These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Forums

 
Capture Portrait
  • Date of Birth: 2009-06-28 10:51
  • First Forum Visit: 2011-04-07 15:28
  • Likes Received: 0

Efraya

Security Status 1.9
  • Dissident Aggressors Member since
  • Mordus Angels Member since

Last 20 Posts

  • Crest fleet endpoint Celestial in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Well well well.jpeg

  • [o7 Show] Guess the Citadel survival rate! in EVE Communication Center

    My guess for fortizars is 85% survival rate
    My guess for astrahus is a 32% survival rate.

  • MORDUS ANGELS WANTS YOU! 24/7 PVP SMALL MEDIUM CONTENT CENTRAL!!! in EVE Corporations, Alliances and Organizations Center

    Bumping

  • Launcher in Offline Mode in EVE Technology and Research Center

    This knobbled me for 2 days, running the link above fixed it for me.

    Thanks!

  • Industry Teams - Current Plans in EVE Gameplay Center

    They are a great feature which will be a shame to see go. They needed better explanation ingame and the auction mechanism needed to be changed. Maybe it needs to be a shorter time to auction to make it more viable.

    The UI around the system selection isn't the greatest IMO.

    Apart from that, keep up the good work.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Lady Rift wrote:

    Faction repair plan. its a thing on these forums its all you need.


    you put in the work to tank your standings now put in the work to increase them.


    Going through the Faction standing repair plan is a) time consuming b) dull as ditch water.

    I'm assuming you are happy with said game design?

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Donnachadh wrote:

    This is part of how you can tell the serious mission runners from the want to be.


    I chuckled, IRL.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    elitatwo wrote:

    And don't take this wrong, your idea has merrit but a little work should remain. A few level 3 storyline missions go a long way to "repair" your standing.


    Precisely. I'm not here to do CCP's dirty work! Just a suggestion factory :D

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Skyler Hawk wrote:
    We already have epic mission arcs for some pirate factions that allow you to repair your standings all the way from -10.0 to having full agent access. It'd be good if CCP filled in the missing pirate faction epics and added lowsec ones for each of the main empire factions.



    This is new information to me! I'll look into it. afaik you can only run these epic arcs once every 6 months though?

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    elitatwo wrote:
    Efraya wrote:
    Seeing as the proposal isn't to go above 0. It's pay to get back to where you were as a little nooblet...


    I'll just leave the name of some rare books in here you might find interesting,

    - Connections
    - Social
    - Diplomacy
    - Fast Talk (only interesting for misunderstandings in lowsec)
    - Mining connections
    - Distribution Connections
    - Security Connections
    - Criminal Connections

    If you want to know what those books have to do with anything, I suggest you read them.

    To be honest, I didn't read them all so the Federation Navy might not be very excited to see me in Gallente space but the Mordus Legion, the Caldari State and the Empress love me very much Smile


    I certainly agree that these skills should remain in their current state. They certainly help. The main issue in my mind is that there is content that is available (Faction missions) which many people decline because they tank your faction standing. Faction standing is very time consuming to work back up. Even with these skills maxed, it would still be nice to have a mechanism by which we could reset our standings to neutral.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Seeing as the proposal isn't to go above 0. It's pay to get back to where you were as a little nooblet...

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Spugg Galdon wrote:
    I'm just gonna leave this here........



    Link


    Great minds think alike. I'm sorry that you didn't get more traction on your thread. I wasn't aware that it was already suggested.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Andrew Indy wrote:
    +1
    When I started missioning I did not know about faction standings losses and while mines not negative enough to be locked out of space , if it was it would limit a lot of other activities (PVP ect).


    This is one of the cruxes of the issue. I would like to add that I don't have a negative enough standing to warrant any sort of worry but the key thing here is knowledge.

    Now that we know to decline, we decline.

    This sort of leads to whole sections of content being automatically being declined.

    Doing something similar to tags for sec, thereby bringing another reason to rat in belts in low. More targets, more "Content" or a straight isk charge at concord.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Donnachadh wrote:
    I say no to any new idea that allows players to "buy" standings whether you call it bribes or whatever.

    My personal opinion is that they should remove ALL forms of pay for standings and that includes any and all of the current methods used. Negative standings is one of the prices to pay for certain game play styles and it should not be easy to repair that negative standing. If you want back into high sec without the hassles of low standings then you should have to work to repair them. After all everyone always says EVE is a game of choices and consequences why should it be easy(even if it is expensive) to overcome the negative sides of this game choice.


    Thanks for your comments, I would certainly agree that eve should be a game of consequences, but I feel that it would be appropriate to have some sort of mechanism for faction standing resetting. A costly one in my opinion.

  • Bribes for Faction Standing in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Hello folks,

    Fairly recently we're had the opportunity to bribe concord with tags and isk to look the other way with regards to security status.

    Surely we should be able to bribe the empires to get faction standing back to zero? Having it go above zero would be very overpowered. But bribing them into neutrality would be sufficient.

    Thanks,

    Ef.

  • Launcher in Offline Mode in EVE Technology and Research Center

    Gessiel wrote:
    Please tell me exactly what to do.
    Launcher worked fine yesterday, not today.
    Do I just install http://cdn1.eveonline.com/EveOnlineLauncher/release/EVEOnlineLauncher_2_1_826897.exe
    or do I need to do anything else?

    I'm not too good with computers


    Install the launcher, accept the defaults, then launch eve like you normally would. It will start patching.

    Thanks for the fix CCP Atropos.

  • Dev Blog: This is (Team) Security! in EVE Information Center

    Security team of my heart.

  • Dev Blog: Reprocess all the things! in EVE Information Center

    Removing the arbitrary values for batch sizes on ore greatly simplifies things. Moving in the right direction CCP. GG WP

  • Mineral Compression Question in EVE Gameplay Center

    I want to move a large number of minerals, I have the list of minerals I want. I want to know what items I need to build. Do I have to do the maths by hand or has someone already done this?

    Thanks,

    Ef.

  • [Rubicon 1.3] Drone Assist change in EVE Technology and Research Center

    As far as I can tell from this change the following will happen.

    In a max fleet of 250 archons. Each of the squad leaders will have the drones assisted, IF all the squad leaders are calling primaries at their own discretions the enemy logistics will have to be really on it's toes as it will splitt the DPS of the fleet over the enemy.

    This may/may not be a good thing I'm not sure.

    I've never flown an archon in a slowcat fleet but I'm fairly sure they don't have their high slots fitted with 5 Drone Control Units.

    Interesting change. I don't think this is a nerf to the current trend of Slow Cat fleets however. Time will tell.

Forum Signature

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]