These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tribal Liberation Force heroine accused of War Crimes!

Author
Mabego Tetrimon
Spiritus Draconis
#41 - 2012-05-25 11:32:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Mabego Tetrimon
Muck Raker wrote:
Disturbing news from the front lines, where the Forces of Freedom are currently winning against the Legions of Oppression !

Top Minmatar militia ace, Matar Colonel Avlynka Surionen, better known by her call sign Ava Starfire, has been publicly accused by opposing forces (which of course include the Caldari), of heinous war crimes!


this could not be true, i disapprove Gutter Press on this one

PS: want one Ava doll pls
Dilaro thagriin
Doomheim
#42 - 2012-05-26 16:04:54 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Dilaro thagriin wrote:
It was a little childish Blake, but never mind.

on a related note, your signature.
'Dulce et decorum est pro imperium mori.'

I believe that in your opinion it is very much a sweet and seemly thing. Though i note that you appear to be having some trouble in that department.



On the contrary, there are quite a few of my corpses out there. I believe that in the past some of them have even changed hands in return for ISK.



Rodj, you mistake reanimating for dying.

capsuleers don't die.. at least not when their capsules do. we just change places with some leftover biomass....

now.. dying.. that's irreversible.. permanent... you know.. real.
i believe you would call it ascending to heaven.

so. as i mentioned.. get on with it. the cluster could do with less of you.

ah... that feels better.. simply saying that to one of the more orthodox slaver types is a cathartic experience.

now, where did i leave my firetail.

-Dilaro
Amun Khonsu
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#43 - 2012-05-28 13:29:48 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
An article with a decent message. I wish Gutter Press would stop getting man-on-the-street style interviews, though. They tend to muddy things.

I have known Ava for a long time now, and both her friends and her enemies can attest to her honour. She fights hard, and she fights fair, and I know that she is concerned with the cause of peace, rather than with the cause of war.



Ava is a stand up citizen.

If the Amarr think being fed porridge is a war crime maybe they should go back to baby formula.

Fight them until turmoil is no more and strike terror into their hearts. www.ross-fw.net

Mekhana
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2012-05-29 08:50:42 UTC
Capsuleers committing crimes?

Who would've thought.

Vide longe er eros di Luminaire VII, uni canse pra krage e determiniex! Sange por Sange! Descanse bravex eros, mie freires. Mortir por vostre Liberete, farmilie, ide e amis. lons Proviste sen mort! Luminaire liber mas! 

Kalaratiri
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#45 - 2012-05-29 10:45:33 UTC
Mekhana wrote:
Capsuleers committing crimes?

Who would've thought.


Except she didn't. It's capsuleers making up accusations of other capsuleers committing crimes. Which is far more likely.

She's mad but she's magic, there's no lie in her fire.

This is possibly one of the worst threads in the history of these forums.  - CCP Falcon

I don't remember when last time you said something that wasn't either dumb or absurd. - Diana Kim

Marin Baator
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#46 - 2012-05-29 16:22:04 UTC
Kalaratiri wrote:
Mekhana wrote:
Capsuleers committing crimes?

Who would've thought.


Except she didn't. It's capsuleers making up accusations of other capsuleers committing crimes. Which is far more likely.


Though these allegations are baseless, our alliance would likely not consider them to be crimes anyway. Twisted
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#47 - 2012-05-29 16:47:35 UTC
Marin Baator wrote:

Though these allegations are baseless, our alliance would likely not consider them to be crimes anyway. Twisted


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?

~Malcolm Khross

Marin Baator
Fusion Enterprises Ltd
Pandemic Horde
#48 - 2012-05-29 21:43:51 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#49 - 2012-05-30 02:40:11 UTC
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.


Not everyone you engage will be interested in doing so, captain. Indeed, there are many that I've met personally that would rather simply defend their space from further incursion than do any manner of enslavement and many more who do not even keep slaves.

In fact, the only ones in the Empire even capable of maintaining slaves are Holders, which are the higher class of citizens and thus the minority of the population. The people you engage on the opposite of the battlefield are fighting for a variety of causes and not all of them are seeking to enslave your people. Do not let yourselves become the monsters you so eagerly seek to destroy.

~Malcolm Khross

Gottii
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2012-05-30 04:39:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Gottii
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.


Not everyone you engage will be interested in doing so, captain. Indeed, there are many that I've met personally that would rather simply defend their space from further incursion than do any manner of enslavement and many more who do not even keep slaves.

In fact, the only ones in the Empire even capable of maintaining slaves are Holders, which are the higher class of citizens and thus the minority of the population. The people you engage on the opposite of the battlefield are fighting for a variety of causes and not all of them are seeking to enslave your people. Do not let yourselves become the monsters you so eagerly seek to destroy.



This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.

They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.
Uraniae Fehrnah
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#51 - 2012-05-30 06:01:42 UTC
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.



There is a distinction here that some people don't seem to make (on both sides). That distinction being that there are Amarrians that have no wish to enslave anyone. Yes I'm aware that the conversation here is focused on the militia, but seeing as I've been told before by another member of the Murientor Tribe that I am just as much an enemy as any pilot of the 24th, I feel it might be best to explain who is and who isn't an enemy.

I'm not a member of the 24th and I'm apparently an enemy, last I heard anyway. I'm not a slaver either so I'm sure you can understand the confusion over this. Would a Murientor Tribe member care to explain where the "that one is a slaver" line begins and ends?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2012-05-30 10:24:18 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.


Not everyone you engage will be interested in doing so, captain. Indeed, there are many that I've met personally that would rather simply defend their space from further incursion than do any manner of enslavement and many more who do not even keep slaves.

In fact, the only ones in the Empire even capable of maintaining slaves are Holders, which are the higher class of citizens and thus the minority of the population. The people you engage on the opposite of the battlefield are fighting for a variety of causes and not all of them are seeking to enslave your people. Do not let yourselves become the monsters you so eagerly seek to destroy.



I would say that I told people so when this alliance formed several months ago, but that would sound arrogant.

However, I would like to point a minor detail in your statement : Holders are not the only legal group that can hold slaves in the Empire. It is a little more complicated than that. Becoming a slave owner requires a lot of standing with the proper authorities (mostly, the clergy and the Amarr Civil Service), that will give in return an official authorization for the new slave owner to start keeping slaves. It is not something that is handled lightly, even if most Holders are Holders precisely because of they were given the right to hold slaves in the past of their dynasties, and that authorization can actually be handled to almost anyone judged worthy of it. That way, it is possible to find commoners owning slaves, and also, the navy under imperial mandate. In the Mandate even, there are no proper Holders, but slave owners that never got to profit from the creation of that title in their legal system.

There is also another whole different group of slave owners that are the slavers. This is another kind of mandate that is closer to a lettre de marque allowing to actually enslave people. Usual slave owners like Holders are not allowed to do that. Only slavers are allowed. The laws regulating their functions are legion and they are bound by imperial and CONCORD law not to raid outside of the Amarr Empire, but also, they do not have the divine mandate to enlight and guide their slaves. This is why they are sold to proper Holders for that purpose. This is a way to keep two enormous powers separate.

Gottii wrote:


This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.


This sounds very simplistic and candide.

Gottii wrote:
They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.


Yes, racial generalization, pots and kettles again.
Mensha Khael Crow
House Murder
#53 - 2012-05-30 11:36:25 UTC
Gottii wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.


Not everyone you engage will be interested in doing so, captain. Indeed, there are many that I've met personally that would rather simply defend their space from further incursion than do any manner of enslavement and many more who do not even keep slaves.

In fact, the only ones in the Empire even capable of maintaining slaves are Holders, which are the higher class of citizens and thus the minority of the population. The people you engage on the opposite of the battlefield are fighting for a variety of causes and not all of them are seeking to enslave your people. Do not let yourselves become the monsters you so eagerly seek to destroy.



This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.

They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.


Should C0URT consider this personal or official stance?
Our righteousness is evident in the failures of the heathen, God keep us from falling prey to their weaknesses.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#54 - 2012-05-30 12:12:19 UTC
Gottii wrote:
This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.

They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.


You cannot begin to dictate the motives of every pilot in the 24IC and as I've stated already, not everyone in the 24IC is fighting to enslave anyone. I find it highly ironic, hypocritical even, that you would justify your own prejudice by clinging to your own self-deceptions.

Farel, thank you for the...clarification on slave ownership in the Empire, I was rather naive to believe it was anything as simple as what I originally stated. It does, however, reaffirm that not everyone in the Empire is a slave-holder nor interested in doing so.

~Malcolm Khross

Ilsenae Alexandros
Perkone
Caldari State
#55 - 2012-05-30 12:41:11 UTC
Gottii wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Marin Baator wrote:
Malcolm Khross wrote:


Does your alliance not have regulations regarding the ethical treatment of enemy personnel?


The welfare of those that wish to enslave are people are not our concern.


Not everyone you engage will be interested in doing so, captain. Indeed, there are many that I've met personally that would rather simply defend their space from further incursion than do any manner of enslavement and many more who do not even keep slaves.

In fact, the only ones in the Empire even capable of maintaining slaves are Holders, which are the higher class of citizens and thus the minority of the population. The people you engage on the opposite of the battlefield are fighting for a variety of causes and not all of them are seeking to enslave your people. Do not let yourselves become the monsters you so eagerly seek to destroy.



This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.

They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.


This is my home. There are many like it, but this one is mine.

To know the face of God is to know madness.

Math'ra Hiede
Trinity's Vanguard
#56 - 2012-05-30 14:07:34 UTC
Gottii wrote:

This is nonsense.

The 24th Crusaders are fighting to keep us from freeing our kin, which means they're fighting to keep them enslaved. It also means they're fighting to enslave yet another unborn generation of Matari.

I care little for whatever self-deceptions these pilots use to assuage their guilt. Their motives mean little compared to their actions.

They claim to be solely defending their "home". Which is the right of any people, save those that build their homes upon the backs and misery of others.



And yet you would simply create more misery, fighting a war in an area of space that has little to no effect on the overall Empires slave trade.

Yet, you would destroy, hunt and murder the countless lives in the name of your republic, more lives than you are ever likely to save.

I make no bones about that war, I fought it to kill Minmatar.
I fought it to protect an Empire that was brutally invaded and subject to a war we didn't want.
I fought to protect my family and home.

Whatever misguided goals you give yourself should not be covered in a thin veil of self righteousness.

If you want to free your enslaved bretheren an exchange might be arranged, your head for theirs.
Markius TheShed
T.R.I.A.D
Ushra'Khan
#57 - 2012-05-30 15:45:24 UTC
Math'ra Hiede wrote:


I make no bones about that war, I fought it to kill Minmatar.
I fought it to protect an Empire that was brutally invaded and subject to a war we didn't want.
I fought to protect my family and home.

Whatever misguided goals you give yourself should not be covered in a thin veil of self righteousness.

If you want to free your enslaved bretheren an exchange might be arranged, your head for theirs.



YOU were brutally invaded!! The first aggressive act was committed by the Amarr on The Day Of Darkness You might not of wanted a war but you will certainly get one.

Our best form of defence against the slavers is to continue our push into the Bleak lands, Amarrians will be given no quarter as none was given to us.

**Murientor Tribe** a capsuleer organization composed of radical Minmatar. Since YC107

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#58 - 2012-05-30 18:28:31 UTC
Markius TheShed wrote:

YOU were brutally invaded!! The first aggressive act was committed by the Amarr on The Day Of Darkness You might not of wanted a war but you will certainly get one.

Our best form of defence against the slavers is to continue our push into the Bleak lands, Amarrians will be given no quarter as none was given to us.


Yes, it is true that the Amarrians have wrought great evil upon your people. It is true that many inhumanities and wicked acts are committed still against your people. Yet it is also true that not all Amarrians are guilty of these sins, not every being born into the Empire is pursuing more evil against your people.

Consider this when you are destroying livelihoods and tearing apart families.

Yes, it is true that your people struggle daily both under the heels of slavery but also under the weight of deprivation. It is true that many children of Matar desire freedom and identity with their people. Yet it is also true that money and resources being spent on a continued advancement effort are money and resources that could be directed toward infrastructure and putting food in the mouths of babes. It is also true that not every Matari in the Empire is mistreated and seeking freedom.

Consider these things when you continue to bring hardship to your people by neglecting stability and infrastructure, focusing your efforts on fueling the flames of the war rather than providing a future for your children.

Have wrongs been committed against your people? Absolutely. Are wrongs continuing to be committed against your people? Absolutely. Does this mean you forsake the people you have in order to seek revenge or liberation for those you don't? Absolutely not.

You claim your only defense is a continued advance and that no quarter shall be shown, but there are other options available to you. Protect that which you already have, provide for those within your communities and develop a future for your children and their children first. Do not let yourselves be consumed by hatred and anger, you will become the very monsters you claim to be fighting against.

I say this not to condemn you, but in hopes that your struggle will be won with wisdom and integrity and that the children of Matar will see a brighter, stronger and more secure future because of your actions today.

~Malcolm Khross

Marcus Prelude
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#59 - 2012-05-30 18:37:14 UTC
The future is bright, ... and rusty-coloured. The Tribes are on the march!
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#60 - 2012-05-30 18:43:58 UTC
Marcus Prelude wrote:
The future is bright, ... and rusty-coloured. The Tribes are on the march!


Sigh.

And so the process of failing to see the forest for the trees continues....

~Malcolm Khross