These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Removing Local is only part of the solution
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#81 - 2012-05-26 12:08:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose. The game is a big rotten camp session. Null Low and High. Its that simple. Its why the damn game can't get past 50k people playing it after ten years. It has **** all to do with being niche and more it being a mediocre attempt at pleasing two types of people. The competitive gamer and the entitlement minded candyass.

Forums always appear to favor the candyass because they arent doing anything in game so they devote their energy to the forums always vigilant for any suggestion that would out them for the game-dulling parasites they are. The competitve gamer is in EVE doing things and wondering why the OBVIOUS solution to 90% of the games problems isn't implemented.

Diablo 3 is the current excuse being thrown around as to why the population is lagging. Well heres a clue. If people weren't bored out of their mind playing EVE where every single feature is hindered by local maybe it wouldn't be so easy for people to walk away from it.

And yeah, Imadbro.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#82 - 2012-05-26 12:10:48 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose.

So that's why you want local removed, because you want the act of ganking to be dumbed down and simplified. Gotcha.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Andrea Roche
State War Academy
Caldari State
#83 - 2012-05-26 12:12:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrea Roche
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose. The game is a big rotten camp session. Null Low and High. Its that simple. Its why the damn game can't get past 50k people playing it after ten years. It has **** all to do with being niche and more it being a mediocre attempt at pleasing two types of people. The competitive gamer and the entitlement minded candyass.

Forums always appear to favor the candyass because they arent doing anything in game so they devote their energy to the forums always vigilant for any suggestion that would out them for the game-dulling parasites they are. The competitve gamer is in EVE doing things and wondering why the OBVIOUS solution to 90% of the games problems isn't implemented.

Diablo 3 is the current excuse being thrown around as to why the population is lagging. Well heres a clue. If people weren't bored out of their mind playing EVE where every single feature is hindered by local maybe it wouldn't be so easy for people to walk away from it.


your level of anger is dusturbing.
you need to have a break from game.

WWOOOOSSSSAAAA!!!!!!!!!
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#84 - 2012-05-26 12:13:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose.

So that's why you want local removed, because you want the act of ganking to be dumbed down and simplified. Gotcha.


The act of ganking?. His psuedointellectualism is over 9000!!!!!!
Frying Doom
#85 - 2012-05-26 12:17:53 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Lexar Mundi wrote:
Quote:
1) Remove Local.
I agree 100%

Of course you do, you're one of those who are bad at ganking and need all the help they can get.

Have you considered that like most of the members of the large alliances it is actually you guys who don't know how to play and you can only fight in blobs and NEED to have local so you can run away?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2012-05-26 12:20:46 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Have you considered that like most of the members of the large alliances it is actually you guys who don't know how to play and you can only fight in blobs and NEED to have local so you can run away?


coming from a guy who dropped corp the second he was wardecced this is p. ironic

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#87 - 2012-05-26 12:22:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose.

So that's why you want local removed, because you want the act of ganking to be dumbed down and simplified. Gotcha.


Im sure you think you're impressing someone Zim. Get 'em slugger.

Again, the truth hurts, doesn't it?

Frying Doom wrote:
Have you considered that like most of the members of the large alliances it is actually you guys who don't know how to play and you can only fight in blobs and NEED to have local so you can run away?

Why don't you stay in your corp during a wardec about it?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#88 - 2012-05-26 12:26:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose.

So that's why you want local removed, because you want the act of ganking to be dumbed down and simplified. Gotcha.


Im sure you think you're impressing someone Zim. Get 'em slugger.

Again, the truth hurts, doesn't it?

Frying Doom wrote:
Have you considered that like most of the members of the large alliances it is actually you guys who don't know how to play and you can only fight in blobs and NEED to have local so you can run away?

Why don't you stay in your corp during a wardec about it?


ZIm, like many, you aren't able to play on the level of a competitive gamer. You need the protection to make up for your lack of ability & mental tenacity. The truth hurts doesn't it?
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2012-05-26 12:33:55 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
ZIm, like many, you aren't able to play on the level of a competitive gamer. You need the protection to make up for your lack of ability & mental tenacity. The truth hurts doesn't it?

Caliph Muhammed, like many, you aren't able to play on the level of a competitive gamer. You need the crutch to make up for your lack of ability & mental tenacity. The truth hurts doesn't it?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Snow Burst
Caldari State
#90 - 2012-05-26 12:38:57 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread. Everything has to be dumbed down and simplified because the candyasses don't want to lose. The game is a big rotten camp session. Null Low and High. Its that simple. Its why the damn game can't get past 50k people playing it after ten years. It has **** all to do with being niche and more it being a mediocre attempt at pleasing two types of people. The competitive gamer and the entitlement minded candyass.

Forums always appear to favor the candyass because they arent doing anything in game so they devote their energy to the forums always vigilant for any suggestion that would out them for the game-dulling parasites they are. The competitve gamer is in EVE doing things and wondering why the OBVIOUS solution to 90% of the games problems isn't implemented.

Diablo 3 is the current excuse being thrown around as to why the population is lagging. Well heres a clue. If people weren't bored out of their mind playing EVE where every single feature is hindered by local maybe it wouldn't be so easy for people to walk away from it.

And yeah, Imadbro.

NO **** YOU!!! xD but in all seriousness... just dont play? :p one person wont be missed if u dnt like eve as u said it sucks

There Is A 90% Chance All Of What You Just Read Is Wrong, Inaccurate Or Just Me Being Controversial In Some Way. Or By Some Chance It's Completely Right In Every Way... At Least To Me :3
Snow Burst
Caldari State
#91 - 2012-05-26 12:40:54 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Lexar Mundi wrote:
Quote:
1) Remove Local.
I agree 100%

Of course you do, you're one of those who are bad at ganking and need all the help they can get.

Have you considered that like most of the members of the large alliances it is actually you guys who don't know how to play and you can only fight in blobs and NEED to have local so you can run away?

wth are u on about? have to blob rofl i dont so dno where u got tht from

There Is A 90% Chance All Of What You Just Read Is Wrong, Inaccurate Or Just Me Being Controversial In Some Way. Or By Some Chance It's Completely Right In Every Way... At Least To Me :3
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#92 - 2012-05-26 12:43:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
ZIm, like many, you aren't able to play on the level of a competitive gamer. You need the protection to make up for your lack of ability & mental tenacity. The truth hurts doesn't it?

Caliph Muhammed, like many, you aren't able to play on the level of a competitive gamer. You need the crutch to make up for your lack of ability & mental tenacity. The truth hurts doesn't it?



Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats utilizing crutches.

You want to depend on local for offense and defense. Therefore your style relies on crutches.

If local goes or stays ill be just fine.

If local goes or stays can you say the same?

Let me reach you a crutch to balance yourself while playing EVE you feeble old man you.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2012-05-26 12:45:34 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats is utilizing crutches.

You apparently rely on local being removed to reach your ganking quota. vOv

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Jebediah MacAhab Dallocort
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#94 - 2012-05-26 12:46:05 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread.

Can I have your stuff when you eventually ragequit because CCP won't remove local?

Also, could you whine about something more significant, like the fact that your cloaky vessel needs cap to cloak? I mean, it should be able to run on unicorn farts and kitten giggles, only carebears need to use caps. Oh, and you should have instant lockon time, right? And bumping people while cloaked should make their ship explode. And when they explode, every single fitting must be preserved because cloak.

No, seriously, shut up. You've already got a cloak, and your prey has the attention span of a kid with ADHD. Use that to your advantage and HTFU.

How to Improve Quality Assurance at CCP

Professional Programmer, DBA, Game Developer and Systems Analyst
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#95 - 2012-05-26 12:46:07 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats is utilizing crutches.

You apparently rely on local being removed to reach your ganking quota. vOv


Are you 8?
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2012-05-26 12:47:23 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats is utilizing crutches.

You apparently rely on local being removed to reach your ganking quota. vOv


Are you 8?

Aww the age retort. How cute. Are you getting mad?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#97 - 2012-05-26 12:49:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Caliph Muhammed
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats is utilizing crutches.

You apparently rely on local being removed to reach your ganking quota. vOv


Are you 8?

Aww the age retort. How cute. Are you getting mad?


No. I'm asking a question of an adult who can't defend his ideas/line of thought and resorts to juvenile tit for tat posts because he knows hes out of his league.
Pete Almighty
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2012-05-26 12:55:10 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
I don't want to rely on local for defense or offense. Therefore its not my style thats is utilizing crutches.

You apparently rely on local being removed to reach your ganking quota. vOv


Are you 8?

Aww the age retort. How cute. Are you getting mad?


No. I'm asking a question of an adult who can't defend his ideas/line of thought and resorts to juvenile tit for tat posts because he knows hes out of his league.

this one speaks the truth.
Caliph Muhammed
Perkone
Caldari State
#99 - 2012-05-26 13:02:00 UTC
Jebediah MacAhab Dallocort wrote:
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
EVE sucks, period. And it sucks because of the mindset of some of the people in this thread.

Can I have your stuff when you eventually ragequit because CCP won't remove local?

Also, could you whine about something more significant, like the fact that your cloaky vessel needs cap to cloak? I mean, it should be able to run on unicorn farts and kitten giggles, only carebears need to use caps. Oh, and you should have instant lockon time, right? And bumping people while cloaked should make their ship explode. And when they explode, every single fitting must be preserved because cloak.

No, seriously, shut up. You've already got a cloak, and your prey has the attention span of a kid with ADHD. Use that to your advantage and HTFU.


You should try thinking before you type. A cloak nor ADD removes ones name from local. Trying harder doesn't make someone any more stealthy. So thanks for the complete waste of everyones time who bothered reading your rubbish.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2012-05-26 13:05:01 UTC
Caliph Muhammed wrote:
No. I'm asking a question of an adult who can't defend his ideas/line of thought and resorts to juvenile tit for tat posts because he knows hes out of his league.

So when you're advocating a change to a mechanic which has been in the game in the same state since it was conceived, which is a change tailor made to help people who can't gank properly, that's because you care so much about the game and want to improve it? Is that what you're trying to get at?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat