These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Are Exhumer's a dead ship line ?

Author
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#401 - 2012-06-05 02:18:09 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Tanked hulk can tank 3 1.5 mil BS belt rats with ease with no boosting. Thats what they were DESIGNED to do. Got a buddy who does it all the time in nullsec. And those 1.5 mil BS spawns are the toughest non-faction spawn you can find outside of an incursion or sleeper site.


Buffer isn't enough. Hulk doesn't have very high regen like Drake has. You need shield booster. And that's not a 'tanked Hulk'.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#402 - 2012-06-05 03:39:17 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

RubyPorto wrote:

My IPH says 18m in a Hulk mining Pyro (16m in a Covetor). You did say the "gank me now" fit. (With an Orca, 27m and 24m, respectively).

All of the risk can be mitigated with either some effort or some sacrifice in yield (14m per Hour in a Rokh, 15m in a Beast Tank Hulk, with an Orca, 22m and 23m respectively).


Price rose since yesterday. But still, your setup is a joke.

I matched your numbers in mine. You included stuff 1 in 500 use like Michi's Excavation Augmentor (in addition of course to the 5% other implant) and all skills to V.
You are talking of a limit situation. It resembles me those claiming incursions yielded 250M per hour, with the difference that incursioneers are way richer and played the game for longer, while miners are the baseline playerbase.
Plus the benchmark mineral is Trit, because it's what you find everywhere and it's also what you find in mission mining (there are very few missions with enough pyro to be relevant).


Using all skills at level 5 is pretty much standard practice for income or fitting discussions not specifically geared to newbies, because otherwise it devolves into "well with *my* skills" annoying festival. And I'm including a 3% implant (18m in Jita) , no Michi's to hit 27.8m Isk mining normal Pyro. A 5% and Michi's hits 29.2m. (Now that I do some more clicking, it does seem that IPH is not including the standard yield implants in its calculations as none of the implants I choose are affecting the yield)

With no implant, you get 26.3m mining standard Veld. And it's still perfectly viable to work in belts safely. You just need to accept some (a lot of) risk or put in a little bit of effort (D-Scan, Aligning, etc All possible without tank).

Quote:

People don't like your setups because they are good on paper and when they try them for real, they find out they earn well less than stated and it's already the bottom profession of all, now just made p*ss annoying.
Even just minor details like the T2 crystals or having to jet can vs before no jet can (= risk of flipping) or else having to warp all the time. All of this sucks.
And no, I have actually been extensively in all sorts of belts and no, for 100 miners there are 2-3 Orcas, so all your equations and workarounds only apply to a minority.

If for some unfathomable disgrace I returned mining I would want 20 ISK pu or else go mine it yourself.
But this won't happen because bots and gunmining will make prices not reach any value that makes you feel like it was worth the risk and effort.


Every Hisec Miner that I know who could use T2 crystals did so. Back before their income doubled.

Bots are not relevant to this discussion, since the people who mine can choose to change professions just as easily as anyone else IF mining isn't worth it to them (in whatever way they determine worth). Gun mining is no longer a significant source of minerals.

Also, there are bot


Quote:

After so long discussion and seeing you EFT / IPH warrior to fabricate irrealistic income scenarios I am hereby going to stop bothering with the whole discussion.
Go ahead and convince the masses that they earn whatever. They won't take long to see by themselves.


I'm trying to convince miners to adapt to changing circumstances. If the income (whatever it is) and assorted benefits (whatever those are) of mining are not sufficient to compensate for the costs (however you measure them) of mining, Do something else. Mineral prices will eventually reach equilibrium where the income and benefits just cover the costs (inc time, etc.).


Quote:

Nobody cares. Only a "silly" would mine ice in low sec, the ice in there does not even give a tangible higher income.
And given the calculated 0.0 income, only an silly would mine ice in nullsec, any ABC is better.
Want proof?

Ice ISK per hour quadrupled. Because people just stopped mining it, they did not go to low or null.
Going to laugh the day PvP heroes will have to train an alt and go sit at a belt themselves and will have to use their GD forum downloaded mega-tank-empty-each-cycle wonder.


Ok, then miners need to keep mining things other than Ice until Ice is worthwhile to mine. But they won't because it's the most AFK you can be in EvE and still be making money without risk (aside from gankers, which are only recently common enough to be a significant problem). Just watch the screen once every 12 minutes (right before the second cycle lands, look at your screen and toss the ice into the orca, then toss the ice from the second cycle in the Orca as soon as it hits), with a 6min cycle (I think that's the fastest cycle not sure, but a longer cycle is even more afk), you get 12min to look away.

Again, all of these arguments are simply suggestions that miners (especially the ones motivated by profit, who are unwilling to give up yield) to adapt to changing circumstances. If you're mining for the love of the activity (some are), mine in a manner that lets you mine safely without much effort. If you're mining for profit, you might also have to adapt if you want to make the same profit you used to since your circumstances have changed.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#403 - 2012-06-05 03:52:42 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

A FFA bubble would be a hilarious way to eliminate suicide ganking... by eliminating the suicide


Why? The very prospect of having somebody forfeiting concord protection but be able to defend, scares pro gankers sh!tless? Surprise!


You misunderstand me. I would love that module. Perimiter gate FFA, here we come! No, but seriously, I honestly don't see ANY way that that sort of module would benefit miners. If they used it (and it were designed in a way that a Perimiter gate FFA zone doesn't work, something that I don't think is possible without making it useless for your purposes), then gankers would be able to use proper gank ships without needing to keep cost down to a minimum. In addition, HS with less CONCORD is called LowSec.

Try defining the FFA module in a way that lets you gank gankers before they fire AND doesn't let gankers shoot everyone on the perimiter gate. I'll bet it's gonna be tricky.

Quote:

Had 2 industry alts in a 0.0 renter corp in IA sov. Worst experience of my gaming life, I would not repeat it even if the they paid me 50 euros a month.
I won't waste bandwidth describing how every day passed. Suffice to say being barely tolerated as parasites, be treatened to be podded if leaving the system to "go steal our valuable roids" and much much else... not gonna happen again.

Renter corps are best for botters.


As with any time you're dealing with a landlord, it all depends on your landlord (IRL, I've had absent, ******, and amazing landlords. The landlords colored my view of my time living in those places).

Quote:

Yeah I forgot, blobs but there are also 0.0 politics. What you show as necessity or even good stuff are despised by many. 0.0 politics are a game breaker that make former 0.0 players not want to return.


On the contrary, some people like the space they live in and are willing to fight for it. Large fleets are the natural extension of that. It's not for everyone, and that's why the whole game isn't sov nullsec.

Quote:

I posted about it in the other post. A new ship - T2 destroyer hull can target a ship (the target) and cast a small red-ish bubble around it.
From now to bubble expiration or target warp out, whoever will attack the mining will not get concorded.
But at the same time (game of consequences) whoever initiates a lock on that ship forfeits concord "revenge" both off the miner himself and from the corporation whose T2 bubble launcher belongs.
This allows mercs to finally be able and promptly assist the target.
Call it "rules of engagement": anyone initiating a lock clearly shows a criminal intention against the target and this mechanism will enable mercs to shoot 2-3 seconds earlier.

I don't know why this would kill suicide ganking. Only a portion would use the mechanic and the ganker just has to PvP his way to the kill, it's not like he's getting any debuff or obstacle.


So I get to gank anyone on the Perimiter gate who has autotarget lockback on? SWEET!

I said that this sort of thing will kill the "suicide" part of the suicide gank. All I have to do is bait the protecting fleet into firing that module and I get to fight and kill them all with a fleet I designed to kill them (they're stationary, so I get to know what they're flying and fitting [well, the guns at least]). Just like ganking a mining fleet in Lowsec (except that I have to do that pesky baiting thing).

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

BoSau Hotim
Uitraan Diversified Holdings Incorporated
#404 - 2012-06-05 05:47:43 UTC
Boooop wrote:
Price Check Aisle3 wrote:
Exhumers don't belong in high-sec, but they're not a dead ship line.


Do t3 cruisers belong in high-sec? What about assault ships? I need to know I'm making a skill plan. Could you please give me a list of which ships belong where?


^^


I guess because the 'description' says they are made to handle deep space.... some have decided that there is no "deep space" in high sec... that it is only located in low or null??? is that it??? lolol

I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE!  Now... where's Ken?

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#405 - 2012-06-05 05:56:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallian Saotome
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Tanked hulk can tank 3 1.5 mil BS belt rats with ease with no boosting. Thats what they were DESIGNED to do. Got a buddy who does it all the time in nullsec. And those 1.5 mil BS spawns are the toughest non-faction spawn you can find outside of an incursion or sleeper site.


Buffer isn't enough. Hulk doesn't have very high regen like Drake has. You need shield booster. And that's not a 'tanked Hulk'.

Yes, you are correct. It is not a buffer tank on this dudes hulk, its a permatank with a booster.

Being able to survive for a few minutes isn't tanking, unless you are talking about a situation where the dps will be removed inside that time frame. He can survive, solo, in a hulk, with that spawn on him indefinitely.

Edit: And, from what he tells me, its a max yield, or very close to max yield, fit.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#406 - 2012-06-05 07:02:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
RubyPorto wrote:


Using all skills at level 5 is pretty much standard practice for income or fitting discussions not specifically geared to newbies, because otherwise it devolves into "well with *my* skills" annoying festival. And I'm including a 3% implant (18m in Jita) , no Michi's to hit 27.8m Isk mining normal Pyro. A 5% and Michi's hits 29.2m.



I'll just leave this screenshot here. Taken with trit at 6.39 (i.e. average buy and sell at the time of yesterday's post). Includes Miki's implant and whatever.


RubyPorto wrote:

Gun mining is no longer a significant source of minerals.


In 2 days of casual missioning I got 20km3 of loot.
I was not even expecially lucky, as I only got 2 mercs missions and no EOH (big volume loot).
Sure it's well below the 35k I'd get before the nerf but it's not a "no longer significant source of minerals".


RubyPorto wrote:

Mineral prices will eventually reach equilibrium where the income and benefits just cover the costs


And this comes with a sizable number of closed accounts, as all those alts are now worthless.
Also forget spamming D-Scan and whatever in a quad box.

I suppose CCP will ~Dealz wiz it~. Maybe with another 20% layoffs.


RubyPorto wrote:

Just watch the screen once every 12 minutes (right before the second cycle lands, look at your screen and toss the ice into the orca


3 Orcas per 100 miners. All the others don't have your luxury things nor are nerds with 4-5 accounts just to obey nullsec overlords.
With the rising costs it will stay 3 Orcas per 100 miners.


RubyPorto wrote:

If they used it, then gankers would be able to use proper gank ships without needing to keep cost down to a minimum


I don't see a problem. Let them come with PvP ships and wrestle their way in.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#407 - 2012-06-05 07:03:05 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

In addition, HS with less CONCORD is called LowSec


I did not recall Lowsec having Jita, stations where you can undock at will, lots of casual player POSes, L4 missions that can be done in a marauder without 5 guys camping each gate...


RubyPorto wrote:

Try defining the FFA module in a way that lets you gank gankers before they fire AND doesn't let gankers shoot everyone on the perimiter gate. I'll bet it's gonna be tricky.


Since the module only applies bubble to 1 specific ship and since the only concord removal applies to that ship and defenders corp, and affects only the attackers on that ship, and it expires on warp out, how would exactly use it to FFA Perimeter?


RubyPorto wrote:

So I get to gank anyone on the Perimiter gate who has autotarget lockback on? SWEET


You mean, the feature known to have to be disabled at once because it causes all sorts of potentially deadly situations even right today?
When I was in Dark Rising, I got in so early I could not fit a T1 rifter yet - the first day they made sure to tell me to disable it. Figures.

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#408 - 2012-06-05 07:15:57 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

So I get to gank anyone on the Perimiter gate who has autotarget lockback on? SWEET


You mean, the feature known to have to be disabled at once because it causes all sorts of potentially deadly situations even right today?
When I was in Dark Rising, I got in so early I could not fit a T1 rifter yet - the first day they made sure to tell me to disable it. Figures.

Fly logi and discover just how many people turn lockback off.

Every single fleet I have to tell 2-3 people minimum to turn that off and stop shooting my scimi.

Would the players who rarely every fly with people, much less friendlies who would lock them for support mods like RR be likely to know about it, or know to turn it off?

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#409 - 2012-06-05 07:17:33 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:



I'll just leave this screenshot here. Taken with trit at 6.39 (i.e. average buy and sell at the time of yesterday's post). Includes Miki's implant and whatever.


The mining yield upgrades aren't working right now in IPH. Turns out my numbers were straight l5 skills with no boosts (except as noted).

Quote:

In 2 days of casual missioning I got 20km3 of loot.
I was not even expecially lucky, as I only got 2 mercs missions and no EOH (big volume loot).
Sure it's well below the 35k I'd get before the nerf but it's not a "no longer significant source of minerals".


How many minerals does that Meta loot reprocess into? And with the recent decrease in meta loot prices, how many mission runners are daft enough to salvage?

Quote:

And this comes with a sizable number of closed accounts, as all those alts are now worthless.
Also forget spamming D-Scan and whatever in a quad box.

I suppose CCP will ~Dealz wiz it~. Maybe with another 20% layoffs.


Thought we were talking about the Solo miner without alts. And D-Scanning is even easier on a per-income basis if you're running more than one account (Hint, Set up your windowed mode so that your squad/fleet commander's screen is entirely visible and use a squad/fleetwarp when his d-scan shows something).

The multiboxing miners will actually have an easier time adapting if only they were willing to try.

Also, I don't see any evidence that any of this ganking causing a significant decrease in subs. Incarna was Obvious.

Quote:

3 Orcas per 100 miners. All the others don't have your luxury things nor are nerds with 4-5 accounts just to obey nullsec overlords.
With the rising costs it will stay 3 Orcas per 100 miners.


Ok, then don't mine Ice if it doesn't make sense to do so for you. Your skills transfer to ore.

Quote:

I don't see a problem. Let them come with PvP ships and wrestle their way in.


I guarantee miners would see it as a problem the first time it was used against them. And it would be. Constantly.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#410 - 2012-06-05 07:26:52 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

In addition, HS with less CONCORD is called LowSec


I did not recall Lowsec having Jita, stations where you can undock at will, lots of casual player POSes, L4 missions that can be done in a marauder without 5 guys camping each gate...


What game mechanical differences (that affect ship to ship combat) are there between High and Lowsec aside from the lack of CONCORD in lowsec?

Quote:

RubyPorto wrote:

Try defining the FFA module in a way that lets you gank gankers before they fire AND doesn't let gankers shoot everyone on the perimiter gate. I'll bet it's gonna be tricky.


Since the module only applies bubble to 1 specific ship and since the only concord removal applies to that ship and defenders corp, and affects only the attackers on that ship, and it expires on warp out, how would exactly use it to FFA Perimeter?


Ok, I fire the bubble at a random freighter on the Perimiter gate. No CONCORD when I shoot the freighter with other stuff. If it's an agressive act to fire the thing, then I just reduced my cost to gank from whatever it takes to alpha a Freighter to whatever the T2 Dessie (I think that's the hull you suggested) that fires this thing is worth (most expensive T2 Dessie is generously 140m) compared to the near Billion isk worth of Nados it needs today. Not quite an FFA, but close.


Quote:

You mean, the feature known to have to be disabled at once because it causes all sorts of potentially deadly situations even right today?
When I was in Dark Rising, I got in so early I could not fit a T1 rifter yet - the first day they made sure to tell me to disable it. Figures.


And yet, people still have it on. Just like people still try to semi-afk mine in belts.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#411 - 2012-06-05 07:31:43 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

The mining yield upgrades aren't working right now in IPH. Turns out my numbers were straight l5 skills with no boosts (except as noted).


I am using the latest version, just checked and the MLUs (both meta and number) apply variations. Shocked


RubyPorto wrote:

How many minerals does that Meta loot reprocess into? And with the recent decrease in meta loot prices, how many mission runners are daft enough to salvage?


Since the last slot on maras is used for salvager...
In fact the drop in meta loot is because now meta are *more* looted not less. It all fits in one run cargo now.
Finally, I have sold like 100M in those mods using EvE refinery program, not all drops are garbage. Others instead would sell for 200k on the market but had 500k-700k worth of minerals.


RubyPorto wrote:

Thought we were talking about the Solo miner without alts.


Not my fault you switched ot Orca talk. You don't get 1 Orca account just for 1 mining account either.


RubyPorto wrote:

Ok, then don't mine Ice if it doesn't make sense to do so for you. Your skills transfer to ore.
3 per 100 miners also appies to minerals.



RubyPorto wrote:

I guarantee miners would see it as a problem the first time it was used against them. And it would be. Constantly.


Yes but unlike for 0.0 sponsored suicide ganking, this time miners would have active tools. And mercs would stop having to explain all the time that no, they could not open fire on those 4 catalysts that hung around his ship for 10 seconds before they were all neatly placed and setup to fire.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#412 - 2012-06-05 07:37:21 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Not my fault you switched ot Orca talk. You don't get 1 Orca account just for 1 mining account either.

My alt flies both orca and rorq. I do not mine with either account(except occasionally to take a retriever ice mining solo because I need gas).

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#413 - 2012-06-05 07:44:13 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


I am using the latest version, just checked and the MLUs (both meta and number) apply variations. Shocked


Sorry, misspoke, it's the implants that are busted. My bad.

Quote:

Since the last slot on maras is used for salvager...
In fact the drop in meta loot is because now meta are *more* looted not less. It all fits in one run cargo now.
Finally, I have sold like 100M in those mods using EvE refinery program, not all drops are garbage. Others instead would sell for 200k on the market but had 500k-700k worth of minerals.


The drops worth selling aren't impacting the mineral market. And it's still not worth sticking around to loot and salvage if you're in a gank boat.

Quote:

Not my fault you switched ot Orca talk. You don't get 1 Orca account just for 1 mining account either.


I was including Orca boosted numbers for completeness, and nobody mines Ice without a hauler.

Quote:

3 per 100 miners also appies to minerals.


Then continue hauling to station. You can fit a hulk such that it will fly at 75% speed aligned out and fill its hold before it leaves the range of the roid it's mining. Warp in, align out, start mining, cargo full, dock, repeat. You can do this totally solo.

Also, Orcas don't have to be on your alt. They can also be part of your Corp. TONS of mining Corps advertise Orca boosted mining 24/7.

Quote:

Yes but unlike for 0.0 sponsored suicide ganking, this time miners would have active tools. And mercs would stop having to explain all the time that no, they could not open fire on those 4 catalysts that hung around his ship for 10 seconds before they were all neatly placed and setup to fire.


You could have. You would have just lost your ship. Amend your merc contract to include the cost of gank ships (and sec status), and suicide gank the gankers first.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#414 - 2012-06-05 07:49:46 UTC
Every ship in Eve can be ganked in high-sec, so does that mean they are all dead lines?

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#415 - 2012-06-05 08:01:58 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

The drops worth selling aren't impacting the mineral market. And it's still not worth sticking around to loot and salvage if you're in a gank boat.


Like you seem to assume many have an Orca or that nobody mines ice without hauler, you also assume people don't 3-4 box missions nor have loot + salvaging accounts. Now, 3-4 boxing is rare-ish but having 1 idle account (scout / cyno / RR and now also mining idle account Twisted) to also make tag along in a Noctis is common. It would just sit there unused anyway.


RubyPorto wrote:

Not my fault you switched ot Orca talk. You don't get 1 Orca account just for 1 mining account either.


I spent weeks in The Forge ice belts. There were 3 Orcas per 100 miners AND 1 hauler in the whole belt.
Nobody healthy of mind would ice mine with an hauler. Almost no time saved since cycles are so long, and can flippers totally focus ice miners because they know most won't stay ATK for 20 minutes straight.
The most common compromise is to "rent" Orca space off somebody in the belt, but that requires to trust them. It's done though, and much more than using an hauler.


RubyPorto wrote:

Also, Orcas don't have to be on your alt. They can also be part of your Corp. TONS of mining Corps advertise Orca boosted mining 24/7.


Hi sec = land of casual players. Vast majority have irregular playtime and just won't be in a corp. Hi sec mining corps are wardec spammed anyway, why bother.

If you were more in the profession you would have replied me with the Orca solution that is actually practiced and works for casual players of heterogeneous corps as well.


RubyPorto wrote:

You could have. You would have just lost your ship. Amend your merc contract to include the cost of gank ships (and sec status), and suicide gank the gankers first.


Will see if I can convince them. Mining profits are not really elastic to allow this kind of luxury.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#416 - 2012-06-05 08:24:15 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Like you seem to assume many have an Orca or that nobody mines ice without hauler, you also assume people don't 3-4 box missions nor have loot + salvaging accounts. Now, 3-4 boxing is rare-ish but having 1 idle account (scout / cyno / RR and now also mining idle account Twisted) to also make tag along in a Noctis is common. It would just sit there unused anyway.


I tried that once when the Noctis came out. Gave up right quick and trained that toon up to a Domi to add DPS. Salvaging in a Noctis is too much of a clickfest to efficiently run a mission at the same time (at least for me).

Quote:

I spent weeks in The Forge ice belts. There were 3 Orcas per 100 miners AND 1 hauler in the whole belt.
Nobody healthy of mind would ice mine with an hauler. Almost no time saved since cycles are so long, and can flippers totally focus ice miners because they know most won't stay ATK for 20 minutes straight.
The most common compromise is to "rent" Orca space off somebody in the belt, but that requires to trust them. It's done though, and much more than using an hauler.


Does the Orca not haul? Anyway, if people just warp to station every cycle, they can get a friend/alt and web each other so they can mine aligned to a safe. You've just shown that miners are able to work together.

Quote:

Hi sec = land of casual players. Vast majority have irregular playtime and just won't be in a corp. Hi sec mining corps are wardec spammed anyway, why bother.


Vast majority of HS mining corps are filled with casual players. If wardec, then drop corp and continue as normal. Seriously, wardecs have very little practical effect on mining corps. You can also disband the corp and create a new one with the same name (from what I heard in another thread, could have misread in which case, with a similar name).

Quote:

If you were more in the profession you would have replied me with the Orca solution that is actually practiced and works for casual players of heterogeneous corps as well.

Will see if I can convince them. Mining profits are not really elastic to allow this kind of luxury.


Gank ships are cheap. So long as you pod, Sec status hits aren't severe, especially since you only need to kill enough Cats to make the gank fail.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#417 - 2012-06-05 08:32:39 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Gank ships are cheap. So long as you pod, Sec status hits aren't severe, especially since you only need to kill enough Cats to make the gank fail.

And it gets CONCORD there faster without resorting to the possible exploit of using them as bodyguards with an alt in an ibis.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Tenchi Sal
White Knights of Equestria
#418 - 2012-06-05 12:57:24 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


I'll just leave this screenshot here. Taken with trit at 6.39 (i.e. average buy and sell at the time of yesterday's post). Includes Miki's implant and whatever.


what tool/calculator are you using?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#419 - 2012-06-05 13:07:57 UTC
Tenchi Sal wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
I'll just leave this screenshot here. Taken with trit at 6.39 (i.e. average buy and sell at the time of yesterday's post). Includes Miki's implant and whatever.
what tool/calculator are you using?
Looks like Isk Per Hour.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#420 - 2012-06-05 17:02:39 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Hi sec = land of casual players. Vast majority have irregular playtime and just won't be in a corp. Hi sec mining corps are wardec spammed anyway, why bother.

If you were more in the profession you would have replied me with the Orca solution that is actually practiced and works for casual players of heterogeneous corps as well.




I work 72 hours a week and manage to be in a corp. Irregular times and casual play are no barriers to getting into a corp or taking other steps to protect yourself.