These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What's up with stacking penalty?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sri Nova
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2012-05-20 07:16:58 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:



Thanks :)

Still stacking does not makes sense. In any world. It's either on everything or on nothing. Why torpedo launchers dont have stacking? They use cpu. Why reactors have stacking? It's not comparison to real world. Its comparison to basic logic.





Dont matter CCP learned several years ago that stacking penalties were needed .

it is a simple solution to a problem and it works.

to argue against this is pretty much arguing that the basic game mechanics need to be changed.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2012-05-20 07:21:52 UTC
Alex Sinai wrote:
Himnos Altar wrote:
it's so you can't get OMG UBER stats from stacking invul/other hardeners on top of each other. SEriously, you'd get 90-100% (EM :P ) resists FAR too easily with 4 Invuls if you trashed the stacking penalty



So i can't get two separate computers work on same aircraft at their full capacity because of? Because you know two separate computers work at their full capacity on aircrafts and also everywhere else without any "stacking penalty". This thing is too far beyond logic and breaks immersion heavily.
Maybe they never quite got multi-threading right in New Eden?
Solhild
Doomheim
#63 - 2012-05-20 08:15:35 UTC
Gorki Andropov wrote:
Our ships fly in a space that's more akin to oil than vacuum, and you complain about this?!


The space our ships fly in is an EM field infused vacuum. The warpcore in our ships creats a massive well that drags against the EM field.

*I'm still thinking of a reason for projectile charges that travel at infinite speed and instantly hit targets at any distance Big smile
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#64 - 2012-05-20 08:57:03 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Maybe they never quite got multi-threading right in New Eden?
Multi-threading is the ultimate example of a real-life stacking penalty.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#65 - 2012-05-20 19:45:05 UTC
Abel Merkabah wrote:
Harristotle wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Abel Merkabah wrote:
Harristotle wrote:
Life is sometimes strange!

x = 0.999
10x = 9.999
10x - x = 9.999 - 0.999
9x = 9
x = 1

For my next trick I will prove that black equals white.


Eh wrong...

10x = 9.99
10x != 9.999

10x - x = 8.991

Nice troll though...lol


I assume he meant the 9s to be repeating.

x=.9999[repeating]
10x=9.99999[repeating]
10x-x=9.999[r]-.9999[r]
9x=9
x=1
1=.99999[repeating]


Correct I did mean them to be repeating, thanks for the clarification.


My Apologies, I stand corrected. Whenever you work with infinite concepts Math can get screwy...


I see it as is proof that the Universe has a Rounding Error.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#66 - 2012-05-20 23:34:49 UTC
Drinking beer has a stacking penalty.

More than one condom at a time has a stacking penalty.

I could go all day.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!