These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ishukone-Raata Enforcement Directive [I-RED] "Ishukone Subsidiary seeks Matari Investment"

Author
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#81 - 2012-05-04 10:46:32 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:


If the State thinks you're a better customer than the Empire, it'll start adjusting its foreign policies to reflect that belief. I-RED severed ties with its Amarrian business partners because they were thieves and liars. They're now looking to replace the Amarrians with someone more reliable and less likely to stab them in the back during a moment of weakness - such as what happened with CVA. That could be you.

You want to really hurt the Empire? Attack its friendships. Ruin its economic ventures. Lure away its allies with better deals. Make it clear that you are a superior choice of companion.


That's basically been my platform of though in regards to enteraining a deal with I-RED. That being said, while I-RED may have broken ties with CVA, has Ishukone broken trade ties with the Empire? Of course not! I would be tickled pleased if I-RED could pull enough influence to have the megacorp go forth with such a move. I do not see that happening, however.
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#82 - 2012-05-04 11:32:48 UTC
Again. This is not a debate, Ishukone-Raata is looking for a mutual trade agreement. We are not here to needlessly argue about Ishukone's past dealings.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Milo Caman
Anshar Incorporated
#83 - 2012-05-04 11:46:38 UTC
John Revenent wrote:
Again. This is not a debate, Ishukone-Raata is looking for a mutual trade agreement. We are not here to needlessly argue about Ishukone's past dealings.


Lessons from history, etc.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#84 - 2012-05-04 12:00:43 UTC
I don't view it as needless. This isn't squabbling for the sake of the past, but rather concern for the future. A company's past dealings are the basis for its reputation and honor. If Ishukone partnered itself with the Republic, would it act with honor and fairness?
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#85 - 2012-05-04 12:04:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Jaiga
Doublepost, reserved for later comments.
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#86 - 2012-05-04 12:15:35 UTC
Mmhm.. What I mean to say is that if you have concerns, comments, questions.. and are truly interested in working toward a cooperative agreement you should be doing so in private. Conducting business with outsider interests involved proves to be more hassle then its worth.

John Revenent wrote:
Further information on this opportunity can be found in the GalNet Channel IshuNET or via mail to Katrina Oniseki.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#87 - 2012-05-04 12:30:23 UTC
Again I have to ask: what is the grounds for dismissing the concerns about Ishukone's support of the Empire as past issues?
Halete
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#88 - 2012-05-04 12:39:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Halete
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
Again I have to ask: what is the grounds for dismissing the concerns about Ishukone's support of the Empire as past issues?


Teraa Matar aren't.

My previous post explains some of my own opinions, but also makes a point of saying that we are not dismissing Ishukone's current ventures. Which we certainly would not, just for emphasis.

"To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin" - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 13:21

Bataav
Intaki Liberation Front
Intaki Prosperity Initiative
#89 - 2012-05-04 12:53:30 UTC
I have been following this discussion with interest and have come to the understanding that there are a number of parallels to the benefits and challenges experienced by I-RED's partners in Placid, specifically in the Viriette Constellation.

Following over two years of working alongside our partners in I-RED, I am happy to be contacted to discuss some of these challenges, and the benefits that greatly outweigh them, to help with any group that is considering a similar arrangement within the Republic.

I can be contacted via mail or within the FreeIntaki channel.

It should be said, though that despite the regrettable circumstances surrounding Ishukone becoming involved with the Intaki system, I-RED's efforts in the area have had a positive impact on the Intaki system and its neighbours.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#90 - 2012-05-04 13:22:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

The State, even if it's run by a madman, is still geared towards the generation of profit. If the State thinks you're a better customer than the Empire, it'll start adjusting its foreign policies to reflect that belief.


Trade with both the Amarr Empire and the Minmatar Republic is not mutually exclusive, especially for most Caldari megas, the liberal ones in particular. Most of the megas, be them Caldari or not, hold trade agreements with megas of the opposite side on a daily basis, even with the current war going on.

Believing that Ishukone will give up on the market of TCMCs with the Khanid Kingdom and some Amarrian Holders just because one of their capsuleer subsidiaries have concluded volatile deals with a few Minmatar capsuleer entities sounds a little stretched to me.

The same way, believing that the Caldari megas will break their current biggest trade agreements with the Tash Murkon family that allowed them to get out of their last economic crysis, or cancel the exploitation agreements they concluded with the Ammatar Mandate a decade ago in exchange of Caldari trade and goods, is pure utopy.

What a lot of people fail to understand is that they are most of the time dealing with megacorporations in the case of the State, and not with political entities.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#91 - 2012-05-04 14:34:59 UTC
Halete wrote:
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
Again I have to ask: what is the grounds for dismissing the concerns about Ishukone's support of the Empire as past issues?


Teraa Matar aren't.

I-RED still is, though, which is what I meant. Apologies for the misunderstanding.
Halete
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#92 - 2012-05-04 15:26:45 UTC
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:

I-RED still is, though, which is what I meant. Apologies for the misunderstanding.


Ah, that's quite fine. Admittedly, I'd misread.

"To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin" - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 13:21

Gottii
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#93 - 2012-05-04 16:09:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Gottii
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
As a man who has many friends in the Minmatar Republic and a good working relationship with I-RED (despite one member's repeated and inexplicable attempts to ruin it), I'd strongly advise Minmatar corporations to consider this:

The State, even if it's run by a madman, is still geared towards the generation of profit. If the State thinks you're a better customer than the Empire, it'll start adjusting its foreign policies to reflect that belief. I-RED severed ties with its Amarrian business partners because they were thieves and liars. They're now looking to replace the Amarrians with someone more reliable and less likely to stab them in the back during a moment of weakness - such as what happened with CVA. That could be you.

You want to really hurt the Empire? Attack its friendships. Ruin its economic ventures. Lure away its allies with better deals. Make it clear that you are a superior choice of companion.



All of this makes sense so long as you're okay with having allies that previously turned on their past allies. If they sold out their past allies once it became profitable to do so, it would be foolish to think they wouldn't do so to us.

And, of course, only so long as you're willing to trample the memory of your enslaved brethren by allying yourself with the people who saw them as a market to exploit for profit as opposed to a crime to stop.

I've done many distasteful things in the name of the goddess of realpolitik, but that is an alliance I do not think I would be comfortable with.
Simca Develon
Doomheim
#94 - 2012-05-04 16:52:48 UTC
Many of you are saying that the State supports slavery. It does not. Let's make that clear. Yes the State is allies with the Amarr Empire, but we also are not the type to tell someone else how to rule their own empire. In other words we are not going to tell the Amarr how to be the Amarr. They want to hold slaves because it's part of their religion and cultural history then fine let them do so. We may not like it, but it's also none of our business how they run their own affairs.

As for TCMCs, did Ishukone sell them to the Amarr? Yes. Did they market them towards workforce control? Yes. That's old news, and opinions should have already been drawn about that. TCMCs can be used as a means of controlling slaves. Big news. They're also more humane and easier to undo than Vitoc, but no one seems to have thought to mention that. This is the last I will speak on this topic.

If any of you have serious interest or questions about the trade agreement you know how to contact us. If you don't want to be part of the trade agreement then we will simply move forward without you.

Je suis le commencement de votre fin.

Le diable prend soin de son proper.

Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
#95 - 2012-05-04 16:58:56 UTC
Gottii wrote:

All of this makes sense so long as you're okay with having allies that previously turned on their past allies. If they sold out their past allies once it became profitable to do so, it would be foolish to think they wouldn't do so to us.

And, of course, only so long as you're willing to trample the memory of your enslaved brethren by allying yourself with the people who saw them as a market to exploit for profit as opposed to a crime to stop.

I've done many distasteful things in the name of the goddess of realpolitik, but that is an alliance I do not think I would be comfortable with.


The inability of some to distinguish between business and politics never ceases to amaze me.

I-RED is looking for business partners, not allies. You and your people will continue to play the victim because every time someone acts against your perceived interests, you behave as though they've wedged a knife between your shoulder blades.

As for the whole TCMC controversy, you really should do some research. The Holder market for TCMCs in the Kingdom was saturated years ago, and the trade agreement between Khanid Innovation and Ishukone ended when it became more lucrative to sell the devices to Gallente idiots looking for the next high.

Besides, Ishukone lost their exclusive patent to TCMCs when Concord liberalized the market and allowed capsuleers to build them, royalty-free, on remote planetary factories. Also, the vast majority of TCMC demand these days is for use in RCMs.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#96 - 2012-05-04 17:10:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
I believe this thread has reached any maximum of usefulness.

We get it. You're butthurt because Zainou Biotech modified the TCMC and Ishukone decided to sell it to somebody you dislike, so now you're not interested in doing business for any subsidiary of us. But I guess that thought never crossed your mind when you welcomed Hilen Tukoss, Program Director at the Otosela Neuropsychology Center for Zainou Biotech, into the Republic. I'll let the implications of that speak for itself.

I find it amusing that the Republic would so readily accept Ishukone into their borders when it harms us, but are unwilling to truly cooperate and work together.

Katrina Oniseki

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#97 - 2012-05-04 17:16:28 UTC
I believe Captain Oniseki and Captain Develon above have quite apptly summarized why many Matari are not too enthusiastic about this business proposal.

The thread seems to have indeed reached its conclusion.

Elsebeth
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#98 - 2012-05-04 17:19:57 UTC
Yes. Kindly take Electus Matari out of the thread then so more open minded organizations can make use of it.

Katrina Oniseki

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#99 - 2012-05-04 17:41:54 UTC
Apparently the part where it is not a good idea to insult people you want to co-operate with is still not quite clear...

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#100 - 2012-05-04 17:57:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Apparently the part where you're not included in that group is still not quite clear...

EDIT:

You and Gotti have shown no willingness to take the offer presented by I-RED. You've only posted in this thread to lambast and mock the spirit of the offer by bringing up old grievances. So, when someone does the same to you, you feel 'insulted'.

You were asked to leave the thread because you have no part in it other than crying foul for something in the past. This isn't insulting. It's to be expected.

If you have no interest in the offer, then yes... please, get out.

Final Note:

You do not speak for all or even most Matari. You are a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of Minmatar society, no matter how much power you think you wield. If we cannot find a Capsuleer organization to work with, we still have the entire rest of Minmatar society to work with... societies who greatly need an influx of capital and goods through legitimate trade and support.

You EM Capsuleers have the luxury of turning down genuine support and free trade in favor of your misguided perceived grudge against us. They do not.

Katrina Oniseki