These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
First pagePrevious page8910
 

Re-elect Elise Randolph for CSM 7 - There is no subsitute for activity!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Rowan Sjet
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#181 - 2012-03-20 11:39:14 UTC
In Breaking News, DailyGrace has officially endorsed Elise Randolph for CSM! For Live coverage, click on our feed below. Our thanks go to FinalFlash84 for this exclusive scoop.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzINxoS8uKA
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#182 - 2012-03-24 18:07:43 UTC
Thank you to all my glorious supporters. Catapulting up to third place sends a very strong message, you are all sextacular. I'd write a victory speech but I'm busy celebrating and dying gloriously in spaceships.

~
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#183 - 2012-03-24 18:55:20 UTC
Acwron
Meet The Fockers
#184 - 2012-03-25 01:09:00 UTC
I gave you 12 votes (12 accounts). Make sure they don't nerf titans that bad or I'll get back to you :D

Now seriously, where's the CSM minutes where CCP agrees with CSM regarding tracking, scan resolution and the 3 targets only for titans? Is this discussion with old CSM 6 or actual one?

Regards,
forator2
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#185 - 2012-03-25 01:14:33 UTC  |  Edited by: forator2
Congrats Elise.

I want you to clarify something for us please.
I know that all the discussions csm-ccp are posted on internet to be seen.

Now, if I read well the last post of CCP Greyscale in section Incoming titan adjustments he says "We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though." talking about tracking, scan resolution and tracking changes.

In the last meeting minute "CSM meeting minutes – Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011" the only thing about titan is "The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix.
The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes."

http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf

Maybe I am wrong, so please clarify this for me. Where are the discutions about the scan resolution and targeting. did csm ever asked anything like that?

thank you.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#186 - 2012-03-25 01:17:31 UTC
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Acwron
Meet The Fockers
#187 - 2012-03-25 01:24:00 UTC
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


Gayswarm detected.

Option one : IGNORE
Option two : TROLL

Choosing option one.
forator2
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#188 - 2012-03-25 01:25:41 UTC
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


You are illiterate, mon petit ... use punctuation
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#189 - 2012-03-25 01:51:11 UTC
forator2 wrote:
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


You are illiterate, mon petit ... use punctuation


learn to use punctuation yourself, that is now how you use ellipses br0

fly away~

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
None ofthe Above
#190 - 2012-03-25 15:42:10 UTC
Andski wrote:
forator2 wrote:
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


You are illiterate, mon petit ... use punctuation


learn to use punctuation yourself, that is now how you use ellipses br0

fly away~


Surely you meant to write "...that is not..."?

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#191 - 2012-03-25 19:36:17 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Andski wrote:
forator2 wrote:
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


You are illiterate, mon petit ... use punctuation


learn to use punctuation yourself, that is now how you use ellipses br0

fly away~


Surely you meant to write "...that is not..."?


surely you are an idiot

you understood what I posted to begin with and he brought up the whole grammar thing

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
forator2
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#192 - 2012-03-25 19:54:40 UTC
Andski wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
Andski wrote:
forator2 wrote:
Andski wrote:
acwron you should ask the same goddamn thing with more characters just to make the question look relevant to anything

fyi nobody cares


You are illiterate, mon petite ... use punctuation


learn to use punctuation yourself, that is now how you use ellipses br0

fly away~


Surely you meant to write "...that is not..."?


surely you are an idiot

you understood what I posted to begin with and he brought up the whole grammar thing


So, for everybody who reads this to understand, we are all idiots cause you are eating characters ( I am sorry, maybe you were hungry and ate the keyboard )

Now really... you don't see everybody's laughing at you?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#193 - 2012-03-25 20:32:35 UTC
btw we haven't seen any of your ~mercenaries~

should get on that m8

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#194 - 2012-03-27 07:21:33 UTC
forator2 wrote:
Congrats Elise.

I want you to clarify something for us please.
I know that all the discussions csm-ccp are posted on internet to be seen.

Now, if I read well the last post of CCP Greyscale in section Incoming titan adjustments he says "We have talked to the CSM about this, and we're comfortable going forward with these changes in light of that discussion. I'm not going to put words in their mouths, though." talking about tracking, scan resolution and tracking changes.

In the last meeting minute "CSM meeting minutes – Iceland 7th to the 9th of December 2011" the only thing about titan is "The CSM noted that Crucible had not adjusted the tracking of Titan guns, which allow Titans to destroy subcapital ships with relative impunity when in a large group. The CSM mentioned allowing Electronic Attack Ships to impact ewar-immune vessels as a possible fix.
The CSM suggested that supercarriers be allowed to dock in outposts which have an appropriate upgrade. The CSM noted it that it did not wish Titans to ever be able to dock, but that supercarriers were now less powerful and more common and should thus be treated more as regular ships rather than special snowflakes."

http://community.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2011/CSM_CCP_Mettings_7-9_12_2011.pdf

Maybe I am wrong, so please clarify this for me. Where are the discutions about the scan resolution and targeting. did csm ever asked anything like that?

thank you.


Not all topics are broached at the summit. In fact, the CSM communicates with CCP regularly, via Skype and the in-game forums, and this instance was one of those. Greyscale presented his solution to the CSM and questions were raised, criticisms were answered (mostly mine, non-shockingly), and a decision was ultimately made. I personally don't think that it is the right course of action and since there is no simple fix I will, thanks to the great voter turnout, continue to make my case for more resources to be devoted to balancing these ships.

~
High Heel
Dark Skies Coalition
#195 - 2012-03-27 12:46:33 UTC
Elise Randolph.

What is your standpoint on the recent outrageous begavior rom Current CSM Chariman The Mittani?
In My opinion he should not be allowed to continiue in this Role.

Will you Voice Your Opinion?
Will you Demand that mittens step down?
Woo Glin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#196 - 2012-03-27 13:58:45 UTC
All these NPC corp dudes showing up to speak their minds. Great to see you guys participating!
Taiwanistan
#197 - 2012-03-28 04:44:18 UTC
no troll question
now that you've been elected, there's a small matter of formality
are you a wis incarna space barbie lover lisping emote lover?
a simple no would do, thank you.

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#198 - 2012-03-30 00:29:29 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
no troll question
now that you've been elected, there's a small matter of formality
are you a wis incarna space barbie lover lisping emote lover?
a simple no would do, thank you.


All my clients are in ship-spin mode, if that answers your question

~
First pagePrevious page8910