These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Plea for Rationale in the System of Natural Consequences

Author
Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#381 - 2012-05-29 13:26:22 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:


Anyway, the miners are using a Solid Gold Spatula to flip burgers at a McDonalds in South Central LA, and expressing surprise and anger when they get robbed.



That is quote worthy.
Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
#382 - 2012-05-29 13:33:53 UTC
Hello OP,

I am new to EVE, been playing for about 3 months, and I love the fact that nowhere is safe. I wouldn't change anything. 100% security is the reason why I've left so many other games, they are 100% boring.

Just like in any other game, if you want to be good at something (such as surviving a gank), you need to do a little research. It's not that hard.

Granted, if a group is targeting you (which I'm sure they will now), it's near impossible to fit enough tank, but a Damage Control and a couple of shield hardeners (which you can overload if attacked) will help you survive the average solo/duo gank attempt.
Lucy Ferrr
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#383 - 2012-05-29 13:37:02 UTC
Malcanis wrote:


What "modifications" do you think are needed? Your averatge mission Tengu has about the same EHP as a tanked up Hulk, and costs 2-5 times as much. If you want to run a 'Tengugeddon' event then go for it - stepping up and organising it is the only "modification" that's required.

Personally I think that would be great. LP prices have sunk dramatically lately and I could do with some competition removing.


My only problem with Hulkaggeddon is that it's not Tenguaggeddon. Although I am not a miner or have a bunch of miner love, I don't hate them either. In fact I am quite fond of the minerals they mine, as I build my machines of war with those minerals. So ganking miners is kind of counter productive for me since I use those minerals. Know what I never use though? The isk that gets deposited straight into missions runner's wallets. In fact the only thing that isk does for me, is cause my isk to be worth less due to inflation. So yes we need a Tenguaggeddon or a Mission-runneraggeddon.

Really I am getting double financially *****-slapped. Mission runners continue farming isk safely causing inflation. Dumb miners that can't fit a tank keep dying causing minerals to rise in price making my isk able to purchase less. I think its time that mission runners learn that High-sec isn't so safe. I've been doing my part to kill mission runners, I scan them down, warp in, kill all the triggers and hope a NPC has them scrammed. I got a mach popped a few days ago it was beautiful.
Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
#384 - 2012-05-29 13:37:37 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Ten Bulls wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

so why should we believe that you'd stop whining if the Hulk got an EHP buff?


Game balance is about balancing gameplay, not balancing whining.


And the Gameplay is fine. Hulks give up defensive ability to gain a little more yield.


Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield.
Jeniam Retriat
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#385 - 2012-05-29 13:40:04 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
You can alpha a 1bil tengu in a tornado and kill most transports in a destroyer. Like everything if you fit no defences and people can profitfrom your death they will go for it.


Yeah, but even if you fit defences on a Hulk or a Mack people can still profit from killing you. It's more effort, but it doesn't result in negative ISK unless the loot gods hate you.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#386 - 2012-05-29 13:41:49 UTC
Ten Bulls wrote:


Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield.


Haulers have to give up defencive ability to run a max cargo hold. Comabt ships have to give up defences to go max offence and so on. What makes you think hulks shouldn't follow the same rules as everyone else?
Chris Cooley
Doomheim
#387 - 2012-05-29 13:42:46 UTC
Totally agree with the OP.
The recent heavy high sec griefing has imbalanced the game considerably.
ORE boats need a big buff and or greifers need a larger penalty.


Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#388 - 2012-05-29 13:43:02 UTC
Ten Bulls wrote:
Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield.
No, they don't.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#389 - 2012-05-29 13:43:11 UTC
Jeniam Retriat wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
You can alpha a 1bil tengu in a tornado and kill most transports in a destroyer. Like everything if you fit no defences and people can profitfrom your death they will go for it.


Yeah, but even if you fit defences on a Hulk or a Mack people can still profit from killing you. It's more effort, but it doesn't result in negative ISK unless the loot gods hate you.


No they cant. It take 3-4 destroyers to kill a a well tanked mac and anything up to 10 to kill a supertank hulk. It is not possible to make a profit from suicide ganking that kind of ship.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#390 - 2012-05-29 13:43:50 UTC
Chris Cooley wrote:
Totally agree with the OP.
The recent heavy high sec griefing has imbalanced the game considerably.
ORE boats need a big buff and or greifers need a larger penalty.




Space is just as safe now as it was 6 years ago for hulks.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#391 - 2012-05-29 13:47:49 UTC
Ten Bulls wrote:
Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield.


Just like a T3 has to give up a large chunk of its defensive capabilities to run 3 links? Just like a Guardian/Basilisk has to be fit with basically no tank to run a 6 rep setup? Just like a carrier has to give up fitting basically any sort of tank to perma-triage? Just like literally everyone who flies an armor tanked ship has to find an optimal balance between tanking and damage?

Why should Hulks be an exception to such tradeoffs?

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Chris Cooley
Doomheim
#392 - 2012-05-29 13:52:36 UTC
Ten Bulls wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

Everyone makes tradeoffs. Miners have simply decided that 2x MLU Hulk is the baseline for mining in a Hulk and started making arguments from that false premise. The baseline for a Hulk is 0 MLUs.


So 8500 ships blew up in Hulkageddon because of bad fits eh... nothing to do with the ships baseline attributes, its the fitting thats totally to blame.

Try and be objective, you might find it enlightening.



werd
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#393 - 2012-05-29 14:01:31 UTC
Chris Cooley wrote:
Ten Bulls wrote:

So 8500 ships blew up in Hulkageddon because of bad fits eh... nothing to do with the ships baseline attributes, its the fitting thats totally to blame.

Try and be objective, you might find it enlightening.



werd


The base stats of the hulk are in the same ballpark as heavy assault ships in defence.

Andoria Thara
Fallen Avatars
#394 - 2012-05-29 14:05:32 UTC
Chris Cooley wrote:
Totally agree with the OP.
The recent heavy high sec griefing has imbalanced the game considerably.
ORE boats need a big buff and or greifers need a larger penalty.




A hulk can easily get around 20k ehp, with low skills. That's plenty to survive the average gank in highsec.

Not sure what the problem here is.
Jeniam Retriat
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#395 - 2012-05-29 14:10:04 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Jeniam Retriat wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
You can alpha a 1bil tengu in a tornado and kill most transports in a destroyer. Like everything if you fit no defences and people can profitfrom your death they will go for it.


Yeah, but even if you fit defences on a Hulk or a Mack people can still profit from killing you. It's more effort, but it doesn't result in negative ISK unless the loot gods hate you.


No they cant. It take 3-4 destroyers to kill a a well tanked mac and anything up to 10 to kill a supertank hulk. It is not possible to make a profit from suicide ganking that kind of ship.


You'd probably know better than me, but the best Hulk tank fits I've found are still only about 30k EHP, whereas a 2mil gank cata can do >6k in under 15 seconds. Obviously I'm not counting bait hulks that don't have strip miners, and I guess an off-grid booster could swing things in the Hulk's favour, but that seems about as far as you can take it. For Macks it's only about 18.5k, which would be about 3 Catas, though the fit on that is also cheaper.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#396 - 2012-05-29 14:24:11 UTC
Jeniam Retriat wrote:


You'd probably know better than me, but the best Hulk tank fits I've found are still only about 30k EHP, whereas a 2mil gank cata can do >6k in under 15 seconds. Obviously I'm not counting bait hulks that don't have strip miners, and I guess an off-grid booster could swing things in the Hulk's favour, but that seems about as far as you can take it. For Macks it's only about 18.5k, which would be about 3 Catas, though the fit on that is also cheaper.


We tested this on sisi at the start of the year before the two ice interdictions. 3 catalysts will not kill a supertank hulk, 3 tornados can pull it off but a 4th is needed to garentee the kill. You also do not get 15 seconds in a lot of high sec.
EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#397 - 2012-05-29 14:30:20 UTC  |  Edited by: EVE Roy Mustang
Ludi Burek wrote:


6.) Demanding that one play style is wrong and it should be curbed goes directly against the concept of the sandbox.


ah, like James 315 and the gankers are DOING to the miners? Glad you agree with the miners then.

RubyPorto wrote:
wiskyjack wrote:
It's simple, just think of eve as being like WW II


Jesus...


no... WWII, youre thinking too far back
Fred Lodenstane
Lizard Ltd
#398 - 2012-05-29 14:32:59 UTC
You know it would be more effective finding ways to defend yourself than convincing CCP that hulkageddon is a form of griefing. After all, CCP makes it clear in all their comments about such matters that the responsibility falls on the player to defend themselves from other players, and such a thing is not CCP's job. CCP considers griefing to be anything mean or hurtful targeted against a specific character, which in this case does not apply since hulkageddon affects all miners in highsec and lowsec. Instead of posting here people can quite easily defend themselves by having logistic ships rep their hulks while they mine (seriously, this all but stops just about any ganker and I'm amazed it isn't used more often) or maybe even shield repair drones for those with less skills. Hulks don't need a buff, players just need to bring support fleets to protect their miners, just like how PvP fleets need to bring along support in order to be effective.

This Hulkageddon, which is three weeks linger than the usual event should be a wake-up call for miners ever that they need to change their fleet comps and really start thinking about game mechanics in order to keep their precious and expensive ships alive. Mining is something that is incredibly risky when done alone or with few people as the losses fall just on one person. What I hope to see emerge from this Hulkageddon are more organized and smarter miners. People are always whining about Goonswarm and their giant coalition which can essentially step on anyone else with little consequence, particularly people in highsec because there is so little organization and unity between those who solely reside there. The game would be a lot more interesting if a highsec coalition existed to challenge nullsec blocs like TEST, Goons, and others.

Do I think any of this actually has a chance of happening? No. The majority of people who actually live in highsec would have to get along and interact with each other to pull this off and considering most don't even read this forum or any news (take the op as an example of one such infrequent poster prior to losing his untanked hulk).

The point is, don't ask for game changes learn to defend yourself. That doesn't mean you have to take up PvP, it just means learning how to support one another in dangerous times.
EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#399 - 2012-05-29 14:34:22 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Ten Bulls wrote:
Gameplay isnt fine, Hulks have to give up all defensive ability to gain a little more yield.
No, they don't.



really... post the build that gets max defense and max yield at the same time tippia, Im calling you on that BS
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#400 - 2012-05-29 14:37:26 UTC
EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
Ludi Burek wrote:


6.) Demanding that one play style is wrong and it should be curbed goes directly against the concept of the sandbox.


ah, like James 315 and the gankers are DOING to the miners? Glad you agree with the miners then.



Because miners are the only people getting attacked and killed in space.