These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

The weak, and the strong

Author
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
Pandemic Horde
#1 - 2012-06-12 13:22:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
So some of the high sec miner types are all up in arms because people are killing their "max yield but not enough tank to stand up to a destoyer" Hulks. I imagine the silent majority are simply taking the more than reasonable counter-steps needed to frustrate the gankers, but this goes out to the stubborn foot stomping entitled few who thinks the game working as intended is somehow wrong.

Talk to High Sec Mission runners.

I'm serious. Just talk to them.. They did this thing called "ADAPTING" and it's much less profitable/satisfying to screw with most of them now.

You see, in the past, some Mission runners felt like the game owed them to right to put full officer fits on mission running ships (these were the "Max-yeild Hulks of mission running"). Well, some other folks used in game items (ship scanners, probes ect) and mechanics (suicide ganking) to take these things away from the super shiney mission runners. Some (the weak) quit in frustration.

The rest (the strong) stopped putting so much shiney crap on mission ships (and/or filled their fracking EM hole on their tengus lol) and are still quietly mission running in high sec to this very day.

The "Incursion Communities" (rofl) just experianced this too. They were doing their own max yeild thing. Then players came in and killed the mother ship or join tehir fleet and withheld reps or simply suicide ganked them out of their 5 bil isk Nightmares/vindicators ect. Then CCP came down from on high and killed the farmable things.

The dedicated incursion runners (the strong) are still at it, the oppurtunistic, fair weather, incursion gold miners (the weak) are long gone, hopefully never to return.

So it is with EVE, this huge Electro-Darwinian Experiment, the strong survive, the weak perish ( but only after multiple General Discussion forum whiney posts, of course).
I'm just glad dinosaurs didn't have forums, or Asteroids would have been nerfed eons ago.........And then what would miners mine?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#2 - 2012-06-12 13:26:03 UTC
Thankfully there are still a lot of mission runners and haulers who don't fit a good tank or do silly things.
Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-06-12 13:26:31 UTC
Not sure if it is strong vs weak or just committed vs not. The ones that left adapted as well, just in a way that fit them.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
Pandemic Horde
#4 - 2012-06-12 13:28:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Savage Angel wrote:
Not sure if it is strong vs weak or just committed vs not. The ones that left adapted as well, just in a way that fit them.


I can see what you mean, but I tend to think of adapting as "somehow continuing on in the same general direction".

By your logic, people who commit suicide are simply adapting to the preassures of real life lol.
Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-06-12 13:30:56 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:
Not sure if it is strong vs weak or just committed vs not. The ones that left adapted as well, just in a way that fit them.


I can see what you mean, but I tend to think of adapting as "somehow continuing on in the same general direction".

By your logic, people who commit suicide are simply adapting to the preassures of real life lol.


Not at all. People play games for enjoyment, and if they can find more enjoyment elsewhere, who can blame them for leaving? Now if they never touched a computer again because of a gank, then they would have problems.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#6 - 2012-06-12 13:32:18 UTC
Savage Angel wrote:


Not at all. People play games for enjoyment, and if they can find more enjoyment elsewhere, who can blame them for leaving? Now if they never touched a computer again because of a gank, then they would have problems.


Nah that doesn't work for me. Giving up is not adapting.
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#7 - 2012-06-12 13:44:30 UTC
Confirming I have a giant EM hole on my mission runner. Big smile

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Savage Angel
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-06-12 13:47:49 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Savage Angel wrote:


Not at all. People play games for enjoyment, and if they can find more enjoyment elsewhere, who can blame them for leaving? Now if they never touched a computer again because of a gank, then they would have problems.


Nah that doesn't work for me. Giving up is not adapting.


You talk like finding a more enjoyable leisure activity for your time and money is giving up. That I really don't get.
Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#9 - 2012-06-12 13:54:12 UTC
You seem to be confusing Eve with Darwin. Eve is a game. Your strong and your weak are internet database operators. Eve is not real, you know, and what you achieve here does not mean anything. So puff yourself up about how tough you are and continue to delude yourself with your badass game.
Ana Vyr
Vyral Technologies
#10 - 2012-06-12 13:59:44 UTC
Yeah, a bog standard T2 fit Raven or Abaddon does the trick for me in level 4's depending on who I'm fighting. I do own a CNR, which is admittedly faster at missioning, but I rarely bother flying it anymore. Missioning gets a bit stale after a while.
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-06-12 14:15:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
The reason why mission runners don't buy officer stuff is because of its price, we would rather buy a few pvp ships instead of getting a few % on some stat :)

Each of us mission runners have our own dps/tank balance that we prefer.

You can't really compare a combat/non combat ship activity.
Jame Jarl Retief
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-06-12 14:16:16 UTC
My question is this: when EVE is made safer, which is the inevitable result of too much suicide ganking and griefing, when it begins to seriously harm the population growth, what will the gankers and griefers do? Will they adapt too? Or will they quit in frustration? That'll be the ultimate irony, if all these "hardcore" players ragequit.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2012-06-12 14:16:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Warbird
I run with standard t2 stuff all day everyday. If I do get ganked, well, it would pretty easy to replace.

I lol'ed at both posts above... Agreed!
Kiteo Hatto
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-06-12 14:20:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Kiteo Hatto
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:
My question is this: when EVE is made safer, which is the inevitable result of too much suicide ganking and griefing, when it begins to seriously harm the population growth, what will the gankers and griefers do? Will they adapt too? Or will they quit in frustration? That'll be the ultimate irony, if all these "hardcore" players ragequit.


I'll assume that they will use the "eve that i liked is dead" excuse when you tell them to HTFU and link that music video multiple times in a thread.
Followed by many "GG CCP U CATERd carebears" threads on GD by pvp masters.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
Pandemic Horde
#15 - 2012-06-12 14:36:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Ban Bindy wrote:
You seem to be confusing Eve with Darwin. Eve is a game. Your strong and your weak are internet database operators. Eve is not real, you know, and what you achieve here does not mean anything. So puff yourself up about how tough you are and continue to delude yourself with your badass game.


"EVE is a game" is true. It is also a dodge.

EVE is (among other things) an activity. One filled with both weak willed and strong willed people. As in real life, the strong willed will find a way to do what they want regardless of the actions of others. The Weak willed will quit or whine/rage about unfariness. If you don't think enough of your chosen pass time/activiy to adapt to chainging circumstances to stay in that passtime/activity (because it's just a game), then why do it in the 1st place?

The people whining on the forums about the unfairness of having their Hulk smashed rather than being silent aren't observing the "it's just a game rule". If it were just a game to them, they'd simpyl log out/unsub and be gone, right?

This is not to say that EVE online is perfect and that no dissent is warranted, we all have thing we don't like, or that we think could be inproved. But we aren't talking about that, we are talking about weak minded individuals who buy into fallacy-land logic like "what's bad for me is bad for the game".

Which is why I say EVE may not be "real", but it mimics real life in one key aspect: only the strong survive.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
Pandemic Horde
#16 - 2012-06-12 14:44:28 UTC
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:
My question is this: when EVE is made safer, which is the inevitable result of too much suicide ganking and griefing, when it begins to seriously harm the population growth, what will the gankers and griefers do? Will they adapt too? Or will they quit in frustration? That'll be the ultimate irony, if all these "hardcore" players ragequit.


I disagree fully. In fact I find your stance to be seriously self- serving.

People have been "greifing and ganking" in eve since day one, and day one started YEARS ago lol. People like you have predicted doom from the start, mainly because you can't understand that everyone else isn't you, and as many people have a higher tolerance for the things you don't like.

If it worked that way, why isn't EVE dead yet? If greifing and ganking (two things the game makers damn near advertise as FEATURES) is so bad, why havne't YOU left yet?

People always predict that some change to the game (that negatively affects them personally) will somehow lead to the death of eve or some major change. I've never seen it happen.

The only (gameplay related)thing that could kill eve are change so major that negatively affect an over-whleming majority of players (like, as an extreme example, CCP removing the ability to undock from a station lol). Players killing hulks in high sec isn't something on that scale, not by a long shot.

i'm not a ganker, I'm a null sec pvp'r and explorer (nullbear if you prefer lol), and I'm even religiously anti-goon (down with something aweful i say). But I'm anti-weak minded entitlement loving blood sucker more than I'm anti-goon lol.


sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-06-12 14:53:48 UTC
'Tis true, my son. You are strong now.

Your 2 bil tanked Hulk now takes 2 catalysts to pop instead of one.Big smile
Random Majere
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-06-12 15:54:12 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:


The people whining on the forums about the unfairness of having their Hulk smashed rather than being silent aren't observing the "it's just a game rule". If it were just a game to them, they'd simpyl log out/unsub and be gone, right?



If people whining on the forums bothers you...that makes you weak.
MasterEnt
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-06-12 15:57:31 UTC
Please explain to me how using a combat ship to attack a non-combat ship is strong?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#20 - 2012-06-12 16:18:48 UTC
MasterEnt wrote:
Please explain to me how using a combat ship to attack a non-combat ship is strong?


Somali skiffs vs bulk tankers

U-boats vs merchant ships

Slave ships vs a royal navy 5th rate

Spanish gold ships vs gallions

Trade hulks vs triremes

Piracy is not a new thing here. Its history goes back for as long as merchant ships have existed. Why would EVE be any different?
123Next pageLast page