These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is hatred vs. Amarr ingrained in Matari culture?

Author
Tarunik Raqalth'Qui
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#81 - 2011-09-20 19:54:09 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Rek Jaiga wrote:
It would be arrogant to assume we have the right to change the Empire's culture to match our own (just as the Empire did to the Matari); we have no right to claim "cultural superiority". But what are you going to do when your family is trapped on the other side of the border? Sit back and say "Well it's their culture and they have the right to practice it, even though my sister or cousin or mother is enslaved over there"?
This, basically.

The Amarr can for all I care enslave each other all day long. While I understand and sympathize with those who think slavery is unethical, I feel this is something for the Amarr to do from within, not for me to do from the outside. The issues have been and remain the third of all Minmatar in captivity as well as the stated aim of the Empire to "reclaim" the rest of us.


Besides, the Amarrians probably ought to consider some internal "reclaiming" too. Slavery dragged them into the same cesspool as it did to the Matari, and now some of them seem to be afraid of mirrors for some odd reason.

Also: I have worked for the Theology Council before, shooting at those pesky Sanshas, Bloods, Guristas, and such. Talking with them was just as bad as trying to shake the truth out of a Krusual. Gosh! Is it any wonder that theocrats never seem to get any actual work done? *facepalm*
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#82 - 2011-09-21 14:33:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Farel,

That it happens does not mean I must simply accept it as the norm and shake my head in disapproval. That it happens enough to be considered "normal" is even more atrocious.

It sounds a lot like a case of the right hand not know what the left hand is doing, or a case of humans finally uniting under one single banner: the absolute lack of moral integrity.

There may be little I can actually do about it, except to continue striving to be an example of the stark contrast. No matter the difficulty or sacrifice involved, I will strive to do my best to remain true to myself, those around me and the ideals I continue to strive embodying.


I must be doing something wrong somewhere. Apparently people do not understand what I try to say, or often see something else in my messages.

I never said this was a "normal" situation. Or maybe it is, in the sense that it has been happening for decades now. It was just my way to put the emphasis on that particular subject you raised, nothing more.

Arkady Sadik wrote:
I find the difference in reaction fascinating. One party, when confronted with actions of their chosen nation that they disagree with, is upset - they won't necessarily break their loyalty, but they would prefer this to be different. The other party tries hard to discredit the sources, to find excuses on why these examples are totally different and not that bad, etc.


Could you be a little more specific on who are the representatives of these two parties, if I may ask ?

Rek Jaiga wrote:

But of course, those factions differ on very many points other than the fact that they embrace slavery. But what are you driving at? My original point was that it is only the Empire which is protected under CONCORD and allowed keep slaves while being shielded from outright war with the Republic and Federation, and this fact probably angers those Matari who even really care about the Amarr (most Matari just go about their daily lives and have their own personal struggles to worry about anyway, just like citizens of all factions).


I give up. I do not understand why you keep avoiding the issue or redirect the discussion on something else.

I thought it was clear the first time, had my doubts after considering your answer, then tried again to explain, and now, all I see is.. I do not know what exactly. A refusal ? Or a genuine misunderstanding ?

For clarification, the slavery as practiced in those factions differ on very many points is what I meant, not that those factions differ on very many point besides slavery...
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#83 - 2011-09-21 16:58:54 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Or a genuine misunderstanding ?

This

Lyn Farel wrote:


For clarification, the slavery as practiced in those factions differ on very many points is what I meant, not that those factions differ on very many point besides slavery...


Oh sure, I agree. Just because it's "nicer" slavery doesn't make it right, however. That's what I was trying to say.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#84 - 2011-09-21 21:36:46 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Oh sure, I agree. Just because it's "nicer" slavery doesn't make it right, however. That's what I was trying to say.
I do not think that you can call any of these group's slavery "nicer" than the others.

The condition of the slaves do not differ much at all. In every group, there are slave owners who treat their slaves well and slave owners who treat them abysmally bad. There is to my knowledge no evidence that any one group would have more of the "nicer" slavers than the other. The best the Amarr do for their slaves is to note that they are "an expensive commodity and should not be wasted," while stressing that they would most certainly not interfere with how their Holders treat their slaves.

As for the purpose of the slavery - whether brainwashing and cheap labor is a "nicer" purpose than solely cheap labor is, I guess, a matter of personal opinion. If I had to decide between just these options, I know I would go for the latter.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#85 - 2011-09-21 22:59:26 UTC
Wow..I wrote what amounted to a miniature essay about utilitarianism and rights analysis and how they both can be used to either support or reject the institution of slavery.

Thank you, GalNet database error, for ruining that for me.

Anyway Arkady, the (incredibly condensed) short version of it is: I agree with you but there have been some instances of happy slaves, and in such scenarios I take up a "let them be" attitude (seeing as such a slave is willing, and thus not truly a slave regardless of what they say). As a general rule, though, I oppose slavery.
Kithrus
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2011-09-22 00:52:25 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Additionally, if it's so terrible and you feel so bad for those who leave to the Republic
Shh, don't tell him, but the fourth article he linked was about how badly these people fare in the Empire, not the Republic.


Quite right, comrade! We should definitely not point out how the Empire left that paricular family and likely many like it out on the curb after the emancipation order, nor should we mention how it implies that the Amarr do not in fact have the well-being of the Minmatar at heart. Shocking news to anyone if we were ever to tell them! Astonishing!



That's not what happened at all.

Anyone with a head on their shoulders plans on how they will make their next move. A simple...

"Master, I would like to leave now that I'm free but just to keep stability I would like to stay on and earn fare to get home to my own people. This will allow you time to find someone to take my place and prevent me from having nowhere to go."

No one in their right mind just leaps and expects the world to catch them.

Also if may underline a very important point.

Amarr don't enslave because they have evil intent or greedy or don't want to pay people. We enslave because its part of our faith. There is no malice or hard feelings or ill will. The entire point this thread exist is to high light the point that the Matari have so envisioned us and demonized us as fat holders sitting behind a desk, counting coins, cackling evilly.

When I train a slave I catch myself picturing meeting this person in paradise after all the hard work they did. There is no smug belief I'm better, smarter, more deserving then the slave before me. I'm humbled by the process because I need them as much as they need me. I'm reminded how I can't live in life alone and be where I am without others to serve me and they need my knowledge of the truth.

So stop please stop. Yes there is abusive holders out there but not many. We honestly believe its for the lesser races own good however, her majisty in her wisdom has foreseen an age where slavery is not needed. This being said as you can witness the movement to phase out slavery has started.

The question is when all is said and done can you honest to God and man look me in the eye and tell me you don't hate me?

If not then Lord Merdaneth was quite right in his opening statement.


Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#87 - 2011-09-22 03:01:32 UTC
Kithrus wrote:

That's not what happened at all.

Anyone with a head on their shoulders plans on how they will make their next move. A simple...

"Master, I would like to leave now that I'm free but just to keep stability I would like to stay on and earn fare to get home to my own people. This will allow you time to find someone to take my place and prevent me from having nowhere to go."

No one in their right mind just leaps and expects the world to catch them.


The Scope article wrote:

Scope Article

"Onyeka Djekatro was a twelfth-generation slave maintaining production line equipment for the Inherent Implants factory in Bittanshal. When the emancipation order was issued , the corporation released Onyeka’s entire family, forcing them to fend for themselves. ”It was before the Sisters [of EVE] started their work. We couldn’t afford to leave,” Inevne Djekatro, her mother, explains. ”We were told to leave the workers’ housing, but where are we going to go if there’s nowhere else?” With nowhere to go, the family was forced to take menial service jobs on the station in order to pay for lodging and food."


I bolded and underlined key words and phrases which shows that they were in fact left out on the curb. So don't tell me "That's not what happened".




Kithrus wrote:

Amarr don't enslave because they have evil intent or greedy or don't want to pay people. We enslave because its part of our faith. There is no malice or hard feelings or ill will. The entire point this thread exist is to high light the point that the Matari have so envisioned us and demonized us as fat holders sitting behind a desk, counting coins, cackling evilly.

I understand the intentions are good, but in practice there is abuse. Even if it's a minority of Holders abusing their slaves, that minority reflects a deep flaw in the system of slavery. Why is a blind eye given to those who abuse? I've never seen the Amarr Certified News headlined with "Abusive Holder Detained and Stripped of Title". Why? Because it would seem Holders do not interefere with how other Houses are ran. They figure "Not my House, not my problem. I should keep my nose out of it".


Kithrus wrote:

When I train a slave I catch myself picturing meeting this person in paradise after all the hard work they did. There is no smug belief I'm better, smarter, more deserving then the slave before me. I'm humbled by the process because I need them as much as they need me. I'm reminded how I can't live in life alone and be where I am without others to serve me and they need my knowledge of the truth.

See, that's much more humble of a mindset than most Holders I've met have. Back when I expressed interest in siding with the Empire I was told by some of the more conservative that I'd be inferior to them even in the afterlife, and this I did not accept and was eventually the reason I had a falling out with the Empire (there were other reasons of course, but theological reasons were the catalyst of it all). So for your more humble attitude than most, I thank you.

Kithrus wrote:

So stop please stop. Yes there is abusive holders out there but not many. We honestly believe its for the lesser races own good however, her majisty in her wisdom has foreseen an age where slavery is not needed. This being said as you can witness the movement to phase out slavery has started.

The question is when all is said and done can you honest to Go/d and man look me in the eye and tell me you don't hate me?


I hope that day when all are free in the Empire comes within my lifetime.

And no, I do not hate you. If I hated you I wouldn't be here discussing this with you. I'd be tracking you down and trying to murder you or something absurd like that. If I hated the Amarr I'd probably be a Bloody Hand member or something.


Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#88 - 2011-09-22 06:57:43 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
We honestly believe its for the lesser races own good
We understand this. But we honestly disagree with you. So, either you stop, or we will be in a conflict until one side perishes. Which is bad for both of our people.

I do not hate the Amarr. If I hate something, it is what the Amarr are doing. There is a difference.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#89 - 2011-09-22 07:33:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Rodj Blake
Rek Jaiga wrote:
If I hated the Amarr I'd probably be a Bloody Hand member or something.




If I remember correctly, the Bloody Hand were originally inspired by the escapades of the Ushra'Khan. For many people in and out of the capsuleer community, the Ushra'Khan represent a paragon of Minmatar culture.

All of which tends to inply that you do consider a hatred of Amarr to be at least partly ingrained into Minmatar culture.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Kithrus
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#90 - 2011-09-22 07:38:43 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:

I understand the intentions are good, but in practice there is abuse. Even if it's a minority of Holders abusing their slaves, that minority reflects a deep flaw in the system of slavery. Why is a blind eye given to those who abuse? I've never seen the Amarr Certified News headlined with "Abusive Holder Detained and Stripped of Title". Why? Because it would seem Holders do not interefere with how other Houses are ran. They figure "Not my House, not my problem. I should keep my nose out of it".



No it underlines that those who brake the law must be brought to justice.

As I mentioned before you can't take the small bad and hold it in the light and say 'See the entire is evil.' Corrupted hearts will do evil with Good things. A knife is a tool, sometimes it cuts its user other time God forbid its used as a weapon. This doesn't make the knife bad, it makes those who wield it all the more careful that doesn't happen.

Bring the names of an abusive holder to me if you have them and I will see justice done.

Arkady Sadik wrote:
We understand this. But we honestly disagree with you. So, either you stop, or we will be in a conflict until one side perishes. Which is bad for both of our people.

I do not hate the Amarr. If I hate something, it is what the Amarr are doing. There is a difference.


As mentioned the Empress has started the ball rolling for the end of Slavery in Amarr. It won't happen overnight, so till then the response to this is yours and your peoples.

Do you help us end slavery or will there be attacked, terrorism, war slowing down the project and hardening the hearts of those who would have in time heeded Her Highness's wishes?

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#91 - 2011-09-22 07:43:53 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
Arkady Sadik wrote:
We understand this. But we honestly disagree with you. So, either you stop, or we will be in a conflict until one side perishes. Which is bad for both of our people.

I do not hate the Amarr. If I hate something, it is what the Amarr are doing. There is a difference.


As mentioned the Empress has started the ball rolling for the end of Slavery in Amarr. It won't happen overnight, so till then the response to this is yours and your peoples.
As Rodj Blake explained, it is quite likely that the Empress meant that with the new Reclaiming she launched, she expects slavery to be unnecessary anymore, because the goal - reclaiming the lands of the heavens and "converting" others - will be done. I am afraid this is not something I look forward to.

I have explained elsewhere what I think the Amarr could do to start ending the war, but I'm afraid this is not for me to decide - you will need to ask your empress to contact the Republic government for conditions of your surrender.

Quote:
Do you help us end slavery or will there be attacked, terrorism, war slowing down the project and hardening the hearts of those who would have in time heeded Her Highness's wishes?
Yes.
Thgil Goldcore
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#92 - 2011-09-22 08:36:54 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
you will need to ask your empress to contact the Republic government for conditions of your surrender.


I don't think I will forget you said that.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#93 - 2011-09-22 12:10:52 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Rek Jaiga wrote:
If I hated the Amarr I'd probably be a Bloody Hand member or something.




If I remember correctly, the Bloody Hand were originally inspired by the escapades of the Ushra'Khan. For many people in and out of the capsuleer community, the Ushra'Khan represent a paragon of Minmatar culture.

All of which tends to inply that you do consider a hatred of Amarr to be at least partly ingrained into Minmatar culture.


Just because there are some who who believe Ushra'Khan to be a paragon of Minmatar culture doesn't make it so. To state otherwise is argument ad populum. Ushra'Khan represents Minmatar capsuleers, rather than commonfolk Minmatar who lives on the planet.

Drawing the conclusion that I imply any such thing is false. I acknowledge that there are frothy-mouthed fanatics within Republic society, but the same is true of all civlizations.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#94 - 2011-09-22 12:20:46 UTC
Kithrus wrote:


No it underlines that those who brake the law must be brought to justice.



Oh absolutely! And publicize the prosecution of abusive slave-holders to boot! Do you realize how many moderate or liberal Matari would applaud such publicized action? That, along with the Empress's declaration of an end to the era of slavery, would surely signal the beginnings of a modern Empire that the Republic would be willing to be at peace with. That or I'm employing overly wishful thinking again.

Kithrus wrote:

As I mentioned before you can't take the small bad and hold it in the light and say 'See the entire is evil.' Corrupted hearts will do evil with Good things. A knife is a tool, sometimes it cuts its user other time God forbid its used as a weapon. This doesn't make the knife bad, it makes those who wield it all the more careful that doesn't happen.

Bring the names of an abusive holder to me if you have them and I will see justice done.

A reasonable enough viewpoint. The same process of seeing the small bad and proclaiming "All is evil" is quite common in rhetoric and debate and has been applied to just about every subject of controversy in the cluster. Perhaps it's time to change that...

Kithrus wrote:

Do you help us end slavery or will there be attacked, terrorism, war slowing down the project and hardening the hearts of those who would have in time heeded Her Highness's wishes?

I can only hope my ranting here will be seen by or trickled into the Imperial government to expedite things. I typically do not make it practice to proactively raid the Empire, but rather beat back any who raid the Republic.

If the Empress is earnestly trying to end slavery in the Empire, then long live the Empress.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#95 - 2011-09-22 12:55:08 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:


Oh sure, I agree. Just because it's "nicer" slavery doesn't make it right, however. That's what I was trying to say.


Statement way too broad to be answered properly. Slavery is just a term applied to many different things. This can be in certain cases a legitimate, ethical, and productive tool with proper strong and exhaustive regulations.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#96 - 2011-09-22 14:41:04 UTC
I think that slavery isn't really the issue with Matari culture, I think it is more that they have the cultural maturity of ungrateful teenagers. What I mean by this, is that they seem to have some cultural significance to challenging authority. There are even groups that do not acknowledge the Republic as their legitimate governing body, because they want to be "cool rebels" who practice piracy and violence because they are too cool for rules.

This is what happens when you try to form some sort of culture without a real central figurehead that loyalty is placed in. This is why tribalism is inherently dangerous as well, it doesn't really create solidarity, the only reason why there is even the illusion of solidarity is because they feel they have a common enemy, the Amarr. If the Empire destroyed all the stargates to Republic space, they would quickly turn on each other, out of their wanton disregard for centralized authority. Even now, it is likely the heavy investment of time and energy that the Federation has put in that prevents this from happening as is.

The Matari culture is one of doing what you want and doing what is best for the tribe/family, therefore it isn't that hatred of the Amarr is ingrained into their culture per se, merely that without a common enemy there wouldn't be a "unified" people at all. I get the feeling that the Minmatar just don't have the level of cultural maturity to exist without a common enemy. The Amarr, inspired by the love and benevolence of their faith, just continue to keep trying to save the Minmatar and keep getting frustrated by them. This isn't hatred either though, more frustration and I daresay perhaps outdated tactics to save people from themselves.

And Yes, I realize the irony of my race as I say this, but I am not on the Matari side, and Ava Starfire told me I wasn't Minmatar, so I guess I am not, I guess that means I don't have a race.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#97 - 2011-09-22 16:42:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Jaiga
ValentinaDLM wrote:

The Matari culture is one of doing what you want and doing what is best for the tribe/family

And this is a bad thing...how? Among the more tribal Matari in particular, the interests of the family and tribe come first. It is very communal, and hardly on the level of "immature teenagers". I remember Avlynka telling me of her sub-tribe being classed as a "primitivist tribe" or something to that effect, with the lifestyle being quiet "simple" (what it lacks in material extravagence it gains in cultural beauty).

Such tribes just want to be left the hell alone; where is the hatred in that?

ValentinaDLM wrote:

I get the feeling that the Minmatar just don't have the level of cultural maturity to exist without a common enemy.

Because prior to the Amarrian Reclaiming the Minmatar totally didn't have a beautiful culture complete with advanced scientific knowledge of mechanics, right? Look at the archaeological data; the Minmatar are fully capable of being a civilized society without any sort of outside influence.

Come on, Val. Look past your biases and see the raw facts.