These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

4.29 billion reasons why CCP loves the Goons lol...
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Proteus Maximus
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#101 - 2012-05-05 00:05:11 UTC
Zagdul wrote:
Schalac wrote:
Zagdul wrote:
It costs me 54billion isk a month to run my alliance's infrastructure and logistics.

As it stands, an empire griefer alliance can shut that down for pocket change. A few dudes looking to kill unguarded ships who don't fire back isn't what war declarations intention was when they were introduced.

The people who are upset are the ones who declare war against entities to grief their pilots, not actually fight them in empire.


This fix to a broken mechanic is long over due.


How is it anyones fault but your own if you are going to move items unguarded? This is why we send gun trucks with supply convoys and why submarines would flank transport ships moving goods between continents.


If something expensive is being moved, we guard it. However, suggesting it's good game design to do this daily makes you look really mentally challenged.

'
It's mentally challenged to expect your stuff to be guarded by a player lobbied game mechanic while undocked ? Really?
I think people are feeling a little to entitled these days...& mad when it's pointed out.
Whats next some tech 20 modules for the entitled masses? or was pod protection enough last weekend?
FIY I'd fly the mind numbing escort duty on my rotation and not ***** one bit. Everyone should have a shift in the mess pealin spuds. You wana have the good systems with all the isk? Work for it.


If Goons were around when God said, "Let there be light" they'd have called the light gay, and plunged the universe back into darkness by squatting their nutsacks over it.
xavier69
Stark Enterprises LLC
#102 - 2012-05-06 05:47:44 UTC
Quote:
whats on sisi now is what was the origional new idea for the cost but far from the final version...


what he said ...^


U shouldnt hate cuaze i spell like a baller and a 12 year old maller...Lol

i am making foon of U cauze uuuS are Sooz angry
Lol
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#103 - 2012-05-06 06:35:43 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
delete
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#104 - 2012-05-06 06:58:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Antisocial Malkavian
DarthNefarius wrote:



I feel like this is a move away from the current system where it is just a way to pvp in high back to more of a " You offended me prepare to die" move


I feel its more of a "you should want to create your own small corp but you should stay in the NPC corp" move

And its funny how much goons qq about that

Alavaria Fera wrote:
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:


Yeah once you guys are unwardeccable everyone goes npc corp, no more wardecs lol

Ah the NPC corp. Such a wonderful mechanism to avoid nonconsenual PVP.

There's ganking of course, but I'm sure someone is working hard on removing that.


Moar tears... pass the tears

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#105 - 2012-05-06 11:45:45 UTC
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:



I feel like this is a move away from the current system where it is just a way to pvp in high back to more of a " You offended me prepare to die" move




Huh I said that? Sounds like a misquote big time?
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'