These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is there a shortage off Low- and Nullsec players?

Author
knulla
Doomheim
#121 - 2012-05-20 11:07:38 UTC  |  Edited by: knulla
Romar Agent wrote:
I have no problem with the existance of PVP. PVPers may PVP all day long. They may even try to PK PVEers if they can catch them. Even me, I have been ganked and will be ganked in the future if I am not cautious enough.

It's an aspect of EVE.

The fact that I don't PVP myself doesn't mean that I don't condone PVP. I see no use for it for myself, that's all.

What catches my interest ist why PVPers tend to try to speak out against PVE at any given opportunity (well, PVEers speaking out against PVP are somewhat catching my interest as well, but they tend to be on the less agressive side).

That's why I started this thread.



I speak for PVE and PVP when I want local removed, more lowsec and 0.0 added, change to gameplay mechanics for mining and building not to mention increase defense around gates and stations in lowsec and more rewards in those systems through incusrions, plexing, missions and better asteroids and a lot more. That also comes with the price of less highsec and less rewards in highsec. What I don't understand is industrialists who do not want to build for any reason other than building, get ISK and never spend it or that enjoy playing and paying for it to be AFK or use a bot.

My changes do not remove a person from the game who wants to only mine, if anything it makes his game better overall.

You then go on to say we are agressive and you like PVP? But you want CCP to protect you while making massive ISK and assume anyone that shoot at other players as being some sort of sociopath.

I told you and let me say it again, without PVP the game is ****, you build ships to be flown, you mine the resources to be used for building. It is all connected with one another and promoting PVP and make EVE less safe does not remove one component from the other, PVP players need industrialists just as much as they need PVP players.

Or are you under the assumption that Goons have no industry at all? You will be hard to find a successful corp or alliance without both type of players, some even do both things on the same character even.

That is EVE, let me know when you find an EVE player that played often for more than a year just "experiencing" the flow of mining and nothing else.

Space is mysterious, vast and amazing not to mention dangerous, take away danger and you guessed it, go play FLOW, this game is not for you and CCP would never make enough money from players like you, EVER!

If you still do not "get it", there i no more point discussing the matter and I will just have to debate it again in a year from now with another one of "you" since you wont be here anymore, like the ones before.

 [u]Malice Redeemer[/u] - "Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory"  Posted: 2012.05.23 01:39

    lol

Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#122 - 2012-05-20 11:30:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Romar Agent
knulla wrote:
...You then go on to say we are agressive and you like PVP? But you want CCP to protect you and assume anyone that shoot at other players as being some from of sociopath.

I do not like PVP, I have nothing against the existance of PVP, as in, I accept that there is PVP and do not work for the removal of PVP.

I also do not work for PVE, as I find the status quo pretty satisfying.

Then I feel that PVPers are more on the agressive side, but well, I am led to belive that people who are attacking others are agressive - pardon me. Apart from nothing being wrong with being agressive.

And of course I want CCP to protect me - I PVE, I'm in need of protection to play the game the way I want.

Not sure where that sociopath thing comes from - anyone who PVPs thus shoots at other players is in their right to do so, it's in the game.

(So is PVE.)

knulla wrote:
... I told you and let me say it again, without PVP the game is ****, you build ships to be flown, you mine the resources to be used for building. It is all connected with one another and promoting PVP and make EVE less safe does not remove one component from the other, PVP players need industrialists just as much as they need PVP players.

Or are you under the assumption that Goons have no industry at all? You will be hard to find a successful corp or alliance without both type of players, some even do both things on the same character even.

That is EVE, let me know when you find an EVE player that played often for more than a year just "experiencing" the flow of mining and nothing else.

Space is mysterious, vast and amazing not to mention dangerous, take away danger and you guessed it, go play FLOW, this game is not for you and CCP would never make enough money from players like you, EVER!

I you still do not "get it", there i no more point discussing the matter and I will just have to debate it again in a year from now with another one of "you" since you wont be here anymore, like the ones before.
Not sure where this came from, with this accusationn label attached to it (well, seems so from the "tone" of it).

Basically I agree with what you write. Yes, EVE without PVP is ****, yes everything is connected, yes EVE isn't (and shouldn't be) absolutely safe, yes PVPers need industrialist and vice versa (not every PVEer is an industrialist and not every industrialist is a PVEer). I suppose Goons have an industry... okay this is getting silly...

Neither do I speak out against PVP, nore do I speak for out for PVE. I'm speaking out for letting people follow their choices, PVPers may PVP, PVEers may PVE.

That's regardless of the way I chose in the game.

And I do get it - you and many other think there is a specific pattern which makes EVE works, and that any balance shift is going to destroy that pattern. Evenmoreso I get that you and many others think that that balance is actually shifting.

I do not think so (in neither of both points).
knulla
Doomheim
#123 - 2012-05-20 11:55:16 UTC  |  Edited by: knulla
Romar Agent wrote:
knulla wrote:


And of course I want CCP to protect me - I PVE, I'm in need of protection to play the game the way I want.

No you do not and if you have to have protection other than that you can put together yourself then play with others! This is a multiplayer game in an artificial sandbox with emphasis on freedom to PVP anywhere in all forms of gameplay activities. My proposed changed not original would improve that and if you refuse to accept it, EVE IS NOT FOR YOU!

[quote=knulla]... I told you and let me say it again, without PVP the game is ****, you build ships to be flown, you mine the resources to be used for building. It is all connected with one another and promoting PVP and make EVE less safe does not remove one component from the other, PVP players need industrialists just as much as they need PVP players.

Or are you under the assumption that Goons have no industry at all? You will be hard to find a successful corp or alliance without both type of players, some even do both things on the same character even.

That is EVE, let me know when you find an EVE player that played often for more than a year just "experiencing" the flow of mining and nothing else.

Space is mysterious, vast and amazing not to mention dangerous, take away danger and you guessed it, go play FLOW, this game is not for you and CCP would never make enough money from players like you, EVER!

I you still do not "get it", there i no more point discussing the matter and I will just have to debate it again in a year from now with another one of "you" since you wont be here anymore, like the ones before.


Not sure where this came from, with this accusationn label attached to it (well, seems so from the "tone" of it).

Basically I agree with what you write. Yes, EVE without PVP is ****, yes everything is connected, yes EVE isn't (and shouldn't be) absolutely safe, yes PVPers need industrialist and vice versa (not every PVEer is an industrialist and not every industrialist is a PVEer). I suppose Goons have an industry... okay this is getting silly...

Neither do I speak out against PVP, nore do I speak for out for PVE. I'm speaking out for letting people follow their choices, PVPers may PVP, PVEers may PVE.

That's regardless of the way I chose in the game.

And I do get it - you and many other think there is a specific pattern which makes EVE works, and that any balance shift is going to destroy that pattern. Evenmoreso I get that you and many others think that that balance is actually shifting.

I do not think so (in neither of both points).



"No you do not and if you have to have protection other than that you can put together yourself then play with others! This is a multiplayer game in an artificial sandbox with emphasis on freedom to PVP anywhere in all forms of gameplay activities. My proposed changed not original would improve that and if you refuse to accept it, EVE IS NOT FOR YOU!"

Their choice is fine all day long, but that choice CANNOT BE to not having to deal with others, in pvp, even if you just want to and in the end only mine ever. It comes with the game, it can't be separated from each other.

Let me explain using this example that follows-

Freedom of speech, it is a right and an important if not the most important part of a democracy. If you agree with that you have to accept every single persons right to say whatever, whenever and however they want to as an absolute. We have to respect that even if their opinions are ****.

What we don't have to do is respect the opinion itself or what was said, and we also have every single right to say whatever we want about it.

-

Perhaps it is not the best example but my point is, you can't love and play EVE the way you want to unless you accept that every one has the right to blow you up to bits. You can hate it but when you call on CCP to enforce your gameplay as an absolute then you have lost your freedom of speech (a tie in to my previous example.)

So if you want to be a miner, then mine, need protection? get better, learn or perhaps team up with others, or find a nice free flash game or even make one with an asteroid, some strip miners and music and save yourself and every one else a headache or 2.

 [u]Malice Redeemer[/u] - "Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory"  Posted: 2012.05.23 01:39

    lol

Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#124 - 2012-05-20 12:24:24 UTC
knulla wrote:
Romar Agent wrote:
And of course I want CCP to protect me - I PVE, I'm in need of protection to play the game the way I want.
No you do not and if you have to have protection other than that you can put together yourself then play with others! This is a multiplayer game in an artificial sandbox with emphasis on freedom to PVP anywhere in all forms of gameplay activities. My proposed changed not original would improve that and if you refuse to accept it, EVE IS NOT FOR YOU!

Wrong on the parts that concern me. And typing in bold doesn't make it any truer.


And I got it the first time: "EVE is that way, and if you don't play that way, it's the highway."

Wrong. I am playing EVE the way I want to. And EVE allows me to play that way. Because EVE is not a-certain-playstyle-only.

And I don't have anything against your ideas except that I don't see any need to (forgive for quoting from another thread, but you condensed it nicely)

"cut highsec in half, turn that into new lowsec, nerf highsec based income so much only new and broke players would live there"

cut down the PVE area. EVE is fine in that regards as it is.
Andrea Roche
State War Academy
Caldari State
#125 - 2012-05-20 12:27:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrea Roche
Romar Agent wrote:
Reading General Discussion is giving the feeling everyone is trying to railroad new players into Low- and Nullsec these days.

As a Highsec player I'm too inexperienced in the ways Low- and Nullsec work, but is there some deeper reasoning behind this than "play the game the way it's meant to be" or "you cannot play different to me/us"?

I mean, Highsec, Lowsec and Nullsec are gathering to three different playstyles within the EVE universe. None of these niches is fundamentaly threatening the other niches playstyle. Do they?

It's a bit problematic to sift through the arguments. One day Highsec is painted as getting to many rewards, the next players are lured with the immense riches of Nullsec - this gives an incoherent picture.

Or is there actually a shortage off players in Low and Null? Do Lowsec players have problems finding opponents? Do alliances have problems to fill their rosters? Do too many players "get stuck" in High?



Historically, high sec and 0.0 used to be the one with the largest numbers for most of the patches.
Now during the sactums buff period, high sec numbrs dropped drastically and low sec + null sec numbers swelled drastically.

Null geting higher numbers ofcource and the reason why so many went low sec was cos pirates beneficiated from roaming in 0.0 and conducting contract on 0.0 entities.

The nerf hammer came to sanctums and 0.0 lost a high number of players. A lot of people were outraged by the nerf due to an incredible amount of investment made in a very short time in 0.0 for theses sactums and the nerf was gonna render their isk spent useless and was not gonna be reinbursed! The investments were very expensive with a high pay out after a few months but very soon it got nerfed! The outrage was so high that a lot of people left and others stopped loging in. I belive somewhere around 30%, perhaps even more. As a result, the contracts for pirates dried up and more people began moving into wormholes. Today we still have not swelled the number of 0.0 players as then.

Then another very unfortunate event happened (which i wont name cos i feel CCP have changed their ways) where people left and threatened in leaving also in big numbers.

Then came incursions and people began to login again cos of isk. Also new changes to ships, ui and CCP fixing stuff has also contributed to increase in login numbers. But there is still this big hole in 0.0 and low sec.
I believe this can only be filled with something like a sanctums buff (or somethign similar) but i believe also that people are gonna be very untrustfull about spending their isk in 0.0 again.

Thats more or less the history regarding the last 4 years or more. But overall the number of players that have registered is higher now. But i would say that the sanctum buff and also an event of a massive war that overwelmed the stars Big smile (DRF vs NC) that affected as much as 50% of eve players if not more, was the days that had probably one of the largest logged concurently people in history of eve. This is also surprising cos during that war there was an issue with grid and the amount of people a server could handle before it crashed. Never the less it was a time of highest activity in the history of eve.
knulla
Doomheim
#126 - 2012-05-20 16:20:40 UTC
Romar Agent wrote:
knulla wrote:
Romar Agent wrote:
And of course I want CCP to protect me - I PVE, I'm in need of protection to play the game the way I want.
No you do not and if you have to have protection other than that you can put together yourself then play with others! This is a multiplayer game in an artificial sandbox with emphasis on freedom to PVP anywhere in all forms of gameplay activities. My proposed changed not original would improve that and if you refuse to accept it, EVE IS NOT FOR YOU!

Wrong on the parts that concern me. And typing in bold doesn't make it any truer.


And I got it the first time: "EVE is that way, and if you don't play that way, it's the highway."

Wrong. I am playing EVE the way I want to. And EVE allows me to play that way. Because EVE is not a-certain-playstyle-only.

And I don't have anything against your ideas except that I don't see any need to (forgive for quoting from another thread, but you condensed it nicely)

Quote:
You can mine, fw or do whatever you want, all I ask you is to not do so AFK and with risk forcing you to pay somewhat of attention on your surroundings. EVE should not be hulks costing 300+million ISK in a highsec system out mining a newbie in a cruiser fit with only cargo expanders having no tank with the game minimized thinking you are safe while watching anime. PVE, with the exception of a new player or someone perhaps forced to due to lack of funds, should not be a game by itself separated from the rest of EVE Online. In fact, it is not even worth playing this game if it was, you in essence throw away what makes EVE, EVE. You saw the trailers I am sure, you knew what the game was about no doubt before you bought it, so why are you here trying to turn this game into something it is not? You might as well start a WoW subscriptions and whine about having space ships in that game.


"cut highsec in half, turn that into new lowsec, nerf highsec based income so much only new and broke players would live there"

cut down the PVE area. EVE is fine in that regards as it is.

Quote:
How did I cut down the PVE area? You still do not understand anything about this game or even PVE do you? People DO PVE in lowsec, WH and 0.0 24/7. People do PVE in highsec even when in war. PVE does not stop being PVE because someone can warp to you mining and blow you up, they are both 1 and the same, EVE.





Those are my quotes in answer to you, try and understand it OK? If you don't at the end of the day, I know we wont be seeing you for long because EVE is not for you.

But don't worry, it is not too late for you Big smile

 [u]Malice Redeemer[/u] - "Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory"  Posted: 2012.05.23 01:39

    lol

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#127 - 2012-05-20 16:21:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Wilma Lawson
knulla wrote:
SNIP....blah,blah,blah...SNIP

You really need to read what people are posting and understand what they are posting prior to launching a screed.
Please, post responsibly. Please have a friend take away your keyboard. What?
Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#128 - 2012-05-20 16:23:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Wilma Lawson
knulla wrote:
Those are my quotes in answer to you, try and understand it OK? If you don't at the end of the day, I know we wont be seeing you for long because EVE is not for you.

But don't worry, it is not too late for you Big smile

You need to learn reading comprehension. You fail at it. Hopefully, you wont stay in Eve long because you can't comprehend written sentences. Lol
knulla
Doomheim
#129 - 2012-05-20 16:27:38 UTC
Wilma Lawson wrote:
knulla wrote:
SNIP....blah,blah,blah...SNIP

You really need to read what people are posting and understand what they are posting prior to launching a screed.
Please, post responsibly. Please have a friend take away your keyboard. What?


I was about to say the same about you.

Wilma Lawson wrote:
knulla wrote:
Those are my quotes in answer to you, try and understand it OK? If you don't at the end of the day, I know we wont be seeing you for long because EVE is not for you.

But don't worry, it is not too late for you Big smile

You need to learn reading comprehension. You fail at it. Hopefully, you wont stay in Eve long because you can't comprehend written sentences. Lol



Oh, I fully comprehend, I even understand you, that is why I know you have not played EVE for long nor will I see much of you in the future.

Cool

 [u]Malice Redeemer[/u] - "Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory"  Posted: 2012.05.23 01:39

    lol

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#130 - 2012-05-20 16:31:43 UTC
knulla wrote:
Wilma Lawson wrote:
knulla wrote:
SNIP....blah,blah,blah...SNIP

You really need to read what people are posting and understand what they are posting prior to launching a screed.
Please, post responsibly. Please have a friend take away your keyboard. What?


I was about to say the same about you.

Wilma Lawson wrote:
knulla wrote:
Those are my quotes in answer to you, try and understand it OK? If you don't at the end of the day, I know we wont be seeing you for long because EVE is not for you.

But don't worry, it is not too late for you Big smile

You need to learn reading comprehension. You fail at it. Hopefully, you wont stay in Eve long because you can't comprehend written sentences. Lol



Oh, I fully comprehend, I even understand you, that is why I know you have not played EVE for long nor will I see much of you in the future.

Cool

No, no you don't. Shocked
knulla
Doomheim
#131 - 2012-05-20 16:34:25 UTC
Wilma Lawson wrote:


No, no you don't. Shocked



Who trolls who? The one trolling or the one making the troll, troll? troll! Ugh

 [u]Malice Redeemer[/u] - "Post if you are unsubing over the new inventory"  Posted: 2012.05.23 01:39

    lol

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#132 - 2012-05-20 16:36:43 UTC
knulla wrote:
Who trolls who? The one trolling or the one making the troll, troll? troll! Ugh

I'm glad you've recognized your problem. That is the first step! I know you can do it! P
Kale Kold
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#133 - 2012-05-20 18:07:21 UTC
Roime wrote:
Problem with EVE is that CCP has failed to remove high-level income from the noob starter areas. Missions and Incursions are detached, alien content in the sandbox.

This has lead to an influx of raid & grind -oriented players from simpler MMOs, who speak with terms like "playstyle", "PVE", "opting out of PVP". They are not attracted to EVE because of it's unique, persistent virtual universe, but are only after a space-themed game where they can achieve a naive sense of success by gathering imaginary space kredits, or certificates, the next shiny ship and module.

I understand that these people also bring money for CCP, but aren't exactly the kind of people that I'd love to play with. They are especially bad problem on the forums, where they keep posting stinking whine threads every single day, always the same theme- CHANGE THE RULES BECAUSE I DON'T ACCEPT SANDBOX.

This post is so full of win i don't know where to start! CCP please read!

“Some people call me insane for the destruction I’ve caused, ...I believe I was just doing my duty!” -- Testimony submitted to Caldari Navy war crimes tribunal.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#134 - 2012-05-20 18:27:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Roime wrote:
This has lead to an influx of raid & grind -oriented players from simpler MMOs, who speak with terms like "playstyle", "PVE", "opting out of PVP".

Sorry bros, I've opted into PvP and you're the other P. :gank:

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#135 - 2012-05-20 18:47:57 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Sorry bros, I've opted into PvP and you're the other P. :gank:

And that's fine with me and the OP. I have no expectations of not being blown up by anyone at anytime. It's part of the game. It's part of the fun. It stops being fun when someone else dictates to me how they think I should play the game!
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#136 - 2012-05-20 18:58:13 UTC
Wilma Lawson wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Sorry bros, I've opted into PvP and you're the other P. :gank:

And that's fine with me and the OP. I have no expectations of not being blown up by anyone at anytime. It's part of the game. It's part of the fun. It stops being fun when someone else dictates to me how they think I should play the game!

Oh you and everyone else is welcome to max yield, rest tank your hulk or whatever, just that people who come and want CCP to make up their tank, or argue that because 5 catalysts can work together to gank them they need more tank or XXYY so they need more tank, it gets sort of lame.

This forums PvP is pretty lame, most of the time.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#137 - 2012-05-20 18:59:41 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Wilma Lawson wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Sorry bros, I've opted into PvP and you're the other P. :gank:

And that's fine with me and the OP. I have no expectations of not being blown up by anyone at anytime. It's part of the game. It's part of the fun. It stops being fun when someone else dictates to me how they think I should play the game!

Oh you and everyone else is welcome to max yield, rest tank your hulk or whatever, just that people who come and want CCP to make up their tank, or argue that because 5 catalysts can work together to gank them they need more tank or XXYY so they need more tank, it gets sort of lame.

This forums PvP is pretty lame, most of the time.

What does this mean? Can someone translate?
Romar Agent
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#138 - 2012-05-20 19:03:47 UTC
I guess she means that she has no problem with laid back PVEers who accept PVP as being part of EVE.

What she has a problem with is those PVEers who are outraged by being PVP targets and try to change the game by complaining to CCP (i.e. working politically to change the game more in their favour, when that favour is not furthering PVP content).
Wilma Lawson
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#139 - 2012-05-20 19:06:52 UTC
Romar Agent wrote:
I guess she means that she has no problem with laid back PVEers who accept PVP as being part of EVE.

What she has a problem with is those PVEers who are outraged by being PVP targets and try to change the game by complaining to CCP (i.e. working politically to change the game more in their favour, when that favour is not furthering PVP content).

Thanks. I read your post and then re-read her post; seems to make sense in a convoluted sort of way. :)
Waylan Yutani
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#140 - 2012-05-20 19:15:36 UTC
Romar Agent wrote:
Reading General Discussion is giving the feeling everyone is trying to railroad new players into Low- and Nullsec these days.

As a Highsec player I'm too inexperienced in the ways Low- and Nullsec work, but is there some deeper reasoning behind this than "play the game the way it's meant to be" or "you cannot play different to me/us"?

I mean, Highsec, Lowsec and Nullsec are gathering to three different playstyles within the EVE universe. None of these niches is fundamentaly threatening the other niches playstyle. Do they?

It's a bit problematic to sift through the arguments. One day Highsec is painted as getting to many rewards, the next players are lured with the immense riches of Nullsec - this gives an incoherent picture.

Or is there actually a shortage off players in Low and Null? Do Lowsec players have problems finding opponents? Do alliances have problems to fill their rosters? Do too many players "get stuck" in High?


This is eve. Your goal should be to deny other people of having fun at your expense while otoh you have fun at theirs. Hi-low null and/or w-space.. it's all the same really