These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Price point for Eve droid apps

First post
Author
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#1 - 2012-05-10 19:38:50 UTC
What would you pay for an Android app?

Just askin :)

Im thinking in the region of a Euro or so but not much. Would that be reasonable?
Peter Powers
Terrorists of Dimensions
HORSE-KILLERS
#2 - 2012-05-11 09:38:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Peter Powers
Miilla wrote:
What would you pay for an Android app?

Just askin :)

Im thinking in the region of a Euro or so but not much. Would that be reasonable?

at the moment you cannot charge for apps involving eve!

Edit: and to answer the question, if it was allowed it would depend alot on what that app would offer.
most likely i'd look on it and if its not worth it write my own version and give it out for free :p

3rdPartyEve.net - your catalogue for 3rd party applications

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#3 - 2012-05-11 10:49:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Steve Ronuken
Peter Powers wrote:
Miilla wrote:
What would you pay for an Android app?

Just askin :)

Im thinking in the region of a Euro or so but not much. Would that be reasonable?

at the moment you cannot charge for apps involving eve!

Edit: and to answer the question, if it was allowed it would depend alot on what that app would offer.
most likely i'd look on it and if its not worth it write my own version and give it out for free :p



There has been /no/ mention of a license allowing for paid applications using CCP/EVE IP. If you want to make one, contact legal@ccpgames.com (iirc), to arrange for a commercial license.


The developers license that was mentioned at fanfest covers ad supported applications.
https://plus.google.com/photos/104420254081686601186/albums/5723099856571622625

In more general terms:
It depends on the application. Anything over £2 or so would require either that it was wonderful, or a strict requirement.

Mobile apps are, pretty much, an impulse buy. as such, they need to be cheap. Money you don't see. And be /damn/ careful what permissions you request. Because too many will turn at least some people off.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#4 - 2012-05-11 17:12:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
API's are not copyrightable the only thing they can do is block API's but how? There is no way to identify the calling app.

That rules out blocking the app on the API level, the only thing they can do to is enforcement of artwork, that is also why I am looking for copyleft replacements of Eve style artwork.

we need an independent creative commons Eve Alternative artwork for app builders so we can avoid using CCP's artwork outside their game.

Currently plenty of apps are using CCP Eve artwork, if they do go after my app, you can be damn sure legally the other apps will be brought up in a dispute as it being accepted by CCP that people use their stuff, IF and only if they do not go for EVERY app builder. I certinally will use the other apps as an example to back up a case :) So take down everybody in the process. Ie., force Google Play to remove all Eve related apps as a result of any decision :) I go down, I will take them all down with me :) I will certinally get Google Play app store involved and have them impose a ban on all non CCP approved Apps :) ANd we all know that would send a shockwave across the Gaming API app builder industry.

I am aiming at about 1 euro for the apps so it will not be a big decision to use it or not.
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#5 - 2012-05-11 18:42:30 UTC
I'm not saying it could never happen, but I kinda doubt that I would pay anything for an app. It'd have to be a pretty impressive app to be worth me paying for it over using one of the existing free apps or writing my own program to do the job.

What kind of features were you planning to include in such a program?
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#6 - 2012-05-11 18:44:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
mxzf wrote:
I'm not saying it could never happen, but I kinda doubt that I would pay anything for an app. It'd have to be a pretty impressive app to be worth me paying for it over using one of the existing free apps or writing my own program to do the job.

What kind of features were you planning to include in such a program?



Well, most "free" apps are "donation" supported, that is another route, but most people Won't donate anything. Again the price point will VERY LITTLE so there won't be crying over such a small amount. Everybody is a whiner, cant please everybody, just read Amazon reviews for proof :)

you can't expect a 100 dollar quality app priced at 1 euro or less. You also have to keep that in perspective. I am not going into details really at the minute, waiting on the CREST API to be released, no point in using an old API :) and sure free apps do the job, but they are free for a reason. And due to CCP trying to cream app builders for money, you won't be getting low price apps, or maybe they will all go donate to avoid their license, I won't be going that route, I will be avoiding their license completely by not using their artwork bundled with it in order to keep the published price in the micropayment arena, i.,e euro cents or 1 euro tops I hope. That pretty much is to cover time and hardware purchases to test on. Those aren't free.
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#7 - 2012-05-11 18:59:51 UTC
Oh, I completely understand, I'm just saying that (in my case atleast) it would take a fairly impressive app to be worth more to me to buy it than writing my own program. I understand that I'm not the average user in that I'm completely willing and able to write my own programs, but you asked what it would be worth to me and I gave you the answer.

If the app is good enough and worthwhile, I wouldn't have anything at all against paying for something. I'm just saying that it'd take an impressive app for me personally to feel that it is worthwhile.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#8 - 2012-05-11 19:09:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
mxzf wrote:
Oh, I completely understand, I'm just saying that (in my case atleast) it would take a fairly impressive app to be worth more to me to buy it than writing my own program. I understand that I'm not the average user in that I'm completely willing and able to write my own programs, but you asked what it would be worth to me and I gave you the answer.

If the app is good enough and worthwhile, I wouldn't have anything at all against paying for something. I'm just saying that it'd take an impressive app for me personally to feel that it is worthwhile.



Sure go ahead write your own app, I am not aiming at developers.

The amount is very tiny, it is to cover time, hardware and books etc. Those are not free. Nobody donates, thats a sad reality, nobody liks adverts. I want to avoid ad's and cannot depend on "donations" because nobody really does.
Shellac Brookdale
Cutting Edge Incorporated
#9 - 2012-05-11 20:03:40 UTC
Quote:
API's are not copyrightable


Thats fine. But the content served through an API is. Ie. as soon as your application provides details on any item name, system, character or anything else that can be considered CCP IP you're violating terms of use. However, what you could to while claiming "APIs are not copyrightable" is to create your own EVE API server that serves its very own content.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#10 - 2012-05-11 20:09:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Shellac Brookdale wrote:
Quote:
API's are not copyrightable


Thats fine. But the content served through an API is. Ie. as soon as your application provides details on any item name, system, character or anything else that can be considered CCP IP you're violating terms of use. However, what you could to while claiming "APIs are not copyrightable" is to create your own EVE API server that serves its very own content.



That is served to the User on the app, Keys are licensed to the USER, not the app. I am not selling their content, I am selling a Tool like internet Explorer, it just browses URI's. I don't lay claim to their content nor am I selling their content. Are you suggeting Internet Explorer is claiming ownership to Eve online when I browse to the REST URI?
Shellac Brookdale
Cutting Edge Incorporated
#11 - 2012-05-11 20:14:00 UTC
You certainly wont go to jail for this, but CCP just has to fill a copyright infringement complain at the respective app store that you use to sell your app and that app is history. All app stores will held you, the author, responsible for potential IP violations. You can't just say "look its the user that pushed the button"
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#12 - 2012-05-11 20:22:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Shellac Brookdale wrote:
You certainly wont go to jail for this, but CCP just has to fill a copyright infringement complain at the respective app store that you use to sell your app and that app is history. All app stores will held you, the author, responsible for potential IP violations. You can't just say "look its the user that pushed the button"


Yeah and every other non licensed app on that said app store will also be pulled. I will make sure of that with equal letters :) They also cannot prevent side loading.

They can file all the frivolous complains they want, but that is all they will be, frivolous. This is the very reason I am avoiding using CCP's artwork bundled and redistributed. Touch that and yes they would have a valid complaint otherwise, not a very strong argument if they cannot show actual IP being redistributed and laid claim to by me .
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#13 - 2012-05-13 17:43:55 UTC
If you charge, and they become aware of it, they almost certainly will have your app killed off from the App store it's in.

If there are apps which people charge for, using the EVE IP, they /should/ be pulled.

The terms CCP make it available under are very simple. It's not like you have a right to make money off their work.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#14 - 2012-05-13 17:52:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Steve Ronuken wrote:
If you charge, and they become aware of it, they almost certainly will have your app killed off from the App store it's in.

If there are apps which people charge for, using the EVE IP, they /should/ be pulled.

The terms CCP make it available under are very simple. It's not like you have a right to make money off their work.


It won't be using Eve IP, it won't be including any art or media assets at all bundled and redistributed with the apk. If CCP want to play dirty, they will be counter charged with interference and harassment and extortion. If they ever rule in favour that it is against the law to dynamically build links to URI's given the fact that the EU has just ruled that API's are NOT copyrightable, then the entire software industry and app store industry is goan be in BIG TROUBLE and we know that won't happen. Given the outcome of the Oracle vs Google suit, you can bet your buttocks that Google will have an App store in the EU spefically for EU apps because of the recent API copyright ruling (not to mention EU directives allowing reverse engineering for open business via interoperability with systems). As I have stated previously, I have had counsel on this very matter and I am VERY CONFIDENT in the outcome. Sure they can keep pumping their money into a legal dispute, but I get legal advice free here :) so it won't cost me a single cent :) I am not denying they can claim copyrights to their art, they can do as they please, If I don't bundle and redistribute or lay claim to any of their media, they have not a single leg to stand on legally and they know it. What can they claim against any app that doesn't bundle or redistribute their copyright protected media? NOT A SINGLE CLAIM and thus their license is overreaching and has no merit in that exact scenario and they know it. They ONLY way CCP can make any claim is if you use their copyrighted works and API's are NOT copyrightable, caching and browsing is also not included, it is infact a service they PUBLISH to the USER via their agreement between them and the USER (consumer) of the API key. NOT the application itself.

Gun's don't kill people, people with guns kill people. RIng a bell?

URI's are not copyrightable, API's are not copyrightable, media and artwork ARE copyrightable. It won't end well for CCP if they interfere with a business account, harass a person and tries to extort money out of them via threats.

Stay clear of CCP artwork and any media content stored and redistributed and don't lay claim in any APK (which you sell) and you are pretty much protected legally.

I will enjoy having this publically trolled in the entire Google App store because if they ever try, IT WILL BE VERY PUBLIC because I have a BIG MOUTH and BAD NEWS TRAVELS in the GAMES INDUSTRY, go ask EA :) The more people try to silence me and walk on me, the LOUDER I BECOME and you can bet I won't be the only person affected :) Imagine falling down a muddy hill, I will grab everybody around me and drag them down with me in the process :) ENJOY, I know I WILL :) I have nothing to lose, have you? I am pretty sure CCP have something to lose, I don't, I don't own anything to lose, I don't depend on CCP for a job either :) :) :)

No ask yourself, do you want to risk your business and your job all for a little biatch like me? Go ahead, make my day :)
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#15 - 2012-05-13 18:12:43 UTC
Going to be interesting to see what you can do with the API, without any of the lookup tables to make sense of the IDs returned by it.

And those lookup tables are part of the database which they've made available. which /is/ covered by copyright.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#16 - 2012-05-13 18:13:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Going to be interesting to see what you can do with the API, without any of the lookup tables to make sense of the IDs returned by it.

And those lookup tables are part of the database which they've made available. which /is/ covered by copyright.



I can make up my own. Numbers and generic names are also not copyrightable :) Unless they have registered those items under copyright and trademarks, good luck.

OMG he said Shield and booster, must be illegal!'

OMG he said -10 drawback! Must be illegal!

Given the fact that a lot of ships in Eve are based on prior art, MYTHOLOGY, I don't think so :) lol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tengu

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loki
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#17 - 2012-05-13 18:17:19 UTC
True.

But it's not the numbers which are meaningful.

Here's a question for you to answer though:

Why? You've already been told there's not going to be much money in it. Why not go do something useful with your time, which could make you more money, without any of the hassle? Or have you just moved your trolling to the Tech Lab?

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#18 - 2012-05-13 18:18:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Steve Ronuken wrote:
True.

But it's not the numbers which are meaningful.

Here's a question for you to answer though:

Why? You've already been told there's not going to be much money in it. Why not go do something useful with your time, which could make you more money, without any of the hassle? Or have you just moved your trolling to the Tech Lab?



Because I can. Somebody has to stand up for the little person, obviously you are NOT the person that will stand up for people. I however, AM such a person.

I am not one to give up my principals. You however are such a person who does give up their principals and why this world is in such the sorry state it is. Because people like YOU, JUST DON'T BLOODY CARE.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#19 - 2012-05-13 18:19:46 UTC
Miilla wrote:
Because I can. Somebody has to stand up for the little person, obviously you are NOT the person that will stand up for people. I however, AM such a person.


Stand up for the little person?

Really? /That/ is your reason?

Which little person? The little person who wants to exploit someone else's work for money?

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#20 - 2012-05-13 18:20:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Miilla
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Miilla wrote:
Because I can. Somebody has to stand up for the little person, obviously you are NOT the person that will stand up for people. I however, AM such a person.


Stand up for the little person?

Really? /That/ is your reason?

Which little person? The little person who wants to exploit someone else's work for money?



But that is the thing, I am NOT exploiting their stuff, In fact, I am ACTIVELY GOING OUT OF MY WAY BY AVOIDING EXPLOITING their stuff by avoiding using their copyrighted works.

The EASY route is to just EXPLOIT their stuff but the HARD way is to NOT exploit their stuff.

Now you are turning avoidance of their copyrighted hard work into a bad thing? Do you work for CCP or something because you make no sense now.

This is for the good of the community of site and app builders, if you cannot see that, then you are DENSE.
12Next page