These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

CCP do you remember when......
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#21 - 2012-05-31 15:43:01 UTC
/ends_thread

The Tears Must Flow
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#22 - 2012-05-31 15:45:22 UTC
sweetrock wrote:
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Drax Dremal wrote:
CCP do you remember when you apologized to the players because you were insensitive to their needs? I think now its time to have a player vote about what they want in EVE. I proprose a confidence/no confidence vote on whether we should make 1.0 and .9 space no combat zones. Only one (1) vote per account created so many months ago.

The problems of victory are more agreeable than the problems of defeat, but they are no less difficult.
Winston Churchill


Hahahahahahahahaha. You think you are going to tell CCP what to do with their game? Really? 1.0 and 0.9 should never, ever be turned in to no combat zones. If you cannot deal with that simple fact then gtfo. This is EVE kiddo, not Hello Kitty Online, the second you undock in this game you risk getting blown up. It's been that way since day one and it will remain that way until the day EVE goes offline for the last time.



Unrelated to this thread, but after seeing some more threads from someone we both know (wont mention names) I think your right on the troll verdict


I am very good at what I do, and I rarely make a wrong call. Glad you've seen it too Cool

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#23 - 2012-05-31 15:45:30 UTC
smokess wrote:
You clearly have no understanding of the underlying principles of Eve Online.

**** off to WoW.


I don't often say this but in the OP's case I'll make the exception. Get out!

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#24 - 2012-05-31 15:45:33 UTC
Why?

.
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#25 - 2012-05-31 15:46:11 UTC
CCP is working on a Sorry - Trailer
Hilmar is dressing up at this very moment

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDqatJPvOfk&feature=related

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP
smokess
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2012-05-31 15:48:20 UTC
Virgil Travis wrote:
smokess wrote:
You clearly have no understanding of the underlying principles of Eve Online.

**** off to WoW.


I don't often say this but in the OP's case I'll make the exception. Get out!


It is actually the first time I have said it, as far as I am aware, but in this case I think it is justified.
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#27 - 2012-05-31 15:50:44 UTC
I bet you 10,000 votes will shoot you down in more ways than one.

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?
MadMuppet
Critical Mass Inc
#28 - 2012-05-31 16:21:38 UTC
Drax Dremal wrote:
... we should make 1.0 and .9 space no combat zones.


Drax Dremal wrote:


I may not win the fight, but if you dont fight for something you wont get it for sure.


roll 1d6
1. The point, you are missing it
2. Facepalm
3. Irony check!
4. Not sure is serious
5. adapt or die
6. All of the above.

This message brought to you by Experience(tm). When common sense fails you, experience will come to the rescue. Experience(tm) from the makers of CONCORD.

"If you are part of the problem, you will be nerfed." -MadMuppet
Internet Lawyer Steve
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-05-31 16:34:06 UTC
Drax Dremal wrote:
CCP do you remember when you apologized to the players because you were insensitive to their needs? I think now its time to have a player vote about what they want in EVE. I proprose a confidence/no confidence vote on whether we should make 1.0 and .9 space no combat zones. Only one (1) vote per account created so many months ago.

The problems of victory are more agreeable than the problems of defeat, but they are no less difficult.
Winston Churchill



This game was like this before you started playing it. I suggest you do some research on a game before you download it. There are no good reasons for anyone to complain about being ganked in high sec or trying to change areas of the game to no pvp. Eve is a ruthless game where people will take advantage of your mistakes.

Internet Lawyer Steve and Associates,

Bringing Justice to New Eden, One post at a time...
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#30 - 2012-05-31 16:37:29 UTC
Drax Dremal wrote:
CCP do you remember when you apologized to the players because you were insensitive to their needs? I think now its time to have a player vote about what they want in EVE. I proprose a confidence/no confidence vote on whether we should make 1.0 and .9 space no combat zones. Only one (1) vote per account created so many months ago.

The problems of victory are more agreeable than the problems of defeat, but they are no less difficult.
Winston Churchill


+1 vote for totally safe areas of space......IF the players who enter that space can in NO WAY affect anything in the game. No missions, no mining, no trading, no haulers allowed to traverse the space, NOTHING but ships being able to warp around and sight-see.

Then you have my vote. If a players action can affect the game in any way, there should be some form of risk involved.
Lady Ayeipsia
BlueWaffe
#31 - 2012-05-31 16:39:57 UTC
To the op....

I find the ballot misleading. You declare a confidence vote, yet do not define what specifically we are vote for confidence in. Does a vote of confidence mean Ccp is fine, eve is good, let it be, or does it mean confidence in your idea if 1.0 and .9 being safe?

Because of this ambiguity, I demand a recount followed by a revote.

My accounts all vote for Mcain!
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#32 - 2012-05-31 16:56:38 UTC
Simetraz wrote:

What has happened in the last month (I think) that makes a re-vote necessary ?


That's just a really dumb question. I just have to say it.

***
Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2012-05-31 17:07:33 UTC
NO

The nature of the whole problem is very different compared to last time (assuming you're referring to the fiasco that followed incarna). That time CCP focused too much on one aspect of the game, neglecting the rest of the game for about two years so that almost no new content was introduced and existing problems weren't fixed.

This time the game (the sandbox) is working as intended and some poor people are having trouble accepting that. Changing any amount of highsec or any other sec into no-combat zones is a horrible, sandbox-breaking idea and it won't happen.
Major Spag
State War Academy
Caldari State
#34 - 2012-05-31 17:14:12 UTC
I would rather vote to be able to shoot people in station.
Simetraz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-05-31 17:17:18 UTC
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
Simetraz wrote:

What has happened in the last month (I think) that makes a re-vote necessary ?


That's just a really dumb question. I just have to say it.


Are you saying something that happened in the last month, should change things so that 1.0 & 0.9 systems should be totally safe ????

Okay lets hear why those 2 security levels should be 100 % safe ?

You do realize if CCP ever makes any system 100% safe they will most likely remove any reason to go there.
Markets , belts , etc etc etc
Basically they end up being restricted by SP
Straight newbie training zones.


EVERYBODY KNOWS
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-05-31 17:17:31 UTC
These goon alt threads are out of control.
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#37 - 2012-05-31 17:19:34 UTC
I agree, you can have your completely 100% safe systems. Only thing is once you leave you can never go back. How's that?

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#38 - 2012-05-31 17:19:38 UTC
This is what will happen-

1) CCP will open vote.
2) People that actually actively play the game will, for the majority, disagree with you.
3) People that agree with you will never vote because they have no brain cells to vote with.
4) People will then whine when the vote is closed that they didn't get an opportunity to vote and that the vote was illegitimate.
5) Iceland will invade Canada.

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#39 - 2012-05-31 17:22:10 UTC
Lykouleon wrote:
This is what will happen-

5) Iceland will invade Canada.


That bit sounds like a larf. We in the Unified Church of the Unobligated approve wholeheartedly.

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.
Roisin Saoirse
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-05-31 17:22:41 UTC
Virgil Travis wrote:
I agree, you can have your completely 100% safe systems. Only thing is once you leave you can never go back. How's that?

Makes sense, just like the starter NPC corps only without the vast number of capship pilots and uberpros. Roll
Previous page123Next page