These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fair Warning: Hulkageddon V Backlash Predicted

First post
Author
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#181 - 2012-04-30 12:19:09 UTC
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#182 - 2012-04-30 12:24:20 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.

I sure hope you are not one of those hardbears. I'd have to call BS on the no homo in that case Bear

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#183 - 2012-04-30 12:27:48 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.

I sure hope you are not one of those hardbears. I'd have to call BS on the no homo in that case Bear



I am not well vised with this new and hip term? Can you explain?

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#184 - 2012-04-30 12:40:43 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.

I sure hope you are not one of those hardbears. I'd have to call BS on the no homo in that case Bear



I am not well vised with this new and hip term? Can you explain?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=102811&find=unread

Also happens to be a term for a certain type of person in the homosexual community, which makes it exceptionally amusing.

Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#185 - 2012-04-30 12:42:53 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome, so what your saying is... someone at the top did not like what you had to say either. Cool. Can we be brosefs now? Just remember to say no homo afterward, else our manly love might be misconstrued by others.

I sure hope you are not one of those hardbears. I'd have to call BS on the no homo in that case Bear



I am not well vised with this new and hip term? Can you explain?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=102811&find=unread

Also happens to be a term for a certain type of person in the homosexual community, which makes it exceptionally amusing.

Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.



Must. Not. Google....

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#186 - 2012-04-30 12:43:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
His post does not seem to make sense, however your post finally does.


Quote:
Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.




CCP is reactionary, therefore people must give them a reason to nerf something. How does one give them reason you might ask? By overuse of a ship/tactic/mechanic. Historically, how does CCP tend to react? They get over zealous with the nerfgun and we all suffer for it.



Cause and effect Mr hardbear.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Velicitia
XS Tech
#187 - 2012-04-30 12:47:18 UTC
Brobocop McBro wrote:
... I am the average miner that has 5 accounts and pays their bills every month buying my accounts with a credit card instead of plexing in order to help them...



You do realise that the people who plex are actually worth "more" than you, right?


Worst case scenario for CC (i.e. monthly sub) --> $15.00
PLEX --> $17.50 (well, $17.495)

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#188 - 2012-04-30 13:35:37 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
His post does not seem to make sense, however your post finally does.


Quote:
Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.




CCP is reactionary, therefore people must give them a reason to nerf something. How does one give them reason you might ask? By overuse of a ship/tactic/mechanic. Historically, how does CCP tend to react? They get over zealous with the nerfgun and we all suffer for it.



Cause and effect Mr hardbear.



Well CCP have always openly supported and encouraged Hulkageddon. It drives a number of the goals for the state of the game.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#189 - 2012-04-30 13:41:29 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
His post does not seem to make sense, however your post finally does.
Quote:
Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.


CCP is reactionary, therefore people must give them a reason to nerf something. How does one give them reason you might ask? By overuse of a ship/tactic/mechanic. Historically, how does CCP tend to react? They get over zealous with the nerfgun and we all suffer for it.

Cause and effect Mr hardbear.

Oh, I can't disagree with you there, entirely. However, it has reached a point where nerfs of this nature are cutting so close to the bone that they will destroy the sandbox. If that happens, well, EVE dies and CCP fails, because the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat.

CCP has to ask themselves, a short term, large income, or a long term moderate income.

On top of this, the 'hardcore' players provide most of the content that people come to play EVE for, which means if you alienate them you no longer have stories in the press about Burn Jita, or the Guiding Hand Social Club heist, which have proven to be the absolute best marketing for EVE there is(we all know the CCP generated content is pretty crap, in terms of gameplay). Hulkageddon is one of the most well know player run events that occur in a regular basis.

So, the final question is this: Will CCP keep to the spirit of the game, and leave the sandbox alive, keeping the sure money, or are they going to gamble on the big money from getting the carebear market(also known as casual in wider gaming circles)and risk the company.

And here is where I point out that CCP already tried to gamble on the big money, and Monoclegate was the result.

I'm not saying you are wrong, but I am saying that I pray CCP learned their lesson from Incarna, and doesn't make the same mistakes of catering to the carebear crowd again.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#190 - 2012-04-30 13:42:17 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Brobocop McBro wrote:
... I am the average miner that has 5 accounts and pays their bills every month buying my accounts with a credit card instead of plexing in order to help them...



You do realise that the people who plex are actually worth "more" than you, right?


Worst case scenario for CC (i.e. monthly sub) --> $15.00
PLEX --> $17.50 (well, $17.495)


monthly subs are almost invarient, plex sales would go up and down all the time - ie only one of them is good for real-world going to a bank and securing a line of credit etc - ie a subbed customer like myself is far more valuable than a plexed customer.

Sub also only needs the game to be fun to work, where as plex requires extremely dogged attention to the economy.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#191 - 2012-04-30 13:52:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Velicitia
Tauranon wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
Brobocop McBro wrote:
... I am the average miner that has 5 accounts and pays their bills every month buying my accounts with a credit card instead of plexing in order to help them...



You do realise that the people who plex are actually worth "more" than you, right?


Worst case scenario for CC (i.e. monthly sub) --> $15.00
PLEX --> $17.50 (well, $17.495)


monthly subs are almost invarient, plex sales would go up and down all the time - ie only one of them is good for real-world going to a bank and securing a line of credit etc - ie a subbed customer like myself is far more valuable than a plexed customer.

Sub also only needs the game to be fun to work, where as plex requires extremely dogged attention to the economy.


all plex needs is someone willing to shell out $17 for (or $34.95 for a GTC). it's no different than selling any other item from a store (e.g. a new T-shirt from [insert clothing store here] ... and they seem to do alright with "hm, we don't know if people will come in on a certain date").

Sub -> $15 from (player A) on the first of the month
PLEX --> $17 from (player B) on the 17th, which is then resold ingame to (Player C) for however many million ISK, and applied to Player C's account on the whateverth.

Now, obviously, having "too many" PLEX out there ends up being a liability (oh, hey, we have to give another "free" month out to everyone because we had two months of unused PLEX sitting in people's hangars from 3 months ago) ... but that's getting a lot farther into economics than I'm familiar with.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#192 - 2012-04-30 13:52:04 UTC
Tauranon wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
Brobocop McBro wrote:
... I am the average miner that has 5 accounts and pays their bills every month buying my accounts with a credit card instead of plexing in order to help them...



You do realise that the people who plex are actually worth "more" than you, right?


Worst case scenario for CC (i.e. monthly sub) --> $15.00
PLEX --> $17.50 (well, $17.495)


monthly subs are almost invarient, plex sales would go up and down all the time - ie only one of them is good for real-world going to a bank and securing a line of credit etc - ie a subbed customer like myself is far more valuable than a plexed customer.

Sub also only needs the game to be fun to work, where as plex requires extremely dogged attention to the economy.

lol, you think major corporations go to banks for a line of credit based on subscription numbers.

They have investors who study the mechanics of the game(as far as income is concern, not in-game mechanics) and base their decisions on that.

I might also point out here that CCP has effectively kept the icelandic economy afloat, single-handedly, when every other business, and all of their banks, collapsed. Even if they DID have to go to the bank for a line of credit, they would get it becuase they are the ones who did the bail-outs.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#193 - 2012-04-30 14:31:26 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
Tauranon wrote:
Velicitia wrote:
Brobocop McBro wrote:
... I am the average miner that has 5 accounts and pays their bills every month buying my accounts with a credit card instead of plexing in order to help them...



You do realise that the people who plex are actually worth "more" than you, right?


Worst case scenario for CC (i.e. monthly sub) --> $15.00
PLEX --> $17.50 (well, $17.495)


monthly subs are almost invarient, plex sales would go up and down all the time - ie only one of them is good for real-world going to a bank and securing a line of credit etc - ie a subbed customer like myself is far more valuable than a plexed customer.

Sub also only needs the game to be fun to work, where as plex requires extremely dogged attention to the economy.

lol, you think major corporations go to banks for a line of credit based on subscription numbers.

They have investors who study the mechanics of the game(as far as income is concern, not in-game mechanics) and base their decisions on that.

I might also point out here that CCP has effectively kept the icelandic economy afloat, single-handedly, when every other business, and all of their banks, collapsed. Even if they DID have to go to the bank for a line of credit, they would get it becuase they are the ones who did the bail-outs.


Its like 2011 never happened. Seriously CCP cannot use plex based income to sustain the kind of loan they had running in 2011 (reportedly $12mil), nor could they use it to apply for new loans - because it manifestly failed to meet financial objectives and caused them to need to lay off 20% of their staff in 2011. They also indicate that there are about 40,000 people using plexes and gtcs. ie the bulk of the user base is subbed.
Victor Markov
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#194 - 2012-04-30 15:01:29 UTC
I am new to Eve and had little idea what was going on Jita. All I knew is the ship right in front of me exploded. I hung around and took screenshots to show my friends. Now this hulk thing is going on and I was telling my sister in law about and now she wants to try the 21 days free.


Good or bad it is interesting.... this appeals to me.
It also makes we wonder in my noob ways, why do people not fight back? Could the Jita attackers not have been pushed out? Can the hulks not take escort? How do the hulks handle it in lowsec?
Will this event drive up the cost of raw minerals? Won't this mean people who have stockpiled be making more money?

I am not really sure what the issue is...but I enjoy the fact that it is an issue and the players have this sort of power.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#195 - 2012-04-30 15:02:25 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:
the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat..



Please direct me to stats that support your assertion? I mean, we would not want people to assume that your pulling numbers out of your ass or anything.


* eagerly awaits.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#196 - 2012-04-30 15:15:33 UTC
I read enough of this thread to see it change from talking possible nerfs due to overuse of game machanics, to a discussion of PLEX vs subs and the income they generate.

In an attempt to stay on topic (and someone may have already pointed this out):
the Boomerang was nerfed because it allowed direct avoidance of Concord, which has always been defined as an exploit, regardless of how creative.

I, too, have been pondering where all the suicide gankage is going. We can speak generically about ship prices and suicide gankers whacking the very players who harvest raw materials, but that seems like ONLY speculation until we see what happens over time. If it gets to the point that the player run economy cannot produce goods that anyone can afford, then I'm sure CCP will do ... something ...

Equally, it is so very far from balanced when a cheap little T1 destroyer can easily gank a ship costing (what?) 100X more. In the name of balance I would expect CCP to eventually do ... something ...

Now defining the "something" and the timining of administrative intervention (the backlash as the OP proposes) is much harder without specific feedback from CCP GMs and DEVs on this level of issue.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#197 - 2012-04-30 15:36:33 UTC
Urgg Boolean wrote:
Equally, it is so very far from balanced when a cheap little T1 destroyer can easily gank a ship costing (what?) 100X more. In the name of balance I would expect CCP to eventually do ... something ...

30x, i think. Something like a 10mil T2 catalyst to a 330 mil hulk (if it has no tank and none of that fancy faction stuff).

Ratio looks worse if the hulk tanks and you need two catalysts, and of course better if you are somehow able to get the pod, which might have implants. Not easy to get pods in highsec though!

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#198 - 2012-04-30 16:45:43 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:
the majority carebears are known to be a temporary, short term users, while 'hardcore' players are guaranteed money if you keep them. 'Hardcore' players are a reliable long term revenue stream, and while its not a LARGE revenue stream, its enough to keep the company afloat..



Please direct me to stats that support your assertion? I mean, we would not want people to assume that your pulling numbers out of your ass or anything.


* eagerly awaits.




Pssssst....
Those stats. Still waiting.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Amanda Holland
Doomheim
#199 - 2012-04-30 16:51:39 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
His post does not seem to make sense, however your post finally does.


Quote:
Oh, and just FYI, CCP is reactionary, for the most part. Someone has to report something before they anything about it.




CCP is reactionary, therefore people must give them a reason to nerf something. How does one give them reason you might ask? By overuse of a ship/tactic/mechanic. Historically, how does CCP tend to react? They get over zealous with the nerfgun and we all suffer for it.



Cause and effect Mr hardbear.


I believe the latest nerf I know of the boomerang ting was because a guy came on the forums and blabbed everything youd ever have to know about it then CCP ruled it an exploit. He did it with two or three other things in that same thread and eventually started crying cause CCP was calling all the neat things he figured out exploits.

THEN in subsequent forum posts he bragged how he found the exploit,, exploited its use and the like. Cant remember the guys' name but I havent seen him in a while.

ლ(ಠ益ಠლ) vroom vroom motorcycle CCP to the sandbox: "This "adapt or die" attitude is nothing new to EVE, but we want to give it a constant rhythm that is a bit more under our control than in the past"

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#200 - 2012-04-30 16:55:19 UTC
You are ofc correct, and forum tears is a key venue for nerfage. I vividly remember Hardbears from all over EVE crying buckets of because of falcons.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]