These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Whats your opinion on the following statements? A general consensus on the state of EVE.

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-06-03 22:47:04 UTC
______ makes locating a war target trivial.
______ makes avoiding a war target trivial.
______ prevents true stealth attacks.
______ prevents true stealth travel.
______ gives intelligence unearned and effort free at zero cost.
______ makes chaos theory and emergent gameplay an impossibility.
______ makes scouting skills on your pvp character an exercise in futility.
______ inevitably turns all sanctioned pvp into a campfest.
______ makes hiring a merc corp to war dec a grief corp a waste of effort and resources.
______ makes cloaking in general, useless.
______ makes "afk" presence an option for asset denial.
______ allows gate camping to be done in relative safety and without do risk of larger camps sneaking up on them.
______ makes neutral alts mandatory when targeting a competent player for non-consensual pvp.
______ doesn't make sense in a hardcore sandbox MMO and feels amateur in implementation.
______ being removed would kill most botting operations in EVE with zero coding required.
______ is a crutch used for the lazy to secure themselves from risk.
______ allows suicide gankers to find miners without any real scanning work being done beforehand.
______ makes the vastness of space feel absurdly small.
______ makes black ops somewhat pointless.
______ makes non-consensual pvp a myth. At best something only the dimmest endure.

There are no right or wrong answers here so its a very general discussion. If by chance one particular answer stands out, ignore your gut feeling. Its just wrong thinking, obviously.
Nyreanya
Serenity Labs
#2 - 2012-06-03 22:47:58 UTC
My opinion is all these statements are incomplete sentences.

[/sarcasm]
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#3 - 2012-06-03 22:48:02 UTC
Spamming the exact same post all over the forums, hmmm?

Didja get trolled out of the last thread already?

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.
Bossy Lady
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#4 - 2012-06-03 22:48:56 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
______ makes locating a war target trivial.
______ makes avoiding a war target trivial.
______ prevents true stealth attacks.
______ prevents true stealth travel.
______ gives intelligence unearned and effort free at zero cost.
______ makes chaos theory and emergent gameplay an impossibility.
______ makes scouting skills on your pvp character an exercise in futility.
______ inevitably turns all sanctioned pvp into a campfest.
______ makes hiring a merc corp to war dec a grief corp a waste of effort and resources.
______ makes cloaking in general, useless.
______ makes "afk" presence an option for asset denial.
______ allows gate camping to be done in relative safety and without do risk of larger camps sneaking up on them.
______ makes neutral alts mandatory when targeting a competent player for non-consensual pvp.
______ doesn't make sense in a hardcore sandbox MMO and feels amateur in implementation.
______ being removed would kill most botting operations in EVE with zero coding required.
______ is a crutch used for the lazy to secure themselves from risk.
______ allows suicide gankers to find miners without any real scanning work being done beforehand.
______ makes the vastness of space feel absurdly small.
______ makes black ops somewhat pointless.
______ makes non-consensual pvp a myth. At best something only the dimmest endure.

There are no right or wrong answers here so its a very general discussion. If by chance one particular answer stands out, ignore your gut feeling. Its just wrong thinking, obviously.



The answer to all of these is "logging in"

Posting on this character because apparently some people get upset when they're asked difficult questions. M.
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#5 - 2012-06-03 22:51:51 UTC
Your repeated posts. We stopped caring last week.

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-06-03 22:52:55 UTC
Didn't you have the previous thread with the same OP locked?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Shian Yang
#7 - 2012-06-03 22:56:08 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Didn't you have the previous thread with the same OP locked?


Greetings capsuleer Zim,

Yes, he did. But, there are some capsuleers who would pilot an untanked Hulk into a belt knowing there is a hostile that just took down their first Hulk. In the same way, he will repost the same thing.

It is a conditioned response.

Simply let CONCORD deal with him as they should.

Regards,

Shian Yang
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#8 - 2012-06-03 22:56:27 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Didn't you have the previous thread with the same OP locked?


My powers are telling me the same might be about to happen to this one too

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
CCP Navigator
C C P
C C P Alliance
#9 - 2012-06-03 22:59:29 UTC
Please do not reopen locked threads.