These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

STEALTH BOMBERS! - PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE THEM.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Julia Allrian
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-04-26 13:08:49 UTC
someone made a video with the new models:

Unofficial Video on Evenews24
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#22 - 2012-04-26 13:32:43 UTC
I think the new Nemesis and Manticore look sexy as hell. Can't wait to get those.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **
Shadowyfreak
WolfPack.
#23 - 2012-04-26 13:43:31 UTC
I still stand by my original post and wish they were not upgraded...They are perfect the way they are...

I am glad that someone posted the reason for the upgrade (missile launchers)...

There should be a way to have both worlds...or maybe CCP just doesnt care about the little guy enough to ask them what they would like...
Jayrendo Karr
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-04-26 14:16:08 UTC
I like the look of the hound personally. New Manti best be asymetric. Others look nice too.
Lili Lu
#25 - 2012-04-26 15:03:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Lili Lu
Roll
Darius Brinn wrote:
The Hound, which is the one I'm using now, looks horribly, but the new model improves it a bit.

Yeah because some some small generic looking fins are better than shark fins. Roll You're taste is lacking. Hopefully the person that said the Purifier and Hound were not yet done was getting a true scoop from the devs. The Hound as it is is beautiful. The proposed new hound is boring. They need to revert back to a dorsal fin.

Also, more importantly, I hope they are improving the agility on the Nemesis and some on the Purifier. I think they got rid of whoever the idiot dev was that would design ships and slots layouts with overdone rp-ing considerations. These ships do not tank. there is no reason to say Gallente and Amarr should have more armor and therefore less agility. The armor and shield stat variations between these ships are minuscule. And noone sane is trying to tank them for a standup brawl.

Same thing was done with the transport ships. The dev team or whoever was running it thought blockade runners would tank. I posted that lows would only ever be filled with cargo expanders or agility/speed mods. But the dev that responded said that racial bonuses would be applied, and stupidly continued to give the Viator "-5% armor repairer duration per level" Lol No wasted bonus there no sir. Not that the shield boost bonuses of the Minmatar and Caldari BRs weren't a waste either. But at least with those one could use them without harming the performance of the ship's role.
Metal Icarus
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#26 - 2012-04-26 15:12:55 UTC
I have seen the new bomber models, the new launchers the new bombs...

OP's opinion is null, void, unpopular, unwise, unplanned, and stupid. Disregard his rant and carry on.
Darius Brinn
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-04-26 15:17:35 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Roll
Yeah because some some small generic looking fins are better than shark fins. Roll You're taste is lacking.


You call them "shark fins", I call them "little unnecessary fans or birdie wings whose presence in this ship questions the sexuality of the pilot".

http://www.ravestats.com/public/fen/minmatar-covert-ops-hound-1.jpg

And yes, the new one looks better to me.

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcReVfL4u3JUaeMBxE8M_cSqOPvnRw-x43hez3OtYtrSdmv9OdEwGaJRiVGhjw

I find your lack of taste disturbing.

Quote:

Hopefully the person that said the Purifier and Hound were not yet done was getting a true scoop from the devs. The Hound as it is is beautiful. The proposed new hound is boring. They need to revert back to a dorsal fin.


You're entitled to your own opinion, I guess, but in fact NO WAY, PLEAZE DEVS DON¡T LISTEN TO THIS TERRIBLE POASTER NEW HOUND IS WAY MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN THE OTHER AND GET THE CHANGES IMPLEMENTED NAO CAUSE ME WANTS TO FLY THE NEW ÜBER-NEMESISISIS AND HOUND KTHKXBYE!

Yes, the old Hound gets on my nerves.
Sidrun
Life sucks then you die Ltd.
#28 - 2012-04-26 15:43:00 UTC
Shadowyfreak wrote:
No sorry, I am unaware of that saying myself...

and as far as "The new stealth bombers are so much better looking" that is your opinion...


Anyone on the forums is invited to discuss this with me on my teamspeak - details can be found on our website.
http://www.WolfPack.net.au.


Please CCP - do not change the bombers.



You're right, that is his opinion. And I believe that alot more people agree with his opinion then yours.
Lili Lu
#29 - 2012-04-26 16:03:59 UTC
Darius Brinn wrote:
You're entitled to your own opinion, I guess, but in fact NO WAY, PLEAZE DEVS DON¡T LISTEN TO THIS TERRIBLE POASTER NEW HOUND IS WAY MORE BEAUTIFUL THAN THE OTHER AND GET THE CHANGES IMPLEMENTED NAO CAUSE ME WANTS TO FLY THE NEW ÜBER-NEMESISISIS AND HOUND KTHKXBYE!

Yes, the old Hound gets on my nerves.

NO U !!

DEVS DO NOT LISTEN TO THIS LACKING-IN-TASTE POSTER. LET HIM CONTINUE TO UNKNOWINGLY CRUISE IN THE MOST SEXY AND BEAUTIFUL SHIP IN THE GAME (NEXT TO MAYBE THE PHOON).P

SHARK FINS FOREVER.Lol
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#30 - 2012-04-26 18:30:32 UTC
Old Nemesis is one of my favorite looking hulls, but CCP did an awesome job on the new hulls, and I have to say the new Nemesis is now my favorite hull. All the other stealth bomber hulls look way better then their old versions as well... The Purifier could be a bit better though.
Tor Gungnir
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2012-04-26 19:42:36 UTC
Isn't it kinda sad that there isn't much difference between the current Minmatar Stealth Bomber and the new one? I mean, the Gallente is a wholly new ship. The Minmatar one is just a slight tweak of the current one.

Space. It seems to go on and on forever. But then you get to the end and a gorilla starts throwing barrels at you.
Corbin Blair
Doomheim
#32 - 2012-04-26 20:56:45 UTC
Shadowyfreak wrote:

This video is in relation to this youtube video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEJbwZCgNgU&feature=youtu.be&t=1h28m12s


Please CCP - do not change the look of my nemesis stealth bomber - my nemesis is as sexy as it will ever be!

Regards
Shadowyfreak
http://www.WolfPack.net.au


They don't have a choice. Large launchers don't fit on the models. Besides, the new stealth bomber models look way better anyway.
Shadowyfreak
WolfPack.
#33 - 2012-04-26 22:27:30 UTC
Bump to top...
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#34 - 2012-04-26 23:48:29 UTC
They cannot leave the Bombers the way they are. Unless you want a hideous ship of just torp launchers??
Shadowyfreak
WolfPack.
#35 - 2012-04-27 06:11:21 UTC
But the ship is not hideous

And it works the way it is...Why cant we just leave it the way it is?
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#36 - 2012-04-27 07:08:38 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Shadowyfreak wrote:
But the ship is not hideous

And it works the way it is...Why cant we just leave it the way it is?

Because the new missile turrets won't fit on the old models.

Check out this clip: http://youtu.be/zXNWgeQmiOE?t=56s

Try imagining a battleship sized launcher on the current models.

How did you Veterans start?
ChromeStriker
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2012-04-27 07:56:41 UTC  |  Edited by: ChromeStriker
The Hound and Purifier are 'design a space ship' competition runners up/entries. Not sure if theyre the actuall designs...

Everything so far is 'unofficial'

Edit: not that i can find them What? hope i didnt have one of those seeing into the future dreams again.......

No Worries
Sidus Isaacs
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2012-04-27 11:49:02 UTC
The old hulls are outdated and it is time for a change. Good changes imo.
Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#39 - 2012-04-27 13:49:59 UTC
Theres always those that oppose progress.
Kattshiro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-04-27 22:53:32 UTC
Sidus Isaacs wrote:
The old hulls are outdated and it is time for a change. Good changes imo.


Agree. T2 need a revamp rather than different lights or paint from t1.
Previous page123Next page