These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[Proposal] - Remove Protectionism From These Systems

Author
Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
#1 - 2012-06-13 13:09:16 UTC
A quote from a beloved GM

GM Homonoia wrote:
Tl;dr We are extending our rookie griefing rules to the system of Arnon.

See our wiki page on this subject: http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_Systems

History lesson
A long long time ago in a galaxy right here in the EVE universe we had a lot of new players who undocked for the very first time and were trying to figure out how to fly their ships. There was also a small group of players that wanted to pad their kill mails in the easiest way possible by preying upon those people who had not yet found the trigger to their civilian guns. This last group moved into the rookie starter systems and started killing our new recruits. This is not cool and so us game masters decided that messing with these newest and most helpless players was not allowed. A ban was put into place for griefing rookies in their starter systems.

Of course, these predators decided that rules should be followed to the letter and the spirit behind these rules can be ignored at will and moved to the career agent systems to do the exact same thing. Unfortunately this forced us to extend the ban on griefing rookies to these systems as well.

Present day
Now these scavengers of corpses have moved to the Sisters of EVE epic arc systems to do the exact same thing once again. This is forcing us to extend this ban to the Arnon system as well. Let me state very clearly that we do so with great reluctance. We do NOT like to impose rules and limitations like these upon the sandbox and we do not do so lightly. These measures are always debated hotly within our department and can often take multiple months of deliberation to make absolutely sure we are doing the right thing.

Let me state this very clearly here. We do NOT want experienced players to mess with rookies barely a week in. We are sure that you have worthier targets than these players who are still learning the ropes. If this behavior does not stop we may extend this rule to all systems that are covered in the Sisters of EVE epic arc. These systems are:

- Tar
- Harerget
- Hatakani
- Hek
- Lustrevik
- Tanoo
- Lisudeh
- Sosh
- Manarq
- Chainelant



Now I don't have a problem with rookie protectionism in the rookie systems but when you extend it outside those systems I have a problem as it makes eve a less complete place and at the moment this is only going to be enforced in Arnon. But personally I don't want to see this outside of rookie systems [including Arnon]. In Hatakani there is an incursion atm, so shall we protect rookies from those too? The GM discretion has to play a part but a lot of GM discretion is ill advised. I don't kill rookies unless they are generally war targets or something similiar. In-game mechanics should be used to help rookies instead of artificially coddling them and its not as if they have much to lose anyway most of the time.

Would rookie alts be protected too in the future? New players who bought an old character. Stop spoiling the sandbox for the majority for the sake of the new.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#2 - 2012-06-13 14:57:54 UTC
How about we propose a new system: a rookie tag on characters that indicates they are not fair game. The specifics of this tag would need to be worked out (I'll get back to that). If you steal from a wreck or can owned by a rookie, you risk bannage. If you gank a rookie, you risk bannage. If you do anything to ruin the NPE, YOU RISK BANNAGE.

Ways to trigger the rookie flag being turned off:
- the ACCOUNT reaches a certain age (alts would never be rookies)
- the character joins a player corporation
- the character engages in activities outside of the new player experience (tutorials, career agents, SOE arc)
- other stuff I haven't though of

This would take some serious work to prevent it being abused, but I think it would solve the problem and prevent people from blundering into warnings and bans by not knowing "The List."

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#3 - 2012-06-13 15:13:33 UTC
I agree that protecting systems that are distant from the rookie systems is a bad idea. But I also agree completely with the GMs that greifing in those systems hampers CCPs growth, and is frankly not cool.

Move the Career agents to the systems next to the rookie systems. Then have it protected. Problems (both of them) solved.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#4 - 2012-06-13 16:44:38 UTC

1.) I think clear labels on the system label, stating it's a rookie system is very appropriate.
-- I'm under the impression it's hard to know what system is considered "rookie safe"!!

2.) I think any special rules that apply to rookie systems should be blatantly stated on one of the System's Information tabs!!!
--- Personally, I think special rules for rookie systems (like no can baiting), is just a PITA to enforce, it's a PITA to keep track of, and having the rules extend to "other" systems is not ok!!! Move the SoE arc to Rookie systems, don't expand the rookie system limitations into SoE systems!!!

3.) Rather than deal with can baiting crap in rookie systems, it would probably be better to have all can's automatically set blue (abandoned) in rookie systems. This way the rookie will only get aggression when they steal from a wreck or shoot at someone for doing so!!!

Finally, it's pretty sad we need protections for rookies....
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-06-14 01:39:21 UTC
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
Finally, it's pretty sad we need protections for rookies....

Agreed.

How lame.

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-06-14 08:36:48 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
How about we propose a new system: a rookie tag on characters that indicates they are not fair game. The specifics of this tag would need to be worked out (I'll get back to that). If you steal from a wreck or can owned by a rookie, you risk bannage. If you gank a rookie, you risk bannage. If you do anything to ruin the NPE, YOU RISK BANNAGE.

Ways to trigger the rookie flag being turned off:
- the ACCOUNT reaches a certain age (alts would never be rookies)
- the character joins a player corporation
- the character engages in activities outside of the new player experience (tutorials, career agents, SOE arc)
- other stuff I haven't though of

This would take some serious work to prevent it being abused, but I think it would solve the problem and prevent people from blundering into warnings and bans by not knowing "The List."



This is actually a good idea. Brand new players should not be the target of griefers, and yes it is griefers as ther are plenty of legitimate and capable targets out there.

Have the age limit be something sensible like 7 or 14 days, plenty of time for a new player to get used to teh game and finish tutorials even if they are a very casual player. New players should not be the target of pvp. Possibly though if it is capable have it IP linked to avoid abuse by making un-targetable alts.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#7 - 2012-06-14 11:18:40 UTC
And so the descent down the slippery slope begins.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#8 - 2012-06-14 11:25:40 UTC  |  Edited by: TheGunslinger42
Rookie protection wouldn't even be needed if some mechanics were properly explained to them right at the start

anyway, is the no-griefing-rookies policy based solely on system? That seems a crap way to manage it (since you have to keep extending it to include other systems, evidently)
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die
Pandemic Horde
#9 - 2012-06-14 13:14:44 UTC
Haved you thought about growing a pair and stop moaning about how you cant kill noobs because you are too lame to kick it with the big boys? My god we might as well line them up liek a firing squad if you want a kill that easily!

Go learn to pvp properly, get in low sec and fight someone who can fight back, and just leave noobies alone

All my views are my own - never be afraid to post with your main, unless you're going to post some dumb shit

Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-06-14 13:22:55 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
Haved you thought about growing a pair and stop moaning about how you cant kill noobs because you are too lame to kick it with the big boys? My god we might as well line them up liek a firing squad if you want a kill that easily!

Go learn to pvp properly, get in low sec and fight someone who can fight back, and just leave noobies alone


some of the rules concerning noobs are universally applied to the system and it makes certain actions a bannable offense regardless of pilot age.

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#11 - 2012-06-14 15:58:39 UTC
tiberiusric wrote:
Haved you thought about growing a pair and stop moaning about how you cant kill noobs because you are too lame to kick it with the big boys? My god we might as well line them up liek a firing squad if you want a kill that easily!

Go learn to pvp properly, get in low sec and fight someone who can fight back, and just leave noobies alone


The issue is that things are based on *system* - and it keeps extending, with potential for hitting the likes of hek, lustrevik, etc. Enjoy getting banned for can flipping in a trade hub, or ninja-looting in a major mission hub, etc
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#12 - 2012-06-14 19:45:08 UTC  |  Edited by: FloppieTheBanjoClown
For example, I had no idea Hatakani was on the list. I pass through there all the time and have on occasion stopped to mess with the locals. There is zero indication in-game that the system is under any sort of special protection.

edit: also creating safe-haven systems is bad because it provides a place for older players to go where it's against the rules for us less savory players to mess with them. That's not the PVP-free zones some of the carebears ask for, but it's a step closer, and is a bad thing.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-06-16 00:07:38 UTC
Kusum Fawn wrote:
tiberiusric wrote:
Haved you thought about growing a pair and stop moaning about how you cant kill noobs because you are too lame to kick it with the big boys? My god we might as well line them up liek a firing squad if you want a kill that easily!

Go learn to pvp properly, get in low sec and fight someone who can fight back, and just leave noobies alone


some of the rules concerning noobs are universally applied to the system and it makes certain actions a bannable offense regardless of pilot age.


Yeah because you can tell who's a real rookie by their character age. Alt accounts of vets are definitely rookie, and casual players who aren't online for hours every day to learn pvp are no longer "rookie" on day 15, right? You turn 18 today, son, now go hang with the big boys, nevermind that you're rolled as an industrialist.Big smile

Extend it to all of the 7% of systems in Eve that is highsec and be done with it.
Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
#14 - 2012-06-16 18:35:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Terranid Meester
They should either extend it to no systems or all systems. Not some grey area. EvE is supposed to be a harsh place, full of danger.
This really isn't helping to convey such a thing as advertised by CCP.

New players could always test out their place on a seperate server [like SiSi for instance or a new server dedicated to rookies].
I like rookie pilots I really do, and most of the time they are not worth shooting because they have nothing of value [plus I usually have no reason to shoot them]. However if this kind of change is expected in future I might have to hire rookie pilots to shoot rookie pilots with a bonus reward for doing so. Then lets see the GM's start banning rookie pilots.
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-06-16 21:10:47 UTC
Terranid Meester wrote:
They should either extend it to no systems or all systems. Not some grey area. EvE is supposed to be a harsh place, full of danger.
This really isn't helping to convey such a thing as advertised by CCP.

New players could always test out their place on a seperate server [like SiSi for instance or a new server dedicated to rookies].
I like rookie pilots I really do, and most of the time they are not worth shooting because they have nothing of value [plus I usually have no reason to shoot them]. However if this kind of change is expected in future I might have to hire rookie pilots to shoot rookie pilots with a bonus reward for doing so. Then lets see the GM's start banning rookie pilots.


Test server is for testing. The idea that SiSi exist for noobs to learn is ridiculous.
Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
#16 - 2012-06-17 18:28:44 UTC
sabre906 wrote:


Test server is for testing. The idea that SiSi exist for noobs to learn is ridiculous.


I didn't say for definite to use sisi. Just an idea.
chopper14
Emo Rage Quit
#17 - 2012-06-30 03:18:06 UTC
Protectionism is a step back for sure,  and it doesn't help noobs.

Most noobs click through the intro,  coast through the entry missions and disregard warnings as fast as possible to get outside and play for that first time.  

I never read the intro or did entry missions.  I vaguely remember a gate warning me I was wandering away from the playground.  It wasn't long after before I traversed low sec and took the pod express home.  

You can continue to extend protection system to system. It won't work. What about all the noobs that travel through Hag?  Or parts or several other low sec areas daily?

It's not Anyones fault for killing them there.  The gate lights up and you prepare to fire. By the time your done researching the targets age it may be gone with it's load of Riggs, drugs, or whatever.  

Simply painting them pink won't save them from insta lock.

If you make them invincible  you create a reconisance exploit.

If you want to coddle noobs and treat them like children, you need to do this.

1. They are pink in space,  on the HUD, and in local.

2. Whenever they jump into a system outside of their home system,  there should be a warning box for all to see that says.  "Clubbing baby seals is wrong!  So is  repeatedly killing disoriented noobs who are probably lost.  If we catch you clubbing baby seals or noobs you will be banned FOREVA!!!"

3. They are worthless.  There is nothing in the wreck and no salvage.

4. If there ship is destroyed it respawns at their home system mods and cargo intact.  Same with there pods.  If they don't get podded. They can dock up and "Pod" jump to their home station.

5. They should be restricted to their home systems for at least 2 weeks.  
Give them some hyper gate's that leads to stuff like a consensual combat arena  where they can blow eachother up for lulz withought fear of loosing their stuff. 
There can be different gates like the combat sites on the test server.  
Maybe one where they can fight older players if they wish. 

But they have to stay in the incubator for two weeks that's the rule.  
Anything less is like leaving the front door of your house open in the middle of NewYork and taking a nap,  Assuming your toddler won't  go outside and that if he does the nice homeless man down the street will bring him safely home.

Eve meet hello kitty IN SPACE!!!
Chin Hakonen
United Evian Peace Corp
Ice.Road.Truckers.
#18 - 2012-06-30 04:25:04 UTC
Such things don't happen everyday does it and not all rookies get shot at? So why the protection. Well this is space and there will be brutes and bullies.

Peace is the way of my war.

Laechyd Eldgorn
Avanto
Hole Control
#19 - 2012-06-30 10:13:03 UTC
idea of having rookie systems is ridiculous i have no idea which systems are rookie systems

repeatedly messing around with noobies doing tutorials whatever should be of course banned but those aside they dont need any special treatment, especially because there's no way to tell if the pilot is a real noob or not
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-06-30 11:13:18 UTC
Rico Minali wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
How about we propose a new system: a rookie tag on characters that indicates they are not fair game. The specifics of this tag would need to be worked out (I'll get back to that). If you steal from a wreck or can owned by a rookie, you risk bannage. If you gank a rookie, you risk bannage. If you do anything to ruin the NPE, YOU RISK BANNAGE.

Ways to trigger the rookie flag being turned off:
- the ACCOUNT reaches a certain age (alts would never be rookies)
- the character joins a player corporation
- the character engages in activities outside of the new player experience (tutorials, career agents, SOE arc)
- other stuff I haven't though of

This would take some serious work to prevent it being abused, but I think it would solve the problem and prevent people from blundering into warnings and bans by not knowing "The List."



This is actually a good idea. Brand new players should not be the target of griefers, and yes it is griefers as ther are plenty of legitimate and capable targets out there.

Have the age limit be something sensible like 7 or 14 days, plenty of time for a new player to get used to teh game and finish tutorials even if they are a very casual player. New players should not be the target of pvp. Possibly though if it is capable have it IP linked to avoid abuse by making un-targetable alts.

In regards to the age-thing, just make the rule "Trials are rookies, off-Trial are legal targets". And give all suchTrial-rookies a label so you can see clearly whether they're Trials or not. Also makes it easier for recruiters to know if an applicant is on Trial or not.

New to EVE? Want to learn? The Crimson Cartel will train you in the fields of _**your **_choice. Mainly active in EU afternoons and evenings. Contact me for more info.

12Next page