Crime & Punishment

Is this 50m starting for a corporation of any size? That's ridiculous. That being said, I don't think CCP is dumb enough to put a system like that in place.

As it says: 50m starting plus 500k per person x1 = 50.5m

*ahem* it's on the test server, thus it's "in place" enough to have made it that far.

I do not think CCP is dumb, I feel CCP is making a choice based on what they felt was good. What means they utilized to decide what is good, who knows.

So don't deck goons in highsec and move in on their turf. There is realisticly, way more ******* people who may not like them and if all of EVE (if that were to happen) were to focus on goons, they would be crushed like a cat under a monster truck. And you could do it without a wardec fee at all.

Also...GTFO of highsec, problem ******* solved. Been saying that all along if you don't like highsec shenanigans

Wut? Half decent mercs aren't cheap. Hiring a bunch of bozos with some PvP ships is just throwing your money away, especially without neutral rr.

There won't be no stacking multiplier in the new system

Small typo, I was aware, but you get what I mean.



Thats most likely what will happen if this is going live on Tranq.

Who will even bother wardeccing someone?
Heck RvB will probably shutdown with this mechanic since the costs for their - in my opinion - amazing Empire war operation will be nigh unfundable for a prolonged amount of time.

I don't think CCP realises the weight of this decision.
People left and right will be offering themselves as so called Mercs just to get free targets and the amount of dockgames will increase to such a degree that within a 2 month notice highsec will become what the PvE'rs (the ones that have at least) always whined about.

And if that doesn't happen highsec will most likely become one big fat alliance or two just to demotivate anyone from ever declaring a war.
I mean, who wants to even pay billions for a one week wartarget hunt?

A big string of systems where every missionrunner, miner and industrialist will be able to do whatever they want without anyone bothering to deploy some grief - not that that's my thing, but making it THIS risk adverse will make it extremely unengaging.
Not to mention the 'suspect' mechanic where even a simple canflip for said griefers will be punished so hard that it's going to become one, big lifeless pool of PvP boredom.

The consequences have too big of an impact.

My proposed changes?

Increase base dec fee and only that, screw +member fees.

Remove max number of corporation decs (like is planned atm).

Limit the number of recruitable allies to 2 corps or a number of people relevant to the aggressors member count in one way or the other.

Neutral logistics. End this. Make out of corp Logi's suspects for anyone to agress, or better yet, give them GCC.
The amount of neutral RR seen as an over(ab)used tactic has gotten way out of hand.
There's ways to deal with this ofcourse, but i personally feel that use of Logi's should be restricted to in-alliance/in-corp usage.

Allinces/corps should have a tax on members that becomes an ISK sink Ie 100m per month per member which would encourage corps to ditch dead beats and prevent them from filling up with alts to boost the price of war. It would also make alting much harder for no profitable reason.

A Corp member tax will not work. If it was 100mil per month per member, it would be cheaper to be in an NPC corp and just pay the high tax when you rat or do missions. The shutdown of almost all the player corps would be the only result.

Just a thought, but RvB's war is mutual, so it doesn't cost anything (although, I may be misinformed, please feel free to correct me if this is so)

If that option stays with the new system, RvB will be able to carry on as they see fit.

This is the only semi sensible 'proposal' you have :/



I suspect someone got some 'suddently logistics' recently? lol. Proposing GCC for this is lame haha. Agression like anything else is fine, but GCC... lol lol