These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Most suitable ship for fastest DED run in 0.6-0.4

First post
Author
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#61 - 2012-06-15 12:48:52 UTC
Ok, I'll admit it, Mnemosyne and Tomcio are both alts of mine I posted with to make it seem like people agree with me.
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#62 - 2012-06-15 12:56:55 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Ahhh, looks like we have to go down this road again. Nowhere in my reply did I say players who barge in and 'take the candy' are doing it wrong. Stop trying to twist my statements around in an attempt to discredit me and justify your own behavior.


Others have already addressed this but I suppose I will as well. Thats exactly what you implied by stating that people that don't follow your self righteous "code" are doing it wrong.

Quote:
Nice attempt to redirect attention and insinuate an incorrect assessment with this sarcastic remark presented as a question : "Who's the troll again?"


Reread your posts brah. The manner in which you express your opinions, the fact that you continue to address me in such a way as if we have a "relationship" and the fact that you seem to think anyone who doesn't agree with you/do it your way/conform to the niceties you seem to expect of people on an internet forum marks you as a troll, albeit an interesting one.

You've changed quite a bit in the past year or so and its been interesting to watch.

Quote:
Guess your other 2 characters have been 'Warned' enough times now that you need to use this character in the forums.


Yes your quest to report all of my posts and get me banned meets success. I have no shortage of alts though and barring RL activity, I'll be here to greet you for a very long time.

Quote:
I hope you don't insist on dancing with me again. If so, I promise you it will be a short dance.


Is that a threat, dear love?

Quote:
Anyway, never said I was a moderator. Obviously they can't view every thread in these forums. As a paying customer and member of this community, I will continue to help and inform CCP whenever the need arises.


Thats all fine and dandy but calling people of the Missions and Complexes subforum "dregs" because they don't conform to your take on how things should be done and proclaiming that this place is "infested" and you must do something about it screams that you seem to think you are a self appointed vigilante that will safe us all from these heathens.

Get over yourself buddy.
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#63 - 2012-06-15 13:02:51 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

A good way to fix that problem is to have random 'Unknown' triggers, especially since it's 'Exploration'.


Hell just froze over.

Because I actually agree with this statement.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#64 - 2012-06-15 14:42:26 UTC
Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:
You are a bit touchy aren't you.Lol

That was not my intention and if you would look at my posts history you would see that I'm the last person to do so.
Show me the rules about 'sarcastic' replies please as I must have missed those.
Just because you feel the way you feel doesn't meant you are right in that matter.


About as touchy as you are it seems.

Yes it was your intention, just like this latest reply from you as well.

* sarcastic, satiric, ironic, sardonic = mean, marked by bitterness and a power or will to cut or sting.
* sarcastic = implies an intentional inflicting of pain by deriding, taunting, or ridiculing.

Feel free to browse the Forum Rules link in the top right corner.

By the way, "I'm trembling in terror." as well as other statements of your reply is sarcastic.

Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

One simple fact of exploration - there is a specific set amount of sites available with no specific respawn timer set on those sites when completed. Interacting with and engaging all available content in each site does not in any way, shape or form deprive other players of content.


Obviously you don't know about site respawning mechanics. If you are spending too much time in one site it will not respawn for other explorers. Someone will be wasting their time scanning other systems and finding nothing while you spend exorbitant amount of time in one site.

Obviously you're reaching now and quite frankly, a bad troll. I know a hell of a lot more about respawning mechanics than to believe that rhetoric.

However, I'll go along with it just this once. All the sites that spawn out in some cobweb corner of the universe and sit there for 4 days before de-spawning are definitely depriving others of content a lot more than me spending 20 to 30 minutes to kill all NPC's within the site.

Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

However, rushing in and taking shortcuts by targeting specific 'Known' triggers to quickly complete a site when somebody else is already engaged there definitely deprives others of content.

Yes because this is NOT a PVP game at all and most of it's content is NOT created by players and the game is NOT based on player interaction Roll

If someone has better skills and experience and is scanning sites faster then what?
Are they depriving others of content because they scan/do the sites faster?
It is exactly the same situation you know. It all boils down to : "who has better skills/ships/mods/experience/knowledge" wins.
By your logic this "winning" equates to depriving others of content.

5 quotes max :(

As far as random triggers go : it is actually good idea. Well maybe not good but definitely better than like it is now.

Ahhh, I was wondering when the PvP game excuse was going to come into play. That is not the issue. The subject was you trying to say I'm depriving other players of content due to staying in the site and killing all NPC's instead of only killing specific ones to quickly gain the Faction loot.

Gratz to you for trying to twist everything around. I'll address the last few statements and then I'm done with you cuz this feels like a bad troll that's just not worth the time.

If someone has better skills and more experience and is scanning sites faster - good for them. Obviously it'll take them much less time to find another site and they probably already know quite a few areas that are usually rich with sites. And due to their vast experience and knowledge, they wouldn't need to bother with barging in and interrupting some novice explorers gameplay.

Unless of course they get off on ruining other peoples game play. But that's another topic which sounds a lot like a CFC meme.

By my logic? You come into a site I'm working and try to pop triggers and 'take the candy', I'm gonna do the same thing like I did with the last guy who tried it.

Since I have top skills, ships, mods, experience, knowledge and ISK, I don't have to resort to 'School Yard' tactics to get some Faction loot. Hell, your replies are starting to sound like excuses Suicide Gankers use to justify attacking Mining ships in high security while calling themselves elite PvP's.

Bottom line - I would love to see all exploration sites have random triggers or require all NPC's to be destroyed before advancing on to next area or causing Overseer / Commander spawn. Right now it's just too easy to get the loot which is flooding the markets and contracts.

DMC
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#65 - 2012-06-15 15:06:02 UTC
Liliana Rahl wrote:
Others have already addressed this but I suppose I will as well. Thats exactly what you implied by stating that people that don't follow your self righteous "code" are doing it wrong.

Quote:
Nice attempt to redirect attention and insinuate an incorrect assessment with this sarcastic remark presented as a question : "Who's the troll again?"


Reread your posts brah. The manner in which you express your opinions, the fact that you continue to address me in such a way as if we have a "relationship" and the fact that you seem to think anyone who doesn't agree with you/do it your way/conform to the niceties you seem to expect of people on an internet forum marks you as a troll, albeit an interesting one.

You've changed quite a bit in the past year or so and its been interesting to watch.

Quote:
Guess your other 2 characters have been 'Warned' enough times now that you need to use this character in the forums.


Yes your quest to report all of my posts and get me banned meets success. I have no shortage of alts though and barring RL activity, I'll be here to greet you for a very long time.

Quote:
I hope you don't insist on dancing with me again. If so, I promise you it will be a short dance.


Is that a threat, dear love?

Quote:
Anyway, never said I was a moderator. Obviously they can't view every thread in these forums. As a paying customer and member of this community, I will continue to help and inform CCP whenever the need arises.


Thats all fine and dandy but calling people of the Missions and Complexes subforum "dregs" because they don't conform to your take on how things should be done and proclaiming that this place is "infested" and you must do something about it screams that you seem to think you are a self appointed vigilante that will safe us all from these heathens.

Get over yourself buddy.

Get over yourself dude.

Relationship? Maybe you should have someone else do a proof read before hitting the 'Post' button.

You keep twisting things around and continue to make untrue statements. I'm too tired to deal with your BS right now and like I said before, not gonna do this dance again. Due to past experiences dealing with you, I know exactly what to do.


DMC
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#66 - 2012-06-15 15:16:30 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

Relationship? Maybe you should have someone else do a proof read before hitting the 'Post' button.


I daresay you're the one that continue to bring up our "past." Thus it is you my dear friend that seems to want to do this dance.

Quote:
You keep twisting things around and continue to make untrue statements.


Please be more vague. Or actually address the parts that are "untrue" and "twisted."

Quote:
I'm too tired to deal with your BS right now


And oddly enough, you weren't too tired to make this post that contributes absolutely nothing to the thread.

So I say again, who's the troll now?

Quote:
and like I said before, not gonna do this dance again.


To be honest, we're well past dancing darling.

Quote:
Due to past experiences dealing with you, I know exactly what to do.DMC


Oh I'm sure you're furiously spamming that report button left and right. Its adorable really.
ISD Stensson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2012-06-15 15:17:32 UTC
Thread locked due to excessive off topic.

Also, the purpose of the forum is to provide a platform for the exchange of ideas. Occasionally, there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Be courteous when disagreeing with others. It is possible to disagree without being insulting.

[b]ISD Stensson Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]