Test Server Feedback

OS: Win 7
CPU: AMD 2 core 2.0 Ghz, probably a mobile version
GPU: I think It's 256mb of integrated laptop ATI card
RAM: 4gb

1 client

graphic settings: low, all effects disabled

Avg Fps zoomed out: 10

Avg FPS zoomed in: 3 (sometimes less than 1)

On a scale of 1-10, NA (I've never been in a big fleet fight so I have no point of comparison)

Disconnects/crashes: no, but my EVE client kept locking up. It would run for about 5 seconds, then freeze for 3-4 seconds, then start running again.

Comments:
EVE can handle a massive fleet fight on a bottom-tier rig. I would rate the experience "barely playable". good job.

OS Version: System 7 (64 bit)
CPU: AMD x 4 630
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9100
One client
Graphic setting: Low

User Experience

Had locked screen on every combat. Took 1M ISK armor damage. Had to leave the site of combat.

FPS was 20 at the station I repaired at. When I went to planet 2 to reengage fps was 9.

Thanks for the event!

TQ runs a better FPS usually?

Bash

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 SP1
CPU: Phenom II X6 1035T
GPU: ATI HD4830
RAM: 8GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low-med

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 15
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 full PC crash (probably heated GPU), 1 client crash. The client also went "not responding" every few seconds during the POS shoot, after a minute or 5 it then proceeded to go fully unresponsive and I had to kill it.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: At one time my memory usage on a whole was 75%, even though task manager said EVE was playing nice and only using 1,2GB. But after I closed EVE my mem usage went right back to 38% so something was fishy there :P This was during the POS bash shortly before my client crashed.

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 X64 Ultimate
CPU: Intel Q6600 @ 2.4 GHz
GPU: XFX ATi HD 5770
RAM: 4GB GEIL PC2-6400
How many clients were you running at the same time: 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High - All Max

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 - 60

Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 6 - 10

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ?: 3

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, Client crashed upon order to fire at the POS, FPS dropped from 45 FPS to 3.2 then client became non responsive with the client using 3GB of memory but only 25% CPU usage. Logged back in and resumed to fight at planet 2, No disconnects experienced but lag and ships not showing in overview was experienced. Server caught up and targets being called showed in overview.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: First mass test experience!!! I'm no longer a virgin :P was a bit hectic with players seeming to do what they wanted rather than actually be serious about testing.

Missile effect's are much better as well as the explosion effect's although I don't understand why they always seem to wiggle when first leaving the launcher, being a missile surely it should have a straight line of fire...

Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows 7
• CPU: Intel Core i7-2600k
• GPU: GTX 460
• RAM: 8
• How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

User Experience

• Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 30
• Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 8
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: first mass test, well run event, will do again.

Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: Windows 7 Pro / 64 bit
• CPU: Intel C2Q 6600 @ 2.7 GHz
• GPU: Sappgire HD4870 / 1Gb
• RAM: 4 Gb OCZ DDR2 SLi Edition
• How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

• Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 2-5

• Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 1-7, jumpy, fps meter reminds a haircomb with broken teeth

• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1 - was perfectly fine until people started shooting the POS, then - completely unplayable

• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No disconnects per se, but a weird laf that resulted in client hanging and unfreezing in about 2 minutes with warp-in, as if a total disconnect had happened

• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Something is wrong with either missile effects or some other weapons - the moment fighting ended (almost ended, but that was enough, really), fps went back up to bearable 15-20. During the second fight something froze the client again. Side note - this is the first time I have to submit error logs in 6 different reports, as they just take so much space to be split in 6 parts, RARed at max compression :)

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: XP
CPU: AMD Athlon X2 64 3800+
GPU: Radeon HD 6570 2gb
RAM: 2GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 0.5 - 15
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): undocked at Station FD-MLJ 11-15 fps, Fight at Planet 0.5.-3 (both Clients)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: very long laggs

OS W7 ultimate 64bit
cpu intel Q8200 2.33ghz quad core
gpu 3x nvid gforce gts250 triple sli configuration
ram 8gb
clients 1
settings medium

User experiance
missed first fight due to rl
Had to relog due to client problem
planet 2 fight was laggy but bearable nice effects enjoyed it
on a scale of 1-10 would give it a six...as soon as i turned eve voice off fps went up was averaging 10 fps (Fraps)
Still needs a bit of work but very good compared to Tranquility not so good
Eve voice still causes problems
Thanks for a good test CCP
i'm sure it will come right in the end

Blue

Machine info and settings:

OS Version: Windows 7 Professional, SP1
CPU: AMD Phenon II X6 (6x 3,2 GHZ)
GPU: MSI gtx560ti OC
RAM: 8GB
Clients at the same time: one
Graphic setting on the client: all lowest, in window mode

User Experience

Average fps during the fight at the planets- between 20 and 30 fps, depending on how much commotion happened
(not much of a difference between zoomed in and zoomed out)

Experience compared 2 TQ- I never took part in large scale battles in TQ (in fact, I never engaged pvp on TQ at all- besides of getting shot down a few times in lowsec), so I can't tell the difference, since I am usually a missionrunning carebear =D
though I am tempted to join red vs blue hehe, can't wait for the new missile effects to get into TQ, I am sure they will look awesome in missions =)

Disconnects, crashes, etc... none, game went fine, but for some reason I could not spin the ship in the hangar since I set ALL settings on lowest... but everything else appears to be working fine^^

My experience- The time dilation does make some Patience issues- when up at 95% an HM needs an eternity to reach the ship 50km away =(
but besides of stabilising the client, it greatly improves the overall fps
Nice new Bomber designs, now they really look badass, but I recommend doing that to all T2 ships- give them a little bit more badass design (when you are done with other stuff), for example assault ships, heavy assault ships and marauders can really use some more... bulky design, as it is now, all the T2 ships look like repainted T1 ships (even though they are a lot stronger)

and btw, do something for the missionrunners- add more high reward missions, especially the L4 ones (like blockades, Worlds collide, etc.), beef up the bountys 4 Guristas and mercs and extend the LP stores- every Mission runner is gonna thank you for that- and add more pve kings of the hill =)
for example an T3 Battleship (like the tengu is a T3 Cruiser), just add it, you don't have to bother with it being OP- it's gonna be expensive as hell anyways- it would not surprise me if only the chassis (without any subsystems) would cost at least 800 million ISK, put some tremendous skill requirements ontop of that (racial BS lvl5 and some other big skills on 5 too) and here we got a new pve king of the hill and with it you can add some more difficult L4 missions =)

hope you consider such a new ship class... eventually

greetings- Ivan

Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 (32-bits)
CPU: Amd Phenom X4 - 2.3GHz
GPU: Nvidia GTS 250 1Gb
RAM: 3Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? = 1 client
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the planets in FD-MLJ, zoomed out (no brackets): 3 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 0.5 FPS
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 1
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? = client froze for a few minutes during warp from P1 to P2 (didnt disconeted)

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Verry Laggy while Shooting POS, when warping from P1 to P2... the grid was still showing P1... couldnt cicle modules or fire missiles ... suddenly was killed and podded.. reshiped and warped back to fight...average fps 15 for the rest of the test