These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

fanfest faction warfare = datacores

Author
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2012-03-23 13:40:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Naween
in the faction warfare they said they where looking at (nothing set in stone) that they wanted to move datacores to the faction warfare militia store instead of our current system.

seems like an interesting system.. not sure what i think atm myself...

clarify: they talk about reducing the datacore from normal source and adding it to the FW store.
Darrow Hill
Vodka and Vice
#2 - 2012-03-23 14:30:43 UTC
...the hell?

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#3 - 2012-03-23 14:38:04 UTC
Not move fully, just limit the amount you get from R&D agents and ad them to FW store too, im not to optimistic about that Sad

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Borun Tal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2012-03-23 15:34:29 UTC
Lady Naween wrote:
in the faction warfare they said they where looking at (nothing set in stone) that they wanted to move datacores to the faction warfare militia store instead of our current system.

seems like an interesting system.. not sure what i think atm myself...


Link, please.
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-03-23 15:35:05 UTC
Borun Tal wrote:
Lady Naween wrote:
in the faction warfare they said they where looking at (nothing set in stone) that they wanted to move datacores to the faction warfare militia store instead of our current system.

seems like an interesting system.. not sure what i think atm myself...


Link, please.


was on the life feed
Dinger
Task Force Delta-14
#6 - 2012-03-23 16:14:34 UTC
Lady Naween wrote:
in the faction warfare they said they where looking at (nothing set in stone) that they wanted to move datacores to the faction warfare militia store instead of our current system.

seems like an interesting system.. not sure what i think atm myself...


Such a move makes no logical sense, the Faction warfare corps' primary focus is the prosecution of the lowsec conflicts between the empires, not Research and Development.

I understand the desire, even the need to remove the passive acquisition of datacores as ocours under the current mechanics, however in order to remain constant with the current backstory, not to mention a lot of people's playstyles, an active acquisition should still be centred around the existing R&D corporations.
Kyr Evotorin
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2012-03-23 16:42:57 UTC
Akrasjel Lanate <--- listen to him, second post after op...

OP... you made me sigh. Future reference, the public responds to what they hear and assumptions that are made more than anything else. to make such a broad post without making sure you were fully aware of the situation is to mis-inform those that... oh wait... I guess it's ok then... since I don't like people who make assumptions like that... but IN ANY CASE:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85163

"•We then discussed a general decrease to passive Datacore gains, as we want to add Datacore offers in the FW LP stores."

Key words here are "GENERAL DECREASE"

Basically... be more informative, or you help the community to flutter in the wind when they are taking your information and talking to other, more well informed friends/subject/minions/spies/whathaveyou.... sigh.
Rengerel en Distel
#8 - 2012-03-23 18:12:59 UTC
Kyr Evotorin wrote:
Akrasjel Lanate <--- listen to him, second post after op...

OP... you made me sigh. Future reference, the public responds to what they hear and assumptions that are made more than anything else. to make such a broad post without making sure you were fully aware of the situation is to mis-inform those that... oh wait... I guess it's ok then... since I don't like people who make assumptions like that... but IN ANY CASE:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85163

"•We then discussed a general decrease to passive Datacore gains, as we want to add Datacore offers in the FW LP stores."

Key words here are "GENERAL DECREASE"

Basically... be more informative, or you help the community to flutter in the wind when they are taking your information and talking to other, more well informed friends/subject/minions/spies/whathaveyou.... sigh.


Perhaps the OP's goal was to drive up the price on datacores so they can unload their stock? That's more the tactic in Market Discussions, but you never know.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#9 - 2012-03-23 18:20:17 UTC
This seems like a horrible idea. I have a healthy T2 business, spent tons of time getting my R&D agents where I can support that and I have no interest in participating in FW. In fact what industrialist is interested in FW?

Adding them to FW? OK, sure. Taking them away from R&D agents No way in heck!

Issler
Zircon Dasher
#10 - 2012-03-23 18:40:19 UTC
This is a wonderful idea!

Much <3 to the new CCP

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#11 - 2012-03-23 18:43:28 UTC
So what would an R&D agent be used for I wonder?

Issler
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#12 - 2012-03-23 18:56:10 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
So what would an R&D agent be used for I wonder?

Issler



Reduction, not removal.

As long as the market value doesn't change significantly, I'm not too bothered. I'm not a huge fan of almost entirely passive income.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Mavnas
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-03-23 19:13:51 UTC
Borun Tal wrote:
Lady Naween wrote:
in the faction warfare they said they where looking at (nothing set in stone) that they wanted to move datacores to the faction warfare militia store instead of our current system.

seems like an interesting system.. not sure what i think atm myself...


Link, please.


So massive skill points for a small amount of passive income -> massive skill points for a miniscule amount of passive income. Well, that's at least one account I need to cancel, possibly two.
Granix Uvelian
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-03-23 21:49:17 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
So what would an R&D agent be used for I wonder?

Issler


If they go through with a 'general decrease' in the amount of datacores which can be earned actively from R&D agents then they should offer a way to 'actively' earn them from R&D agents. C'mon.

Not sure what FW has to do with R&D of private companies. Roden Shipyards operates in multiple sovereign spaces, as well as many of the research based NPC corps. If anything one could make the case that while they align primarily with a single faction the non-statist NPC corps try to maintain a sense of neutrality between factions.

What we really need is a way to actively obtain datacores. Heck I would love to see more exploration sites which drop datacores not just decryptors. That'd be a start. But some form of active 'research' mini-game would work too.

My 2 ISK for now
Ten Bulls
Sons of Olsagard
#15 - 2012-03-23 22:05:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Ten Bulls
Kyr Evotorin wrote:

"•We then discussed a general decrease to passive Datacore gains, as we want to add Datacore offers in the FW LP stores."

Key words here are "GENERAL DECREASE"


Key words here, "CCP RETARDS"

Its obvious from the quote that CCP want to reduce the reward people make from the countless hours of grinding standings to R&D corps, they dont make any reference to compensation.

FW and T2 production are separate professions, and it doesnt make any sense to link them.

CCP if you want to fix past mistakes, fix the T2 BPO issue first, then start with the inventors.

Or try playing the game and doing some industry (or talking to people who do industry) before making decisions about it.
Reppyk
The Black Shell
#16 - 2012-03-23 22:13:21 UTC
I've done the maths, and datacore farming is already a very low income.
I can't see how they could lower it.

And it won't change the fact that 00 T2 producters cannot build stuff on their own (datacores found in RADAR sites are a joke).

I AM SPACE CAPTAIN REPPYK. BEWARE.

Proud co-admin of frugu.net, a French fansite about EVE !

Bennet Am
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-03-23 23:27:17 UTC
As I recall. The datacores in question were faction starship engineering.
Thawed Corpse
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-03-24 07:26:12 UTC
Arbitrarily reducing the rewards of research is a very bad idea, to take away what people have earned.

Unless, of course, they are going to combine it with taking away all the tech II BPOs that some people use as their cash cows.

The two mechanics are very similar, being things that were acquired, and also they provide easy permanent isk flow once the hard work (or lucky draw, or investment) was done.

If CCP does in fact decide to nerf both of these things, I just hope they do it slowly and over time, so that those that are losing value, can recover at least some of their loss.
Llyandrian
Livestock Science Exchange
#19 - 2012-03-24 09:21:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Llyandrian
This will only effect the faction data cores, Faction starship engineering. It don't make any sense to limit the rest.

It will push up the price of T2 ships which should make T3 more attractive to players.
Kyr Evotorin
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#20 - 2012-03-24 13:22:44 UTC
Not like many are going to take the time to read this, but... incoming rage/logic/wtfcommunity post.

I joined this community on the single idea that, you couldn't be a ****** to play this game. It has the best weed whacker I've seen to date. Is it in our nature to be annoying as well? I mean really... ~75% of the people I've met in Eve can't stop complaining. One change here and there and the whole world is falling apart for you guys.

May I explain some logic to you cowards that think the market will go down the shitter once a change like this goes through...?

Honestly, would you really want the RP gains to remain the same. Think about the market. If the RP and Datacores remained the same, but CCP implemented the FW LP Datacores, prices would drop. They are reducing the amounts of datacores that can be put out to maintain the pricing that is in place to the best of their ability. Sure, adding FW Datacores seems a little strange, but you could toss in some lore as an argument and datacores would be justified. Obviously, the prices on datacores will change, but the goal is to limit that change. I mean... I've already iterated above this post... The word choice of the dev post was well placed.

Find something else to complain about, really.


Ten Bulls

Sorry man, the key words in my post were "General Decrease." I don't know where you learned to translate from, but I'm sure English to English is pretty straight forward.

I already explained above why the market shouldn't be too affected by this change. Just to add, people probably won't waste their time buying datacores, seeing as there are other things they will be adding for FW LP that would relate to what people want. only people with alts that need money will buy them. who would waste their time putting an alt into FW if they need money? FW is suposed to be an ISK sink. kthx.

FW is a combat Profession. T2 Production happens primarily in high sec, but the acquirement of T2 materials often happens via some form of necessary combat. One could attribute your need to see a link between the two to one small issue: Link T2 Production with half (more than) the fighting involved in the game. Factions can't fight over more than just the need to fight? Learn to read between the lines man.

The T2 BPO's are a delicate disruption to the game. People have valid arguments that work both ways. umad.

Your last comment really has no strong points, thus... this was fun!


In any case... I'm done defending CCP for the moment. I think this idea isn't 100% stupid, but it isn't a solution at all.
123Next page