These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Ishukone-Raata Enforcement Directive [I-RED] "Ishukone Subsidiary seeks Matari Investment"

Author
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#21 - 2012-05-02 18:29:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Jaiga
Gottii wrote:
Giving money to our enemies, for profit no less, strikes me as something between naive stupidity and outright treason worthy only of an Ammatar.

Why would any loyal son or daughter of the Matari simply give money to a subsidiary of Ishukone of all things? So Ishukone can further refine their Transcranial Microcontroller? Or perhaps come up with a new way to further degrade and enslave the People, and profit from their misery?

I would consider investing in the State only after the State and all the various Megacorps break all economic, military, and political ties with the Empire, and cease production of the TCMC and any other technology used to further slavery. Until such a time exists, investing in the State is foolishness bordering on treason.


To be fair, Gottii, this is less a case of "giving money to the enemy" and more a case of conducting legitimate trade with a capsuleer organization that happens to be a subsidary of Ishukone.

Additionally, think of this from a business standpoint. If Ishukone is willing to do business with the Republic, do you think it would still conduct activities that would harm its reputation with its new trade partner? In business, reputation itself is an important asset.

If Ishukone is willing to do trade with and invest in the Republic (investments being something dearly needed), even in spite of past disagreements, I think it's clear what sort of reputation the company wishes to build. At the very least, there shouldn't be harm in simply talking things over. Worst-case scenario, one can always politely decline trade relations and get on with their lives.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#22 - 2012-05-02 18:36:45 UTC
Pardon me for asking, but your message does not seem to tell precisely what kind of trade agreements you want to conclude. You might face difficulties if the people you are adressing to do not even know what kind of products and services you want to deal with in the first place.
Simca Develon
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-05-02 18:41:38 UTC
John Revenent wrote:

Further information on this opportunity can be found in the GalNet Channel IshuNET or via mail to Katrina Oniseki.


Perhaps that will help, or must everything be disclosed for the public to see?

Je suis le commencement de votre fin.

Le diable prend soin de son proper.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#24 - 2012-05-02 18:44:03 UTC
A, I see !

As we are not really the target audience of this announcement, I will refrain from annoying you furthermore.
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#25 - 2012-05-02 19:45:48 UTC  |  Edited by: John Revenent
Gottii wrote:
Giving money to our enemies, for profit no less, strikes me as something between naive stupidity and outright treason worthy only of an Ammatar.

Why would any loyal son or daughter of the Matari simply give money to a subsidiary of Ishukone of all things? So Ishukone can further refine their Transcranial Microcontroller? Or perhaps come up with a new way to further degrade and enslave the People, and profit from their misery?

I would consider investing in the State only after the State and all the various Megacorps break all economic, military, and political ties with the Empire, and cease production of the TCMC and any other technology used to further slavery. Until such a time exists, investing in the State is foolishness bordering on treason.


Ishukone-Raata and Electus Matari once called each other friends. Some of the reasoning behind this move is a rebuilding of relations that your pilots were more then happy to destroy along with the Ishukone Watch vessel commanded by Miko Frunze who was operating well within the limits of Caldari Law.

Perhaps you should look to the future, but instead you dwell on the past.

Silas Vitalia wrote:
Graelyn wrote:
Why?


Because John's organization wants to be friends with everyone. An open business partner.

But being all things to all people, well that's an impossibility.


Not friends, just partners.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Davlos
State War Academy
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-05-02 20:30:39 UTC
I remember a time when Electus Matari used to be a respectable entity, with Evanda Char at the helm.

It's difficult for me to believe what I'm now seeing from EM's pilots.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#27 - 2012-05-02 20:34:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Rek Jaiga wrote:
To be fair, Gottii, this is less a case of "giving money to the enemy" and more a case of conducting legitimate trade with a capsuleer organization that happens to be a subsidary of Ishukone.

Without taking further stance on the issue, I find this logic faulty.

To give a (hopefully) clarifying example, how would you feel about a "legitimate trade with a capsuleer organization that happens to be a subsidiary of the Amarrian Navy"? It seems to me that for your argument, it would be more important to prove that Ishukone in this context is different from the Enemy, than it is to point out that the subsidiary of Ishukone in question is a capsuleer one.

Towards that goal, how do you justify the claim that the Republic's issue with Ishukone is a past disagreement? Is there a reason to suspect that they have suddenly stopped being interested in selling high-tech slave control gear to their Amarrian allies?

Davlos wrote:
I remember a time when Electus Matari used to be a respectable entity, with Evanda Char at the helm.

To you and some other I-RED commenting on this here and on real-time channels: please note that it is rarely beneficial to publicly insult people you apparently wish to have better relations with.
Kohiko Sun
Stormcrows
#28 - 2012-05-02 21:05:47 UTC
All this talk of TCMCs. I remember having this discussion often.

I still ask why the vendor is required to dictate what its product is used to do - TCMCs have medical and robotic use. I still ask why there is all this focus on them, and fire for Ishukone, while at the same time making use of the Falcon - an Ishukone design - in Rainbow Squad. I still ask why makers of chains, locks, and sticks - all of which are tools that can be used to impose one's will on another - are not subjected to calls of boycott.

A new one I ask is, "Is there moral outrage at the pilots who produce them and then sell them on the open market where anyone can buy them and use as they wish?"
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-05-02 21:11:43 UTC
Kohiko Sun wrote:
All this talk of TCMCs. I remember having this discussion often.

I still ask why the vendor is required to dictate what its product is used to do - TCMCs have medical and robotic use. I still ask why there is all this focus on them, and fire for Ishukone, while at the same time making use of the Falcon - an Ishukone design - in Rainbow Squad. I still ask why makers of chains, locks, and sticks - all of which are tools that can be used to impose one's will on another - are not subjected to calls of boycott.

A new one I ask is, "Is there moral outrage at the pilots who produce them and then sell them on the open market where anyone can buy them and use as they wish?"


Your naievity is breathtaking.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#30 - 2012-05-02 22:07:51 UTC
Valid concerns are raised, and I shall do my best to address them.

The reason I distinguish between an entity such as Ishukone and an entity such as the Amarr Imperial Navy is because the former is profit-seeking. If the capsuleer subsidary organization of Ishukone has deemed it appropriate to invest in the Republic, this is a strong indicator the rest of Ishukone feels similarly. That is to say, Ishukone may be looking at things in a new light and may have determined that siding with us is healthier for trade and profit. That is the hope here; that the Republic is gaining a new partner.

That being said, the use of TCMCs for the purposes of slavery is absolutely disgusting and is an entirely deal-shattering concern to have. I will continue speaking with the I-RED representatives on the matter in hopes of finding clarity. Electus Matari have been very dear friends and allies thus far, so we have reason to heed their advice and take these negotiations slowly and carefully.
Lucius Vindictus
Arachnos
#31 - 2012-05-02 22:27:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucius Vindictus
((null))
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#32 - 2012-05-02 22:27:54 UTC
And how does one control what their wares are used for once they are sold. In the unofficial master Kuvakei fan club, I produced and sold a great deal of capital armor plates, since these have to potential for use for or against anyone , certainly I couldn't take responsibility for what customers did with them. Therefore, I would like to encourage the use, production, and research into TCMCs.
Lucius Vindictus
Arachnos
#33 - 2012-05-02 22:31:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucius Vindictus
Kohiko Sun wrote:
All this talk of TCMCs. I remember having this discussion often.

I still ask why the vendor is required to dictate what its product is used to do - TCMCs have medical and robotic use. I still ask why there is all this focus on them, and fire for Ishukone, while at the same time making use of the Falcon - an Ishukone design - in Rainbow Squad. I still ask why makers of chains, locks, and sticks - all of which are tools that can be used to impose one's will on another - are not subjected to calls of boycott.

A new one I ask is, "Is there moral outrage at the pilots who produce them and then sell them on the open market where anyone can buy them and use as they wish?"


If the vendor were to dictate what the product is to be used for, their sales pitch would sound something like this:

"By offering to keep prices low and affordable, many holders may now benefit from their numerous applications as a method of workforce control."

But who cares, right? It was just business. And capsuleers are quick to forget...

I can admire a corporation that manages to sell to both sides in a conflict.
Hans Nardieu
Federal Nationalist Party
#34 - 2012-05-02 23:07:44 UTC
Gottii wrote:
Giving money to our enemies, for profit no less, strikes me as something between naive stupidity and outright treason worthy only of an Ammatar.

Why would any loyal son or daughter of the Matari simply give money to a subsidiary of Ishukone of all things? So Ishukone can further refine their Transcranial Microcontroller? Or perhaps come up with a new way to further degrade and enslave the People, and profit from their misery?

I would consider investing in the State only after the State and all the various Megacorps break all economic, military, and political ties with the Empire, and cease production of the TCMC and any other technology used to further slavery. Until such a time exists, investing in the State is foolishness bordering on treason.


Truer words were never spoken. Why would the Matari associate with the people who to this day facilitate the slavery of their countless brethren, rather than their natural allies within the Federation?

I consider the words of the late, great Alain Octirant:

Quote:
Make no mistake, sons and daughters of Matar - The Caldari are not your friends. They are collaborators with your dire enemy. Your allies, your natural allies, are the free peoples of the Federated Union of Gallente Prime.


Col. Hans Nardieu (ret.) Chairman, National Party of the Federated Union of Gallente Prime Office of the Party Headquarters, Villore VII-6 Senate Bureau Station

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#35 - 2012-05-02 23:20:49 UTC
Lucius Vindictus wrote:
Kohiko Sun wrote:
All this talk of TCMCs. I remember having this discussion often.

I still ask why the vendor is required to dictate what its product is used to do - TCMCs have medical and robotic use. I still ask why there is all this focus on them, and fire for Ishukone, while at the same time making use of the Falcon - an Ishukone design - in Rainbow Squad. I still ask why makers of chains, locks, and sticks - all of which are tools that can be used to impose one's will on another - are not subjected to calls of boycott.

A new one I ask is, "Is there moral outrage at the pilots who produce them and then sell them on the open market where anyone can buy them and use as they wish?"


If the vendor were to dictate what the product is to be used for, their sales pitch would sound something like this:

"By offering to keep prices low and affordable, many holders may now benefit from their numerous applications as a method of workforce control."

But who cares, right? It was just business. And capsuleers are quick to forget...

I can admire a corporation that manages to sell to both sides in a conflict.


I'm sure after the first few Matari representatives return from their meetings with IRED with suddenly "improved" attitudes they'll be most cooperative.



Sabik now, Sabik forever

Simca Develon
Doomheim
#36 - 2012-05-02 23:22:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Simca Develon
Hans Nardieu wrote:
Gottii wrote:
Giving money to our enemies, for profit no less, strikes me as something between naive stupidity and outright treason worthy only of an Ammatar.

Why would any loyal son or daughter of the Matari simply give money to a subsidiary of Ishukone of all things? So Ishukone can further refine their Transcranial Microcontroller? Or perhaps come up with a new way to further degrade and enslave the People, and profit from their misery?

I would consider investing in the State only after the State and all the various Megacorps break all economic, military, and political ties with the Empire, and cease production of the TCMC and any other technology used to further slavery. Until such a time exists, investing in the State is foolishness bordering on treason.


Truer words were never spoken. Why would the Matari associate with the people who to this day facilitate the slavery of their countless brethren, rather than their natural allies within the Federation?

I consider the words of the late, great Alain Octirant:

Quote:
Make no mistake, sons and daughters of Matar - The Caldari are not your friends. They are collaborators with your dire enemy. Your allies, your natural allies, are the free peoples of the Federated Union of Gallente Prime.




If that came from someone other than you it might actually have some merit. As it stands we are trying to change that outlook. We have no part in the Empyrean conflict, as I have already stated. We are simply trying to help the Republic and it's people through economic means. I'm sure you noticed that one of our interested parties is in the militia. Surely that is collaborating with the Amarr in it's highest form.

Alain Octirant was a bigoted and intolerant fool. I'm not surprised you think so highly of him.

Je suis le commencement de votre fin.

Le diable prend soin de son proper.

Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#37 - 2012-05-02 23:52:28 UTC
When the Federation invests in the Republic, some Minmatar call it 'meddling'. When the State invests in the Republic, some Minmatar call it 'welcomed'.

Putting aside the fact that ethnicity-based tribes and a profit-based corporations have nothing in common with one another, one has to remember that, when the Gallente invested in the Republic, they at least have some moral conviction to do so; a commitment to Federal ideals and all that (even if cynics may call this just a cloak ). Even from a purely pragmatic outlook, the Federation's population is one-third Minmatar. The two nations are thus interdependent on one another, a lot. It would be foolish for the Federation to not invest in the Republic, and vice versa.

Meanwhile, the Caldari have no moral conviction in their traditions to assist a foreign population. A while ago, Caldari pilot Hamish Grayson pointed out that a Caldari Liberal mindset has nothing to do with the Gallentean ideals of peace and cooperation, but more the fact that the State can benefit domestically from peaceful foreign trade. While that may be his own opinion, one needs to remember the Caldari are an inward-looking people, and VERY different from "saviours of the galaxy" Gallente. Therefore, from this less optimistic outlook, a Liberal corporation investing in the Minmatar Republic is motivated purely out of self-gain.

While I support Ishukone's grasp of the bigger picture in New Eden, I just thought I would point out this laughable discrepancy that Minmatar pilots sometimes make.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#38 - 2012-05-03 00:47:44 UTC
While the concept of saying something that seriphyn might like does disturb me, I too have noticed a trend, especially among so called freedom fighters in the republic, where the federation is spoken of in a very negative light. This makes no sense they ought to be showing the federation gratitude as the federation is probably the best thing that has ever happened to the republic.

Just ask yourself this if the federation didn't exist, what would the quality of life be like in the republic?
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#39 - 2012-05-03 01:08:23 UTC
No one is denying the Federation's role in aiding the Matari people, Seriphyn. But why not attract as many investors and trade partners as possible? So long, of course, as old friends are not angered and scared off and your own culture and people forgotten in the process. That is why, while I remain optimistic, I am cautiously so.
Hans Nardieu
Federal Nationalist Party
#40 - 2012-05-03 01:45:51 UTC
Simca Develon wrote:


Alain Octirant was a bigoted and intolerant fool. I'm not surprised you think so highly of him.


Professor Octirant was a man who told hard truths, so he rarely endeared himself with those he was challenging.

Like you for example. He called you a turncloak, and that obviously made you uncomfortable.

The Federal Nationalist Party aligns itself with the Minmatar Republic. We are both popular movements, driven by the people. All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word cast into the midst of the people.

Col. Hans Nardieu (ret.) Chairman, National Party of the Federated Union of Gallente Prime Office of the Party Headquarters, Villore VII-6 Senate Bureau Station