These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Remove Concord!!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Malak Dawnfire
Unquestionable Prosperity
Grand Inquisitors Federation
#1 - 2012-05-16 22:40:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Malak Dawnfire
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!
NickyYo
modro
The Initiative.
#2 - 2012-05-16 22:42:21 UTC  |  Edited by: NickyYo
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!


Do that and EVE will be dead within the week.
Face it, some people play the game for fun and not the enjoyment of others while they are camped..

..
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#3 - 2012-05-16 22:43:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Petrus Blackshell
I am posting in a thread. Oh and my post isn't edited!
Edit: Aw ****. Failed at not editing my post again.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Imortal valkyrie
The Logistics Of Tax Evasion
#4 - 2012-05-16 22:43:05 UTC
Good idea man i support this 100%


Btw me being a player say KEEP CONCORD. Seriously highsec would not work without it.

Raevyn Enderas > wasn't it Jerky Boys where they were talking about blasting someone in the ass with a vasoline potato?
Shaampoo
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-05-16 22:43:12 UTC
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!
Remove Players Let concord decided how the game is played
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#6 - 2012-05-16 22:44:25 UTC
Okay I'm not going to edit this post.

This thread is now about editing posts.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Malak Dawnfire
Unquestionable Prosperity
Grand Inquisitors Federation
#7 - 2012-05-16 22:45:17 UTC
Shaampoo wrote:
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!
Remove Players Let concord decided how the game is played


I'd subscribe to your newsletter.
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-05-16 22:54:16 UTC
Just want to point out

You can still shoot anyone anywhere anytime if they are not docked.

CONCORD infact is the players policing themselves, because as we all know...battleships are rarely used to gank hulks now. Because players don't like the repercussions of losing something so valuable, because its risking so much...Pussies. Its like sticking a metal object in a light socket...after awhile the person doesn't like CONCORD shocking them so much. But its ok to use a destroyer and take a static shock like dragging wool sock covered feet over shag carpet during a dry autumn day.
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#9 - 2012-05-16 23:00:52 UTC
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!



Yes, let all the imbeciles run free, but don't cry when CCP can't afford to keep the servers running...Roll

Signature removed - CCP Eterne
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#10 - 2012-05-16 23:04:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Simi Kusoni
Aqriue wrote:
Just want to point out

You can still shoot anyone anywhere anytime if they are not docked.

CONCORD infact is the players policing themselves, because as we all know...battleships are rarely used to gank hulks now. Because players don't like the repercussions of losing something so valuable, because its risking so much...Pussies. Its like sticking a metal object in a light socket...after awhile the person doesn't like CONCORD shocking them so much. But its ok to use a destroyer and take a static shock like dragging wool sock covered feet over shag carpet during a dry autumn day.

Aqriue, I want to meet you one day. Just to see if you are genuinely bat **** crazy in real life, or if its all some very determined ploy.

I've honestly never before been that curious about what someone on the internet is really like. I bet you're a crossdressing cage fighter called Marvin, or something similarly awesome.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]
bongsmoke
Visine Red
420 Chronicles of EvE
#11 - 2012-05-16 23:08:28 UTC
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!


Now this would be neat. But, I fear it would kill the game.
Generals4
#12 - 2012-05-16 23:35:35 UTC
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!


Yes... but no

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _
Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2012-05-16 23:35:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Tor Gungnir
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!



Yes, let the inmates run the asylum.

By the by, there already is a place for what you suggest:

It is called Low-Sec.

If you had any balls, you'd check it out.

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.
bongsmoke
Visine Red
420 Chronicles of EvE
#14 - 2012-05-16 23:38:00 UTC  |  Edited by: bongsmoke
Tor Gungnir wrote:
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!



There is already a place like that.

It is called Low-Sec.

If you had any balls, you'd check it out.


Not that i disagree, but i think the OP's objective isnt about him, but the carebears that refuse to try low/null sec.

Edit: Low sec sucks, null is where the greatness is, imo.
Karn Dulake
Doomheim
#15 - 2012-05-16 23:38:21 UTC
This would be fantastic for the first hour and then there would be no one to shoot at as everyone in highsec would stop playing.


Imagine. you could park up at Jita and just shoot everyone.

Imagine how leet your killboard would be.

You rock
I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2012-05-16 23:40:56 UTC
bongsmoke wrote:
Tor Gungnir wrote:
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!



There is already a place like that.

It is called Low-Sec.

If you had any balls, you'd check it out.


Not that i disagree, but i think the OP's objective isnt about him, but the carebears that refuse to try low/null sec.

Edit: Low sec sucks, null is where the greatness is, imo.


Your point being? if they don't want to, you have no right to force them.

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#17 - 2012-05-16 23:44:15 UTC
Want to see how well players police themselves, and how popular that pastime is?

Visit lowsec.

I keep wondering what a complete PvE SHARD would be like....

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction
Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2012-05-16 23:52:48 UTC
Vincent Athena wrote:
Want to see how well players police themselves, and how popular that pastime is?

Visit lowsec.

I keep wondering what a complete PvE SHARD would be like....



Something like Woodstock I'd imagine.

Only more futuristic.

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.
Malak Dawnfire
Unquestionable Prosperity
Grand Inquisitors Federation
#19 - 2012-05-16 23:57:59 UTC
bongsmoke wrote:
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!


Now this would be neat. But, I fear it would kill the game.


Nah. Goonswarm would come up here and make sure it didn't get outta hand, I'm sure of it. Lol
Generals4
#20 - 2012-05-16 23:58:57 UTC
bongsmoke wrote:
Tor Gungnir wrote:
Malak Dawnfire wrote:
Let the players decide how the game should be played, let us police our own players!



There is already a place like that.

It is called Low-Sec.

If you had any balls, you'd check it out.


Not that i disagree, but i think the OP's objective isnt about him, but the carebears that refuse to try low/null sec.

Edit: Low sec sucks, null is where the greatness is, imo.


So what? Why should be people be forced to do what you think is greatness? I personally think Wh's and lowsec are much more interesting then null. Maybe i should petition to remove null?

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _
123Next pageLast page