These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Darwinism Died with Eve? How Space Ship Engineers Never Learned to Adapt - And Stopped Worrying.

Author
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#121 - 2012-05-07 07:23:27 UTC  |  Edited by: MotherMoon
Andski wrote:
There's this one hull that can be fit to mine pretty well and fit a great tank.

You may have heard of it, it's called the Rokh.


This, OP, your right. we can make ships able to mine and take gank damage. However, this requires more room for defense. That means less mining. So... just do that. Fit less mining upgrades, fit more defense. Lots of mining fits will save you from ganks, but you won't mine as much. Just like real life design.

Also you CAN change the ships stats. It's called rigs. Try fitting some, increase your defense. It's the miners who keep doing the same things over and over again.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#122 - 2012-05-07 07:27:24 UTC
the problem with mining in a rokh is that you have to stagger lasers and move minerals more often

this does not suit their afk playstyle

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#123 - 2012-05-07 07:31:39 UTC
Andski wrote:
Ocih wrote:
Using mining as an example, ship spinners who use the forums to entertain themselves use dumbass ideas like 'Mine aligned' because it works in missions or null bear belt ratting. A Hulk can be as aligned as it wants, it won't get to warp speed before the lock and insta volley kills it.


you don't know what "being aligned" means do you

it means moving at 75% or more of your maximum speed in the direction you wish to warp

every ship can instantly enter warp by doing this, from frigates to titans


And I have said 100 times before, YOU - CAN'T - MINE - HIGH SEC - THAT - WAY.

Rocks aren't big enough, range on strip miners isn't high enough, you would need 200 bookmarks per belt or slowboat to ideal align range at the back side of a rock. It's the stupidest fail troll solution I've seen the armchair forum gang regurgitate over and over but feel free to regurgitate it again. You are only fooling yourself.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#124 - 2012-05-07 07:34:55 UTC
Ocih wrote:
And I have said 100 times before, YOU - CAN'T - MINE - HIGH SEC - THAT - WAY.

Rocks aren't big enough, range on strip miners isn't high enough, you would need 200 bookmarks per belt or slowboat to ideal align range at the back side of a rock. It's the stupidest fail troll solution I've seen the armchair forum gang regurgitate over and over but feel free to regurgitate it again. You are only fooling yourself.


yeah 15km on strip miners is simply ~not enough~

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#125 - 2012-05-07 07:50:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Ocih wrote:
Andski wrote:
Ocih wrote:
Using mining as an example, ship spinners who use the forums to entertain themselves use dumbass ideas like 'Mine aligned' because it works in missions or null bear belt ratting. A Hulk can be as aligned as it wants, it won't get to warp speed before the lock and insta volley kills it.


you don't know what "being aligned" means do you

it means moving at 75% or more of your maximum speed in the direction you wish to warp

every ship can instantly enter warp by doing this, from frigates to titans


And I have said 100 times before, YOU - CAN'T - MINE - HIGH SEC - THAT - WAY.

Rocks aren't big enough, range on strip miners isn't high enough, you would need 200 bookmarks per belt or slowboat to ideal align range at the back side of a rock. It's the stupidest fail troll solution I've seen the armchair forum gang regurgitate over and over but feel free to regurgitate it again. You are only fooling yourself.


It's actually fun reading 0.0 players suggesting to stay aligned. Every time I played alone in neut / hostile space in 0.0 I immediately got bumped or attempted to be bumped away from stations and similar. So they should know better.

Now, I have seen the identical same behavior done in hi sec. You will NOT realign in time with a slowass mining ship if you get bumped and they DO it.

Another thing I noticed is that they very often fit a warp scrambler on the destroyers. Unless the miner really spams D-Scan like a madman and NEVER moves the eyes out of the screen, he'll get a warp on top of his head and then he's scrambled and won't be able to warp away even if aligned.

Now, I have never, never needed such rabid eyesighting around outside of first person shooter games. When I did missions in low and 0.0 sec (only times when you sit there in prey position for long time without a cloackie) I never needed to pay that much attention. The incoming guys usually don't come in a long range scram ship and they land on the warp in buoy at 40-50km away. Now you can see them and warp out. And you can drop cans to uncloak incoming hostiles (mission not in pockets) and alts at warp in to catch them.

Nothing of this is possible to miners.

Now, I don't care about the whole never ending arguments about miners being popped or not, but I feel people forum white knights should stop lieing their ass like this.

They either know sh!t about the game or are just rationalizing their arguments a la Bush / crusader way: create a synthetic enemy and push everybody against them.
Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
#126 - 2012-05-07 07:56:41 UTC
The defences on oil rigs and so forth ignore the various international anti-piracy agreements...

Looking back to a time where the "terrain" was similar to that of EVE however we see merchantmen as heavily armed as ships of the line, where the fact that the water barrels were stored on deck, between the guns, to free space up below decks was what generally distinguished them.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#127 - 2012-05-07 07:57:19 UTC
yeah because they can lock you the instant they're on your overview

"hey look at that flashy catalyst landing in the belt he must be here to mine with me"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#128 - 2012-05-07 07:58:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Mars Theran
For your amusement:

[Hulk, Malign Hulk]
200mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II

'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
Enfeebling Phase Inversion ECM I
Passive Targeting Array I
Drone Navigation Computer II

Strip Miner I
Strip Miner I
Improved Cloaking Device II

Medium Anti-Kinetic Pump I
Medium Anti-Explosive Pump I


Hornet EC-300 x5
Light Armor Maintenance Bot II x5


Just a thought, but Hulks have really ****** powergrid. CPUs not so bad.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Shian Yang
#129 - 2012-05-07 07:58:48 UTC
Archdaimon wrote:
Mining ships. It makes no sense, from any fluffy perspective that ships continuously ganked never develops and becomes able to counter that thread. Few times in history have people insisted on being so ******** as to continue doing the same mistake over and over. No place in Eve has ever been safe enough for any ship design as paper thin as an exhumer to be designed in the first place!


Greetings capsuleer,

Whilst I am not an industrialist I have made a point of studying old Earth technology. I've found that in ancient, historical battles they often struggled with their logistics. No, this is not a fully fitted Scimitar - but a convoy of vehicles, similar to those employed by mercenaries in New Eden, that would supply troops on the battlefield.

Those vehicles were built for a specific purpose - namely supply and boasted much more cargo space than the average mobile battle tank. They were lightly armoured and students of warfare often made a point of finding ways to ensure the security of their supply lines and their convoys. This was often accomplished by escorts of armoured and armed vehicles.

If I were to translate this to what I understand of ship construction, and being Minmatar you will forgive me for a more ... jury rigged approach. But I can understand that to equip a vessel the manufacturers often need to make rather painful design decisions. For example, a heavily armoured mining hull would have insufficient cargo room. Or the additional weight consumes so much power the mining turrets operate at reduced efficiency.

To make the most effective mining vessels they've had to rely on a pilots' common sense in securing their operations; such as using escorts, fitting appropriately or remaining aware of space around you. They simply could not make the trade-offs necesary to create a mining vessel that is capable of out-tanking a battleship hull, be as maneuverable as a frigate and have the cargo hold of a Fenrir.

Fortunately we as capsuleers have tools at our disposal. We can engage in activities with others in our corporation for the benefit of all. We can fit our ships for greater defenses, instead of achieving the optimal mineral yield. All trade-offs we make. Alternatively, you can, believe it or not - mine in a battleship. It is not as efficient as mining in a Hulk, or so I am told, but you do have a much greater measure of safety.

I hope this has been of help to you,

Regards,

Shian Yang
Ocih
Space Mermaids
#130 - 2012-05-07 08:01:37 UTC
Andski wrote:
Ocih wrote:
And I have said 100 times before, YOU - CAN'T - MINE - HIGH SEC - THAT - WAY.

Rocks aren't big enough, range on strip miners isn't high enough, you would need 200 bookmarks per belt or slowboat to ideal align range at the back side of a rock. It's the stupidest fail troll solution I've seen the armchair forum gang regurgitate over and over but feel free to regurgitate it again. You are only fooling yourself.


yeah 15km on strip miners is simply ~not enough~


The thing is, I have done what you are saying. Not with Ore but with Ice because I didn't need to update a bookmark grid to do it with ice and was able to come in on the other side of the Ice shard and mine a cycle before I was on the station near side. While it worked, the amount of Ice I was mining was cut in half by transit and dock, undock times. It's not a practical solution. If it gets that harsh for miners, train to use T2 deep core and fit a Rokh or a Hyperion. Either one will get 60% of the Hulk and have well over 70K EHP. That's a stable mining solution but still leaves the question, why the hell is a Hulk even in the game?

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#131 - 2012-05-07 08:04:04 UTC
Ocih wrote:
That's a stable mining solution but still leaves the question, why the hell is a Hulk even in the game?


Because it is capable of outmining every possible setup of any other hull in the game?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#132 - 2012-05-07 08:05:57 UTC
Andski wrote:
Ocih wrote:
That's a stable mining solution but still leaves the question, why the hell is a Hulk even in the game?


Because it is capable of outmining every possible setup of any other hull in the game?


Not if it blows up every time you undock it?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#133 - 2012-05-07 08:06:38 UTC
also hulks are getting an indirect buff in the form of CPU rigs

not that any of you will be using anything other than cargo rigs because you feel entitled to max-yield, max cargo and max tank

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#134 - 2012-05-07 08:07:02 UTC
Ocih wrote:
Not if it blows up every time you undock it?


we both know this is untrue, stop playing dumb

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#135 - 2012-05-07 08:09:38 UTC
Ocih wrote:
Andski wrote:
Ocih wrote:
And I have said 100 times before, YOU - CAN'T - MINE - HIGH SEC - THAT - WAY.

Rocks aren't big enough, range on strip miners isn't high enough, you would need 200 bookmarks per belt or slowboat to ideal align range at the back side of a rock. It's the stupidest fail troll solution I've seen the armchair forum gang regurgitate over and over but feel free to regurgitate it again. You are only fooling yourself.


yeah 15km on strip miners is simply ~not enough~


The thing is, I have done what you are saying. Not with Ore but with Ice because I didn't need to update a bookmark grid to do it with ice and was able to come in on the other side of the Ice shard and mine a cycle before I was on the station near side. While it worked, the amount of Ice I was mining was cut in half by transit and dock, undock times. It's not a practical solution. If it gets that harsh for miners, train to use T2 deep core and fit a Rokh or a Hyperion. Either one will get 60% of the Hulk and have well over 70K EHP. That's a stable mining solution but still leaves the question, why the hell is a Hulk even in the game?



Too bad~

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#136 - 2012-05-07 08:12:11 UTC
worthless mining pond scum complained about brutixes killing their hulks and mackinaws before the insurance nerf

worthless mining pond scum now complain about catalysts killing their hulks and mackinaws after the insurance nerf (and removal of the destroyer RoF penalty)

worthless mining pond scum will continue to complain until the ability to attack ships in hisec is removed

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#137 - 2012-05-07 08:14:31 UTC
Andski wrote:
yeah because they can lock you the instant they're on your overview

"hey look at that flashy catalyst landing in the belt he must be here to mine with me"


It takes how long, 5 seconds to land and lock such a big hull?

Yeah, the guys are supposed to BURN thru their monitor without a second of respite for 8 hours a day like they were assigned a Black ops fleet super delicate operation.

Oh wait it's totally apples and oranges.

On one side you have active and heart pumping gameplay involving very high focus on a time limited activity you don't repeat. And you will have significant impact and responsibility in the outcome.

On the other side you have the most absurdly BORING mechanic of any MMO to be performed for 2-8 hours, every day the same crap nobody cares about.

Don't be ridicolous, the former WILL have to apply skillful gameplay mastered in years, totally on their toes. The latter do the classic minimal wage "sweatshop" garbage for prolonged amounts of time. No way they will be ever attentive for 2-8 consecutive hours for that.

Also LOL terrible self liking with alts.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#138 - 2012-05-07 08:21:46 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Also LOL terrible self liking with alts.


Shian Yang liked your forum post: Darwinism Died...
22 minutes ago

yeah shian yang is totally my alt

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Shian Yang
#139 - 2012-05-07 08:23:19 UTC
Andski wrote:
yeah shian yang is totally my alt


Greetings capsuleer,

Not with a hairstyle like yours.

Regards,

Shian Yang
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#140 - 2012-05-07 08:23:38 UTC
maybe you could turn off your macro and stop expecting to be safe

also "lol" people whining about having to be attentive

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar