These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

When Soundwave moves T2 mfg out of high sec....

Author
Vince Snetterton
#1 - 2012-05-11 00:28:49 UTC
What will you do with your chars?

BTW, the IF is no longer a question.
It is only a matter of when and how.

Soundwave's has made that direct statement in the past week.
The first phase of the datacore devastation is only the first step in the removal of T2 mfg from high sec.

I have no clue if he will remove T2 invention or mfg or both.
I imagine it will depend on what his null sec buddies tell him is best for them.

And yes, before the null sec zealot propagandists jump in, I am insane, I am posting with an alt, high sec makes way too much money with zero risk, null sec players drive all content in the game, and good riddance to my kind from the game.

Now, to those who have thought soberly about this issue, what will you do?
Would you actually try to make a go of it mfg / inventing in low / null, or will you decide on other actions with your char, including lapsing the subscription?
Derglas Servekti
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-05-11 00:39:36 UTC
Vince Snetterton wrote:
Soundwave's has made that direct statement in the past week.


Citation?

IF T2 invention and manufacturing becomes impossible by game mechanics in high sec, then I'll probably stop doing it. If I can do it in lowsec, I'll do that. Not if ti is just a way of making me a target for gankers, but if with some precautions I'm able to do it only rarely losing ships I'll probably keep doing some of it. If invention moves to lowsec, I don't know if my corp will want to have a tower there to allow me to invent, however. I'll have to wait and see.

I'm not likely to want to join one of the sociopathic boys' clubs that pass for nullsec alliances in order to do T2 manufacturing, however. So, if that's the choice, then I'll do something else.

(Citation on the "sociopathic boys' clubs" is here:
http://mabricksmumblings.blogspot.ca/2012/05/if-this-is-null-goons-can-have-it.html -- yeah, that's a biased picture, and it's just one coalition, but from what I hear things are more or less the same everywhere.)
Vince Snetterton
#3 - 2012-05-11 00:46:18 UTC
Derglas Servekti wrote:
Vince Snetterton wrote:
Soundwave's has made that direct statement in the past week.


Citation?

IF T2 invention and manufacturing becomes impossible by game mechanics in high sec, then I'll probably stop doing it. If I can do it in lowsec, I'll do that. Not if ti is just a way of making me a target for gankers, but if with some precautions I'm able to do it only rarely losing ships I'll probably keep doing some of it. If invention moves to lowsec, I don't know if my corp will want to have a tower there to allow me to invent, however. I'll have to wait and see.

I'm not likely to want to join one of the sociopathic boys' clubs that pass for nullsec alliances in order to do T2 manufacturing, however. So, if that's the choice, then I'll do something else.

(Citation on the "sociopathic boys' clubs" is here:
http://mabricksmumblings.blogspot.ca/2012/05/if-this-is-null-goons-can-have-it.html -- yeah, that's a biased picture, and it's just one coalition, but from what I hear things are more or less the same everywhere.)



Going to take some digging re: original the citation, but he quote has been copied many times in the datacore thread on the first page of GD. Further, watch him in the Ten Ton Hammer interview, the infamous one where he introduced the datacore devastation.
Haulie Berry
#4 - 2012-05-11 00:52:31 UTC
I will continue making asstons of money. Actually, I'll probably make substantially more money as the hobbyist highsecbears abandon manufacturing. :D
Galadriel Vasquez
Project Omega Industries
Fraternity.
#5 - 2012-05-11 04:22:33 UTC
What's the big deal if he does move it to low or null? Blockade Runners will get you in and out without much hassle. Its not like Null is a shooting gallery is it?

I have tin foil hat trained to 5.

Haulie Berry
#6 - 2012-05-11 04:41:31 UTC
Galadriel Vasquez wrote:
What's the big deal if he does move it to low or null? Blockade Runners will get you in and out without much hassle. Its not like Null is a shooting gallery is it?


Yep. Honestly, I don't really see it as a bad thing. A lot of manufactured goods are oversupplied (hence all the whining about margins). Higher barriers to entry would help with that, even if they're relatively superficial ones.
Stella SGP
#7 - 2012-05-11 05:03:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Stella SGP
Vince Snetterton wrote:
What will you do with your chars?

BTW, the IF is no longer a question.
It is only a matter of when and how.

Soundwave's has made that direct statement in the past week.
The first phase of the datacore devastation is only the first step in the removal of T2 mfg from high sec.

I have no clue if he will remove T2 invention or mfg or both.
I imagine it will depend on what his null sec buddies tell him is best for them.

And yes, before the null sec zealot propagandists jump in, I am insane, I am posting with an alt, high sec makes way too much money with zero risk, null sec players drive all content in the game, and good riddance to my kind from the game.

Now, to those who have thought soberly about this issue, what will you do?
Would you actually try to make a go of it mfg / inventing in low / null, or will you decide on other actions with your char, including lapsing the subscription?


So first you start of your post with such a strong STATEMENT on a piece of information which you have clearly misinterpreted..... NICE!

Then you go on to claim that you have NO CLUE about what your statement was about, then you went on to IMAGINE how it was going to be done..... NICE!

Let me start a thread on something totally imaginary and just claim that it was a statement from a random Dev..... NICE!

I like the way you think!
Lara Dantreb
Reisende des Schwarzschild Grenze
#8 - 2012-05-11 07:47:49 UTC


After all, why limit it to T2 production ? Remove all manufacturing slots from highsec and POS assembly arrays aswell.

Products should all be more risky to produce...

---   Buying T2 ship bpos since 2005  ---

Ersteen Hofs
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2012-05-11 08:18:40 UTC
I'll try t1 prod and if that won't work well enough I'll cancel all accs but 1 and try station trading, or just quit.

honestly i don't even know why i keep playing any more so if he does that i'll be grateful.
sg1jack
The Omega Particle
#10 - 2012-05-11 08:29:39 UTC  |  Edited by: sg1jack
I have built T2 in high sec for some time and I can't see what mechanisim could be used to move it out of high sec.

On saying that there are huge implications for moving it out:

1. Just about every tower in high sec would close down if invention goes unless there just used for ME
2. markets in fuel blocks and PI would be greatly effected.
3, Ammo markets would also be effected.

What I can see from the dev blog is more the removal of AFK datacore mining but time will tell.

Either way I will find a way to continue playing the game in a way that suits me.

To go all tin foil hat on it if T2 Manu and invention goes out of high sec then I would say someone will benifit greatly from it, as they say in RL follow the money.

Tin foil hat removed as over use can result in long term objectivity lossBig smile
Ersteen Hofs
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#11 - 2012-05-11 08:53:13 UTC
Quote:
I have built T2 in high sec for some time and I can't see what mechanisim could be used to move it out of high sec.


well it's easily done actually.

1. remove all t2 capabilities from current POS equipment and NPC stations. this includes the ability to install t2 BP for manufacturing and invention slots.

2. add new anchorable POS structures that have invention slots and t2 manufacturing slots. make these modules only anchorable in low sec or lower, like reactor arrays right now.

what's so hard about it?
clixor
Celluloid Gurus
#12 - 2012-05-11 09:12:27 UTC
I've given this issue some thought and discussed it with some MD / SCC people.

What i personally think when talking about removing T2 production from hi, unless they want to remove all production from hi (which is unlikely imo) Soundwave is talking about removing the ability to anchor Component arrays in hi, and disallowing to manufacture the T2 components on NPC lines.

As you need to build the T2 components to make T2 (really) profitable this would in turn limit T2 production in Hi.

Although a POS in losec can be defended pretty well (with the new merc system as well) a lot of casual, one man or smaller corp, would drop T2 production due to the perceived risk.

Now, i don't have exact numbers on this, but my guess is a great deal of T2 comes from these small time manufacturers as simply there are a lot of them. If only 50% stops manufacturing T2 supply of everything T2 will be down significantly.
Add to the fact that POSses in losec have great implications for logistics (no more POS close to hubs so a JF would become a requirement really) what we can expect in this scenario that T2 prices would skyrocket.

From a CCP point of view this makes sense though, players have to organize (interact) more and i really have the feeling they are working on levelling the PVP playing field making it more n00b friendly (less T2, smaller hulls due to high prices).

Ersteen Hofs
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2012-05-11 09:32:59 UTC
well as I heard the chinese don't use t2 at all, maybe this will happen here as well.

honestly with the prices t2 will get if this happens, it won't be worth spending isk on over the meta4 components. plus, the faction/desadspace modules will have comparable prices so the only t2 things that will be used are guns and launchers.
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#14 - 2012-05-11 09:42:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
I'll carry on with my trade and industry alt much the same as I do now, never bothered with T2 manufacture and never needed to.

I must say I'm getting very tired and more than a little bored of your ongoing doomsaying and panic posts, world hasn't ended yet and just because there are changes coming it doesn't mean it will.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Ersteen Hofs
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2012-05-11 10:11:08 UTC
Samillian wrote:
I'll carry on with my trade and industry alt much the same as I do now, never bothered with T2 manufacture and never needed to.

I must say I'm getting very tired and more than a little bored of your ongoing doomsaying and panic posts, world hasn't ended yet and just because there are changes coming it doesn't mean it will.

tell that when all the people who do t2 now will begin doing t1 and your margins will shrink even tinier :)
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#16 - 2012-05-11 10:45:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Samillian
Manufacturing T1 is a small part of what I do to make money, comes down to it I won't miss it much at all. In this game it pays to have a wide number of money making options, failure to diversify is short sighted.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

shar'ra matcevsovski
Doomheim
#17 - 2012-05-11 11:32:25 UTC
Honestly, if its just the invention that moves to low sec its not that of a big deal. Im pretty sure it would even lead to better margins for the t2 manufactures at the end. Although it would make the entire high sec POS, high faction standng requrements obsolete.

T2 production in low sec only tho, doesnt seem to be very realistic. It would simply change to much at once and the consequences would be even for CCP unpredictable. Since there would be a massive m³ traffic between High- and Low sec, it would just overpopulate low sec.

So I would propbably look for a calm low-sec area and do what I did before in high sec.

shar'ra phone home

Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-05-11 12:24:07 UTC
Stella SGP wrote:
So first you start of your post with such a strong STATEMENT on a piece of information which you have clearly misinterpreted..... NICE!

Then you go on to claim that you have NO CLUE about what your statement was about, then you went on to IMAGINE how it was going to be done..... NICE!

Let me start a thread on something totally imaginary and just claim that it was a statement from a random Dev..... NICE!

I like the way you think!


+1

Amazing 17 replies already based on some phantom citation from a Dev that the OP has yet to actually produce.
Lara Dantreb
Reisende des Schwarzschild Grenze
#19 - 2012-05-11 12:33:41 UTC
Derath Ellecon wrote:
Stella SGP wrote:
So first you start of your post with such a strong STATEMENT on a piece of information which you have clearly misinterpreted..... NICE!

Then you go on to claim that you have NO CLUE about what your statement was about, then you went on to IMAGINE how it was going to be done..... NICE!

Let me start a thread on something totally imaginary and just claim that it was a statement from a random Dev..... NICE!

I like the way you think!


+1

Amazing 17 replies already based on some phantom citation from a Dev that the OP has yet to actually produce.


Wait... It's not idea lab forum ??? ShockedBig smile

---   Buying T2 ship bpos since 2005  ---

Khoga Zdag
Cats Illegal Strike Force
#20 - 2012-05-11 13:35:04 UTC
Why not stop any activities in Hi Sec and WH except flying in noob ships?


If the T2 production (any activities: copy, invent or Manuf) willn't be possible in Hi, I will stop playing all of my 4 acc.



123Next pageLast page