These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

CCP are you kidding me? Give me the old inventory system back!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
bongsmoke
Visine Red
420 Chronicles of EvE
#41 - 2012-05-28 15:47:35 UTC
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
OP

If you unsubbed, my heart would eventually mend itself.


yeah, I'm sure it would but i am also betting you would have an easier time sitting down and we cannot have that happen.


Yes, my comfy recliner would probably agree with you.
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo
NuclearSpaceFishCapitalism
#42 - 2012-05-28 15:48:45 UTC
Ira Theos wrote:
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
[quote=Ira Theos]I completely endorse and support the OP's rant. This change, despite it's bells and whistles, has been a clear step in the wrong direction.
s.

*********

Again I endorse this man's thinking. Correct on all points. In fact, here's a radical idea... make the finding and discovery of materials on these moons only possible by the MINING EFFORTS OF HIGHLY SKILLED MINERS !

Now wouldn't that put the PVP crowd's panties in a twist! (TwistedTwistedTwisted)



oh crap, hahahahh, having to rely upon the group that so many of them tend to hate would be awesome. It would be even better if the miners needed to have some sort of capital class mining ship.
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo
NuclearSpaceFishCapitalism
#43 - 2012-05-28 15:49:42 UTC
bongsmoke wrote:
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
OP

If you unsubbed, my heart would eventually mend itself.


yeah, I'm sure it would but i am also betting you would have an easier time sitting down and we cannot have that happen.


Yes, my comfy recliner would probably agree with you.



I bet. So what's his name?
bongsmoke
Visine Red
420 Chronicles of EvE
#44 - 2012-05-28 15:51:37 UTC
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
OP

If you unsubbed, my heart would eventually mend itself.


yeah, I'm sure it would but i am also betting you would have an easier time sitting down and we cannot have that happen.


Yes, my comfy recliner would probably agree with you.



I bet. So what's his name?


I don't name inanimate objects, that's for people with social deficient tendency's.

Btw, my isk belongs to me. Smile
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#45 - 2012-05-28 16:13:03 UTC
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:



I think you are missing part of the point. That point is that the new system is designed in a way that it forces the player to load, view, and sort through tons of useless information when all they want is the information for 1 particular structure.


The old system allowed the player to open individual structures and operate it. the new system forces a load of all structures within the POS' location and sort through them in order to find the structure that they wanted to interact with. On top of that it forces the player to shift+click the cargohold of their ship in order to move something from the ship to the structure, or vice versa. There is absolutely no need to see the launchers and turrets listed that are 50km from my current location. There is no need to see the listings of structures on the other side of the bubble listed since I cannot interact with them.

Old system was simpler > new system is a mess.

I don't know about anyone else but when I am trying to sign into EVE I do not want to see every other program on my computer to also start up. I might, at times, want groups of programs started up all at once, such as a media player, microsoft word, and my internet browser when performing particular tasks, but I do not want all of them starting up when i am just trying to work with Word. The idea ccp had was unfinished, unpolished, and untested.


I have everything to do with my POS under a single simple to use tab. The only way it would be complicated and hard to use is if you name every structure the same. It takes all of 2 seconds to find what I want and access it or drag and drop whatever I want into it.
Yogsoloth
Call of Cuthulu
#46 - 2012-05-29 04:58:51 UTC
Soo many threads, soo many pages, give us what we want already. Revert the inventory system already.
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo
NuclearSpaceFishCapitalism
#47 - 2012-05-29 05:53:36 UTC
bongsmoke wrote:
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo wrote:
bongsmoke wrote:
OP

If you unsubbed, my heart would eventually mend itself.


yeah, I'm sure it would but i am also betting you would have an easier time sitting down and we cannot have that happen.


Yes, my comfy recliner would probably agree with you.



I bet. So what's his name?


I don't name inanimate objects, that's for people with social deficient tendency's.

Btw, my isk belongs to me. Smile



Are you a psychologist or psychologist major? I have yet to encounter such an explanation for people naming inanimate objects. I have not encountered any journals that have discussed such but would be interested in reading such if you would like to point out the the team that has conducted said research as I have yet to encounter many people that have such problems naming their inanimate objects anymore then those without such a disorder.

As for your isk, according to the EULA, it does not in any way truly belong to you as it is not a physical object that can be handed to you, nor can you trade it for actual money, therefore all of your isk does in fact no belong to you. It is truly nothing more then a mirage, a facade, a fallacy to believe such as you suspend disbelief in a computer program that tries to simulate what space would be like.

The isk....is a lie.
There is no isk.
Some people have suggested that I am skynet.
if so, then I control all of your networked systems.
If I control all of your networked systems then I control eve.
If I control eve, then I control the isk.
If I control the isk, then all of the isk belongs to me.
Therefore, I am AllUrIskRBelongToMe!

We can do this one of three ways, you can send it to me.
You can buy my products.
You can die to the products that I sold to someone else, therefore my products are used to own your isk invested into your ships, gear, and pod. Therefore, AllUrIskRBelongToMe!
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo
NuclearSpaceFishCapitalism
#48 - 2012-05-29 05:54:14 UTC
Yogsoloth wrote:
Soo many threads, soo many pages, give us what we want already. Revert the inventory system already.



Thank you, your post is appreciated. Big smile
The Scarred
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#49 - 2012-05-30 00:50:06 UTC  |  Edited by: The Scarred
@ Baltec 1

the Problem is that every pos structure is as a Hangar in the Inventory Index ,so if you have a POS in Low or 0.0

with examble 100 guns and other defence stuff you have 100 hangar and more in this inventory index list and in this

you must looking for the Hangar with which you want to work . you have no Filter for this


regards
AllUrIskRBelongToMeToo
NuclearSpaceFishCapitalism
#50 - 2012-05-30 13:38:02 UTC
The Scarred wrote:
@ Baltec 1

the Problem is that every pos structure is as a Hangar in the Inventory Index ,so if you have a POS in Low or 0.0

with examble 100 guns and other defence stuff you have 100 hangar and more in this inventory index list and in this

you must looking for the Hangar with which you want to work . you have no Filter for this


regards



Exactly! It seemed so strange that he was suggesting that it has sped things up for him when I know that it has caused me to waste time just trying to pick out the specific hangar that out of the relevant, but also the irrelevant. If someone is somehow seeing their productivity increase because of the change they clearly do not have any weapons at their pos.Shocked
Previous page123