please, feel free to correct me on any of these points if I have misunderstood you.


Only a little.

Geography may make contact between our nations inevitable, but-- and, again, you will probably find this extreme-- I really feel that the best state to maintain that border in is a closed, highly-militarized no-man's land.

The difference between my view, which could be regarded as hard-line Patriot, and the conqueror's view, which would be militant Provist, comes down to this: there's no point at all in conquering something you want no part of. The ideal would be to sever most non-diplomatic ties, and even shut down the stargates between our regions .

It seems kind of a gloomy approach, but, because of your culture's belief in its own universal applicability and correctness, currently being demonstrated in vivid terms by Seriphyn Inhonores' efforts to demonstrate that Gallentean culture is really the native culture of all humanity, you're never going to let us be.

Just going with the flow of history on this seems like an excellent way to keep corrupting our own leaders until something really goes wrong and the State either implodes or goes genocidal.

The best solution may be to part ways. Still-- there's a lot of insight in the Federation, a lot worth learning. And the forbidden has a powerful lure. Even if it's only available through the black market, that's far from being "unavailable"....

Perhaps the proper solution is to just fire up the State's own media systems, mass-market highly-sophisticated material demonstrating the value of community and cooperative effort, and spoof the thousand hells out of simplistic Federal cultural arguments.

Hm. ... and distribute holoflick vouchers. Give the higher-ups and the lower-downs some common social capital.

It's not like we don't have a local head start, or like we can't produce decent writers. Now if only NOH didn't own most of the State's media assets....

Of course there's that unfortunate Caldari tendency to devalue artists, but that may be something we can fix.

Worth considering, maybe....
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#12 - 2012-06-19 23:52:41 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Geography may make contact between our nations inevitable, but-- and, again, you will probably find this extreme-- I really feel that the best state to maintain that border in is a closed, highly-militarized no-man's land.


I hope that the borders remain wide open. I think that the Federals and their culture have a lot to teach us, and hope that we as a people are worthy of the challenge. If they corrupt us, then we deserve our corruption.

May the best system win.

Aria Jenneth wrote:
Perhaps the proper solution is to just fire up the State's own media systems, mass-market highly-sophisticated material demonstrating the value of community and cooperative effort, and spoof the thousand hells out of simplistic Federal cultural arguments.


Oh, I like this idea. I'm no memetic engineer, but we have an excellent PR department here at Lai Dai. They would love this as a side project. I'll speak to them on it, maybe they're looking for a challenge.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-06-20 00:10:16 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Nakal Ashera wrote:
Please, feel free to correct me on any of these points if I have misunderstood you.


Only a little.

Geography may make contact between our nations inevitable, but-- and, again, you will probably find this extreme-- I really feel that the best state to maintain that border in is a closed, highly-militarized no-man's land.

The difference between my view, which could be regarded as hard-line Patriot, and the conqueror's view, which would be militant Provist, comes down to this: there's no point at all in conquering something you want no part of. The ideal would be to sever most non-diplomatic ties, and even shut down the stargates between our regions .

It seems kind of a gloomy approach, but, because of your culture's belief in its own universal applicability and correctness, currently being demonstrated in vivid terms by Seriphyn Inhonores' efforts to demonstrate that Gallentean culture is really the native culture of all humanity, you're never going to let us be.

Just going with the flow of history on this seems like an excellent way to keep corrupting our own leaders until something really goes wrong and the State either implodes or goes genocidal.

The best solution may be to part ways. Still-- there's a lot of insight in the Federation, a lot worth learning. And the forbidden has a powerful lure. Even if it's only available through the black market, that's far from being "unavailable"....

Perhaps the proper solution is to just fire up the State's own media systems, mass-market highly-sophisticated material demonstrating the value of community and cooperative effort, and spoof the thousand hells out of simplistic Federal cultural arguments.

Hm. ... and distribute holoflick vouchers. Give the higher-ups and the lower-downs some common social capital.

It's not like we don't have a local head start, or like we can't produce decent writers. Now if only NOH didn't own most of the State's media assets....

Of course there's that unfortunate Caldari tendency to devalue artists, but that may be something we can fix.

Worth considering, maybe....



Let me begin by saying that I'm not from the Federation. That assumption could lead you to believe I'm on the defensive - Speaking for my own cultural values. I'm not.

With all due respect, you seem to be missing the forest for the trees, to some extent. What you want or think would lead to the best solution does not matter. I agree that hypothetically, if the State severed all of it's ties to the Federation - absolutely and completely - it would retain it's cultural integrity as you describe, and perhaps, depending on the context of the situation, prosper as a result.

However, that is not really worth discussing, because it will not happen. The cluster has, to some extent, intergrated into a single community, atleast amongst members of the elite. Despite the wars, constant and massive literal and cultural trade between all four Empires has become routine. Even between the State and Federation. There are an untold amount of interests that would be against such a move, probably including several of the megacorporations. And of course, CONCORD itself.

And, as I already said, there is the issue of Caldari Prime being situated in the Federal Capital system. Unless the State only wishes to possess the planet symbolically - which seems quite unlikely - transport to the center of the Federation is going to have to remain open.

"Parting ways" is not an option. I believe that if such a sentiment became popular, it would only result in even greater conflict born from the frustration of it's impossibility - One that may well lead to the end of both powers.


Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#14 - 2012-06-20 00:13:26 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
I hope that the borders remain wide open. I think that the Federals and their culture have a lot to teach us, and hope that we as a people are worthy of the challenge. If they corrupt us, then we deserve our corruption.

May the best system win.


My worry is that there's a certain self-gratifying quality to Federal literature, etc., that lends it additional allure. The really troubling bits lack depth, but have an attraction to them that has nothing to do with value.

They're guilty pleasures, but very ... viscerally satisfying. Good versus evil! Freedom versus slavery!

Who could ever object to that?

I'm not sure I like a straight fight with that kind of enemy.

That said, I suspect that a clever turn or two could expose them as the predictable, shallow, flavorless goo that they are.

Quote:
Oh, I like this idea. I'm no memetic engineer, but we have an excellent PR department here at Lai Dai. They would love this as a side project. I'll speak to them on it, maybe they're looking for a challenge.


You know, the cruel, selfish, sordid, decadent, exquisitely damaged lives of the pre-Heth elite could make for a first-rate holodrama series. And carry a few necessary points across-- no need to even be heavy-handed about it.

Best that we just plain avoid bludgeoning people with it at all, really. Scalpel over bludgeon-- make it a thematic element instead of a plot point, and it'll get into their heads without anybody even noticing they're being taught.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-06-20 00:20:11 UTC
Now you are stereotyping, Captain Jenneth, and you know it.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#16 - 2012-06-20 00:31:48 UTC
Nakal Ashera wrote:
However, that is not really worth discussing, because it will not happen.


You may wish to be a little slower to say "will not," Ms. Ashera. A lot of things occur on a regular basis that most don't anticipate, and radical shifts in politics, policy, geography, and power are the stuff of which history is made.

You're not wrong, but those obstacles you mention are just that: obstacles. If Tibus Heth were to fall, and the Patriots acquired solid control in his wake, a negotiated peace worked out with the Caldari holding the advantage might look more like what I suggested than you might think.

The arrangement would go something like, "Tensions between us are too high; our nations cannot continue to exist side by side. Therefore, we will maintain only minimal contact. Connecting gates will be switched off; the only contact will be at Caldari Prime, where a new, long-range gate, bridging to Perimeter, is under construction. Caldari Prime orbital space is now a no-go zone to all non-diplomatic traffic originating elsewhere in the Luminaire system. Trespassers will be given one warning to turn back, then destroyed."

That sort of thing. Capsuleers would complain, of course, but we'd get used to it.

Still, I'm starting to like this idea of a cultural counteroffensive.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#17 - 2012-06-20 00:39:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Nakal Ashera wrote:
Now you are stereotyping, Captain Jenneth, and you know it.


Which part? The horrid schlock?

Did you miss the "really troubling bits" qualifier? Most of the really bothersome Gallentean media-- at least from where I sit, and I used to watch it occasionally-- is the stuff that paints the world in terms of black and white, good and evil-- no nuance, no subtlety. Right, wrong; truth, lies; freedom, oppression. Meritocrats are a pack of vicious, blood-drinking elitists who live on the suffering of those they have enslaved and deserve to get blown up along with their private armies. That sort of thing.

I'm doing it a mild disservice, but only in the sense that I'm leaving out the detail that the dialog is often very good.

The subtle stuff might be more insidious, but it's also more attenuated. We can counter that more easily, because it's much less likely to make you want to cheer.

Edit:

If you're talking about the other part, with the old elites, then yes-- well, sort of.

You see, the old elites were quite a corrupt lot. I should know-- I got asked to supply "entertainment" to a fair few of their parties. The problems may not have been universal, but they had become widespread pretty much everywhere except, famously, Ishukone.

The idea isn't to depict them as monolithically evil; quite the opposite. The idea is to depict them as sympathetic, fragile, human-- and badly damaged. This can't work quite the same way for any two of them, and it can't be wholly universal, or it spoils the effect. The idea isn't to repel (that would make for very poor sales), but to fascinate the viewer with characters who are sympathetic, but by no means admirable.

You can't stereotype much, if at all, in that scenario, because the predictability of a stereotype works against you. So, three-dimensionalty it is.
Dex Nederland
Lai Dai Infinity Systems
The Fourth District
#18 - 2012-06-20 01:12:28 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
The problems may not have been universal, but they had become widespread pretty much everywhere except, famously, Ishukone.


And Ishukone reformed only after the late Gariushi-haani mysteriously became the Chief Executive Officer.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-06-20 01:16:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Nakal Ashera
I won't argue any more points about the problems with cutting off the two nations completely (which I cannot stress enough that I believe would be utterly throwing out the baby with the bathwater at best) as I can see our discussion just becoming circular. I'd be interested in discussing it properly elsewhere, if you would.

Still, I will address the rest.

Aria Jenneth wrote:
Which part? The horrid schlock?

I was talking about both, actually.

First, I don't think you can really claim that the Federation is worse then any other in that regard. I've seen media from every corner of the cluster, and of course it always plays off he public mindset. Amarrian media features godly men being tested by savage outsiders, while Minmatar media oft shows murderous slavers battling against heroic freedom fighters. The reason this happens is, of course, because people like things that do not challenge them or their worldview, which usually follows the cultural norm.

Because, well, if I may be blunt, most people are quite stupid. Or at the very least, comparatively uneducated.

"Black and White" themes and generally shallow media are not a product of the Federation or it's culture - rather, they are a product of ignorance and those who wish to profit - politically and monetarily - from it. And you will not find a place in the cluster where ignorance is utterly lacking.

So I was saying that it was stereotyping to attribute it so greatly to (or atleast imply that) it is the province of the Federation.

...Gods, I need to stop myself before I start sounding like Captain Inhonores.

As to the other point, it did strike me as an odd generalization. Though I will admit that such corruption did exist. I do think, though, that it is unfair to attribute it to Federal influence completely - power, by it's very nature, offers and even promotes individualism.

And as for your other suggestion, I would agree the State needs a stronger media - It is, if nothing else, a very institutionalized environment, and sadly creativity (even when that, too, is institutionalized) tends to suffer in such a way. Again, I would not presume how one could go about averting this. Perhaps the Achura would be better producers of such content - They tend to, as far as I have seen, be more thoughtful and creatively inclinded then the true Caldari, if you will forgive a small measure of stereotyping of my own.

But I'm not sure that pushing it to happen so unorganically is the right way to do it. Look at it in the wrong light, and it's nothing more then, in uglier terms, institutionalized indoctrination.
Nakal Ashera
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-06-20 01:18:33 UTC
((double post. again.))
123Next pageLast page