These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

[Importen] CCP fail to acknowledge and fix +4 year old bug
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#21 - 2012-05-18 13:29:01 UTC
mxzf wrote:
You misunderstood Danika because you were too busy raging.

The RAM requirements don't round up to 1, they require a RAM for each run, but don't use the entire thing up. This might not be what you're hoping for, but it is a perfectly valid way for it to be implemented. How you have decided it 'should' work and how the devs have decided that it will work are not required to overlap.

Also, confirming that calling people 'incompetent', saying they 'fail', and cursing at them is the best way to get them to do you a favor and change things to how you want them Roll

And if you think about it, it is rocket science after all P


This.

I get what the OP is saying, but I neither agree with the proposed change nor how he decided to attempt to get his point across.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
MR rockafella
Santa's Factory
#22 - 2012-05-18 14:43:22 UTC  |  Edited by: MR rockafella
Mallak Azaria wrote:
mxzf wrote:
You misunderstood Danika because you were too busy raging.

The RAM requirements don't round up to 1, they require a RAM for each run, but don't use the entire thing up. This might not be what you're hoping for, but it is a perfectly valid way for it to be implemented. How you have decided it 'should' work and how the devs have decided that it will work are not required to overlap.

Also, confirming that calling people 'incompetent', saying they 'fail', and cursing at them is the best way to get them to do you a favor and change things to how you want them Roll

And if you think about it, it is rocket science after all P


This.

I get what the OP is saying, but I neither agree with the proposed change nor how he decided to attempt to get his point across.


Well i get now that my sarcasm doesnt always get understood, but its also frustrating that a bug like this exist after so many years and i know that can be cut 'n dry sorta say but ya i can only say that i do have aspergers and ADD, although thats not an excuse its a explaination but it doesnt change that some people choose to focus on verbal expression of my writing without actually thinking about the bug and my explaination on it, they choose to make it about me cause of the way i delivered it, when simple they could have choosen to ignore me and my post completely, but instead choose to derial my post and point because of it.

Maybe i'm a idiot for thinking that people actually want a better game, but the facts stands clearly the build window quote shows an incorrect amount of ram's need for any blueprints that need rams at a x amount of runs' and it is clearly to me that cause for this must lie in the way that window round up or down the build cost and since ram's arent an integer but a percentage of 1 it must be converted to a number and for veldspar II mining crystalls its 1.5% of 1 but thats 0.015 of ram and that whould be rounded to 0 so none whould be used thus i must conclude that its being rounded up to 1 and then timed with with amount of runs.

This is very logical for me and the way i think and i have had alot annoyences over this cause i have several t2 blueprints and i have to build some of them in a correct order if i dont ill have to build less and less and this is because i build for cycle of days and i wont be able to do that when i dont have the incorrect amount of ram's and its really alot of ram's i need every month and its alot of extra build time we are talking well over 10.000 ram's and ram's take more time and is really big congestion in my production cause of one single little big bug.

So yes i apologize my for undetected sarcasm and ask people to show support for getting ccp to spend ½ and hour to repair a simple math bug that prevents me for clicking build even though everything i have is correct.

Thank you all, and even you drake. I truely did laugh from the start when i wrote the post and to this one, cause i do realize not everybody can understand the thoughts of different think but highly intelligent person

Disclaimer : The last 2 paraphrase may or may not have included sarcasm.
Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#23 - 2012-05-19 17:56:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Carrigan
Your lack of comprehension of something that was broken down to simpler terms and explained to you is nothing short of ****ing astounding. But, of course you were to busy emo-raging to actually notice the fact that people were explaining things to you in a simplistic manner. Pull your head out of your *** and actually read before you post again. On second thought, shove your head further up your *** so that you can see **** more clearly, and just don't post anymore.

And Draconis, the ****post from someone who doesn't even play EVE is unnecessary, unwanted, and pointless. We don't need a critique on everything from your point of view. So do us all a favor, and just unsub. Even your own Alliance doesn't want you, but then again, you should be used to that.

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||
Roldanus
Black Anvil Industries
#24 - 2012-05-20 05:33:27 UTC
Drake Draconis wrote:
I'm not sure I beleive this toon....his first post is like a drunk 12 year old screaming and can't talk worth crap.

Suddenly hes talking english and spitting walls of text like nothing else.


Emo rage much?


Not supporting until I see OTHER people of credability state this is in-fact a bug.

Otherwise Mister rage poster over there can calm the #### down.


PS: and like it or not....you have to file bug reports to get things done...posting about it here is a waste of time. Until such time I see droves of inventors making said claims of this bug. For all we know its an intentional random mechanic to do with invention.

PS2: Veldspar Mining II Crystal is not ammo nor is it for PVP....cute play on words but seriously bad form.


Im sure he is drunk.
Dude, I understand your frustration but you are simply not going anywhere this way. If this was they way the original petition was placed no wonder why they didn't fix it.
Previous page12