These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

T3 is old
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#1 - 2012-05-10 20:31:11 UTC
Where is the new?

T3 just seemed to have died along with many of CCP's features.

T3 has been out for too long without any new things.... When do we get new toys?
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#2 - 2012-05-10 20:34:22 UTC
Miilla wrote:
Where is the new?

T3 just seemed to have died along with many of CCP's features.

T3 has been out for too long without any new things.... When do we get new toys?

Shocked Still have 11 days to wait for mine. Cry

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-05-10 20:34:55 UTC
The forum sez...

Ohnomnomnomomnom...delicious poast!

*ahem*

As I was trying to say a minute ago...

When you break ALL of the old toys.
"If."
Tillin Sylph
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-05-10 20:35:39 UTC
Only Goons get new toys now silly.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-05-10 21:13:58 UTC
I loled :D

(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#6 - 2012-05-10 21:15:42 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
I loled :D

(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )




Yes, let us add more game breaking items to EVE's inventory.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
#7 - 2012-05-10 21:51:23 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
I loled :D

(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )



Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS?

Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp.

And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges.

Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#8 - 2012-05-10 22:02:02 UTC
Epiphaniess wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
I loled :D

(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )



Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS?

Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp.

And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges.

Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it.


They had planned t3 modules and other t3 stuff, typical CCP, once its a new feature, its patched to nerfinity then let rot.
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2012-05-10 22:09:51 UTC
I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#10 - 2012-05-10 22:11:17 UTC
TECH 3 not TIER 3. *facepalms*
Gaia Ma'chello
Photosynth
#11 - 2012-05-10 22:14:03 UTC
CCP stopped adding major new features after Incarna when everyone complained that CCP was wasting time on new features when there was so much broken stuff.

Maybe its time to have a little balance? Say equal effort on:

New features
Improving game play
Iterating existing features
Fixing bugs
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
#12 - 2012-05-10 22:19:40 UTC
Miilla wrote:
Epiphaniess wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
I loled :D

(I do want T3 BSs tho ;) )



Why would they add T3 BS, when they still don't have any decent pvp oriented T2 BS?

Marauders, are pve and gimped for pvp.

And Black Ops are still terrible, glorified jump bridges.

Don't expect anymore T3 for awhile, they seem to be really hard to balance right with out them just taking over. They still have not come up with the 5 subsystem set and have quietly forgotten about it.


They had planned t3 modules and other t3 stuff, typical CCP, once its a new feature, its patched to nerfinity then let rot.


It does appear at times that CCP has a habit of putting something in the game then forgetting about it. What it really is it takes them a really long time to get back to it. I don't know if that is bad or good or both but it is frustrating. Ask the Faction Warfare people. But it may not be so bad, you don't want to break the game to much to often for that will frustrate people as well.

It would be nice to see some T3 modules and other T3 stuff. But the reason we have not yet is that anything like that would probably out shine T1 so much and make T2 the ugly red head middle child, that it would cause a whole lot of issues.

T3 modules would need to be a whole new distinct entity, not just better preforming versions of what we got currently.

Maybe the player base should think of suggestions?
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#13 - 2012-05-10 22:20:13 UTC
Gaia Ma'chello wrote:
CCP stopped adding major new features after Incarna when everyone complained that CCP was wasting time on new features when there was so much broken stuff.

Maybe its time to have a little balance? Say equal effort on:

New features
Improving game play
Iterating existing features
Fixing bugs



Uhh this was long before Incarna. AND we are heading right back to Incarna, take a look at SiSi, more new NEX items.

YELLOW FONT business plan is still in effect, microtransactions are on the way again.
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#14 - 2012-05-10 22:20:34 UTC
I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.

The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#15 - 2012-05-10 22:21:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.

The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.



In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now".
Epiphaniess
Verboten Technologies
#16 - 2012-05-10 22:22:16 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.


That might be one of the reasons why CCP is planing on moving away from the Tier system. In the future revamping of all the ships.


Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#17 - 2012-05-10 22:23:39 UTC
Epiphaniess wrote:
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
I am laughing at the ones that are still confusing "Tech" and "Tier" with each other.


That might be one of the reasons why CCP is planing on moving away from the Tier system. In the future revamping of all the ships.





Guess I will sell all my ships now then.
Miss Yanumano
Cadence Industrial Syndicate
#18 - 2012-05-10 22:24:06 UTC
Miilla wrote:
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.

The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.



In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now".


Their current road map seems to say "We're going back to fix all this **** that have accumulated over the years", which is also one of the most requested "feature" of all time, seems all good to me, when they're done fixing most **** they can add new content, otherwise all you get is buggy feature creep.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#19 - 2012-05-10 22:25:04 UTC
Miss Yanumano wrote:
Miilla wrote:
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
I would rather have modular POS first before new T3 craft.

The last news for T3 was the next line would be smaller than a crusier over a year or more down the road from the last massive "answer all questions" topic that failed miserably halfway through. Yet with the tier tear down now, it may be all up in the air whats to come shipwise.



In other words, CCP has no road map, no future design except "make money" and were heading back down the NEX road again with them just going "oh look, lets make money here" then a month or two later, "oh lets do this now".


Their current road map seems to say "We're going back to fix all this **** that have accumulated over the years", which is also one of the most requested "feature" of all time, seems all good to me, when they're done fixing most **** they can add new content, otherwise all you get is buggy feature creep.



Ahh yes, that's why there is new NEX pants on SiSi right now.
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#20 - 2012-05-10 22:25:08 UTC
They have a small dedicated team for the avatar experience and they would continue to put in new NEX items or update avatars as they get down with features like arm tattoos. This has been known, this is not news, this started out as a almost valid topic for once yet now its just down to whining at CCP per usual.
12Next page