These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Small Truths

Author
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#1 - 2012-06-11 19:16:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Saisieni, pilots.

I should start off with two apologies. First, I wish to apologize to Khross-haan, and to the others in the Wiyrkomi Honor Guard, who have taken a considerable risk in taking me in, for speaking so soon, and so publicly. Some may attribute my beliefs to you, and they will err in so doing. The reason I must move so soon relates to the second apology.

In earlier times, my voice was often heard, here. I promoted a philosophy of separateness and distinction, the "otherness" of our kind, writing from a position of good faith, but limited understanding. Few followed, but many listened. In this, I have been a source of harm. If this is not precisely my fault, it is certainly my responsibility, and so I must write.




There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.

There are no Laws but those that cannot be broken. There are no Borders but those that bound reality itself. There are no Identities that divide, no Ideals that dictate a higher world.

There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.

If this is true, and it surely is, then what duties are there for us-- figments, shadows of our own minds? And what hope?

Across the ages, people have found many answers. A cold world spoke to the Caldari, and taught them of interdependence and sacrifice, and the value of resources. A warm world spoke to the Gallente, and taught them of rights and freedoms. An ancient writ spoke to the Amarr, and taught them of a God, of His hierarchy, and of His purpose-- and that purpose spoke, in turn, to the Minmatar, and taught them the importance of identity, of suffering shared, and of bitter loss.

Truths, small truths, to fill the lack of great ones.

And now, we, ourselves, walk the stars. And, as ever, the land we walk speaks to us of truths. The Black between the stars whispers to us.

The Black, the killing near-nothing, enfolds all, contains all.

None, whispers the Black. Speck, figment, there are none.

No worth that is not fiction, no truth that does not lie, no cause worth fighting for. Take. Give. Build. Destroy. All are one. All are naught.

... so be what you will be, and do as you will do, and do not trouble to care for either, for the universe surely will not.


That is what the Black whispers to us, capsuleers, we children of humanity who walk those empty halls sheathed in tritanium skins. It tells us what it knows, and, for it, it is right.

But the Black knows nothing of life. Life is alien to it; life exists within it only by living in the exception, the pocket of sustaining matter. It is anomalous for living things to touch it, but touch it we do.

It tells us of what it is. While we live, it is folly to listen to a place so hostile to life.

But as the creatures we are, doing the work we do, it is all but impossible not to listen. It seeps into us, creeps into our thoughts and our emotions, poisons us with cold uncaring. It mocks honor, love, and hope, sneers at charity, and laughs at principle. It cannot attack self, for self is nearer to us than it is, but it reduces us until self is all we have or care for.

Unresisted, it will make demons of us all, killers as remorseless as hard vacuum.

And yet, living things that we are, we can never be its creatures. Its state exists in tension with ours, as surely as our pressurized atmospheres exist in tension with its near-absence of everything. To become like it is to suffer, through that tension, to suffer and to spread suffering.

So, what to do?

There are three small truths common to all thinking creatures, three duties inimical to the void. They are not Great Truth, but paths to a life free of suffering, as is the way of small truths, and grounded in our place in things.

Humility, for the shadow that is yourself is only the nexus of greater forces.

Compassion, for it is only circumstance that grants superior strength to one over another.

Moderation, for extremity tears at the fabric of the world, of the lives around us-- and our own.

In any culture, even when unrecognized, these are the duties, the basic requirements, given humans and humankind. To follow them is, perhaps, no guarantee of happiness, but to violate them is to spread suffering, and to invite suffering upon one's self.

Are these three, in all ways, sufficient to a life well-lived? Perhaps not, but to live without them is to court a decline that will never end.

It is an understanding I have come late to, even if I had long been told these things, and had even repeated them myself. In the past, I have spoken of a need to separate ourselves, to part ways with humanity. I no longer believe this to be possible, or desirable. Nearer to the void, to the Black, than most of humankind, we surely are.

But that does not make the emptiness any less deadly.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#2 - 2012-06-11 19:27:07 UTC
I quite enjoyed this, and while I would like to comment on so much of it, for now I will limit myself to one thing.

You say space is hostile to life. While this is certainly true in the basest sense, in that entering it unprotected will assuredly kill you, until such time as you come to view that titanium skin as 'yourself, unprotected', there is a paradox there that must be addressed.

If the void, endless space, the universe is so hostile to life, there seems to be an awful lot of life to fill it, and more every day.

And while it is these small balls of life-sustaining organics and gasses are what have sheltered humanity to this point, in some places we are starting to realize that they are not enough. Humanity, eventually, will outstrip these tiny blue specs, and will need to find some way else to live.

Space offers us that place. Space is the future of our species.

I am glad to see you back, Ms. Jenneth, and endeavoring to work past your desire to seperate you from humanity. Instead, I hope you will work to uplift the rest of humanity to your place. Let us all have titanium shells, after a fashion.
Edaine Numenor
Numenor Benevolent Holdings
#3 - 2012-06-11 19:38:40 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:

There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.

While I am sure that you did not intend to do so, you began your argument with a self-defeating syllogism or oxi-moron if you like. The second statement cannot follow from the first. If no great truths proceed from Human Understanding, then to claim that there is but one great truth, as you understand, it is a contradiction of your own stated logic. Perhaps you want to start over and revise your preliminary statements.

Liberating slaves wherever, whenever, and however I can.

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#4 - 2012-06-11 19:52:34 UTC
Edaine Numenor wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:

There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.

While I am sure that you did not intend to do so, you began your argument with a self-defeating syllogism or oxi-moron if you like. The second statement cannot follow from the first. If no great truths proceed from Human Understanding, then to claim that there is but one great truth, as you understand, it is a contradiction of your own stated logic. Perhaps you want to start over and revise your preliminary statements.


I think it was meant as a paradox. A koan, of sorts. We have them too, but they are difficult if not impossible to put into words.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#5 - 2012-06-11 20:13:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Space is the future of our species.

... I hope you will work to uplift the rest of humanity to your place. Let us all have titanium shells, after a fashion.


What is best for humanity's future is not a thing I pretend to be positioned to judge.

That said, there is, I think, a difference between living in a habitat in space and coming in contact with space, Mr. Thessalonia. One involves walking down pressurized halls, breathing recycled air, and using more-or-less analog controls to maneuver one's vehicle, or whatever, around. Alternatively, it involves putting on a suit and bumbling about in a teeny bubble of oxygen covered with hopefully-airtight fabric.

The other involves putting on a tritanium body the size of, not coincidentally, a space ship, whose outer surfaces are directly exposed to space and which makes the little human lives scuttling around inside you like so many blood cells seem very small and insignificant indeed.

One leads to carpal tunnel syndrome. The other leads to capsuleer dementia. These two are distinguishable, as workplace hazards go. I'll be more enthusiastic about "uplifting humanity" to "my place" when someone invents a psychologically ergonomic capsule to mitigate the problem.

Until then, the fewer hyper-empowered people limited to using intellectual comprehension of what it means to be compassionate as a stand-in for actual empathy, the better.


Edaine Numenor wrote:
If no great truths proceed from Human Understanding, then to claim that there is but one great truth, as you understand, it is a contradiction of your own stated logic. Perhaps you want to start over and revise your preliminary statements.


Haha ... ah, Mr. Numenor, thank you, but no: I prefer it precisely as it is.

Are you and Mr. Momaki still close?
Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#6 - 2012-06-11 20:16:48 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.


You are incorrect. All that is not is also a "great truth."
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#7 - 2012-06-11 20:25:03 UTC
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
You are incorrect. All that is not is also a "great truth."


A null set is, by its nature, empty.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#8 - 2012-06-11 20:49:21 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
A null set is, by its nature, empty.


I'm surprised and overjoyed by your use of mathematics in this case, Pilot Jenneth. If only everyone was willing to state their beliefs so precisely. I would in fact like to restate your initial paradox in set theory, if I may - correct me if I'm wrong, but you mean:

There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.


All sets are constructed by compounding the null set, {0}.

From this central fact we construct all of mathematics, and from mathematics all other things - All that Is. Yet, the null set itself is the definition of nothing. I think that this lends support to Pilot Noh, who does not get enough credit and can, in fact, bake a marvellous starcake when so moved.

I will make no comment yet on the rest of your poetry, I haven't been able to assemble enough of my thoughts to make an intelligent reply. Frankly, I'm having a hard time getting past the first few sentences. No faoult of your own! It's hard for me to think on these lines. But it's very much worth the effort, and I enjoy the puzzle. Thank you.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#9 - 2012-06-11 20:55:37 UTC
It's good to see you back, Ms. Jenneth.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Aldrith Shutaq
Atash e Sarum Vanguard
#10 - 2012-06-11 21:59:50 UTC
Superb words, Ms. Jenneth.

The Knighthood of the Merciful Crown is interested in producing a written code of honor by which it will judge its own pilots and other capsuleers. While my Grand Master is a cyber knight and abides by the holy code that profession entails, he is unfamiliar with the world of capsuleers. While not an especially intellectual man, he recognizes the need to learn. I, and indeed my Grand Master, are intrigued by the subjects you present here, and therefore you.

We request and audience with you if you would permit it.

Your corporation is permitted within the walls of Mercy's Keep, though if you would like to meet somewhere else we would be willing to accommodate.

Aldrith Ter'neth Shutaq Newelle

Fleet Captain of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore of the 24th Imperial Crusade

Lord Consort of Lady Mitara Newelle, Champion of House Sarum and Holder of Damnidios Para'nashu

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#11 - 2012-06-11 22:25:45 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
You are incorrect. All that is not is also a "great truth."


A null set is, by its nature, empty.


And from emptiness comes everything that exists. So, sweetie, which is the greater truth?
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#12 - 2012-06-11 22:30:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Scherezad wrote:
... correct me if I'm wrong, but you mean:

There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.


All sets are constructed by compounding the null set, {0}.

From this central fact we construct all of mathematics, and from mathematics all other things - All that Is. Yet, the null set itself is the definition of nothing.


I'm afraid you're a bit more up on your mathematics than I am, Ms. Scherezad, though I am not surprised that the two seem to mesh: Achur religious thought tends to incorporate knowledge, rather than resist it. My understanding derives from a lot of sources, including mathematics, physics, biology, anthropology, psychology, and semiotic theory-- like a lot of religiously-motivated seekers, at least among the Achura, I'm a dabbler. I leave the deeper probings into specific areas to the actual scientists, while trying to grasp the whole.

What you say of Ms. Noh may be true, but I find the set of what is much more interesting and significant than its null-set counterpart, for this reason:

If we define "that which is" as that which can influence the universe, and the border of the universe as encompassing all of "that which is," and nothing else (a reasonable statement, it seems to me), then anything that can influence the universe, exists within it.

What does not exist, in the very most literal sense, doesn't matter.

This, however, means that fictitious beings, abstract concepts, and other imaginary things have their own reality-- they influence; therefore they exist.

Take for instance, the Amarrian God. I by no means believe in the Amarrian God, but you can't walk down a back alley in the Amarr Empire without finding proof of His influence. He is considerably more "real," in this sense, than I am-- if only as a construct of mind (which describes you and me, as well-- the minds in question being largely our own).

The thrust of my remark to Ms. Noh, then, was aimed primarily at the status of the null set-- nonbeing-- as a "Great Truth." That nothing is nothing may be true, but is easily derived from the statement that what is, is. And what is, is much more interesting to contemplate, not to mention live in.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#13 - 2012-06-11 22:35:08 UTC
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
And from emptiness comes everything that exists.


... Ah ...

This strikes me as a statement of belief, rather than established fact. Usually, emptiness doesn't explode with sufficient force to generate a universe. You need something to do the exploding. What might have come before said very large kaboom remains unclear.

I admit that if it turns out that a god waved a recognizable hand and generated it all from nothing, I will be floored.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#14 - 2012-06-11 22:39:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Mr. Shutaq:

Ah, sir.... I would be honored, of course.



Mr. Nightstorm:

Thank you. It's ... good ... to be back.

And maybe a bit saner than I was when I left.
Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#15 - 2012-06-11 22:42:21 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
And from emptiness comes everything that exists.


Usually, emptiness doesn't explode with sufficient force to generate a universe.


Is that so?
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#16 - 2012-06-11 22:47:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
Is that so?


As far as I'm aware, yes. Mind you, there are all sorts of things going on in a lot of apparent emptiness that are very interesting indeed.

But, actual, simple emptiness? No energy? No forces at play?

... Can you point me to something that suggests otherwise?

Edit:

To explain a little further: my preferred understanding of the origins of the universe does not place that "original" blast as the literal origin-- that there were either pre-existing conditions or a pre-existing superstructure that gave rise to the necessary conditions. These, however, are within my sense of the universe as a whole, or the Totality.

I do realize that pairs of opposing bits of matter pop up and self-annihilate where there was previously no matter, all over the universe, constantly. But that process strikes me as an energy interaction more than true generation out of "nothing"; otherwise, the second law of thermodynamics is a load of hooey.

If you'll pardon the expression.

As I mentioned, I'm a dabbler, not a specialist, so I may be missing something. If you can point me to countervailing data, I'd be grateful.
Unit XS365BT
Unit Commune
#17 - 2012-06-11 22:54:53 UTC
We welcome you back pilot Jenneth.

We Return.

Unit XS365BT. Designated Communications Officer. Unit Commune.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#18 - 2012-06-11 23:00:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Scherezad
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Usually, emptiness doesn't explode with sufficient force to generate a universe.


I apologize for bringing set theory into the conversation; it's certainly not required for this sort of talk. I'd like to help in the point I quote above, though, if you'll accept a little more.

The idea of "emptiness exploding with force to create the Universe" is something of a fallacy, and part of the reason I dislike metaphors. While they're very pretty they tend to muddy the issue. The idea of the universe "exploding" from an initial singularity is a poor metaphor for the expansion of the universe, it does no justice to the math. It's far more accurate (and, if I can say, edifying) to imagine the universe as a sphere in four imaginary dimensions (as in, dimensions along the imaginary number line). This should dissolve the confusion somewhat.

But that has little to do with your conversation. I 'm afraid I've missed your point somewhat - again, no fault of your own. I'm a poor learner and often miss the point. I'll content myself with listening, and will comment if I can come up with a reply of merit.

EDIT - I wanted to comment on the idea of "simple emptiness." To my admittedly limited knowledge, we actually haven't found any yet, it's a theoretical construct. Nature, it appears, abhors a vacuum to a great degree.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#19 - 2012-06-11 23:00:53 UTC
Edaine Numenor wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:

There are no Great Truths, as people understand them.
There are no Great Truths but one: all that is.

While I am sure that you did not intend to do so, you began your argument with a self-defeating syllogism or oxi-moron if you like. The second statement cannot follow from the first. If no great truths proceed from Human Understanding, then to claim that there is but one great truth, as you understand, it is a contradiction of your own stated logic. Perhaps you want to start over and revise your preliminary statements.


You misunderstood the statement, unless I am mistaken. There is no human truth since every human sees his own personnal but biased, flawed truth through his own prism, and cannot comprehend the whole, the Truth. And the Truth is a concept that can not be proved false in its very own definition. It simply exists as long as the whole fabric of the universe exists.

You should read Gorda Hoje.
Che Biko
Alexylva Paradox
#20 - 2012-06-11 23:04:24 UTC
A popular theory is that time started at the same moment the universe came into existence, and that therefor, before the universe came into existence, there was no time for anything to exist before it.

Not that I'm completely sure if this accounts for all dimensions, known and unknown, or if there's any proof, but I mention it because it seems relevant. I'm sure you can dig up more about the theory if you were so inclined.
123Next page