These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Expanding EvE with out adding solar systems.

First post
Author
Mirima Thurander
#1 - 2011-09-15 16:48:54 UTC
Expanding EvE with out adding space.


I had an idea but the more i thought about it the more it just seamed to be not enough, so how would you go about making EvE seam bigger with out adding in more solar systems?



1 - My first thought was reducing the speed ships warp at by a drastic amount, and reducing freighters and other hauling ships by even more,
but then warping would just becomes a pain if it takes to long to get around.

But after a while everyone would get used to the lowered speed of warp and we would be right back the the hole SPACE is not big enough.


2 - Another way would be do away with the warping through Planets and forcing People to pick a route through Each system that's not a straight line from gate to gate.


So I wanna see your ideas for ways to make space bigger with out adding more systems.


All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.

Plyn
Uncharted.
#2 - 2011-09-15 16:57:16 UTC
Could go with a reversal of what they did in the past, which is to re-adjust the connections between systems to on average require more jumps between destinations, remove junctions, etc.

As a side note, why do you leave additional systems out of the running? What about an additional handful of k-space regions on the other side of some w-space?
Mirima Thurander
#3 - 2011-09-15 17:42:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Mirima Thurander
Because from past treads people are hard against adding more systems, that's most of the reason.

We have quite a few systems now, there's just no reason to go to most of them / There empty.

All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#4 - 2011-09-15 21:05:16 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:



So I wanna see your ideas for ways to make space bigger with out adding more systems.





Take the useless systems and give people a reason to use them.
tankus2
HeartVenom Inc.
#5 - 2011-09-15 21:19:40 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
Mirima Thurander wrote:



So I wanna see your ideas for ways to make space bigger with out adding more systems.





Take the useless systems and give people a reason to use them.



I agree with this, there are currently too many systems that have no reason to be in other than for some mining or missioning. OR for fleet fights.

would be nice to see a no-warp though planets thing implemented.

Where the science gets done

Burseg Sardaukar
Free State Project
#6 - 2011-09-16 07:06:11 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:

2 - Another way would be do away with the warping through Planets and forcing People to pick a route through Each system that's not a straight line from gate to gate.


While I think the major "pipes" should prob have line-of-sight warp paths between gates, I DO think planets/moons/stars should have gravity wells that suck ships out mid-warp if their warp trajectory takes them "through" the planets. Also, this well should exist out to a range, so you have to slow boat out of it to enter warp again.

I'm not a big fan of slowing down warp, because when I need to just get to Jita, I really don't want it taking any longer. Also, when chasing a WT through a system, I would prob punch a baby if I was going the warp speed of a freighter in a ceptor... and even more so if I was actually in a freighter and making ANY distant travel.

Can't wait to dual box my Dust toon and EVE toon on the same machine!

Khersei
Deimos Delivery Co
Pillars of Liberty
#7 - 2011-09-16 11:24:00 UTC
Gravity wells sound interesting - especially as planets are currently boring.

This would basically make planets act like Hictors though - which means Low and null sec planets would be extreme navigation hazards.

To make this work you would have to allow arbitrary warp to a point on the system map - to allow a pilot to warp around planets. Adding this mechanic would devalue warp disruption bubles.

On the plus side it would add an element of system geography
Alberio
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#8 - 2011-09-16 16:15:11 UTC
Space seems pretty big to me already. I think you need to define what you mean by "making space bigger".

Do you mean: "spread people out more"?
Do you mean: "Make it so it takes longer to get from point-a-to-point-b"?

From the sounds of your proposals, it seems like you would like space travel to take longer. Personally, I disagree there: adding mechanics to make it take longer to get to a warp gate sounds tedious and annoying. I would hate to have to warp to a planet, re-align, warp, re-align, warp again every time I want to travel three systems away.

I think Danika Princip said it best: make the existing, 'useless' systems more useful, and people will go out there and populate them. This will spread people out, make space seem 'bigger', and make most travel take longer.

That said, I dissagree with the notion that there are too many systems that have no reason to be other than mining or some missioning. Their reason for being is to be populated and colonized. Grab your rag-tag corp of ruffians, set up a couple of POS's in a system and claim dominance. Start to build up your own little sandcastle empire in the sandbox.

You may die horribly in your pod, trying to scream bio-gel fluid out of your lungs. Or you may plant the seeds for a future, multi-system spanning alliance. Either way, it'll be a nice change from the standard.
Plyn
Uncharted.
#9 - 2011-09-16 17:01:50 UTC
Sure, there are plenty of systems that aren't being fully utilized. As it turns out, though, there are loads of people who would like to use those systems! The problem is these systems are being held by major powerblocks, and even though they aren't using them, if you move into them and start to take them over, you'll have more fight than you can likely handle on your hands.

These systems, in effect, are being used for something. They're being used for resource-denial. Unless you can find some way to change game mechanics to remove this as a viable strategy for keeping the little guys little, nothing is really going to change this.
Elindreal
Planetary Interactors
#10 - 2011-09-16 17:40:56 UTC
all great powers hold buffer states.
eve is no different, alliances will hold buffer systems on their periphery for security.
they in turn become under-developed, exploited, wastelands
Baljos Arnjak
Dark Praetorian Order
#11 - 2011-09-16 23:10:27 UTC
Well, one thing that I think can be done is to add a sort of fog of war by limiting how far away the overview can see to something like 32 or 64AU or something. As it is right now, you can see just about everything in system except for signatures and anomalies.

I think one of the main problems that makes space seem small sometimes is that basic navigation is so dry. Warp to gate, jump, warp to next gate, jump, until you get to where you were going. There really isn't anything to see other than the occasional debris field around some gates, the billboard, and gate guns.

Using the fog of war idea, you'd have to actually find the next gate by either warping to another object close enough to see it on the overview, or by having a previously made bookmark. This would also give a little mystery in exploring areas of the map that you've never been to before. Just knowing that you don't see everything the second you load the system would be an improvement over what we have now, imho.

Another problem is that there simply isn't enough variation in the space we occupy. It's not just a matter of the limited number of backgrounds we have, we need other environmental effects that help us mark our position in the universe. Stuff like planetary nebula and dust clouds that give a system wide visual effect. This is why I like going through Incursion areas and doing Recon 3/3 (before they changed it to normal space), you get a different and interesting visual experience.

Heh, I could go on for an hour about this stuff Big smile.
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2011-09-17 02:33:42 UTC
move things slower? why....

highsec is fine, and lowsec seems to be fine ( for this issue anyways)

nullsec the issue is jump bridges and huge coalitions that blue the neighboring regions.
BLACK-STAR
#13 - 2011-09-17 02:37:26 UTC
No and No.
CCP Spitfire
C C P
C C P Alliance
#14 - 2011-09-17 08:55:45 UTC
It's not exactly on topic, but there is still a lot of good ideas in the Smallholding brainstorming thread on the old forums.

CCP Spitfire | Marketing & Sales Team @ccp_spitfire

inexistin
Rubbish and Garbage Removal
#15 - 2011-09-17 09:21:44 UTC
Mirima Thurander wrote:
Expanding EvE with out adding space.


I had an idea but the more i thought about it the more it just seamed to be not enough, so how would you go about making EvE seam bigger with out adding in more solar systems?



1 - My first thought was reducing the speed ships warp at by a drastic amount, and reducing freighters and other hauling ships by even more,
but then warping would just becomes a pain if it takes to long to get around.

But after a while everyone would get used to the lowered speed of warp and we would be right back the the hole SPACE is not big enough.


2 - Another way would be do away with the warping through Planets and forcing People to pick a route through Each system that's not a straight line from gate to gate.


So I wanna see your ideas for ways to make space bigger with out adding more systems.




Start using the directional and probe scanner, and some systems will seems os big, they'll have you cursing for the rest of your stay in them.
Mirima Thurander
#16 - 2011-09-17 12:22:32 UTC
So, i kinda like the gravity well thing, but what about moons?

Would they have one to?

Would a sun have a larger well than say a earth sized planet?


All automated intel should be removed from the game including Instant local/jumps/kills/cynos for all systems/regions.Eve should report nothing like this to the client/3rd party software.Intel should not be force fed to players. Player skill and iniative should be the sources of intel.

Daedalus II
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2011-09-17 19:35:33 UTC
I've been thinking about something like this:

* Reduce the acceleration time when going into warp (make it more snappy, like on the login screen).
* Reduce max warp speed a little to compensate.
* Make it so you don't warp through planets and other stuff by having the warp system pick out "redirection nodes" to where the ship will warp. A "redirection node" is like a road crossing where you slow down, realign in normal speed, and warp again, automatically. I imagine a typical station-to-gate warp to encompass 3-4 such realignments.

These realignment spots would be fairly similar for ships that travel the same route and would be a prime location to set up pirate camps (the camps can then be avoided by not taking the obvious route gate-to-gate).

I think this will give a feeling of a bit larger space, without necessarily making travel times very much higher, but instead you spend more time realigning at nodes. It will give you a better feeling for the space you are in instead of just blasting past it at max speed.
Breaker77
Reclamation Industries
#18 - 2011-09-17 21:05:47 UTC
Baljos Arnjak wrote:
Well, one thing that I think can be done is to add a sort of fog of war by limiting how far away the overview can see to something like 32 or 64AU or something. As it is right now, you can see just about everything in system except for signatures and anomalies.



I want an overview that can show ships, POSes, wrecks, NPCs, cans, deadspace gates, and drones that are not on grid!

Seriously, do you even know what you are talking about? The overview only shows gates, stations, planets, moons, active cynos, and beacons systemwide. Everything else is limited to the current grid.

So 6 out of a couple hundred items are available systemwide on the overview. I would not call that "just about everything".

Oberine Noriepa
#19 - 2011-09-17 21:20:42 UTC
Burseg Sardaukar wrote:
Mirima Thurander wrote:

2 - Another way would be do away with the warping through Planets and forcing People to pick a route through Each system that's not a straight line from gate to gate.


While I think the major "pipes" should prob have line-of-sight warp paths between gates, I DO think planets/moons/stars should have gravity wells that suck ships out mid-warp if their warp trajectory takes them "through" the planets. Also, this well should exist out to a range, so you have to slow boat out of it to enter warp again.


tankus2 wrote:
would be nice to see a no-warp though planets thing implemented.

I want this now! Smile

Baljos Arnjak
Dark Praetorian Order
#20 - 2011-09-18 00:12:49 UTC
Breaker77 wrote:
Baljos Arnjak wrote:
Well, one thing that I think can be done is to add a sort of fog of war by limiting how far away the overview can see to something like 32 or 64AU or something. As it is right now, you can see just about everything in system except for signatures and anomalies.



I want an overview that can show ships, POSes, wrecks, NPCs, cans, deadspace gates, and drones that are not on grid!

Seriously, do you even know what you are talking about? The overview only shows gates, stations, planets, moons, active cynos, and beacons systemwide. Everything else is limited to the current grid.

So 6 out of a couple hundred items are available systemwide on the overview. I would not call that "just about everything".



Ok, you got me there, but the basic premise is having things that are always visible on the overview takes from the sense of scale in a system and negates some of the mystery of exploring new areas. I think the difference between us here is that I'm talking about the overview from the context of navigation, and you're talking about it from the context of it being an intel gathering tool.

Maybe the overview should be split up into two distinct tools, one for intel gathering and one for navigation. I dunno, what would be your contribution to this thread?
123Next pageLast page