These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Crimes for Unposted Policies?

First post First post
Author
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#201 - 2012-06-13 11:46:34 UTC
Adriel Malakai wrote:
GM Homonoia wrote:
Can flipping is specifically mentioned because it is impossible to target someone specific. If you can flip a veteran in a rookie system we will (most likely) not take action against you. But if a rookie takes the bait you better not open fire.


I definitely understand the not-shooting at rookies if they take a flipped can, I was more concerned with the more common use-case of can-flipping, which is simply stealing to gain aggro against the owning player/corporation.

As long as it's still legal to steal from non-rookies and kill them (via flipping, stealing, ganking, ninjaing, war, or any other means) in these systems, then this is a perfectly reasonable rule. If these 25 systems are 100% safe zones for all players, then that's completely out of line and goes against the whole "no-where is safe" thing.



The only ones who were EVER safe ANYWHERE in EVE were the rookies, both in their starter systems and now (because some people are just pathetic and like to kill rookies) possibly the SOE Epic Arc systems as well. Everyone else, everywhere else, is a fair target.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#202 - 2012-06-13 11:48:09 UTC
GM Homonoia wrote:
See the post made by GM Spiral above. GM discretion is applied here and we generally do not protect veteran players, but if a rookie gets caught in the crossfire we act accordingly.


This is completely reasonable, but this should also be clearly documented. As it stands, a player new to HS PVP is likely to come across that page and be misinformed, thinking that all players are safe there and that they will be banned if they kill veteran players in those systems. If it was made clear, then everyone knows where the line is and can act appropriately.
Luis Graca
#203 - 2012-06-13 11:52:20 UTC
I gonna fast forward this tread

What's the line between a newb and a vet?

i play for 3 years and i consider my self a newb in so many things, and please don't say something very vague, say it how long does it play to stop being a newb


Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#204 - 2012-06-13 11:52:47 UTC
The saddest part of all of this is that there is a need for these rules and these threads ensue. The rules are now applied to another system because there is a group of people engaged in douchebaggery that involves killing players with characters that are less than a week old. Go off the deep end as much as you want about high sec miners and mission runners breaking and ruining Eve. But it's these people, these rookie-killing asshats, that are doing the most damage.

If I am reading GM Homonia's responses correctly f this behavior of targeting new players continues, the GMs will have to extend protections across many more systems. How far do we want to see that go? In my opinion, do not extend ANY more protections to any systems and simply perma-ban any player that targets and shoots at a rookie in any system. Do not punish the entire community because of the douchebaggery of a few. Just get rid of the few - the game is better without them.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#205 - 2012-06-13 11:54:05 UTC
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
The only ones who were EVER safe ANYWHERE in EVE were the rookies, both in their starter systems and now (because some people are just pathetic and like to kill rookies) possibly the SOE Epic Arc systems as well. Everyone else, everywhere else, is a fair target.


Even after sleeping you seem to be unable to understand anything that is said in this thread.

If you read my posts, I actually stated that rookies should be protected in these systems. The problem is that the pages that state the rules regarding these systems indicate that everyone is completely safe in the listed systems, but the GMs here are saying that this is only kinda-sorta true, and will be arbitrarily decided on a case-by-case basis.

What several of us are asking for is the page to fully explain the rules - so that it is clear that only rookies are protected (even if rookie is not explicitly defined), but that non-rookie pilots are fair game. If this is not explicitly stated, all this will lead to is even more petitions that are hashed out because some veteran in a drake got ninjad/killed in Arnon, then cried because it was against the rules, even though it apparently isn't.
Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#206 - 2012-06-13 11:58:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Adriel Malakai
GM Spiral wrote:

  • Stopgap measures such as these policies are in place until a proper update to the NPE can be made. Measures that are less disruptive to the sandbox environments are being looked into.
  • Can baiting non-rookies in a rookie system? This is a monumentally bad idea on many levels. Dump a can outside a rookie system station or in a rookie system asteroid belt and try to convince me that the rookie you "accidentally" blew up after he poked around in your container was not an intended target. Take can baiting OUT of rookie systems! There are far more entertaining targets out there than those found in those systems. We'll keep the ruling as it stands on the wiki and act on reports as appropriate as they come in. GM discretion in these cases will apply.


Can-baiting is obviously not-cool in rookie systems, as you are basically fishing for random idiots (or noobs). The problem comes when you consider your wiki page and targeted means of getting aggro, such as ninja-salvaging, or can-flipping.

The wiki explicitly states can-flipping, which is the act of stealing a can from another player, is considered griefing. Your page literally says that I am not allowed to gain aggro against any player in a rookie system, regardless of whether or not they're a vet, or a rookie. What needs to be done is to make it clear that these targeted forms of gaining aggression, as long as they're employed on non-rookies are legal in these systems, assuming this is actually the case.

Otherwise, we can only assume that everything the two of you have said in this thread about non-rookies is completely unreliable, doesn't actually reflect the rules, and is utterly useless.

EDIT: My intent is not to be hostile to the GMs, but the reality is that if you do not clearly define this, it will only become a problem for you in terms of increased petition load.
gfldex
#207 - 2012-06-13 12:00:47 UTC
GM Homonoia wrote:
We are not going to define them. We say 8 days, someone will target 9 day old people. Again, spirit of the rule, not the letter. If you find yourself trying to figure out specifically where we draw the line you are obviously targeting rookies, which is NOT allowed. You decide to do this, you will find out where the line is when we warn you.


When I try to figure out where you specifically draw the line I try to avoid getting banned by _avoiding_ to target a rookie. I feel insulted by your reply and have to ask you to it back.

If you take all the sand out of the box, only the cat poo will remain.

Grinder2210
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#208 - 2012-06-13 12:01:13 UTC
Cant we just get a Stright anwser here

if arnon is now safe from all forms of pvp fine if its not fine

if rookies are safe than you have to difine a rookie

Its just bad Poltitcs not to
Danfen Fenix
#209 - 2012-06-13 12:02:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Danfen Fenix
Myself...I'd like to think we could all agree that 30 days is the limit of how long someone could be classed as a 'rookie' for, seeing as, you know...rookies are also kicked out of the 'Rookie help' after 30 days P
Grinder2210
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#210 - 2012-06-13 12:04:40 UTC
Danfen Fenix wrote:
Myself...I'd like to think we could all agree that 30 days is the limit of how long someone could be classed as a 'rookie' for, seeing as, you know...rookies are also kicked out of the 'Rookie chat' after 30 days P




Like to think that to than someone flys buy me in a vindy with everytype of repper and lasers ...........
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#211 - 2012-06-13 12:05:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Cutter Isaacson
Adriel Malakai wrote:
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
The only ones who were EVER safe ANYWHERE in EVE were the rookies, both in their starter systems and now (because some people are just pathetic and like to kill rookies) possibly the SOE Epic Arc systems as well. Everyone else, everywhere else, is a fair target.


Even after sleeping you seem to be unable to understand anything that is said in this thread.

If you read my posts, I actually stated that rookies should be protected in these systems. The problem is that the pages that state the rules regarding these systems indicate that everyone is completely safe in the listed systems, but the GMs here are saying that this is only kinda-sorta true, and will be arbitrarily decided on a case-by-case basis.

What several of us are asking for is the page to fully explain the rules - so that it is clear that only rookies are protected (even if rookie is not explicitly defined), but that non-rookie pilots are fair game. If this is not explicitly stated, all this will lead to is even more petitions that are hashed out because some veteran in a drake got ninjad/killed in Arnon, then cried because it was against the rules, even though it apparently isn't.



And clearly YOU cannot read.


GM Homonoia wrote:


Those are the same rules. There is no difference. You cannot mess with rookies. You can mess with anyone else no matter the system. veterans are NOT protected in rookie systems.



Ta da!!

Next illiterate nincompoop please!

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#212 - 2012-06-13 12:05:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Adriel Malakai
As a side note, there's a somewhat legitimate reason why they won't define a rookie.

A big part of this is that a lot of players will make a trial account and let it lapse, then a year later, they'll come back and reactivate the account. In this case, the player is still a rookie, even if their character is old. As a rule of thumb, it's probably safe to say that anyone who is in a ship that can't be trained on a trial account is not a rookie, given that they're older than a few weeks (ie BCs, BSs, etc).
Luis Graca
#213 - 2012-06-13 12:06:19 UTC
In a game that allows grieffing, scams and other stuffs like that it's imperative that there's very straight and clear rules to protect newbs because they are they easiest targets and will probably stop playing because of emo-rage

DeBingJos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#214 - 2012-06-13 12:06:39 UTC  |  Edited by: DeBingJos
GM Homonoia wrote:
DeBingJos wrote:

Then define a rookie please.Is it a player on a trial account? How can we see this ingame?


We are not going to define them. We say 8 days, someone will target 9 day old people. Again, spirit of the rule, not the letter. If you find yourself trying to figure out specifically where we draw the line you are obviously targeting rookies, which is NOT allowed. You decide to do this, you will find out where the line is when we warn you.


Don't get me wrong. I'm against griefing new players. However, if you are going to use a heavy-handed approach like banning, you should make sure the rules are clear.

Edit: as stated in a post above, a clear rule would be: You are a rooky as long as you have the rookie-help channel open. (30 days)

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Phill Esteen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#215 - 2012-06-13 12:08:34 UTC
GM Homonoia wrote:

- Tar
- Harerget
- Hatakani
- Hek
- Lustrevik
- Tanoo
- Lisudeh
- Sosh
- Manarq
- Chainelant


righteous space-messiah, not Hek! Please GMs, have mercy /o\

– postum faex est – 

never forget

Adriel Malakai
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#216 - 2012-06-13 12:08:55 UTC
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Ta da!!

Next illiterate nincompoop please!


Why I'm still bothering to respond to you is beyond me, but here goes.

GM Homonoia wrote:
Adriel Malakai wrote:
GM Homonoia wrote:
Can flipping is specifically mentioned because it is impossible to target someone specific. If you can flip a veteran in a rookie system we will (most likely) not take action against you. But if a rookie takes the bait you better not open fire.


I definitely understand the not-shooting at rookies if they take a flipped can, I was more concerned with the more common use-case of can-flipping, which is simply stealing to gain aggro against the owning player/corporation.

As long as it's still legal to steal from non-rookies and kill them (via flipping, stealing, ganking, ninjaing, war, or any other means) in these systems, then this is a perfectly reasonable rule. If these 25 systems are 100% safe zones for all players, then that's completely out of line and goes against the whole "no-where is safe" thing.


See the post made by GM Spiral above. GM discretion is applied here and we generally do not protect veteran players, but if a rookie gets caught in the crossfire we act accordingly.


Source

This is why I want it clearly stated on the wiki page, as the GM answers, regarding non-rookies, are literally changing every-other post.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#217 - 2012-06-13 12:09:59 UTC
Grinder2210 wrote:
Cant we just get a Stright anwser here

if arnon is now safe from all forms of pvp fine if its not fine

if rookies are safe than you have to difine a rookie

Its just bad Poltitcs not to


You could always rely on common sense. The GMs are not going to define "rookie". As Homonia stated if they define "rookie" as 8 days old or less, these clowns will target 9 day old characters.

Common sense - if you have to ask, don't shoot it. Rookies are in the rookie channel for 30 days. So why not 30 days? It will be decided on a case by case basis and as such you'd better use your common sense. I know that is hard sometimes - I live in the U.S. and there is a huge lack of it here.

Common sense is hard.
Eve is hard.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Inzax
#218 - 2012-06-13 12:22:55 UTC
Instead of banning noob griefers have CCP put contracts on them. A known griefer goes red and is gankable in noob systems for "x" amount of days/time without CCP interference. Perhaps make the griefer a target in all of high sec? Let the players police the issue.

I am sure this is a terrible idea...flame away.

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#219 - 2012-06-13 12:25:24 UTC
Inzax wrote:
Instead of banning noob griefers have CCP put contracts on them. A known griefer goes red and is gankable in noob systems for "x" amount of days/time without CCP interference. Perhaps make the griefer a target in all of high sec? Let the players police the issue.

I am sure this is a terrible idea...flame away.




It is a terrible idea, and I support it fully CoolCool

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

DeBingJos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#220 - 2012-06-13 12:29:47 UTC
Remember, adding non-rookie systems like Hek and Arnon to the list opens up other griefing oppurtunities

1. Create new toon
2. Set course to Hek
3. Probe a mission runner
4. Steal loot
5. Report him for griefing when he shoots you<
6. Collect tears.

I am still very much in favor of improving the tutorials with a lot of info about game mechanics instead of these rules.

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.